I agree in separating two parts. But since there are no point (at least this is how I looked it) to leave one neutral and another red so I decided to have all at once.

Few weeks ago may be months, I saw DireWolfM14 somewhere said he sent JollyGood a PM about some feedback to discuss or something, I can not remember it clearly.
These days I am more in reputation board, I was noticing JollyGood creates unnecessary arguments and insults others who do not support his arguments, likes to show off he has an ignore list, disrespects senior members who were producing babies even before his birth to this forum. He can not tolerate when someone say he is wrong in something. All looked to me an attitude problem.
So I wanted to see how his inappropriate attitude reflects on the feedback he left. He has many pages of feedback which was impossible for me to check one by one. So I was quickly scanning a few of them before I found the case for starmyc and NEMGUN. NEMGUN case looked to me the same as Royse777 but starmyc case looked to me very straight forward. So I sent a short PM to starmyc:
I saw starmyc had everything good even a good feedback from another DT member for his work. But since JollyGood left the negative feedback, starmyc tried to resolve it but eventually gave up and slowed down in the forum.

In the mean time he replied my PM

I used to be a software engineer. Freelanced for many years in the long past so I know how it goes. I do not have any doubt that JollyGood started demanding additional works but denied to pay and kept asking for more works. Sometimes an employer thinks that they bought the freelancer and use them as their own property. I suspect that exactly what happened and resulting he even asked to refund for the first job which was finished successfully before starting the 2nd job. And finally it finished with the negative feedback he has to hostage him.

But I can not just take one side in considering so I PMed JollyGood and asked if we can have a one to one conversation. But even after 6 days he ignored and did not think to reply. Then I created this topic. But still there are no input. At this point what should I take as guaranteed? He does not have any explanation at all. If he does not then his feedback to starmyc was inappropriate and it will be safe to say that he scammed the labor of starmyc and did not pay him for the work. I will believe starmyc over him because starmyc gave me more explanation after his last PM response.

It seems, starmyc really is established person in his life right now, happy with the job now, he does not care at all. But he expressed his regret

This is one starmyc, how many more starmyc have the same feeling and JollyGood destroyed their forum life? He did not pay for the work but he did not stop there. He decided to leave a negative feedback and stopped starmyc.

I suggested starmyc to create a flag if he thinks that there should be no more starmyc if he does then I will have no problem to support it.

Sorry if you are confused and thinking I did the same as he did. It must be my failure. But any way let me try again.

His feedback has no reference (he does not have one in fact) to response my negative feedback to him.
He says I was posting lie
He says my accusations are baseless
He thinks its a revenge
The repeating part is not clear to me.

More reasons,
I did not leave red or neutral to bitlucy scam.

From above which one warns a red tag or even a negative inspired neutral feedback?


My feedback has a clear reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5408864.msg60704946#msg60704946
First of all he did not pay user starmyc but silent him with his negative feedback. He did not reply to my PM and even still have not replied to me for a clear explanation which leads me to believe that he does not have one but scammed.

More supporting cause

More and more


Let's be on topic.
I have pointed out 4 inspirations for leaving a negative feedback in the starting topic.
(1). Which ones apply to his feedback left for me, starmyc, nemgun and Royse777?
(2). Which ones apply to my feedback?

Update: Please read: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5407834.msg60714131#msg60714131
You will understand why the first topic was created, when the PM was sent and why this topic was created.

It could be a good debate. But without any supporting evidences it's just word and mouth between you, me and others. Without any supporting document it's impossible to prove.

Who have time to ring the bell?

What am I missing? The bet was rejected before the result. So I do not see a problem. It worth discussing if the bet was rejected after the ball stopped in the number 32.

In live roulette there could be an argument that they delay the streaming and change the result but it will be unlikely and hardly possibly in the short period of time. When you chat with them on the table you will understand it's almost instant.

Are you sure this is a correct list? I was supposed to be in the list 🤣

There are certain instructions and guidelines to follow for trust settings. If you do not follow the basic then it will become a worthless system and is not gonna serve the purpose. The trust system is not your personal asset, you are liable to act accordingly that was given to you by others. Or others are free to withdraw their support from you.

How it worked: Theymos adds some selected members as DT1 and the DT1 members add users in their network who they trust, they become DT2.

For the record DT level can be extended up to DT4 (please correct me if I am wrong) but anything over DT2 is always ignored because it includes almost everyone which does not create any value for the network.

The current DT network: In January 2019 Theymos decided to change the old algorithm. Without giving all responsibility to one member (theymos) he decided to have a voting system for DT1 members and the voting system allow to select 100 members in the DT1 network to make the entire network decentralized.


TL;DR;

The current system created an open area for anyone to be in the DT network. We add, remove a user in our trust setting depending on their judgement of feedback leaving to others based on how less is their retaliatory mindset. Obviously none of us are perfect, none of us are above our personal likes and dislikes. But when a user's feedback leaving is (1) clearly out of retaliatory, (2) clearly to hostage others to silent against him, (3) clearly based on inappropriate arguments, (4) clearly using it to scam others would you still add him in your trust network or you will tilde (~) him?

Warning: Be BOLD and brave, who do not care for a negative feedback and a tilde (~) before leaving an opinion. Here are your examples:

100% retaliatory negative feedback:


In response to:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5408864.msg60704946#msg60704946

100% retaliatory tilde (~)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5407834.msg60709658#msg60709658

Be careful who you are talking against. I will not surprise to see you received one just because you expressed your opinion in the bold form I marked.

PM sent, public topic created but instead of explanation he now thinks sending a red tag on my trust page was appropriate. He did not use any of the chances that he was given. Right now his response does not carry any value. I will rather ask others mainly everyone including who have him in their trust list.

This is not a case for me that I became a victim of something. Now I desperately need to reach out to other members to request support to get the tag removed, on the other hand with the long years in the forum I don't think anyone will feel comfortable too if I PM requesting to make a connection with JG. It sounds funny and dramatic. By the way it was a sarcasm (the gig thing) on the other post but thank you for the list.

I wanted to have a one to one discussion which was said in the PM I sent to JollyGood on the last 20th July. I was expecting his response. I waited 6 days until I created this topic on 27th. I still waited and until now there are no explanation from JollyGood of why he left these unfair red tags to user starmyc and nemgun? He failed to support his cause.

Starmyc has business in the forum, a Software Engineer. Since the red tag left by JollyGood, starmyc did not get any order (it seems JG revenged tag worked), he became inactive although he sent me PM on July 17th saying, JollyGood took the work and asked him to refund for the previous work (how unfair and sounds pathetic). Nemgun obviously was a victim of the CEO just like Royse777 was a victim of his CEO. You don't jail the shareholders because the main head runaway with the money.

I wanted to ask jollyGood in private without making it public that he should resolve the problem with starmyc or give me a reasonable story and reconsider their tags. The tag on Starmyc can be even looked at as JollyGood was using it to silent him. Look at all others feedback on starmyc, how it went wrong only with JollyGood?

I have my reasons explained in the reference. In short
1. He did not pay starmyc for his work even asked for refund for the first job. Left red tag as hostage.
2. His arguments are inappropriate and his use of red tags based on the inappropriate arguments. He did it twice (from the limited investigation I conducted myself) once for nemgun and recently for Royse777

An example of his inappropriate argument and how he suggest others to step in to his arguments

It explained

Can you give us some example? Only words are not gonna work.

Taking 100 USDT for 100 USTC is not a scam but a negotiations LOL

Did you find your silent angel investors yet to fund the secret coin? Stop it and leave the place.

Obviously the bet was rejected before the result. Stake does not have any clue that it was supposed to be on the 32. Furthermore in live roulettes it's the game provider who decides win or lose, in other words everything related to the table you are in decided by the provider of the roulettes table. Stake or any other casino are just using their API and storing the data of their clients (in this case it's you) to pay your winnings or take money from your loss.

What the F***! 🤣

In the future 1BTC = 1M
I give you 1BTC and you give me 1M. If this is a deal then you are not a scammer. How about this?
I deny your request and supporting the flag. Also leaving you a tag so that people who are not aware can see your scam approach.

I am interested to know who are these some of them. A user who paid for feedback, a user decodx who is advocating for you and who else?

This is a perfect example of how you justify a case and hostage users with your red tag. You are pissed because Royse777 did not share you private information and ignored your unlawful demand. Now when JanEmil, a victim himself is admitting that Royse777 has nothing to do with it, you are advising him to involve Royse777. Are you saying for example, in a group of company if the chairman runaway with the fund resulting the entire company including their shareholders in loss, you are going to tag the chairman and all the shareholders? This is pathetic. You were the same pathetic against the user nemgun too. I would like others to understand your arguments are totally inappropriate which obviously reflects on the tag I left for you.

Liverpool made it habit to stay confused in early rounds make the league difficult for them and then comeback strong to lose the league from very small margin. Let's hope they recover early in this season. I was expecting a huge win for them, at least a 1 - 3.

It's one of those days, you win all and expect the sure one is just about time to win, then they surprise you. Bookies need to make money 🤣

I think this was the right thing to do, others may disagree.

I must missed your earlier post. I am more into removing the tags since they started paying. They already know the tags are pressure for them and if they refuse to pay at any stage then tags will be given again. Removing the tags give them access to continue their business. People who check feedback (I believe most do not care to check reference for update) they will consider the casino is still a scam and did not came to a negotiation, resulting not joining them. Eventually they lose business. For a business it's very important that they are in constant cash flow so that they can pay their players even if they have huge bankroll.

You are a trust spammer. Your game is to keep others hostage of your red tag and demand attention. Your history is once upon a time you were a scam buster which was able to build a good reputation for you. Once achieved you found 1xBit is the easiest target for you to continue. Because of your previous active scam busting history, you took it as guaranteed that you earned some sort of authority from some users. They easily added you in their trust list.

These users are still in the hope that you are still a good spam buster. But you changed and became a ghost hunter and trust abuser. You are constantly using unjustifiable theories to justify feedback that you left for others. Your justifications, (1) A member was asked to build a system, the team had ICO, ICO failed or scammed. Your theory is the guy who was asked to build the system is the scammer. (2) You gave a 2nd job because 1st one was successful, in the 2nd job your thing did not go to your way so now you refuse to pay for the time for the 2nd job but pathetically you are asking to refund you for the 1st job. As usual your red tag is the hostage. (3) a member did not share some data to you because they did not feel safe with you. Except one or two members, everyone else accepted the situation. Even from the discussion in public (from several other topics by other victims) it was clear that the member was not the same scammer who you though was the same person. It's even clear that he was as much victim as others, in fact he was the most hurted from the entire project. His reputation has been used, his cash has been used, his privacy has been breached. But still you are harassing him with double red tag (in response for How many red tags is the scammer Royse777 going to get?) and continuing your disrespectful conversation towards him with a troll like PaperWallet.

You are using your reputation that you earned from previous work. You now think yourself a powerful authority to ignore conversation with people who challenge your feedback leaving practice. Currently, if anyone here is making the situations uncomfortable for the DT than it's no other than you.

You are harmful because you behavior changes for little financial motivation. This leads me to believe that your previous work were to build a reputation for you so that you can earn a living from the forum. The reason of changing your usual character towards duelbits was simple. You did not want to lose your paycheck in case duelbits really was caught on the case. Scam busting was just an easiest route for you, thankfully for you it worked, if it did not then you would find another route. You are using your current reputation to process nonsense against the people you do not like to answer and protecting your employers.


PS:
Feedback reference

I assume, there was a user who had trouble with Wintomato and they found out the user was exploiting their system. The same user could be the OP. So, wintomato thought to have their statement to reply him.

I wish you would post it before me so I would not need to spend 5 minutes reading the copy/paste information from OP. Such a waste of time and I blame you 🤣

I was even searching for wintomato on the topic just to be sure that I did not miss to read a line related to wintomato. The word exists in the 2nd line and that's it.

Is this a new way to whore merit?

It's pretty standard. I don't see it wrong. Everything has good and bad effect depending on how we are using it. I knife could be used to kill someone and the same knife we use in the kitchen. Telegram users can set a username if they want. In their privacy setting they can chose whether they want their number visible to others or not. Someone who is good man but concern about his privacy, for him it's a good choice. Exploiters will exploit everything.