hello

I am only posting this after trying to work with support and them lying and plain out not understanding basic sportsook stuff.

I placed a bet on esports soccer. It was a live bet and as you know when a bet is placed live on soccer if goal is scored bet is rejected and not placed.

When i placed the bet at exact same time i placed the bet  a goal was scored and bet was rejected due to a error they let it go throgh and  I then contacted them right away and told them bet was a error and even told them how it was easy to check by comparing time of goal and bet was accpeted. It was exactly same time so obivouis bet error.   i even showed them live stream and there own site. They said to wait . I did they asked for error mesage i gave it to them it to them and they made waited more time. Then they asked exact same question 8 hours later. and ater 28 hours they reply no error bet stands.
Now i know they did not look at any of my proof or therre own backoffice. They just wanted to keep my money . I do want to say from talking to them its obvouis they know very little about sports betting or even there own software. I sent very detailed proof showing it was impossible for there not be a error. they then got back to me with a bs excuses about bet i tried to placed 30 second before not bet i placed at all showing scam or that they should not be running a sportsbook. They dont even know how to use there wn system they said bet was placed at 11:36:00 which was start time not bet time as it shows clearly in my proof bet was placed at 11:36:26 same time goal was scored. You can see shis buy just watching live stream. Its clear cut case of a scam or knowing nothing about sportsbetting.


PROOF

live stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1lrGaO791Q


1:33:35 into live stream Goal was scored exactly same time of bet  26 second into start of play.


Bet: https://imgur.com/a/fxNg6X6  as you can see it match started at 11:36:00 and in upper right hand corner bet was placed at 11:36:26

as you can see goal was scored same time as bet and should have been easly rejected for a live bet


All i want is real reply from BITSLER or someone that knows what there doing

It's equally crazy how I've debunked your "I can't breathe" nonsense about 10 times yet you keep repeating it as if it holds any weight. Floyd screeching he couldn't breathe before he even went to the ground makes his words meaningless. We have the video and the autopsy. He was screaming at the top of his lungs for 6 minutes and lifting his head up numerous times. He could breathe.

But setting the video aside, I wish we had an autopsy report that would examine the neck tissue of George Floyd. If only.

Your reluctance is palpable here when you can't even cite the single piece of evidence that would validate your entire argument and essentially end the conversation.

To answer the question I asked you -- there isn't evidence of asphyxiation or strangulation which is why you are failing miserably at providing it.

What evidence do you have the officers were willfully attempting to hurt/kill Floyd? You know the other officers were George Floyd pressing down on his thoracic cavity right? Presumably making it hard to breathe, why shouldn't they be charged? Don't you see holes in the logic here?

That's the press report that's made in conjugation with the DA's office (if I understand correctly) aka not the autopsy report.

I'm talking about a conviction. Any brain dead AG can slap on charges in response to violent riots. A corrupt DA can also slap on charges that are baseless -- see the Rayshard Brooks shooting for an example of that.

It doesn't matter what Floyd said. Criminals say a lot of things while being arrested.

Malice means with ill will and there is no evidence that the officers were willfully trying to harm Floyd.  

Yes.  We do.  There's footage and transcripts.
(for the record I don't think the other officers deserve to be charged)





Full restraint, including neck restraint, is common when dealing with people with delirious drug induced episodes. And if you watch the full body cam video, they only placed Floyd in full restraint, including neck control, after he was flapping around like a fish taking 3 grown ass men to put him in a patrol car which ultimately failed. He was also kicking his legs throughout the entire commotion, and Floyd is 6'4 233 pounds. MPD policy does allow neck restraint in these sorts of situations.

The "cause of death" you're referring to is the "case title" of the autopsy report which explain the circumstances surrounding the death, not necessarily the cause of death.

In legal context, murder usually means a killing with malice intent, which is why I'm not using the word murder unless evidence is released that Chauvin and the other officers willfully were trying to kill Floyd.

That's the wrong question to ask. The question to ask is what's the justification for restraining Floyd. The police officers involved can't control that Floyd had underlying conditions or that he took drugs which contributed to his heart stopping when he was being restrained.

You might be quick to say that Chauvin had control over his knee on the back of Floyd's neck, but I'll repeat it again, that isn't what directly caused death. The ME's report found no physical evidence of strangulation or asphyxiation.

Inspired the best meme thread on Bitcointalk. Some people say that thread is the best in the world in the history of all time.

Well, death by say, strangulation does leave evidence that would be found by the ME.

To add -
"Police subdual and restraint" is not asphyxiation or neck compression. No physical evidence supported asphyxiation according to the Minneapolis ME's office.

This isn't an refutation to Joe Biden only condemning violence once it affects his poll numbers while standing idle as riots happen across the country, including Portland which is going on nearly month 3. I actually do care, believe it or not. But I'm also not a fool in taking Biden's word for his condemnation of violence while offering no plan to counteract these rioters whilst also spreading this baseless accusation that Jacob Blake was killed with malice intent due to racist cops without even having all the facts.

I'll ask you again. Where was his condemnation months ago when all this violence was taking place after George Floyd's death? Why is Joe Biden immediately jumping the gun and insinuating the officers were racist and that Jacob Blake was shot because of malice? Why did Joe Biden say the cops should be held accountable, implying guilt?

Protesting such brutality is right and necessary. It’s an utterly American response. But burning down communities and needless destruction is not. Violence that endangers lives is not. Violence that guts and shutters businesses that serve the community is not.
The act of protesting should never be allowed to overshadow the reason we protest. It should not drive people away from the just cause that protest is meant to advance.

The previous two days showed the participant pool dropping by 3, from 96 to 93. Those that were dropped are the following:

---

Remaining participants just got their final prize increased by 3.2%, to 10.75 mBTC.

Pace is going as expected.

The officers could be heard telling Blake to drop the knife. That alone is strong evidence he had a knife.

I'm sorry, but this isn't a Republican spin. This is the democratic platform in 2020.

KEY TAKEAWAYS
1. The Democratic Party platform opposes defunding police, despite growing pressure from Black Lives Matter activists.
Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden and the Democratic Party platform committee do not support defunding police and shifting the money to public service programs. Black Lives Matter organizer Patrisse Cullors, who is pushing for funding to be shifted from police departments to organizations that help marginalized communities, said Monday: “The Democratic Party of today will be remembered as the party of complicity.”

Joe Biden is against defunding the police because he can't defund the police...The federal government does not have the authority to defund city PD's.

Of course, he was no where to be found when Minneapolis sustained 500 million in damage after George Floyd's death nor did he condemn Portland rioters that had been rioting for 3 months. No where in this video Biden put up does he detail a plan to counteract violence, he merely says "stop pls" so that he is shielded from the political liability of these riots.

Joe Biden, like fucking clock work, releases out this piss poor tweet condemning violence - https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1298697722304888833

Once again, a Black man — Jacob Blake — was shot by the police. In front of his children. It makes me sick.

Is this the country we want to be?

Needless violence won’t heal us. We need to end the violence — and peacefully come together to demand justice.

Makes sense, this is actually something that the GOP is trying to capitalize on right now with suburban voters which is the group of voters that they have been losing for sometime now. 2018 showed that the GOP needed better messaging or they were going to not have much of a chance against the Dems in the coming years.

This is the point that they're going to drive home, and this is something that reasonates with people. Talk about the horrible crime that occurs, get some videos and display them of people being knocked out by rioters, show burning buildings / cars, etc.

That sort of storyline is what they're aiming to go down this election cycle, they want suburban voters to think that if Biden is elected then this sort of madness will spread from the urban areas into the suburban areas -- a very scary thing to tell voters.

Poll numbers agree with the GOP here, and if they do proper messaging on this then they may walk away with a win in November.

I'm pretty sure that the Supreme Court would side with the police officers in the case of Jacob Blake. Going into a car where officers are unaware of what you have in it opens up a potentially life threatening point for law enforcement. Whether I agree with this or disagree with this doesn't matter, this case would be an open and shut one of the SC.

If he was just running away from them and hadn't fired a weapon, pointed it at officers, or anything along those lines -- then shooting this particular person would not hold up. But in this case, I think the line is a bit more gray.

It 'feels' pretty straightforward to me:  Zionists are engaged in ethnic cleansing of the 'promised lands' roughly in accordance with the 'Yinon plan'.  Using their various influence in the U.S. they are shaking us down for money and bullet-stoppers in order to do it.

You can't be serious -- you're giving me a link to a website called ' The New Arab' here's a quote regarding them:


I don't think it really makes a lot of sense in regards to credibility of your source to send a clearly biased source regarding Israel. Don't you think that this would come up from another source, or be brought to light during an oversight committee hearing if this was substantiated?

You left out the fact that he was waiving a knife around. This makes your argument moot as it gives police the probable cause to use deadly force once he becomes a fleeing felon.

This is not in response to the Jacob Blake case, I'm just pointing out that your statements are objectively untrue according to the Supreme Court.