The account owes almost $4000! I bought this account and told the lender to settle the loan at 0.25 BTC ..but i dont know what went wrong and he said "NO"! He might still agree if you can go till 0.3 BTC! Anyways its going to be hero soon and cloudmining.website's campaign pays an awesome price though their posting boards are limited...you can get back the ROI within 21 days even with the Bit-mixer campaign! I cant sell this account at loss! I've waited a long time to make it reach here...but i need money now..so i'm selling this
It definitely wouldn't be worth 0.1 BTC then if it has ~ 14 BTC in outstanding loans due. To my knowledge Bitmixer doesn't allow negative trust accounts anymore, but both Bitmixer and Cloudmining.website have extremely low rates for Senior or Hero members. So if you're looking to move this account along, I'd suggest lowering your price quite a bit.
|
|
|
methods for growing bitcoin is by way of investing in a variety of favorable sites and participate sig campaign What kind of site that you've invested your money? i think participate signature campaign is not one of the method of growing your bitcoin because you dont need invest your money to earn bitcoin You don't necessarily to invest money to grow your bitcoin. With signature campaigns all you're investing is your time, and if you're already spending quite a bit of time on the site then you can make a decent amount with really no extra work.
|
|
|
A decent method in growing your bitcoin is to invest in the house of a trustworthy gambling site. It'll take time but your bitcoin should slowly grow as the site brings in more money, and then you can cash out whenever you feel like it. Other than that I'd recommend just holding, because most securities in the bitcoin world end up being scams.
|
|
|
It's been discussed before here. I don't think anyone really knows what the site is for, but obviously I wouldn't recommend logging in on that site if it is indeed a phishing site rather than just a mirroring site for traffic.
|
|
|
0.1 BTC for an account with negative trust is way too high. I think a better starting price might be 0.04 or 0.05 BTC, and even still those prices are probably a little high.
|
|
|
What version of Electrum are you using? I've heard that some versions are quite buggy with the Trezor so if you're running an older version I'd suggest updating to 2.3.2 and seeing if that helps at all.
|
|
|
Are you still sell this account? Is this account registered by you? Waithing some reply.
always asking if account is still available but looks like not really interested Because he has paid signature. 0.6 btc is too cheap for Hero account. I don't trust this user. 0.6 BTC is probably on the higher end for a Hero account. Prices have really gone down in the past few months and it seems that most are selling for between 0.4 and 0.55 BTC.
|
|
|
If they're legit they're probably running the actual miners somewhere else. Which introduces yet another third party risk vector.
That's very possible, but it doesn't mention anywhere on their site that their miners are run outside of Australia. It sounds like the whole operation is based in Australia. We'll have to wait awhile to see if any news comes out of this operation, because I definitely have a couple questions about it.
|
|
|
https://www.btcminer.coi guess that is most likely legit, they mentioned that they will plug their mining to your pools, but i am thinking about the fees problems: they said no electric fees are required. They're charging a monthly fee, so apparently the electric costs are included. But I still wouldn't touch them, the pricing doesn't make sense and the risk is still the same as with any cloud mining. It does look a little sketchy but it's an interesting approach to cloud mining if it's indeed legit. Nice to see a place that allows users to point their hashpower to whatever pool they want to. At least then you know there's actual hardware mining for you, but obviously that could stop at any time if they decide to shut down, and run off with their hardware and user's funds. I also took a look at their contact page - it's interesting that the business is run out of Australia because power costs are quite high there (it looks like on average power costs about $0.29 / kWhr) and the address they have posted on their website is a residential address, not a storefront or anything like that. Seems a little odd that they're based out of a country with high power prices rather than one with cheaper power costs.
|
|
|
I hope I will be accepted too so for 50 posts we will get 0.15 btc correct ? I am updating the signature now with my profile This campaign only accepts users with rank Full Member or higher, so you aren't eligible for it.
|
|
|
Hashie scammed me Amhash scammed me Cloudmining.website scammed me Cloudminr.io....well, I managed to ROI there. After that, they scammed me.
Most of times, coudmining means Ponzi.
Cloudmining.website did not scam anyone. Sometimes people mine less and sometimes they mine more. This is very normal to mining. Cloudmining.website is still mining and paying everyone. They are one of the longest standing cloud mining entity right now. It's pretty clear that Cloudmining.website is a ponzi. They may not have scammed people yet, but I'm sure they'll close up shop soon enough and scam a bunch of people out of their bitcoins. They've been running for about eight months now, but I suspect they'll disappear fairly soon. Looks a lot like PBMining, which only lasted 11 months or so before running off with investors' bitcoins.
|
|
|
If you're looking to pay with Bitcoin I recommend checking out Namecheap. They have fair prices, great support and accept bitcoin as well. I've been using them for about a year now for hosting, and I've bought a couple domains through them as well. Never had any issues on their end, but their live chat always answered my questions quickly.
|
|
|
I am resigning from this campaign. I lost access to my Bit-x account. They told me I should contact Marco, which I did. This was a week ago with no response. I like this campaign and Bit-x. But I do not see the point of continue if I will never be able to access the BTC I earn. Thanks all and I wish you good luck.
You should contact support, not Marco. They will be able to help you fast. Did you link an email address? If you are able to access it again, try using Google 2FA and backup secret code you got from BIT-X. Yes, I have 4 tickets with Bit-x support, their final response was to contact Marco, maybe to try to verify my Bitcointalk account because the only deposits on Bit-x were from this campaign and there has never been a withdrawal. I never had made any recovery questions, and did not know my phone would be needed to sign in. I never logged in until after I had my phone number disconnected. I have been trying all week to get this fixed and no one is responding to me. It is my own fault and I understand that, but I do not want to stay in a promotion that I will never be able to access the funds from. Create a new BIT-X account and replace your current BIT-X address in your profile with new address? That would work in the future as long as foodstamps has a mobile phone number to sign up again with, but he still wouldn't be able to access the funds from the previous posts he made, which totals to about 0.03 BTC.
|
|
|
Seems like they are the highest rates around however most of people prefer weekly then monthly , still good . and you should make devthedev post here to confirm that he actually hold the funds I guess Anyway I just wanted to point that you made a mistake on the OP : Rates Full Members 0.05 for 50 posts (Rate of 0.001BTC) [Max. Participants: 20] Sr, Hero and Legendary Members: 0.1BTC for 50 posts (Rate of 0.002) [Max. Participants: 10] Exclusive: Legendary Members: 0.15BTC for 50 posts (Rate of 0.0020 [Max. Particpants: 5]
I guess the first you meant Senior & Hero members . Good luck I noticed another small mistake in the OP as well. It states that the rate for Legendary members is 0.002 BTC / post, when it's actually 0.003 BTC / post. However this campaign isn't the highest paying on the boards, the Rollin signature campaign pays higher than this, and maybe a couple others as well. Like amiryaqot mentioned, if you raise the Senior and Hero rates it'll definitely be a more attractive campaign.
|
|
|
Have anything to offer up as collateral? If not, then expect for your account to get marked with negative feedback pretty quickly for being a newbie asking for a loan without collateral.
|
|
|
Provided an escrow for us for a trade. It went smoothly. Recommended ++
Then proceeded to publish all the information regarding the trade assuming that the account is still under my ownership. While any private information is forfeit in case of a scam, the escrow should've informed me to avoid any mistake before doing so. I will not be using him as escrow in future and suggest others avoid too. The trade went smoothly, but his subsequent poor judgementt in trying to show the community that he is an useful member makes him an unreliable escrow. So he escrowed an account sale then published the account name? On SellingSenior's feedback it looks like MZ left a feedback saying that he's an alt of "The Bad Guy" so I'm guessing that The Bad Guy account was sold by SellingSenior, and made publicly by MZ afterwards.
|
|
|
is it fake? he was really arrested or no?
Sounds like he was really arrested. There was an article on /r/Bitcoin earlier today stating that the Japanese police were going to arrest him on August 1st, and it looks like they arrested him as planned. Any verified source? Links? There's alot of spam, but a real source would be nice. Here was the source I saw on Reddit. It's in Japanese, but translated it sounds like they arrested him.
|
|
|
is it fake? he was really arrested or no?
Sounds like he was really arrested. There was an article on /r/Bitcoin earlier today stating that the Japanese police were going to arrest him on August 1st, and it looks like they arrested him as planned.
|
|
|
HW.1 is so cheap I am eager to buy one for every day use. I am still waiting for better support for HW.1 from Electrum before I buy one to test. HW.1 is working fine for me but I compiled Electrum 2.0 myself. I can help you setting it up if you want.
What is the different between the download executable and one compiled myself. Aren't they essentially the same code? Are some parts of the code excluded from a windows compile? Why would they do that? They should be the same code. If you compile the source code yourself then you can verify the code and double check to make sure that there's no malicious code in the software. For the average user using the executable is much easier than compiling the source code into an executable. Basically they offer the source code for users to read through, modify if they like, and compile for themselves if they wish. Launching an installer is much easier than compiling all the code.
|
|
|
|