CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[kama]

guys what's the exact qubit hashrate of gtx 750 ti with sp_'s modded ccminer ?

[sp_]

Around 4650KHASH on the low clocked cards, and 5400 with overclocking.

[becker]

Does ScryptJane not work on the SP version?

I've run gobs of different settings and always get an error message like

"
[2015-10-26 04:33:33] GPU #0: cudaError 4 (unspecified launch failure) calling '
cudaMemcpyToSymbol(pdata, host_pdata, 20*sizeof(uint32_t), 0, cudaMemcpyHostToDe
vice)' (keccak.cu line 471)"

I got it working with the tpruvot version, but I'm not getting the hashrate they state I should on nicehash, and can't use their suggested settings.

Confused.

Best I could get painstakingly running threw probably 50 different settings is 850 on a 970 using -L 18 -l t13x22 , they state they are getting like 1.15KHash/s using -L 14 -l t13x28 on nicehash at https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp?p=news&id=41

Anyway, driving me bonkers.

Thanks.

[sp_]

Does ScryptJane not work on the SP version?

No. It's broken. You can mine with the cpu, but then the ccminer hashrate of the rig will drop several MHASH. (use the -C option to improve it)

Best I could get painstakingly running threw probably 50 different settings is 850 on a 970 using -L 18 -l t13x22 , they state they are getting like 1.15KHash/s using -L 14 -l t13x28 on nicehash at https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp?p=news&id=41

Leocoin has increased the nfactor to 16, so the speed is lower.

[sp_]

I have optimized the Pentablake for ccminer  (Nvidia Maxwell gpu's)

Hashrates:

750ti: 32MHASH
970: 80MHASH ++
980ti: (I think around 140MHASH but not tested)

This is around 100% faster than the opensource miner.

7 copies have been sold so far.

The miner is for sale for 0.3 BTC

If I sell one more I will release a boost on the gtx 970 (and other compute 5.2 cards.) 85MHASH to the buyers..

[tbearhere]

tbearhere, how much is your 980ti doing in pentablake in the opensource?

I have sold 7 copies. If you buy one (0.3 BTC) I might release version 3 to the buyers. (with a boost on compute 5.2)

90MHASH with overclocking (gtx 970)

I didn't test it. But it would take me 2 weeks to make .3btc maybe more. On top of the almost .5btc I paid in the last year for open and one

private. If the 10,000 miners did that it would equal  5,000btc or over $1,000,000 usd. I don't have any btc to pay..ooo .12btc is all I have. And I

will have to cash that out for food and medical. There is nothing worth mining with pentablake. Wallet mining a high net hash coin = -0 profit. 

I'll benchmark mark it though....but I forget how..and it's not in the help menu.
Is it        ccminer.exe  -a pentablake  -d 0  - benchmark

[sp_]

tbearhere, how much is your 980ti doing in pentablake in the opensource?
I have sold 7 copies. If you buy one (0.3 BTC) I might release version 3 to the buyers. (with a boost on compute 5.2)
90MHASH with overclocking (gtx 970)

I didn't test it. But it would take me 2 weeks to make .3btc maybe more. On top of the almost .5btc I paid in the last year for open and one
private. If the 10,000 miners did that it would equal  5,000btc or over $1,000,000 usd. I don't have any btc to pay..ooo .12btc is all I have. And I
will have to cash that out for food and medical. There is nothing worth mining with pentablake. Wallet mining a high net hash coin = -0 profit.  
I'll benchmark mark it though....but I forget how..and it's not in the help menu.
Is it        ccminer.exe  -a pentablake  -d 0  - benchmark

With the current diff at around 100 Penta is highly profitable, but only with my fast private kernal and few miners.

run with -a penta

[tbearhere]

tbearhere, how much is your 980ti doing in pentablake in the opensource?
I have sold 7 copies. If you buy one (0.3 BTC) I might release version 3 to the buyers. (with a boost on compute 5.2)
90MHASH with overclocking (gtx 970)

I didn't test it. But it would take me 2 weeks to make .3btc maybe more. On top of the almost .5btc I paid in the last year for open and one
private. If the 10,000 miners did that it would equal  5,000btc or over $1,000,000 usd. I don't have any btc to pay..ooo .12btc is all I have. And I
will have to cash that out for food and medical. There is nothing worth mining with pentablake. Wallet mining a high net hash coin = -0 profit.  
I'll benchmark mark it though....but I forget how..and it's not in the help menu.
Is it        ccminer.exe  -a pentablake  -d 0  - benchmark

With the current diff at around 100 Penta is highly profitable, but only with my fast private kernal and few miners.

run with -a penta

The hashrate should be close to 80mh ... it needs to be implemented 
The 980ti is 4  750ti  no need for 4x the mb psu hdd  ect  I will never buy a 750ti again...there like a little cpu

[sp_]

You can mine on a pool here:

http://coinspool.cu.cc/workers_joincoin-pentablake

The current diff is 114

At the current diff 700 MHASH is giving around 270 joincoins a day (0.07 BTC)

[sp_]

With my optimized code, the junior gtx 970 with 1600 shaders will outperform the gtx 980ti. I can push it up to 90MHASH with heavy overclocking, but 85 is more stable. I haven't tested the latest kernal on the 980ti yet, I but would love to see it running. The pentablake sp-mod 3 is unreleased..

Your Average hashrate in the benchmarkmode is around 60MHASH, so I believe the private miner will do around 120 or more on your card. Hopefully 140MHASH with spmod release 3

[sp_]

Private pentablake miner (sp-mod 2) with overclocking:

[sp_]

profits:

pentablake sp-mod: 0.01BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
quark@nichash (opensource sp-mod 72) 0,0021BTC per gtx 970 (24h)

[GKar]

T Nelson fixed the solomining bug. Please donate some beers to him if you solomine....

next week i will be setting up a couple more servers ...

could you please pm me your details t-nelson so that i may be able to setup the donation server? ...

so far there are three more that i need to setup ...

- tsiv ( still no contact ) ...
- pfool - have all the details now ...
- t-nelson ...

tanx ...

#crysx

I've never understood this. Why don't you input their BTC address on a multipool or Nicehash and mine to it? Or if you're really picky and want to differentiate yourself from normal donations, ask them for a new BTC address just for mining.

HAMPSTERWHEEL MINING--

It started as a joke, in this thread, about the time Neoscrypt was really a hot algo.  I kept saying I would mine on my "hamster wheel", a 6x 750ti rig, for the code.  I did, for a while.  Why be so critical?  It is another way to donate, and privately.       --scryptr

tanx ...

its not only another way - but its a simplified way to donate also ...

- ONE url ... that is easy to remember ( donate-<dev> ) instead of a btc address ...
- the url never changes ... even the ports stay the same for the various algos ( even if we add or remove ports ) ...
- if the dev decides to change the btc address for ANY reason ... the donation mining doesnt ... so no messing with the miner addresses for the life of the donation systems ...
- anonymous ... if you want to stay anonymous ... like i do ...
- amalgamated into one worker - no matter how many people mine ... which gives more processing power if miners were to mine all at once ...

the explanations and resons are all there in the thread - as well as the btc addresses - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1089744 ... so it is a concentrated base of info ABOUT the devs as well ... at least as much info as they are willing to allow me to put on there ...

which means - with the setup the way it is - when the new multipools and setup is finished - it will make it an easier integration into the granite ecosystem and thefarm integration ...

anyone can donate anyway they like ... i just want to make it an easier way to do so - on a more regular basis ...

there are much more things happening behind the scenes also ... the upgrading of the servers is next - then the upgrade of the stratum proxy software ... and a specialized server for mining ONLY for the devs ...

mostly - its a way of trying to get the mining community together FOR the devs - not just for the USE of the devs products - and to make it as easy as possible to donate by mining ( dbm ) ... possibly even withthe devs coding the addresses INTO the miners for an easy switch to donate to them at the discretion of the miner themselves ... maybe even a command switch -dbm 25 ( donate by mining 25 minuts evenry 7 hours ) that can be added by the MINER and not forced by the dev - to the hardcoded addresses within the miner ...

that way - no hash goes astray - and it is at the miners discretion whether they wish to dbm for the dev and how mich hashrate they are willing to allow for the dev ... in the thread itself - it says that nicehash is CURRENTLY the sole site - but can change anytime ... so that more pools may added to maximize the hashing potential of the donations ... all this is done without the miners themselves fiddling with addresses settings ... just set it all once and your off ...

just ideas ...

#crysx

I like this ideal of an optional donation switch in the miner.     

[tbearhere]

With my optimized code, the junior gtx 970 with 1600 shaders will outperform the gtx 980ti. I can push it up to 90MHASH with heavy overclocking, but 85 is more stable. I haven't tested the latest kernal on the 980ti yet, I but would love to see it running. The pentablake sp-mod 3 is unreleased..

Your Average hashrate in the benchmarkmode is around 60MHASH, so I believe the private miner will do around 120 or more on your card. Hopefully 140MHASH with spmod release 3

Then if implemented the 980ti should do 160 mh     2816      cuda cores  

[sp_]

profits:
pentablake sp-mod: 0.01BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
quark@nichash (opensource sp-mod 72) 0,0021BTC per gtx 970 (24h)

Now the diff is at 231.30 and the profit is not the same anymore...

[tbearhere]

profits:
pentablake sp-mod: 0.01BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
quark@nichash (opensource sp-mod 72) 0,0021BTC per gtx 970 (24h)

Now the diff is at 231.30 and the profit is not the same anymore...

I know... it's not worth it to mine if a 750ti does 20mh penta.

But here is r71 vs r72 quark
R71

R72  Quark

[sp_]

profits:
pentablake sp-mod: 0.01BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
quark@nichash (opensource sp-mod 72) 0,0021BTC per gtx 970 (24h)

Now the diff is at 231.30 and the profit is not the same anymore...

I know... it's not worth it to mine if a 750ti does 20mh penta.

But here is r71 vs r72 quark
R71

R72  Quark

You have to let it run more than 17 accepts.

[bathrobehero]

tbearhere, how much is your 980ti doing in pentablake in the opensource?
I have sold 7 copies. If you buy one (0.3 BTC) I might release version 3 to the buyers. (with a boost on compute 5.2)
90MHASH with overclocking (gtx 970)

I didn't test it. But it would take me 2 weeks to make .3btc maybe more. On top of the almost .5btc I paid in the last year for open and one
private. If the 10,000 miners did that it would equal  5,000btc or over $1,000,000 usd. I don't have any btc to pay..ooo .12btc is all I have. And I
will have to cash that out for food and medical. There is nothing worth mining with pentablake. Wallet mining a high net hash coin = -0 profit.  
I'll benchmark mark it though....but I forget how..and it's not in the help menu.
Is it        ccminer.exe  -a pentablake  -d 0  - benchmark

With the current diff at around 100 Penta is highly profitable, but only with my fast private kernal and few miners.

run with -a penta

Penta's diff is usually higher. Keccak, Luffa, Whirl and probably even Quark is more profitable than Penta for a while now (on 750 Ti rigs).

[tbearhere]

profits:
pentablake sp-mod: 0.01BTC per gtx 970 (24h)
quark@nichash (opensource sp-mod 72) 0,0021BTC per gtx 970 (24h)

Now the diff is at 231.30 and the profit is not the same anymore...

I know... it's not worth it to mine if a 750ti does 20mh penta.

But here is r71 vs r72 quark
R71

R72  Quark

You have to let it run more than 17 accepts.

Yes sorry. New one. And I updated the other pics.

[tbearhere]

tbearhere, how much is your 980ti doing in pentablake in the opensource?
I have sold 7 copies. If you buy one (0.3 BTC) I might release version 3 to the buyers. (with a boost on compute 5.2)
90MHASH with overclocking (gtx 970)

I didn't test it. But it would take me 2 weeks to make .3btc maybe more. On top of the almost .5btc I paid in the last year for open and one
private. If the 10,000 miners did that it would equal  5,000btc or over $1,000,000 usd. I don't have any btc to pay..ooo .12btc is all I have. And I
will have to cash that out for food and medical. There is nothing worth mining with pentablake. Wallet mining a high net hash coin = -0 profit.  
I'll benchmark mark it though....but I forget how..and it's not in the help menu.
Is it        ccminer.exe  -a pentablake  -d 0  - benchmark

With the current diff at around 100 Penta is highly profitable, but only with my fast private kernal and few miners.

run with -a penta

Penta's diff is usually higher. Keccak, Luffa, Whirl and probably even Quark is more profitable than Penta for a while now (on 750 Ti rigs).

And with Keccak we know where we can get 25% increase.