EDIT: Wait, does +1 count as a zero-value post?
That's correct, it is a zero value post.
|
|
|
When i connect to your pool, welcome message is from ckpool. Is there anything i have to worry about or should i connect with ckpool directly rather to your pool, where i can get more from there.
Can some experienced miners please explain and give suggestion to me, what should i do continue with this pool or go to ckpool
ckpool is the name of SOFTWARE. People confuse that with kano's ckpool and my solo ckpool. This pool does not direct its hashes to either of our pools; it simply uses my software.
|
|
|
No, the stakes are far too high for not broadcasting a block and block finding is too random and rare to waste effort on not propagating it.
On the other hand your post could be seen as an advertisement for this gambling site since realistically not propagating a block would be ridiculous for the stakes involved there.
|
|
|
Oh, Antpool is one of the worst offenders for producing empty blocks as well. In fact, any pool that produces empty blocks is denying miners income. There is absolutely no need for producing empty blocks, yet quite a few pools out there do so consistently. Good for us, the 0.13 Bitcoin Core change this : +Compact Block support (BIP 152) +------------------------------- + +Support for block relay using the Compact Blocks protocol has been implemented +in PR 8068. + +The primary goal is reducing the bandwidth spikes at relay time, though in many +cases it also reduces propagation delay. It is automatically enabled between +compatible peers. +[BIP 152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki) + +As a side-effect, ordinary non-mining nodes will download and upload blocks +faster if those blocks were produced by miners using similar transaction +filtering policies. This means that a miner who produces a block with many +transactions discouraged by your node will be relayed slower than one with +only transactions already in your memory pool. The overall effect of such +relay differences on the network may result in blocks which include widely- +discouraged transactions losing a stale block race, and therefore miners may +wish to configure their node to take common relay policies into consideration. That doesn't help not in the slightest since they're including NO transactions. This only helps orphan races when there are two equally sized blocks and one pool is including spammy transactions and the other one includes the standard included transactions.
|
|
|
this is 210 block solved by ckpool.org One block for 1DiicP3M2hxuNKces2wPPZvXCMJMAZDBGz ... [2016-10-16 11:09:17.475] Possible block solve diff 333722287567.354431 ! [2016-10-16 11:09:17.694] BLOCK ACCEPTED! [2016-10-16 11:09:17.694] Solved and confirmed block 434586 by 1DiicP3M2hxuNKces2wPPZvXCMJMAZDBGz.solomininglottery41 [2016-10-16 11:09:17.694] User 1DiicP3M2hxuNKces2wPPZvXCMJMAZDBGz:{"hashrate1m": "2.34P", "hashrate5m": "1.64P", "hashrate1hr": "628T", "hashrate1d": "3.7P", "hashrate7d": "1.06P"} [2016-10-16 11:09:17.694] Worker 1DiicP3M2hxuNKces2wPPZvXCMJMAZDBGz.solomininglottery41:{"hashrate1m": "2.34P", "hashrate5m": "1.64P", "hashrate1hr": "248T", "hashrate1d": "11T", "hashrate7d": "1.57T"} [2016-10-16 11:09:17.694] Block solved after 341961354111 shares at 132.3% diff
|
|
|
Enough paid responses. The answer was given straight up. Deleted all the refspammers and locked thread.
|
|
|
The default options as set out by bitmain on their miners make them all remotely configurable by design (morons) so someone is hijacking your machines. Learn how to configure the API and put your machine behind a firewall.
|
|
|
Use an existing thread or search for one before posting. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1640764.0Also since your account is new and that's the first thing you posted about you're probably one of the scammers themselves and are promoting awareness of this scam trying to scam other people, but let's make it clear this is a scam for anyone reading these threads. /thread locked
|
|
|
Solo antpool is NOT a solo mining pool, they just use the name. Solo ckpool is run by the person who wrote and maintains ckpool - me - and has unique code for solo mining. Solo ckpool has found the most solo blocks by far at over 200 blocks found. Nicehash solo pool uses ckpool code as well but they maintain their own solo component to the code.
|
|
|
[2016-10-13 00:49:37.859] Possible block solve diff 796974635105.063110 ! [2016-10-13 00:49:38.221] BLOCK ACCEPTED! [2016-10-13 00:49:38.221] Solved and confirmed block 434122 by 1QFz2nQygrDfQM8BefQeRn7AFyJroRrHAx.119 [2016-10-13 00:49:38.221] User 1QFz2nQygrDfQM8BefQeRn7AFyJroRrHAx:{"hashrate1m": "17.5T", "hashrate5m": "12.9T", "hashrate1hr": "10.4T", "hashrate1d": "7.1T", "hashrate7d": "6.3T"} [2016-10-13 00:49:38.221] Worker 1QFz2nQygrDfQM8BefQeRn7AFyJroRrHAx.119:{"hashrate1m": "17.5T", "hashrate5m": "12.9T", "hashrate1hr": "10.4T", "hashrate1d": "7.1T", "hashrate7d": "6.3T"} [2016-10-13 00:49:38.221] Block solved after 30107111592 shares at 11.6% diff
https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/block/000000000000000001612c8822e63b4efad06674de5775b3b2fd9be39725ec54Yet another small guy! It's on for one and all and again very lucky.
|
|
|
Use official support thread as mentioned above.
/locked
|
|
|
assuming mining in iceland, for best performance, should primary be set to:
de.ckpool.org:3333
and secondary set to:
solo.ckpool.org:3333
what's the current ratio of PH vs. blocks found per unit of time? (at current difficulty?)
thanks!
Yes that's the order. Currently 12PH solves 1 block per day.
|
|
|
[2016-10-12 14:49:02.753] Possible block solve diff 777566634560.007324 ! [2016-10-12 14:49:02.965] BLOCK ACCEPTED! [2016-10-12 14:49:02.965] Solved and confirmed block 434068 by 1KQNm6jDoUWTTpsPJYaqDiwmDTFMbVKAf6.42 [2016-10-12 14:49:02.965] User 1KQNm6jDoUWTTpsPJYaqDiwmDTFMbVKAf6:{"hashrate1m": "8.28T", "hashrate5m": "9.15T", "hashrate1hr": "8.77T", "hashrate1d": "10.2T", "hashrate7d": "6.91T"} [2016-10-12 14:49:02.965] Worker 1KQNm6jDoUWTTpsPJYaqDiwmDTFMbVKAf6.42:{"hashrate1m": "8.28T", "hashrate5m": "9.15T", "hashrate1hr": "8.77T", "hashrate1d": "10.2T", "hashrate7d": "6.91T"} [2016-10-12 14:49:02.965] Block solved after 306723309995 shares at 118.6% diff
https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/block/00000000000000000169fd38a681be327ab4e361270fa671a0c21cbcc175df01Another small miner, the smallest in a long time!
|
|
|
Here's a long discussion regarding empty blocks in mining: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1085800.0In short it's a crappy workaround used by some pools to speed up their block changes immediately after another blocksolve to compensate for slow software which does not do full verification of the previous block, using only the header and therefore cannot build any more transactions onto the next block. If you look at this site at the last 6 months' blocks you can see the sizes and pools that offend with 1txn blocks: http://data.bitcoinity.org/bitcoin/blocksize/6m?t=lAlso if you sort by average size you'll see my pool has the largest average blocksize - in fact 3 of the top 4 average blocksize pools run my software. I strongly advocate against SPV mining and empty blocks.
|
|
|
DE dead?
Looks like the server crashed. Will try to reboot it. All mining on DE back online. Seems to have been a kernel crash... now that's unlucky.
|
|
|
Incoming community service announcement.
No one's ever heard of you and you have no reputation whatsoever on this forum so if you expect people to entrust you with the running of millions of dollars worth of hardware that produces tens of thousands of dollars worth of coin each day to reliably distribute the funds then you are either 1. a scammer or 2. naive. The usual pattern on this forum is people belong to the former, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and suggest to you what I offer all new unknown pool operators. Find yourself a well respected member of the forum who is happy to hold 12.5BTC in escrow from you until your pool finds its first block and you distribute the funds from it, with every miner on your pool confirming they have received their reward. The usual response from scammers is they can't afford to outlay 12.5BTC. If you can't afford to offer 12.5BTC in escrow funds then why do you expect miners to entrust you with all their money?
|
|
|
|