tbearhere, how much is your 980ti doing in pentablake in the opensource?
I have sold 7 copies. If you buy one (0.3 BTC) I might release version 3 to the buyers. (with a boost on compute 5.2)
90MHASH with overclocking (gtx 970)
I didn't test it. But it would take me 2 weeks to make .3btc maybe more. On top of the almost .5btc I paid in the last year for open and one private. If the 10,000 miners did that it would equal 5,000btc or over $1,000,000 usd. I don't have any btc to pay..ooo .12btc is all I have. And I will have to cash that out for food and medical. There is nothing worth mining with pentablake. Wallet mining a high net hash coin = -0 profit. I'll benchmark mark it though....but I forget how..and it's not in the help menu. Is it ccminer.exe -a pentablake -d 0 - benchmark With the current diff at around 100 Penta is highly profitable, but only with my fast private kernal and few miners. run with -a penta Penta's diff is usually higher. Keccak, Luffa, Whirl and probably even Quark is more profitable than Penta for a while now (on 750 Ti rigs). How many blocks a day on quark ? I got 115 mh and nothing. |
|
|
|
Need to hit 150 blocks a day to make a profit.  |
|
|
|
Im going to give it a try.....where did you get the difficulties ?
From the blockchain.. Ya...I forgot ... the wallet.  |
|
|
|
I have one by kbomba.........but needs adjustments.
Should integrate into miner control, and release a NVIDIA joincoin miner (profit switcher). (always mine the most profitable algo) Sp is whirlpool and whirlpoolX the same algo?
Whirlpoolx is almost the same algo, so I think I can optimize it to be faster than today. But the algo name in ccminer is -a whirl (included in release 71) Im going to give it a try.....where did you get the difficulties ? |
|
|
|
tbearhere, how much is your 980ti doing in pentablake in the opensource?
I have sold 7 copies. If you buy one (0.3 BTC) I might release version 3 to the buyers. (with a boost on compute 5.2)
90MHASH with overclocking (gtx 970)
I didn't test it. But it would take me 2 weeks to make .3btc maybe more. On top of the almost .5btc I paid in the last year for open and one private. If the 10,000 miners did that it would equal 5,000btc or over $1,000,000 usd. I don't have any btc to pay..ooo .12btc is all I have. And I will have to cash that out for food and medical. There is nothing worth mining with pentablake. Wallet mining a high net hash coin = -0 profit. I'll benchmark mark it though....but I forget how..and it's not in the help menu. Is it ccminer.exe -a pentablake -d 0 - benchmark With the current diff at around 100 Penta is highly profitable, but only with my fast private kernal and few miners. run with -a penta Penta's diff is usually higher. Keccak, Luffa, Whirl and probably even Quark is more profitable than Penta for a while now (on 750 Ti rigs). And with Keccak we know where we can get 25% increase.  Here are the current difficulties for joincoin. Sha256 953402 keccak 492 penta 281.3 luffa 237.5 nist5 137 whirlpool 34.8 quark 26,7 x13 18.38 x15 8.8 Bastion 1.3 + some others (scrypt? ) We should make profit calculator.. So hard to follow. I have one by kbomba.........but needs adjustments. Sp is whirlpool and whirlpoolX the same algo? |
|
|
|
tbearhere, how much is your 980ti doing in pentablake in the opensource?
I have sold 7 copies. If you buy one (0.3 BTC) I might release version 3 to the buyers. (with a boost on compute 5.2)
90MHASH with overclocking (gtx 970)
I didn't test it. But it would take me 2 weeks to make .3btc maybe more. On top of the almost .5btc I paid in the last year for open and one private. If the 10,000 miners did that it would equal 5,000btc or over $1,000,000 usd. I don't have any btc to pay..ooo .12btc is all I have. And I will have to cash that out for food and medical. There is nothing worth mining with pentablake. Wallet mining a high net hash coin = -0 profit. I'll benchmark mark it though....but I forget how..and it's not in the help menu. Is it ccminer.exe -a pentablake -d 0 - benchmark With the current diff at around 100 Penta is highly profitable, but only with my fast private kernal and few miners. run with -a penta Penta's diff is usually higher. Keccak, Luffa, Whirl and probably even Quark is more profitable than Penta for a while now (on 750 Ti rigs). And with Keccak we know where we can get 25% increase. |
|
|
|
profits:
pentablake sp-mod: 0.01BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
quark@nichash (opensource sp-mod 72) 0,0021BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
Now the diff is at 231.30 and the profit is not the same anymore... I know... it's not worth it to mine if a 750ti does 20mh penta. But here is r71 vs r72 quark R71 R72 Quark You have to let it run more than 17 accepts.  Yes sorry. New one. And I updated the other pics. |
|
|
|
profits:
pentablake sp-mod: 0.01BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
quark@nichash (opensource sp-mod 72) 0,0021BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
Now the diff is at 231.30 and the profit is not the same anymore... I know... it's not worth it to mine if a 750ti does 20mh penta. But here is r71 vs r72 quark R71  R72 Quark |
|
|
|
With my optimized code, the junior gtx 970 with 1600 shaders will outperform the gtx 980ti. I can push it up to 90MHASH with heavy overclocking, but 85 is more stable. I haven't tested the latest kernal on the 980ti yet, I but would love to see it running. The pentablake sp-mod 3 is unreleased..
Your Average hashrate in the benchmarkmode is around 60MHASH, so I believe the private miner will do around 120 or more on your card. Hopefully 140MHASH with spmod release 3
Then if implemented the 980ti should do 160 mh 2816 cuda cores  |
|
|
|
tbearhere, how much is your 980ti doing in pentablake in the opensource?
I have sold 7 copies. If you buy one (0.3 BTC) I might release version 3 to the buyers. (with a boost on compute 5.2)
90MHASH with overclocking (gtx 970)
I didn't test it. But it would take me 2 weeks to make .3btc maybe more. On top of the almost .5btc I paid in the last year for open and one private. If the 10,000 miners did that it would equal 5,000btc or over $1,000,000 usd. I don't have any btc to pay..ooo .12btc is all I have. And I will have to cash that out for food and medical. There is nothing worth mining with pentablake. Wallet mining a high net hash coin = -0 profit. I'll benchmark mark it though....but I forget how..and it's not in the help menu. Is it ccminer.exe -a pentablake -d 0 - benchmark With the current diff at around 100 Penta is highly profitable, but only with my fast private kernal and few miners. run with -a penta The hashrate should be close to 80mh ... it needs to be implemented The 980ti is 4 750ti no need for 4x the mb psu hdd ect I will never buy a 750ti again...there like a little cpu  |
|
|
|
tbearhere, how much is your 980ti doing in pentablake in the opensource?
I have sold 7 copies. If you buy one (0.3 BTC) I might release version 3 to the buyers. (with a boost on compute 5.2)
90MHASH with overclocking (gtx 970)
I didn't test it. But it would take me 2 weeks to make .3btc maybe more. On top of the almost .5btc I paid in the last year for open and one private. If the 10,000 miners did that it would equal 5,000btc or over $1,000,000 usd. I don't have any btc to pay..ooo .12btc is all I have. And I will have to cash that out for food and medical. There is nothing worth mining with pentablake. Wallet mining a high net hash coin = -0 profit. I'll benchmark mark it though....but I forget how..and it's not in the help menu. Is it ccminer.exe -a pentablake -d 0 - benchmark |
|
|
|
|
When will ver 1.1.0.5 be released? I will have to wait till then. thx
|
|
|
|
The hashrate does not drop, because sp miner is used on maxwell cards and tpruvot miner for 3.x cards, they don't interfere.
You already mine single algo - whichever is most profitable. If you ran benchmark previously, then NHM will autoselect best algorithm. Each ccminer instance is doing this - thus it can happen that sp miner is mining one algo and tpruvot another algo, because the ratio of speeds are not the same.
If you wish to mine with only 5.x devices, you can disable 3.x.
Support for disabling individual algorithms comes in 1.1.0.5.
Ok I have only 5.x and 5.2x. and I need it to mine with the best algo only..1 cmd and on this computer only 2 of my 3 cards. Let me do the benchmark again because I think it did it with 3.x. The 750ti. is 5.x I think. When you open NHM, you can see how it qualifies devices. If some are recognized as NVIDIA3.x and you only have 5.x, then of course, this is a bug and has to be investigated why it happens. What I really need it to do is mine with only 2 of the 3 cards on this computer only. On my rigs it doesn't matter. Nice benchmark tester you have there. The 5x throw me off at first.. 5.0 = 750ti 5x = all 5. series I see. It did the benchmark properly with nvidia5x. Ok the worker name can be anything like x or just leave it at worker1.. correct? You have table where you can click on checkbox - if this checkbox is disabled, then it will not use this video card for mining. After that, you should run benchmark, so it benchmarks only cards that you want to use for mining. Worker can be anything, even empty. I have to wait for ver 1.1.0.5. Because the profits are based on scrypt very incorrect way and I need to delete some algo's like x11 because the profit is so low it's best to turn off the rigs. x11 was only making a profit 1 year ago. I see the profit switch to x11 and another algo is paying 6x as much and I'm shaking my head at this.  Saying what are they mining that for. |
|
|
|
The hashrate does not drop, because sp miner is used on maxwell cards and tpruvot miner for 3.x cards, they don't interfere.
You already mine single algo - whichever is most profitable. If you ran benchmark previously, then NHM will autoselect best algorithm. Each ccminer instance is doing this - thus it can happen that sp miner is mining one algo and tpruvot another algo, because the ratio of speeds are not the same.
If you wish to mine with only 5.x devices, you can disable 3.x.
Support for disabling individual algorithms comes in 1.1.0.5.
Ok I have only 5.x and 5.2x. and I need it to mine with the best algo only..1 cmd and on this computer only 2 of my 3 cards. Let me do the benchmark again because I think it did it with 3.x. The 750ti. is 5.x I think. When you open NHM, you can see how it qualifies devices. If some are recognized as NVIDIA3.x and you only have 5.x, then of course, this is a bug and has to be investigated why it happens. What I really need it to do is mine with only 2 of the 3 cards on this computer only. On my rigs it doesn't matter. Nice benchmark tester you have there. The 5x throw me off at first.. 5.0 = 750ti 5x = all 5. series I see. It did the benchmark properly with nvidia5x. Ok the worker name can be anything like x or just leave it at worker1.. correct? |
|
|
|
The hashrate does not drop, because sp miner is used on maxwell cards and tpruvot miner for 3.x cards, they don't interfere.
You already mine single algo - whichever is most profitable. If you ran benchmark previously, then NHM will autoselect best algorithm. Each ccminer instance is doing this - thus it can happen that sp miner is mining one algo and tpruvot another algo, because the ratio of speeds are not the same.
If you wish to mine with only 5.x devices, you can disable 3.x.
Support for disabling individual algorithms comes in 1.1.0.5.
Ok I have only 5.x and 5.2x. and I need it to mine with the best algo only..1 cmd and on this computer only 2 of my 3 cards. Let me do the benchmark again because I think it did it with 3.x. The 750ti. is 5.x I think. EDIT:What I really need it to do is mine with only 2 of the 3 cards on this computer only. On my rigs it doesn't matter. Nice benchmark tester you have there. |
|
|
|
Nicehash ... on nicehashminer for nvidia what version of ccminer does it use..why does it mine with two cmd windows ....why is it mining a worthless algo.. why 20 more questions but don't have the time to ask. Theres gotta be a better miner control.
What kind of GPUs you have inside? It will use tpruvots for non-maxwell cards and sp for maxwell cards. Make sure to complete benchmark correctly and that values reported in benchmark are what you expect. Nvidia.... why does it mine with two cmd windows ? And I have sp ccminer latest at higher hashrates. Some of the benchmarks are good. Like being said already, it will mine with two, if you have a mix of maxwell and non-maxwell cards. You can insert in latest sp ccminer manually (bin folder). Ok thank you....but if I open 2 cmd windows with my sp ccminer the haahrates drop. How come they don't with nicehash miner? And how can I get it to mine with only one algo at a time? thx |
|
|
|
Nicehash ... on nicehashminer for nvidia what version of ccminer does it use..why does it mine with two cmd windows ....why is it mining a worthless algo.. why 20 more questions but don't have the time to ask. Theres gotta be a better miner control.
What kind of GPUs you have inside? It will use tpruvots for non-maxwell cards and sp for maxwell cards. Make sure to complete benchmark correctly and that values reported in benchmark are what you expect. Nvidia.... why does it mine with two cmd windows ? And I have sp ccminer latest at higher hashrates. Some of the benchmarks are good. |
|
|
|
Really need pools. Wallet mining against all that hash without shares=electricity bill.  |
|
|
|
Do I have to put my wallet in a certion mode if I put in all algo's in the conf file?
Algo=
"sha" "x11" "x13" "x15" "scrypt" "nist5" "groestle" "pentablake" "whirlpool" "luffa" "keccak" "quark" "bastion
Yes you do What algo are you going to use? Not sure yet what algo......but how do you put the wallet in a mode plz? thx Do I need gen=1 in the conf file or gen=0 or none at all? thx |
|
|
|
|
Do I have to put my wallet in a certion mode if I put in all algo's in the conf file?
Algo=
"sha" "x11" "x13" "x15" "scrypt" "nist5" "groestle" "pentablake" "whirlpool" "luffa" "keccak" "quark" "bastion
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
