Weird, you lost $600 and didn't leave a tag (it doesn't matter if there are already red tags or not).
It was on telegram where CEO used the user @BitlucyCEO Has notting to do with Royse777I was contacted because I have a post here om bitcointalk where I seek crypto jobs. Was stupid pay some services for the CEO. He should then give me funds back. Well it does not matter which employee or part owner of Bitlucy contacted you to work for them. Based on the facts as they are known thus far, Bitlucy was owned by two people: Royse777 and the Bitlucy CEO - therefore some would say it does have something to do with Royse777. I am interested to know who are these some of them. A user who paid for feedback, a user decodx who is advocating for you and who else? This is a perfect example of how you justify a case and hostage users with your red tag. You are pissed because Royse777 did not share you private information and ignored your unlawful demand. Now when JanEmil, a victim himself is admitting that Royse777 has nothing to do with it, you are advising him to involve Royse777. Are you saying for example, in a group of company if the chairman runaway with the fund resulting the entire company including their shareholders in loss, you are going to tag the chairman and all the shareholders? This is pathetic. You were the same pathetic against the user nemgun too. I would like others to understand your arguments are totally inappropriate which obviously reflects on the tag I left for you.  |
|
|
|
I think have Liverpool to win on all my multibets, about 3 of them. I just never saw them not winning against more so a new promoted team, but then it is what it is..
Liverpool made it habit to stay confused in early rounds make the league difficult for them and then comeback strong to lose the league from very small margin. Let's hope they recover early in this season. I was expecting a huge win for them, at least a 1 - 3. I personally lost 4 multibets  It's one of those days, you win all and expect the sure one is just about time to win, then they surprise you. Bookies need to make money 🤣 |
|
|
|
I removed the negative feedback and removed my support for the flag. Op is already receiving his money so the case is resolved, there is no need to change it to neutral
I think this was the right thing to do, others may disagree. I stand by what I said earlier. I will remove support for the flag when the casino has paid out everything they owe. I still consider this casino a high-risk gambling platform since no shred of evidence has ever been posted to back up their claims. But luckily they have decided to do the right thing in this case at least.
I must missed your earlier post. I am more into removing the tags since they started paying. They already know the tags are pressure for them and if they refuse to pay at any stage then tags will be given again. Removing the tags give them access to continue their business. People who check feedback (I believe most do not care to check reference for update) they will consider the casino is still a scam and did not came to a negotiation, resulting not joining them. Eventually they lose business. For a business it's very important that they are in constant cash flow so that they can pay their players even if they have huge bankroll. |
|
|
|
Waiting to see what BitcoinGirl.Club has to say as well. I am not bothered, it is just another attention seeker that I have on my ignore list. You are a trust spammer. Your game is to keep others hostage of your red tag and demand attention. Your history is once upon a time you were a scam buster which was able to build a good reputation for you. Once achieved you found 1xBit is the easiest target for you to continue. Because of your previous active scam busting history, you took it as guaranteed that you earned some sort of authority from some users. They easily added you in their trust list. These users are still in the hope that you are still a good spam buster. But you changed and became a ghost hunter and trust abuser. You are constantly using unjustifiable theories to justify feedback that you left for others. Your justifications, (1) A member was asked to build a system, the team had ICO, ICO failed or scammed. Your theory is the guy who was asked to build the system is the scammer. (2) You gave a 2nd job because 1st one was successful, in the 2nd job your thing did not go to your way so now you refuse to pay for the time for the 2nd job but pathetically you are asking to refund you for the 1st job. As usual your red tag is the hostage. (3) a member did not share some data to you because they did not feel safe with you. Except one or two members, everyone else accepted the situation. Even from the discussion in public (from several other topics by other victims) it was clear that the member was not the same scammer who you though was the same person. It's even clear that he was as much victim as others, in fact he was the most hurted from the entire project. His reputation has been used, his cash has been used, his privacy has been breached. But still you are harassing him with double red tag (in response for How many red tags is the scammer Royse777 going to get?) and continuing your disrespectful conversation towards him with a troll like PaperWallet. You are using your reputation that you earned from previous work. You now think yourself a powerful authority to ignore conversation with people who challenge your feedback leaving practice. Currently, if anyone here is making the situations uncomfortable for the DT than it's no other than you. You are harmful because you behavior changes for little financial motivation. This leads me to believe that your previous work were to build a reputation for you so that you can earn a living from the forum. The reason of changing your usual character towards duelbits was simple. You did not want to lose your paycheck in case duelbits really was caught on the case. Scam busting was just an easiest route for you, thankfully for you it worked, if it did not then you would find another route. You are using your current reputation to process nonsense against the people you do not like to answer and protecting your employers. I was following jollyGood and found that it's annoying how he conduct any scam accusations against individuals or company. He always comes from a suspicious perspective enjoys to create unnecessary imaginary arguments against the individual possibly he does not like or against a company which he possibly use to increase his reputation. The way the OP of that topic created the scam accusation with evidences (obviously until his last post it was not clear who was at the wrong side) it was hard to take a side even though duelbits was able to gain huge reputation in the forum over the years. But JollyGood seemed took the job of advocating for Duelbits not only in that thread but also in other thread too which obviously does not go alone with the JollyGood image. PS: Feedback reference  |
|
|
|
I am now curious how wintomato knows that the OP was cheating their Deposit bonus, faucet and fortune wheel farming via multiple accounts when the OP never mentioned anything about his account on his plagiarised post. also, what the hell is going on in OP's mind copy-pasting an article as a scam accusation against a casino?
I assume, there was a user who had trouble with Wintomato and they found out the user was exploiting their system. The same user could be the OP. So, wintomato thought to have their statement to reply him. |
|
|
|
I wish you would post it before me so I would not need to spend 5 minutes reading the copy/paste information from OP. Such a waste of time and I blame you 🤣 So, nothing to do directly with wintomato I was even searching for wintomato on the topic just to be sure that I did not miss to read a line related to wintomato. The word exists in the 2nd line and that's it. Is this a new way to whore merit? |
|
|
|
Not for nothing, but that's pretty fucked up that telegram allows that.
It's pretty standard. I don't see it wrong. Everything has good and bad effect depending on how we are using it. I knife could be used to kill someone and the same knife we use in the kitchen. Telegram users can set a username if they want. In their privacy setting they can chose whether they want their number visible to others or not. Someone who is good man but concern about his privacy, for him it's a good choice. Exploiters will exploit everything. |
|
|
|
site https://wintomato.comIn describing professional cheating in private card games, the book focuses on the structure of such games and specific cheating techniques associated with the shuffle, deals, and switching cards. Specialized moves are described for various card games. Typical amateur scams in private card games are also reviewed. An examination of scams run by casinos and their employees focuses on techniques used in craps, blackjack, and roulette. Cheating techniques used by casino patrons encompasses blackjack, craps, roulette, and slot machines. Casino cheating conspiracies are also described. After reviewing the various cheating techniques used in private dice games, the book details scams in various carnival games and in three-card monte. The con games described involve various plots whereby victims believe they are guaranteed returns on their investments because of a dishonest edge. The con games discussed include short-term games that are typically played in bars and long-term cons that involve extended investment frauds. The proposition bets described pertain to scams involving betting on some unusual event, such as a passing license plate or which commercial will appear next on television. A glossary. Betting fraudsters offer inside information that tends to focus on horse racing, but could involve betting on any sport. You receive a glossy brochure introducing you to an insider in the world of horse racing who is consistently able to provide information that will give your betting decisions a winning edge. If you pay a subscription fee, you can have this confidential information sent to you. Or, you can use your own money to place bets on behalf of the ‘expert’ and send him his winnings while also placing your own bets. The stake you place on behalf of the expert acts as your fee. An obvious question is: why would someone with inside information want to pass it on to others when they could make bigger profits from it by keeping it secret? The fraudsters have an answer. They will say they are unable to place their own bets because they are too well known to bookmakers. As a result, the only way to profit from their inside information is by selling it or getting you and others like you to place bets on their behalf. The fraudsters don’t have inside information or unbeatable systems that guarantee winning bets. Nor will you increase your chances of winning through these schemes. It is against horse racing rules for people within the industry to pass on sensitive information. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that anyone who has inside information will advertise the fact. Anyone who does is very likely to be up to no good. Are you a victim of betting fraud? You’ve received a glossy brochure introducing you to a sports insider who has an outstanding track record in winning bets. You’ve paid a subscription fee and received “confidential” information. You’ve started to place bets based on the information you’ve received, or on someone else's behalf. What should you do if you've been a victim of betting fraud? Report it to Action Fraud. Break off contact with the fraudster immediately. If you’ve reported the fraud to Action Fraud, keep any brochures, documents and communications as possible evidence. Be aware that the fraudster may have sold your contact details to other fraudsters, who will target you with other frauds. Protect yourself against betting fraud Beware of any scheme that guarantees you will win at betting. Be vigilant about betting schemes offering insider secrets to you. Why would someone sell his or her secrets? Don’t place bets on behalf of someone else, particularly someone you don’t know. Quoted. What is wintomato have to do with all this? After reading the entire post I felt I was reading a blog article which title could be "Don't buy insider information". If you have a scam accusation then be specific. No one has time to read wall of texts. Be specific, bring substantial evidence, make it readable for others. |
|
|
|
1xbit has already paid a lot of players
You say that because you are getting paid by 1xBit. Do you really believe what you are saying? If we have anyone to find a stat of number of scam accusation for a each service that has advertised in the forum then 1xBit will win with a huge margin. All cases need substantial proofs but in case of 1xBit it does not matter at all. It's well know, they are scammers. |
|
|
|
Well in this case JollyGood may publish a list of users who he trust for discussion, so we can see LoyceV and whoever else are in it. It will save our time and we will know who to request to get answers from JollyGood. Don't tell me these are the users who he had in his distrust list. Have a service, "I will get your answer from JollyGood for $5" (like they do on fiverr LOL). Whenever any of us will need the service, we will order the gig. They will be users like me or the people who received negative feedback but when they wanted to contact JG in PM or wanted to address him in reputation thread, he decided not to respond their valid reasons. Sounds like a joke. but look a the number of feedback he left. The service will really make them rich. He obviously feels that he is above explanation of what he do now. If a user has such mindset then its risky to give them responsibility. DT is a huge responsibility. A DT member should come forward to clear his doings when its in question by anyone. Accepting or denying the explanation is something else but this anyone even could be the real scammer who received the feedback for a proven scam. |
|
|
|
But I'm sure that many of us would have thought that if we bought bitcoin like for $10/btc then we most likely sold it for $100. That's the reality, so salute to those that have been holding for so long and still haven't sold any of it or probably have sold but still managed to hold a lot.
Who always had the coin in mind, most of them sold when they had a decent gain of the coin they purchased or even mined. So someone brought at $10 a coin, when it reached $100 they sold. It made sense. That time bitcoin to have $100 was as big as bitcoin to have $10k now. On the other hand there were people (even still exists), who forgot about their coin. Completely out of mind. Some incident or something reminded that they had some coins in their old device or they had the key somewhere, then they looked for it to restore the coins. These are the people who became rich. In this criteria there are many people who were not able to recover the wallet. Call them the most unfortunate. All their life only they know what they missed. There are other type of people who always had bitcoin but they knew this has a potential and $100 was the start only. So even they sold a portion but they always kept some portion for long future. These are the people considers as true bitcoiner. They are the visionary. |
|
|
|
It's a GPG signature for the zip file. It's digital proof that the person who controls this GPG key claims ownership of that file. And it's dated and encrypted to the file, which means if the file is changed the signature won't match. I know how it works but since I was not able to access the link, I did not know the reason for the key. All looks good now 😉 Flag supported and left a negative feedback for the user too. Good job in connecting him. |
|
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=1phj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
What do we do with the code? The google URL is asking for permission. Is it possible to change the permission setting? He's also using a Telegram account with a hidden username:
This is very common for telegram users. |
|
|
|
taking or giving a loan in crypto it's always a risk, for both sides of course.
All business has its own risks. In loan business it's safe to practice collateral but I understand for a small amount OP did not care. It's safer for lenders to give in crypto because price against USD does not effect him when price suddenly bulls which happened in this case. But unfortunately downside happened is since the price against USD was 10x it became huge amount for the borrower resulting not returning the loan at all. |
|
|
|
Btw, why JollyGood has not defended himself in this thread?
I am in his ignore list, this is the reason I am guessing so far. It's more of ego than giving a good reason. If this is the reason then it's obviously a childish which questions his mental stability. If someone is too childish to accept constructive criticism then how would you trust his feedback left from left to right, everywhere. Feedback system is not for children. It's for adults. Ignoring PM, ignoring public calls question his self-confidence. But I will rephrase that by saying that it would be more useful if it served to prevent the initial scam.
As long as you are right it prevents but if you are wrong then you are accountable for the damage you made to the account. |
|
|
|
If negative feedback is only used to tag someone when they have already scammed, then it is useless.
It not useless. The tag then save others not to fall in the same trap. Loan default accusations are the best example. Two user is question in the topic. starmyc and nemgun. I quote from starmyc He took the stuff, and even asked me for a refund for a previous work. There were two jobs. The first one was paid and supplied. He must be talking about the 2nd one. JollyGood took the 2nd work but since he was not happy, he even asked for refund for the first work. starmyc obviously is conducting a business in the forum (from the stuffs in his signature). You and me know JollyGood leaves feedback for no serious reasons but it is not necessary for his potential clients to know who is what in the forum. They will see the feedback from JollyGood, starmyc lose his potential clients. Read (including the quoted message of JollyGood) where I am coming from for nemgun: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5195361.msg52985918#msg52985918I don't think it's justified to keep him tagged. JollyGood even decided to block his PM LOL |
|
|
|
so he might have gambled his win and lost.
If he does then the casino do not owe him anything. Obviously that did not happened not at least when the title edited as Resolved. Two party had conflict in agreements, they resolved it. Both should forget the past and move on. <snip>
Updating your quote so the users can recheck the case. Red Flag: LoyceV, Slow death, Pmalek, TwitchySeal, joeperry, WhyFhy, Jawhead999, Mahdirakib, Blossom15, naim027, GamblingBro, shrxkt Yellow/light orange flag: LoyceV, Slow death, TwitchySeal, khaled0111, shasan, WhyFhy, Jawhead999, acroman08, Mahdirakib, naim027, PaperWallet, lule29, shrxkt, giornogiovana |
|
|
|
Serious warning because 1inch is a giant in the world of cryptocurrencies. Since such practices are starting to happen there really think about what happened to LUNA, CELCIUS, 3AC ETC and now that such 1inch for me is already crossed out !
It's hard to have faith in non-established crypto startup. Many people lost their hard earned money but it's also true that many people made life changing money from crypto. It's always is to do your due diligence before involving in any crypto startup. You did not provide any proof for your words. It will be more credible if you add some form of evidence (blockchain transactions itself should be a good start) |
|
|
|
Oh here we go again, same story, Russian scammers, Russian mafia, I've seen this kind of pattern nearly a hundred times and it's always without proof. Anything goes wrong on internet, Russians are there to take the blame LOL The company is based in Finland run by russian scammers right? I have no contacts in Finland is there a way to hire somebody there who visit the company to get more information?
As far as I know they have legal entity which means you can take them to the court. Why not take that route? $50 is a lot of money. |
|
|
|
Here is the second listing. This I don’t understand. They label it with much of the same information as the other listing, and as a hardware wallet, yet there is no physical wallet, just a DVD labeled “GNU ZONE” (their User Name). I’m assuming it’s just a copy of Electrum on DVD?
It could be. Even it could be an Electrum fork with malware injected. Install it, send coins from exchange or any wallet, the script will take the coins out before you know anything. Ebay, amazon are full with internet frauds. considering messaging them.
It obvious he listed it to scam naive crypto users. You will not get a response at all. Ebay do not care to handle reports from regular users. Let's hope you are lucky. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
