"Megaupload 2.0 Will Link File Transfers to Bitcoin Transactions"
Would this really come out like how he want's it to? So.. I think pretty much files would need btc payments i think.
If MegaUpload is going to integrate bitcoin in their system and the users are getting in bitcoin if someone downloads their files then can somebody make a difference between MegaUpload and SatoshiBox where the last one charges 6% fee or 0.0006 BTC? Satoshi box - Sell your digital content for bitcoins. Megaupload - Sell some digital content for bitcoins? I don't think it will be a platform where you will sell stuff you created. Megaupload's big selling point was downoading illegal content for free.
|
|
|
Thanks again guitarplinker! That's the 7th payment in a row. Now it's hard to imagine I only joined because I like Rollin 7 months ago, without expecting to reach the minimum number of posts. It turned out pretty good.
|
|
|
I'm not sure how you don't know the obvious answer to that question: Because the blocks are larger. Just because the block size limit has been at 1 MB for years, that does not mean that the blocks were actually 1 MB in size. Blocks prior to 2015 and 2016 were usually quite smaller. Note: Downloading these blocks at 2 MB/s isn't the bottleneck, but validating them is. You can speed this up if you add a high "dbcache" setting (e.g. 4-8 GB). Does that mean validating 10 blocks (each 0.2 MB) takes less time than validating 2 blocks (each 1 MB)? That would explain it, although I don't get why this would be different. I only have 4 GB RAM so much more dbcache won't work. Hint: Something like this should probably be discussed in a separate thread.
Probably I've had this on my mind for a while, and reading about the 20 MB blocks triggered it.
|
|
|
My desktop could easily handle 20 mb blocks, and it isn't anywhere near top of the line. Does anyone know why current blocks take so much longer to download in Bitcoin Core than old blocks? As far I as know the increased difficulty is only related to mining and has nothing to with checking downloaded blocks. Example: When I start a fresh installation of Bitcoin Core, it starts downloading the blockchain. It quickly goes through the first years with small blocks, then after that it's downloading with more than 2 MB/s continuously. That means at least 2 blocks per second (say 90 seconds to download 1 day's worth of blocks). But when it gets closer to the current date, it slows down. Now when I start Bitcoin Core, it downloads fast for a bit, then stops, continues a bit later again, and then downloading stops entirely for a long time. CPU load is low, hard drive I can't hear (and I have no indicator LED). My question is: why is it so slow? Why can't it continue to download 2 MB/s so I can update 3 days in 5 minutes? This also happens on a trimmed version of the blockchain, so it can't be caused by Bitcoin Core checking all transactions on disk. The only thing that also gets bigger in the trimmed version, is the chainstate directory (now 1.6 GB). Could that be what slows it down? As another test, on my old Atom laptop, it updates 3 weeks blockchain in 2 calendar days. To come back to the statement I quoted: if blocks would be 20 times larger, and I extrapolate this, my old Atom couldn't keep up anymore. And if this gets worse in the future, it could become a limitation for faster hardware too. While I've typed all this, Bitcoin Core running on my i3 still says "3 days behind", the same as when I started typing. Network activity has slowed down to just a few kB/s "background" level. What is it doing?
|
|
|
And another 2012-account that suddenly starts posting without reading what it is about: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=56659Doesn't have to be a hacked account, the account could have also voluntarily changed hands (ie account selling)
Maybe. But considering they all behave exactly the same, I think they're all owned by the same person now.
|
|
|
Congratulations brexit for winning 40 mBTC. Full Lottery Results are of course public.The winning Lottery Ticket was #43. The next Draw is Sunday 23:00h Amsterdam time. As always, you can claim Free Lottery Tickets every day.Next server seed: 3204L0Qa22v6JF8HnG8vV21B33M2HNJ8
|
|
|
The following Rollin users received Free Lottery Tickets (Ticket number(s) shown behind the name). Your name can be in the list more than one time:hulkpanther 91 Provablylucky_ 92 Alby 93 SergiuS 94 2x Slick 95,96 natsag3 97 3x shanem 99,100,101 star2343 98 ashitha 102 ba4114 103 maleficent 104 BitYoLo 105 visions 106 2x CASIO 107,108 2x psonowa 109,110 2x maat 111,112 arunkmr865 113 aRp 114 Humbertin19_ 115 3x Erikalui 116,117,118 3x katerniko1 119,120,121 karmakeddon 122 hulkpanther 123 james1 124 tyagi 125 Irvoir 126 Abe_ 127 Tryme4pkr 128 2x singpays 129,130 alvinmtp 141 2x SimpleRed7 142,143 2x interbtc 144,145 If you posted your name but didn't get tickets, one of these options is most likely the cause:- You used the wrong format in your post. Use this format: Username: Loyce
- The username you posted doesn’t exist on Rollin.io
- You never talked in Rollin Chatter Box
- You have Red Trust on Bitcointalk
- You are Blacklisted for abusing this giveaway
- You have already claimed Free Tickets today
- You posted shortly before I posted this, and your post wasn't there yet when my Scraping Bot checked for new posts. If this happened, your post will be included in the next run.
You can always send me a message. 5 remaining ticket(s) (146-150) donated in Rollin Chatter Box:FLT rains 4 tickets: BitLab-1,Loyce-1,Bumpy-1,Irvoir-1 PvP 150 Next Draw is Thursday 23:00h (Dutch time). Lottery pot: 15 mBTC. Good luck!
|
|
|
It might be faster to use oclvanitygen and a file dump but I think the file would become extremely large. oclvanitygen needs about 1 second to start up, which makes it slower than vanitygen for short strings. 140,000 addresses was just 17 MB, so it's not a limitation. Maybe we need a rare private key thread? I've noticed some cool things in private keys as well Make one and link it here The only problem is, once you do, the key is worthless. My computer is still searching for matches from my 25000 words in the 140000 addresses. No match yet. I am only searching for long words. A manual search for short words: Address: 1234FU3xLWm16vCT2DTqxNsfa7mVsBMV4k Privkey: 5KWZ8XRh BabynoSiyBSQVX6pi8yLQVhm1chHEnwPJ9je83gqJ6x Address: 1234Xqmtkg1VtsDmtxV2HgFtJJMQanwEVR Privkey: 5JoDFeZgv5DHRi6BfYDksqqU addymetEw2mA17aLxXDYaRxZu9W Address: 1234LVxMembBRbSAXQC1WaYEUuBJsEgHpm Privkey: 5JsSRhE mBTCLoARm9vX4f8Y4E5FTeWrrL2MJbwDZyp15a5cneZo Address: 12344F1FSq6X2RRHagCcC3znT5dZqLhXXw Privkey: 5KgpG TALK3ax9Tn2ozEXMMnbTcBtkTCBdtpZ4pRm2mia4YQCnE4 Address: 1234Lr964TRmcyYWqMoi1R3QbKu8P1Wb6q Privkey: 5Jy sendjjYyGp6zeDkT8CgZDF6ohRD3krz1Ei81br5wHJKq1Bzt Timelord, for a challenge, how about finding a vanity addy with the prefix somewhere in the private key? This is the best I've got: Address: 1234QDTHDK8SBviuurjoLrHMvwjZJ5oAMK Privkey: 5Hs 1236P51isqzteRFsGt2C6mXX99wr2ccc3k5WtyvSM7SmPnaL
|
|
|
Congratulations Tryme4pkr for winning 17 mBTC. Full Lottery Results are of course public.The winning Lottery Ticket was #84. Congratulations! You have found Rollin.io's Contest 4: "the Christmas Hunt". The Hunt is open from December 25th (2016) until the end of the year. If you're the first to post "5KTuAdeJ2vw7eVh4UJ2JwjPaQQHWKTkWoNSby3bG2y8rNqN95qq" on https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1726278.0 , you win 20 mBTC. Before posting, please read the "How to Join"-section, and make sure your account is eligible (see the Rules). The next Draw is Thursday (tonight) 23:00h Amsterdam time. As always, you can claim Free Lottery Tickets every day.Next server seed: QMbv757BjJW26G36P63W8kH5tq2JIOK4
|
|
|
In order to better the first one, you would need the format ABCDE*EDCBA as the one I bested was 123*321 so you might tie mine but I believe you have to beat it to get it listed. After finding 1234imbqWvqq1nNUgDxQ2wrg1R7GBZF321 in minutes, I didn't find another one ending on 321 all night. I have 141247 addresses starting with 1234 now. Two of these have a private key ending on 321: Address: 12342YbDeQgi3dz4hcYiN5WRrth5MisEan Privkey: 5HwRHBe1xQc4PgPGUUG8foi7ZAqLc2Qa6V1WbTkzjcYbrijj 321Address: 1234SGdyL9rDCjVdkTYySaTvJZNoyHEBBi Privkey: 5J82rcTpLRfdh67SutpSj5AMXuMG8y3bc2bE2kR1bzS6YmMq 321I know it's totally useless having a vanity private key, as you can only use it to show off by posting it. I'll search my long list through these 142247 keys for matches, it might take a while. Finding 1234xxxxxxxxx4321 can't be that hard, right? Not sure of any other way to search for that form of other than to set the keep searching switch to er, keep searching to a dump file and then sift through what you've found. I was indeed just writing output to a file.
|
|
|
The difficulty of finding such an address makes it rare though and I'm still working on
Finding 1234xxxxxxxxx4321 can't be that hard, right? I'll let it run for the night, see if I get it. Using vanitygen, it's faster than oclvanitygen for addresses this short. I found 1234imbqWvqq1nNUgDxQ2wrg1R7GBZF321 in minutes. 12345amanapLanacanaLpanama54321
but I don't expect to be done any time this century unless I buy another Nvidia 970 or 2... X1012 If you could find this, you could just as well find an addy with 50 million dollar balance in it. It won't happen.
|
|
|
I read a while ago someone has a 20,000 word list of search items they are searching for
That may have been me 38000 entries now. Some are duplicate, as vanitygen always tells me. For example: abandon/abandoned overlap. End result is it searches 25000 prefixes. I just composed it from a few "long word lists" I downloaded. I have 7000 addresses saved now, with lots of duplicate prefixes. I only keep the special ones, the rest is just stored in a long list. I haven't been searching in a while. I just saw I have Address: 1 fairsex6JFJNnPRwjCXaXmkBLDpKFFQ8 in there Let me sort the results on length, see if I missed anything special: 1greasers 1merchant 1meantime 1mayoress 1crutches 1anaLysis 1desiring 1bounties 1furthest 1benefice 1pLumping 1fouLness 1ferryman 1frankest 1nobodies 1edgeways 1detained 1audience 1assignees 1basinfuL 1Listened 1bankabLe 1LifeLess 1abruptLy 1Littered 1pressing 1heatwave 1faLsebay 1branches 1empLoyer 1pyrenees 1garfieLd 1fuzziest 1gadgetry 1herdsman 1Ligature 1frampton 1paraquat 1demeaned 1cauLdron 1pLumping 1nickname 1Lacerate 1gardener 1anypLace 1butthead 1betrayaL 1etcetera 1catchiest 1heresies 1Leniency 1futurist 1pedestaL 1gunmetaL 1emersion 1ruggiero 1fLeshier 1bLuntest 1frothier 1mcmiLLan 1peterson 1cravenLy 1Libretto 1anaphora 1caresses 1drubbing 1fairness 1beginner 1hinduism 1mastered 1cocksure 1prurient 1grandeur 1cordoned 1digested 1faceLift 1futurity 1megastar 1cruciate 1epiduraL 1maLtreat 1feverish 1Lakewood 1Leukemia 1Livening 1apheLion 1Lamenter 1Leighton 1LoveLace 1cauLdron 1Leninist 1Linesman 1Lavender 1Lingerie 1Leafiest 1Lengthen 1geraghty 1Listener 1Literary 1Ligature 1modeLLer 1Limiting 1Londoner 1Lavatory 1LawyerLy 1francais 1poLygyny 1Launched 1Layering 1Latitude 1LandLess 1Leftover 1Leakiest 1LoadabLe 1Landsman 1numskuLL 1Larynxes 1bonemeaL 1LoanabLe 1LocaLize 1querying 1ListLess 1LiveabLe 1LegaLese 1Launches 1Listeria 1Likewise These are my longest words: 1assignees 1catchiestBoth take more than 500 years for 50% chance on my system.Never mind, these were case insensitive: 1 CaTchieSTKGaFzYM798H4RFtuqQUQ9HYE and 1 ASsigneESZgjjLSv86sQYfiMofA8rzq44 The rest of this list is partially case insensitive. I have 1Lingerie and 1Leftover though Starting with L is easier to find than anything else. My list has one shortcoming, the words don't start with a capital, while that is easier to find. I only want the first character to be case insensitive, so I should add them all twice.
|
|
|
BitYoLo as you can see, Timelord beat me too it I was still searching, hit 75% chance twice, so not much luck on this one. Timelord searches 3 times faster than me, thanks Timelord, I've canceled mine.
|
|
|
The following Rollin users received Free Lottery Tickets (Ticket number(s) shown behind the name). Your name can be in the list more than one time:famiextrem 11 2x interbtc 12,13 3x MonsterV2 14,15,16 Alby 17 Alby 18 SergiuS 19 Provablylucky_ 20 lolgatocell 21 natsag3 22 james1 24 3x shanem 25,26,27 2x psonowa 28,29 star2343 31 latina02 32 ashitha 33 3x Erikalui 34,35,36 aRp 38 2x SimpleRed7 39,40 maksosip 41 Abe_ 42 arunkmr865 43 tyagi 44 2x CASIO 45,46 AtlantaSix 47 Humbertin19_ 48 karmakeddon 49 2x hitava 23,30 2x singpays 37,50 If you posted your name but didn't get tickets, one of these options is most likely the cause:- You used the wrong format in your post. Use this format: Username: Loyce
- The username you posted doesn’t exist on Rollin.io
- You never talked in Rollin Chatter Box
- You have Red Trust on Bitcointalk
- You are Blacklisted for abusing this giveaway
- You have already claimed Free Tickets today
- You posted shortly before I posted this, and your post wasn't there yet when my Scraping Bot checked for new posts. If this happened, your post will be included in the next run.
You can always send me a message. 0 remaining ticket(s) (-) donated in Rollin Chatter Box:- Next Draw is Wednesday 23:00h (Dutch time). Lottery pot: 5 mBTC. Good luck!
|
|
|
I'm a little stumped what else to search for that is random? I could say things like 1Xena 1House 1StarWars 1StarTrek or did you have something else in mind?
I made this puzzle 2 weeks ago. It doesn't require a search for vanity addresses, but it did include them. Why would you want something random? To make sure nobody has it already? You could just pick a Bitcoin-related word. But even then, it's nothing more than a combination of computing power and luck to see who wins. 1bitcointaLk is too much BTW.
|
|
|
1DWutrU 2 months 25 minutes 1oGoMo16h 500 years 10 years For 50% chance. I'm out Unless you make it a more fun thing to do than searching for some random strings that will never look more impressive than any random addy. I typed a 1 in front of the copy-pasted prefix, that lead to the very high difficulty.
|
|
|
Oh snap! I've got eight sixes too! 16666666618MC85xBnFLymYA3FJUkwEuZP What about my eight "H"'s (the eighth letter of the Alphabet...) 1HHHHHHHHrSFHFWdE8LdCFJbegLwuemoB8
I didn't have HHHHHHH in my list yet. Added now. If someone wants to use it, add these prefixes to a txt-file: 1111111 122222222 133333333 144444444 155555555 1666666666 177777777 188888888 199999999 1aaaaaaaa 1bbbbbbbb 1cccccccc 1dddddddd 1eeeeeeee 1ffffffff 1gggggggg 1hhhhhhhh 1iiiiiiii 1jjjjjjjj 1kkkkkkkk 1mmmmmmmm 1nnnnnnnn 1oooooooo 1pppppppp 1qqqqqqqq 1rrrrrrrr 1ssssssss 1tttttttt 1uuuuuuuu 1vvvvvvvv 1wwwwwwww 1xxxxxxxx 1yyyyyyyy 1zzzzzzzz 1AAAAAAAA 1BBBBBBBB 1CCCCCCCC 1DDDDDDDD 1EEEEEEEE 1FFFFFFFF 1GGGGGGGG 1HHHHHHHH 1JJJJJJJJ 1KKKKKKKK 1LLLLLLLL 1MMMMMMMM 1NNNNNNNN 1PPPPPPPP 1QQQQQQQQ 1RRRRRRRR 1SSSSSSSS 1TTTTTTTT 1UUUUUUUU 1VVVVVVVV 1WWWWWWWW 1XXXXXXXX 1YYYYYYYY 1ZZZZZZZZ 666666666 has 9 decimals now, as it's the only number prefix that I have with 8 decimal already. I search case-sensitive, that's why they're all in the list with both cases. I think there's a bug in the difficulty from oclvanitygen: if I search just the above list case-sensitive it gives the exact same difficulty as case insensitive. If I just search 1AAAAAAAA case insensitive, it expects to be faster than the full list.
|
|
|
There is another thread on here called "100% primedice win rate" and in the video the guy keeps betting on 98% and he keeps getting 98.0 as the result and wins, is this a bug? Here is the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REMOVED as requested I think he messed up the slider with his script. He's rolling > 1.99. If he would really get 98.0 only all the time, he would bet >97.9 and win a lot.
|
|
|
|