is it possible bitcoin used without internet? such as making physical version. of course many people will be interested in bitcoin. and think that bitcoin is real money right
It kinda has "bit" in the name. The keys are a bit long to transfer over the phone. |
|
|
|
My GPU is pretty neat.. How do u check my MKeys/s ?
Maybe mine is faster and i will give it a try?
Edit : so you mean you get 15Mkeys/s ? :/
Am merely getting 1.15 Mkeys/s and with using
Sounds like you using vanitygen on a fast CPU, and not oclvanitygen on a fast GPU. I recently got it working thanks to this topic: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22]. My cheap 1.5 years old i3 laptop runs (up to) 9 Mkeys on GPU now. |
|
|
|
|
An increase leads to more people buying, a decrease leads to more people selling. So whatever happens, it gives itself positive feedback to accelerate the process.
Speculation and normal variation. Nobody knows what the future will bring, as with any investment/gamble/buy.
|
|
|
|
thereum, on the other hand is about to spew another 20 million coins into the supply over the next 12 months, shrinking your holding as a percentage of the coin supply by 28%.
I wonder how many ethereum-buyers know this. It's the first time I read about it now, does this mean the creators will dump 200 million usd worth of ethereum? That does support the pre-mine-scam-theories out there. |
|
|
|
I'd just love it if BTC price went back down to $250 so that we could have the sig rates and account market back
I assume the payout in dollars stays about the same when bitcoin doubles, right? So why would a cheaper bitcoin be better for us users in a campaign? Yes you get more bitcoins, but no you can't buy more with it. So why does it matter? |
|
|
|
I hate to ask it again, but I'll do it anyway since I did find the best address ever: can I change my Bitcoin Address for this campaign to 1 RoLLiNpNdPDKkgyngdSg5QHBqRqTUrFY ? I'll convince you my account has not been compromised in the same way as I did last time  |
|
|
|
Can I keep the signature after the campaign, and add my own rolllin referral link to it?
Mate... If I understood correctly, you misunderstood, your signature campaign with this twitter campaign. I guess rollin signature campaign will live long as they have very limited post count for monthly basis.... Thank you, you are absolutely right! I was wondering why it took me 4 days to see the message about closing. I clicked wrong searching for the topic on Google and obviously didn't read the complete title. Either way, happy to hear the good news! |
|
|
|
|
Can I keep the signature after the campaign, and add my own rolllin referral link to it?
|
|
|
|
you needed root to load the nvidia_uvm kernel module. with the nvidia-modprobe package installed, you can load the kernel module as user too or rather, it gets auto loaded.
I skipped this part of your previous comment since I got it working, but it sounds like an improvement. When I google it, it simply says to `apt-get install nvidia-modprobe`, but it doesn't exist on my system. I now know it's something I should still fix, but for now I'm happy I can use it  |
|
|
|
try to run the miner with sudo, as with a incorrect OpenCL setup, you'll need root to load the nvidia_uvm kernel module. Once loaded you dont need sudo again. Your missing that module, hence the failure.
This fixed it! Running once as root, compiling kernel, and now it runs as user too. From 200-400 kkeys/s (depending on system load) to up to over 7.5 Mkeys/s! Thank you so much, that's 25 times faster on average! Difficulty: 264104224
Compiling kernel, can take minutes...done!
Pattern: 1test
Address: 1testvSQ7NjT2bjG3Ywv8GkCNCCQmUxcz
Privkey: 5HrhdHG7LzJG1k1teTKbGRhNqZzU9LxMsYTUxoNoTmUb7frNmDB Now the search continues It's running at 79 degrees C now, and slowly going up, After cleaning it a bit it runs at 62 degrees C now. Edit: on performance: the GeForce 840M reaches just over 9 Mkeys/s if I close my browsers to reduce CPU (or video?) load. |
|
|
|
I just found 1LimeLightHA2NqDu5hxu1RN9c78qiL97V ( blockchain). Update: right after depositing 100 mBTC to it, I messed up  Being tired doesn't help.... I accidentally pasted the private key instead of the public key into Google and blockchain.info search field. Too bad, I liked how rare this address is, now I can't use it anymore. The BTC 0.1 hasn't gone too far. https://blockchain.info/address/1317ST8CrnHcycS46F7wFpEFRzhVSba1jG Is that your wallet? *edit* ouch - 2.3 years to reach 50% for 1LimeLight - feel for you pal. Yes, I did withdraw by myself to be sure. On my CPU it takes 210 years for 50%, it was a lucky hit. Edit: Nvidia joined the party! Now it's only 8 years for 50%  But I'll find another nice one, dictionary attack with 25000 words works fine so far, and about 25 times faster from now on. |
|
|
|
I just found 1LimeLightHA2NqDu5hxu1RN9c78qiL97V ( blockchain). Update: right after depositing 100 mBTC to it, I messed up Being tired doesn't help.... I accidentally pasted the private key instead of the public key into Google and blockchain.info search field. Too bad, I liked how rare this address is, now I can't use it anymore. |
|
|
|
The instructions document and .exe application are on Google Drive now (which prescans for viruses) so there is nothing to worry about when downloading them.
Call me paranoid, but wouldn't a scammer say the same? Any application you build yourself can do anything you like without containing any known virusses. |
|
|
|
|
The best way to fight this, is not to buy it. Up to you to pick a different name, or a different top level domain.
|
|
|
|
Try to name one thing that isn't being used for illegal activities..... I think it's really hard to think of something, as almost everything can be used illegally. Guns, knifes, hammer, saws, tape, bricks, cars, etc. etc. are all used for illegal activities on a massive scale. That doesn't mean that hurts them in the long run, it just means a larger demand than if it would only be used for legal activities. To compare: Every British bank note is contaminated by cocaine within weeks of entering circulation |
|
|
|
I'd like to stake Address: 1 foreverDArUNEX2gVD26vautcx3b8zTZ -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- This is LoyceV staking address 1foreverDArUNEX2gVD26vautcx3b8zTZ on March 8, 2016 for https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318-----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- 1foreverDArUNEX2gVD26vautcx3b8zTZ HH92BZEyS13Z1md5bF/c8QHqdB9W2Z2amLQJPBkNa3jldMaD0AhPFhmGD/HtXFC4y0ULyAzUoqbWN8ZK7akJaNI= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- I would appreciate if someone could quote this message for me. |
|
|
|
not skipping was correct. You'r binary is compiled and ready to go. Now we need to fix the last issue: Thanks is the package nvidia-modprobe installed? if not, install it. Seems like it: # lsmod | grep -i nvidia
nvidia 8646656 33
drm 344064 7 i915,drm_kms_helper,nvidia # find / | grep modprobe | grep -i nvidia
/etc/modprobe.d/nvidia-graphics-drivers.conf
/etc/modprobe.d/nvidia-352_hybrid.conf
/lib/nvidia-352/modprobe.conf
The contents of these files: Laptop / # cat /etc/modprobe.d/nvidia-graphics-drivers.conf
# This file was installed by nvidia-352
# Do not edit this file manually
blacklist nouveau
blacklist lbm-nouveau
blacklist nvidia-current
blacklist nvidia-173
blacklist nvidia-96
blacklist nvidia-current-updates
blacklist nvidia-173-updates
blacklist nvidia-96-updates
blacklist nvidia-352-updates
alias nvidia nvidia_352
alias nvidia-uvm nvidia_352-uvm
alias nouveau off
alias lbm-nouveau off
Laptop / # cat /etc/modprobe.d/nvidia-352_hybrid.conf
# This file was installed by nvidia-352
# Do not edit this file manually
blacklist nouveau
blacklist lbm-nouveau
alias nouveau off
alias lbm-nouveau off
Laptop / # cat /lib/nvidia-352/modprobe.conf
# This file was installed by nvidia-352
# Do not edit this file manually
blacklist nouveau
blacklist lbm-nouveau
blacklist nvidia-current
blacklist nvidia-173
blacklist nvidia-96
blacklist nvidia-current-updates
blacklist nvidia-173-updates
blacklist nvidia-96-updates
blacklist nvidia-352-updates
alias nvidia nvidia_352
alias nvidia-uvm nvidia_352-uvm
alias nouveau off
alias lbm-nouveau off I don't know iff the blacklists are relevant. I am running the Nvidia-driver:  Judging by this I would say my X-server knows the card:  And this is what I have installed:  check if this file exists: $ ls -al /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnvidia-opencl.so.1
does this exist too? $ ls -al /etc/OpenCL/vendors/nvidia.icd if not: $ sudo mkdir -p /etc/OpenCL/vendors
$ sudo tee /etc/OpenCL/vendors/nvidia.icd <<< 'libnvidia-opencl.so.1'
I think this is all okay: Laptop ~ # ls -al /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnvidia-opencl.so.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Nov 16 20:51 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnvidia-opencl.so.1 -> libnvidia-opencl.so.352.63
Laptop ~ # ls -alL /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnvidia-opencl.so.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 15901968 Nov 8 06:08 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnvidia-opencl.so.1
Laptop ~ # ls -al /etc/OpenCL/vendors/nvidia.icd
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 22 Nov 8 05:08 /etc/OpenCL/vendors/nvidia.icd
Laptop ~ # cat /etc/OpenCL/vendors/nvidia.icd
libnvidia-opencl.so.1 Anything else I can do/try? It's probably something really simple once you know it |
|
|
|
$ find /usr -name libOpenCL.so
/usr/lib64/OpenCL/vendors/intel/libOpenCL.so Or more complete: ls -l `find / | grep -i ibopencl.so`
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 35200 Mar 15 2014 /usr/lib64/OpenCL/vendors/intel/libOpenCL.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Nov 16 20:51 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1 -> libOpenCL.so.1.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Nov 16 20:51 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1.0 -> libOpenCL.so.1.0.0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 25148 Nov 8 06:10 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Nov 16 20:51 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1 -> libOpenCL.so.1.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Nov 16 20:51 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1.0 -> libOpenCL.so.1.0.0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 26432 Nov 8 06:09 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1.0.0 I've been searching in this direction before, but didn't manage to fix it then. $ gcc oclvanitygen.o oclengine.o pattern.o util.o -o oclvanitygen -ggdb -O3 -Wall -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ -lpcre -lcrypto -lm -lpthread -l:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so I now get this: test@Laptop:~/vanitygen-master$ make clean
rm -f vanitygen.o oclvanitygen.o oclvanityminer.o oclengine.o keyconv.o pattern.o util.o vanitygen keyconv oclvanitygen oclvanityminer
test@Laptop:~/vanitygen-master$ make
cc -ggdb -O3 -Wall -c -o vanitygen.o vanitygen.c
cc -ggdb -O3 -Wall -c -o pattern.o pattern.c
cc -ggdb -O3 -Wall -c -o util.o util.c
cc vanitygen.o pattern.o util.o -o vanitygen -ggdb -O3 -Wall -lpcre -lcrypto -lm -lpthread
cc -ggdb -O3 -Wall -c -o keyconv.o keyconv.c
cc keyconv.o util.o -o keyconv -ggdb -O3 -Wall -lpcre -lcrypto -lm -lpthread So far so good! test@Laptop:~/vanitygen-master$ make oclvanitygen
cc -ggdb -O3 -Wall -c -o oclvanitygen.o oclvanitygen.c
cc -ggdb -O3 -Wall -c -o oclengine.o oclengine.c
oclengine.c: In function ‘vg_ocl_prefix_check’:
oclengine.c:1553:18: warning: variable ‘tablesize’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
int orig_delta, tablesize;
^
cc oclvanitygen.o oclengine.o pattern.o util.o -o oclvanitygen -ggdb -O3 -Wall -lpcre -lcrypto -lm -lpthread -lOpenCL
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lOpenCL
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [oclvanitygen] Error 1 Errors! If I do make oclvanitygen first, the next command does not give errors: test@Laptop:~/vanitygen-master$ gcc oclvanitygen.o oclengine.o pattern.o util.o -o oclvanitygen -ggdb -O3 -Wall -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ -lpcre -lcrypto -lm -lpthread -l:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1 But after this it still can't find the OpenCL platforms: test@Laptop:~/vanitygen-master$ ./oclvanitygen 1test
Difficulty: 264104224
clGetPlatformIDs(0): Unknown code -1001
clGetPlatformIDs(0): Unknown code -1001
Available OpenCL platforms: If I skip the "make oclvanitygen", it gives this: test@Laptop:~/vanitygen-master$ gcc oclvanitygen.o oclengine.o pattern.o util.o -o oclvanitygen -ggdb -O3 -Wall -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ -lpcre -lcrypto -lm -lpthread -l:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1
gcc: error: oclvanitygen.o: No such file or directory
gcc: error: oclengine.o: No such file or directory I'm hoping your guess is better than mine  |
|
|
|
|
I'm a senior member now guitarplinker! Can I upgrade my signature already, and join as Senior from March 15? Assuming the campaign is continued of course.
|
|
|
|
$ find /usr -name libOpenCL.so
/usr/lib64/OpenCL/vendors/intel/libOpenCL.so Or more complete: ls -l `find / | grep -i ibopencl.so`
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 35200 Mar 15 2014 /usr/lib64/OpenCL/vendors/intel/libOpenCL.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Nov 16 20:51 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1 -> libOpenCL.so.1.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Nov 16 20:51 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1.0 -> libOpenCL.so.1.0.0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 25148 Nov 8 06:10 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Nov 16 20:51 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1 -> libOpenCL.so.1.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Nov 16 20:51 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1.0 -> libOpenCL.so.1.0.0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 26432 Nov 8 06:09 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1.0.0 I've been searching in this direction before, but didn't manage to fix it then. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
