Bitcoin Forum
May 17, 2024, 11:24:24 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 [1302] 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 »
26021  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Megaupload + Bitcoins on: September 17, 2016, 07:58:53 AM
"Megaupload 2.0 Will Link File Transfers to Bitcoin Transactions"

Would this really come out like how he want's it to? So.. I think pretty much files would need btc payments i think.

If MegaUpload is going to integrate bitcoin in their system and the users are getting in bitcoin if someone downloads their files then can somebody make a difference between MegaUpload and SatoshiBox where the last one charges 6% fee or 0.0006BTC?
Satoshi box - Sell your digital content for bitcoins.
Megaupload - Sell some digital content for bitcoins? I don't think it will be a platform where you will sell stuff you created. Megaupload's big selling point was downoading illegal content for free.
26022  Economy / Services / Re: [FULL] Rollin.io Signature & Avatar Campaign on: September 16, 2016, 02:15:44 PM
Thanks again guitarplinker! That's the 7th payment in a row.
Now it's hard to imagine I only joined because I like Rollin 7 months ago, without expecting to reach the minimum number of posts. It turned out pretty good.
26023  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: 1mb is too big on: September 16, 2016, 12:42:48 PM
I'm not sure how you don't know the obvious answer to that question: Because the blocks are larger. Just because the block size limit has been at 1 MB for years, that does not mean that the blocks were actually 1 MB in size. Blocks prior to 2015 and 2016 were usually quite smaller. Note: Downloading these blocks at 2 MB/s isn't the bottleneck, but validating them is. You can speed this up if you add a high "dbcache" setting (e.g. 4-8 GB).
Does that mean validating 10 blocks (each 0.2 MB) takes less time than validating 2 blocks (each 1 MB)? That would explain it, although I don't get why this would be different.
I only have 4 GB RAM so much more dbcache won't work.

Quote
Hint: Something like this should probably be discussed in a separate thread.
Probably Wink I've had this on my mind for a while, and reading about the 20 MB blocks triggered it.
26024  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: 1mb is too big on: September 16, 2016, 12:22:43 PM
My desktop could easily handle 20 mb blocks, and it isn't anywhere near top of the line.
Does anyone know why current blocks take so much longer to download in Bitcoin Core than old blocks? As far I as know the increased difficulty is only related to mining and has nothing to with checking downloaded blocks.

Example: When I start a fresh installation of Bitcoin Core, it starts downloading the blockchain. It quickly goes through the first years with small blocks, then after that it's downloading with more than 2 MB/s continuously. That means at least 2 blocks per second (say 90 seconds to download 1 day's worth of blocks). But when it gets closer to the current date, it slows down.
Now when I start Bitcoin Core, it downloads fast for a bit, then stops, continues a bit later again, and then downloading stops entirely for a long time. CPU load is low, hard drive I can't hear (and I have no indicator LED). My question is: why is it so slow? Why can't it continue to download 2 MB/s so I can update 3 days in 5 minutes?

This also happens on a trimmed version of the blockchain, so it can't be caused by Bitcoin Core checking all transactions on disk. The only thing that also gets bigger in the trimmed version, is the chainstate directory (now 1.6 GB). Could that be what slows it down?

As another test, on my old Atom laptop, it updates 3 weeks blockchain in 2 calendar days. To come back to the statement I quoted: if blocks would be 20 times larger, and I extrapolate this, my old Atom couldn't keep up anymore. And if this gets worse in the future, it could become a limitation for faster hardware too.

While I've typed all this, Bitcoin Core running on my i3 still says "3 days behind", the same as when I started typing. Network activity has slowed down to just a few kB/s "background" level. What is it doing?
26025  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: And 1 more hacked account? on: September 16, 2016, 11:53:11 AM
I can add 3 more:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=52401
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=78713
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=76195

All accounts from 2012 or 2013, all about 20 posts, and all caught my attention by applying in my giveaway thread without having any clue how it works (in other words: they didn't read at all).
Since these old accounts all suddenly start posting, I assume they are the same person and blacklist all of them from my giveaway.
And another 2012-account that suddenly starts posting without reading what it is about: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=56659

Doesn't have to be a hacked account, the account could have also voluntarily changed hands (ie account selling)
Maybe. But considering they all behave exactly the same, I think they're all owned by the same person now.
26026  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: ¦¯¦¦¯¦ Rollin.io Free Lottery Tickets ¦¯¦¦¯¦ Daily Giveaway ¦¯¦¦¯¦ 712 mBTC won on: September 15, 2016, 09:16:46 PM


Congratulations brexit for winning 40 mBTC.
Full Lottery Results are of course public.


The winning Lottery Ticket was #43.

The next Draw is Sunday 23:00h Amsterdam time. As always, you can claim Free Lottery Tickets every day.
Next server seed: 3204L0Qa22v6JF8HnG8vV21B33M2HNJ8
26027  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: ¦¯¦¦¯¦ Rollin.io Free Lottery Tickets ¦¯¦¦¯¦ Daily Giveaway ¦¯¦¦¯¦ 712 mBTC won on: September 15, 2016, 06:51:50 PM
The following Rollin users received Free Lottery Tickets (Ticket number(s) shown behind the name). Your name can be in the list more than one time:
hulkpanther 91
Provablylucky_ 92
Alby 93
SergiuS 94
2x Slick 95,96
natsag3 97
3x shanem 99,100,101
star2343 98
ashitha 102
ba4114 103
maleficent 104
BitYoLo 105
visions 106
2x CASIO 107,108
2x psonowa 109,110
2x maat 111,112
arunkmr865 113
aRp 114
Humbertin19_ 115
3x Erikalui 116,117,118
3x katerniko1 119,120,121
karmakeddon 122
hulkpanther 123
james1 124
tyagi 125
Irvoir 126
Abe_ 127
Tryme4pkr 128
2x singpays 129,130
alvinmtp 141
2x SimpleRed7 142,143
2x interbtc 144,145

If you posted your name but didn't get tickets, one of these options is most likely the cause:
  • You used the wrong format in your post. Use this format: Username: Loyce
  • The username you posted doesn’t exist on Rollin.io
  • You never talked in Rollin Chatter Box
  • You have Red Trust on Bitcointalk
  • You are Blacklisted for abusing this giveaway
  • You have already claimed Free Tickets today
  • You posted shortly before I posted this, and your post wasn't there yet when my Scraping Bot checked for new posts. If this happened, your post will be included in the next run.
You can always send me a message.

5 remaining ticket(s) (146-150) donated in Rollin Chatter Box:
FLT rains 4 tickets: BitLab-1,Loyce-1,Bumpy-1,Irvoir-1
PvP 150

Next Draw is Thursday 23:00h (Dutch time).
Lottery pot: 15 mBTC.
Good luck!
26028  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Rare address hall of fame on: September 15, 2016, 01:11:57 PM
It might be faster to use oclvanitygen and a file dump but I think the file would become extremely large.
oclvanitygen needs about 1 second to start up, which makes it slower than vanitygen for short strings.
140,000 addresses was just 17 MB, so it's not a limitation.

Quote
Maybe we need a rare private key thread?  I've noticed some cool things in private keys as well Wink
Make one and link it here Cheesy The only problem is, once you do, the key is worthless.
My computer is still searching for matches from my 25000 words in the 140000 addresses. No match yet. I am only searching for long words.

A manual search for short words:
Address: 1234FU3xLWm16vCT2DTqxNsfa7mVsBMV4k
Privkey: 5KWZ8XRhBabynoSiyBSQVX6pi8yLQVhm1chHEnwPJ9je83gqJ6x

Address: 1234Xqmtkg1VtsDmtxV2HgFtJJMQanwEVR
Privkey: 5JoDFeZgv5DHRi6BfYDksqqUaddymetEw2mA17aLxXDYaRxZu9W

Address: 1234LVxMembBRbSAXQC1WaYEUuBJsEgHpm
Privkey: 5JsSRhEmBTCLoARm9vX4f8Y4E5FTeWrrL2MJbwDZyp15a5cneZo

Address: 12344F1FSq6X2RRHagCcC3znT5dZqLhXXw
Privkey: 5KgpGTALK3ax9Tn2ozEXMMnbTcBtkTCBdtpZ4pRm2mia4YQCnE4

Address: 1234Lr964TRmcyYWqMoi1R3QbKu8P1Wb6q
Privkey: 5JysendjjYyGp6zeDkT8CgZDF6ohRD3krz1Ei81br5wHJKq1Bzt

Timelord, for a challenge, how about finding a vanity addy with the prefix somewhere in the private key? This is the best I've got:

Address: 1234QDTHDK8SBviuurjoLrHMvwjZJ5oAMK
Privkey: 5Hs1236P51isqzteRFsGt2C6mXX99wr2ccc3k5WtyvSM7SmPnaL
26029  Economy / Reputation / Re: Known alts of anyone: User generated on: September 15, 2016, 09:48:17 AM
I found 4 Alts today:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=873013 (jangkarkehed)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=873014 (tangkurak)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=873015 (cungursia)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=873016 (siagelo)
All registered just 1 minute apart 2 months ago, and now they're all posting their username in my (giveaway) thread (pages 168 (archive.is) and 169 (archive.is), close together, all without reading how it works, three with Very Poor (0.00%) post quality (jangkarkehed reaches 5.88%), and all limited to Games and rounds and Announcements (Altcoins). Three of the accounts had not posted in 4 weeks, one had not posted in 2 months. All in all enough reason to know they’re Alt-accounts, which makes them cheating in the giveaway.

Later addition:
I wouldn't be surprised if https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=873432 (godin) is the same person too.
I can add 2 to this list:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=873447 (referrall)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=873446 (tramadol)
Still exactly the same behaviour: posting his nickname instead of reading the topic, accounts created in a row, same post-history and all created on July 2 like the other accounts. I don't bother tagging them anymore, I just blacklist them from my giveaway thread.

I can add this one too:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=873438 ($scams$)
26030  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: ¦¯¦¦¯¦ Rollin.io Free Lottery Tickets ¦¯¦¦¯¦ Daily Giveaway ¦¯¦¦¯¦ 712 mBTC won on: September 15, 2016, 06:30:23 AM


Congratulations Tryme4pkr for winning 17 mBTC.
Full Lottery Results are of course public.


The winning Lottery Ticket was #84.

Congratulations! You have found Rollin.io's Contest 4: "the Christmas Hunt".
The Hunt is open from December 25th (2016) until the end of the year.
If you're the first to post "5KTuAdeJ2vw7eVh4UJ2JwjPaQQHWKTkWoNSby3bG2y8rNqN95qq" on https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1726278.0 , you win 20 mBTC.
Before posting, please read the "How to Join"-section, and make sure your account is eligible (see the Rules).

The next Draw is Thursday (tonight) 23:00h Amsterdam time. As always, you can claim Free Lottery Tickets every day.
Next server seed: QMbv757BjJW26G36P63W8kH5tq2JIOK4
26031  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Rare address hall of fame on: September 15, 2016, 06:19:00 AM
In order to better the first one, you would need the format ABCDE*EDCBA as the one I bested was 123*321 so you might tie mine but I believe you have to beat it to get it listed.
After finding 1234imbqWvqq1nNUgDxQ2wrg1R7GBZF321 in minutes, I didn't find another one ending on 321 all night. I have 141247 addresses starting with 1234 now. Two of these have a private key ending on 321:

Address: 12342YbDeQgi3dz4hcYiN5WRrth5MisEan
Privkey: 5HwRHBe1xQc4PgPGUUG8foi7ZAqLc2Qa6V1WbTkzjcYbrijj321

Address: 1234SGdyL9rDCjVdkTYySaTvJZNoyHEBBi
Privkey: 5J82rcTpLRfdh67SutpSj5AMXuMG8y3bc2bE2kR1bzS6YmMq321

I know it's totally useless having a vanity private key, as you can only use it to show off by posting it. I'll search my long list through these 142247 keys for matches, it might take a while.

Quote
Finding 1234xxxxxxxxx4321 can't be that hard, right?

Not sure of any other way to search for that form of other than to set the keep searching switch to er, keep searching to a dump file and then sift through what you've found.
I was indeed just writing output to a file.
26032  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Rare address hall of fame on: September 14, 2016, 08:36:26 PM
The difficulty of finding such an address makes it rare though and I'm still working on
Finding 1234xxxxxxxxx4321 can't be that hard, right? I'll let it run for the night, see if I get it. Using vanitygen, it's faster than oclvanitygen for addresses this short.
I found 1234imbqWvqq1nNUgDxQ2wrg1R7GBZF321 in minutes.

Quote
12345amanapLanacanaLpanama54321

but I don't expect to be done any time this century unless I buy another Nvidia 970 or 2... X1012
If you could find this, you could just as well find an addy with 50 million dollar balance in it. It won't happen.
26033  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Rare address hall of fame on: September 14, 2016, 06:59:24 PM
I read a while ago someone has a 20,000 word list of search items they are searching for
That may have been me Cheesy 38000 entries now. Some are duplicate, as vanitygen always tells me. For example: abandon/abandoned overlap. End result is it searches 25000 prefixes. I just composed it from a few "long word lists" I downloaded.
I have 7000 addresses saved now, with lots of duplicate prefixes. I only keep the special ones, the rest is just stored in a long list. I haven't been searching in a while.

I just saw I have Address: 1fairsex6JFJNnPRwjCXaXmkBLDpKFFQ8 in there Cheesy

Let me sort the results on length, see if I missed anything special:
Code:
1greasers
1merchant
1meantime
1mayoress
1crutches
1anaLysis
1desiring
1bounties
1furthest
1benefice
1pLumping
1fouLness
1ferryman
1frankest
1nobodies
1edgeways
1detained
1audience
1assignees
1basinfuL
1Listened
1bankabLe
1LifeLess
1abruptLy
1Littered
1pressing
1heatwave
1faLsebay
1branches
1empLoyer
1pyrenees
1garfieLd
1fuzziest
1gadgetry
1herdsman
1Ligature
1frampton
1paraquat
1demeaned
1cauLdron
1pLumping
1nickname
1Lacerate
1gardener
1anypLace
1butthead
1betrayaL
1etcetera
1catchiest
1heresies
1Leniency
1futurist
1pedestaL
1gunmetaL
1emersion
1ruggiero
1fLeshier
1bLuntest
1frothier
1mcmiLLan
1peterson
1cravenLy
1Libretto
1anaphora
1caresses
1drubbing
1fairness
1beginner
1hinduism
1mastered
1cocksure
1prurient
1grandeur
1cordoned
1digested
1faceLift
1futurity
1megastar
1cruciate
1epiduraL
1maLtreat
1feverish
1Lakewood
1Leukemia
1Livening
1apheLion
1Lamenter
1Leighton
1LoveLace
1cauLdron
1Leninist
1Linesman
1Lavender
1Lingerie
1Leafiest
1Lengthen
1geraghty
1Listener
1Literary
1Ligature
1modeLLer
1Limiting
1Londoner
1Lavatory
1LawyerLy
1francais
1poLygyny
1Launched
1Layering
1Latitude
1LandLess
1Leftover
1Leakiest
1LoadabLe
1Landsman
1numskuLL
1Larynxes
1bonemeaL
1LoanabLe
1LocaLize
1querying
1ListLess
1LiveabLe
1LegaLese
1Launches
1Listeria
1Likewise
These are my longest words:
1assignees
1catchiest

Both take more than 500 years for 50% chance on my system.
Never mind, these were case insensitive: 1CaTchieSTKGaFzYM798H4RFtuqQUQ9HYE and 1ASsigneESZgjjLSv86sQYfiMofA8rzq44
The rest of this list is partially case insensitive. I have 1Lingerie and 1Leftover though Cheesy
Starting with L is easier to find than anything else.

My list has one shortcoming, the words don't start with a capital, while that is easier to find. I only want the first character to be case insensitive, so I should add them all twice.
26034  Economy / Services / Re: Pretty Addy Giveaway on: September 14, 2016, 06:04:29 PM
BitYoLo as you can see, Timelord beat me too it Cheesy I was still searching, hit 75% chance twice, so not much luck on this one.
Timelord searches 3 times faster than me, thanks Timelord, I've canceled mine.
26035  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: And 1 more hacked account? on: September 14, 2016, 05:45:46 PM
I can add 3 more:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=52401
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=78713
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=76195

All accounts from 2012 or 2013, all about 20 posts, and all caught my attention by applying in my giveaway thread without having any clue how it works (in other words: they didn't read at all).
Since these old accounts all suddenly start posting, I assume they are the same person and blacklist all of them from my giveaway.
26036  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: ¦¯¦¦¯¦ Rollin.io Free Lottery Tickets ¦¯¦¦¯¦ Daily Giveaway ¦¯¦¦¯¦ 712 mBTC won on: September 14, 2016, 04:43:34 PM
The following Rollin users received Free Lottery Tickets (Ticket number(s) shown behind the name). Your name can be in the list more than one time:
famiextrem 11
2x interbtc 12,13
3x MonsterV2 14,15,16
Alby 17
Alby 18
SergiuS 19
Provablylucky_ 20
lolgatocell 21
natsag3 22
james1 24
3x shanem 25,26,27
2x psonowa 28,29
star2343 31
latina02 32
ashitha 33
3x Erikalui 34,35,36
aRp 38
2x SimpleRed7 39,40
maksosip 41
Abe_ 42
arunkmr865 43
tyagi 44
2x CASIO 45,46
AtlantaSix 47
Humbertin19_ 48
karmakeddon 49
2x hitava 23,30
2x singpays 37,50

If you posted your name but didn't get tickets, one of these options is most likely the cause:
  • You used the wrong format in your post. Use this format: Username: Loyce
  • The username you posted doesn’t exist on Rollin.io
  • You never talked in Rollin Chatter Box
  • You have Red Trust on Bitcointalk
  • You are Blacklisted for abusing this giveaway
  • You have already claimed Free Tickets today
  • You posted shortly before I posted this, and your post wasn't there yet when my Scraping Bot checked for new posts. If this happened, your post will be included in the next run.
You can always send me a message.

0 remaining ticket(s) (-) donated in Rollin Chatter Box:
-

Next Draw is Wednesday 23:00h (Dutch time).
Lottery pot: 5 mBTC.
Good luck!
26037  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Rare address hall of fame on: September 14, 2016, 12:14:08 PM
I'm a little stumped what else to search for that is random?  I could say things like 1Xena 1House 1StarWars 1StarTrek or did you have something else in mind?
I made this puzzle 2 weeks ago. It doesn't require a search for vanity addresses, but it did include them.

Why would you want something random? To make sure nobody has it already? You could just pick a Bitcoin-related word. But even then, it's nothing more than a combination of computing power and luck to see who wins.
1bitcointaLk is too much BTW.
26038  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Rare address hall of fame on: September 14, 2016, 11:20:53 AM
1DWutrU
2 months 25 minutes
Quote
1oGoMo16h
500 years 10 years
For 50% chance. I'm out Tongue
Unless you make it a more fun thing to do than searching for some random strings that will never look more impressive than any random addy.

I typed a 1 in front of the copy-pasted prefix, that lead to the very high difficulty.
26039  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Rare address hall of fame on: September 14, 2016, 10:21:38 AM
Oh snap! I've got eight sixes too! 16666666618MC85xBnFLymYA3FJUkwEuZP What about my eight "H"'s (the eighth letter of the Alphabet...) 1HHHHHHHHrSFHFWdE8LdCFJbegLwuemoB8
I didn't have HHHHHHH in my list yet. Added now. If someone wants to use it, add these prefixes to a txt-file:
Code:
1111111
122222222
133333333
144444444
155555555
1666666666
177777777
188888888
199999999
1aaaaaaaa
1bbbbbbbb
1cccccccc
1dddddddd
1eeeeeeee
1ffffffff
1gggggggg
1hhhhhhhh
1iiiiiiii
1jjjjjjjj
1kkkkkkkk
1mmmmmmmm
1nnnnnnnn
1oooooooo
1pppppppp
1qqqqqqqq
1rrrrrrrr
1ssssssss
1tttttttt
1uuuuuuuu
1vvvvvvvv
1wwwwwwww
1xxxxxxxx
1yyyyyyyy
1zzzzzzzz
1AAAAAAAA
1BBBBBBBB
1CCCCCCCC
1DDDDDDDD
1EEEEEEEE
1FFFFFFFF
1GGGGGGGG
1HHHHHHHH
1JJJJJJJJ
1KKKKKKKK
1LLLLLLLL
1MMMMMMMM
1NNNNNNNN
1PPPPPPPP
1QQQQQQQQ
1RRRRRRRR
1SSSSSSSS
1TTTTTTTT
1UUUUUUUU
1VVVVVVVV
1WWWWWWWW
1XXXXXXXX
1YYYYYYYY
1ZZZZZZZZ
666666666 has 9 decimals now, as it's the only number prefix that I have with 8 decimal already.
I search case-sensitive, that's why they're all in the list with both cases.

I think there's a bug in the difficulty from oclvanitygen: if I search just the above list case-sensitive it gives the exact same difficulty as case insensitive. If I just search 1AAAAAAAA case insensitive, it expects to be faster than the full list.
26040  Economy / Gambling / Re: Primedice | Most Popular & Trusted | Huge Community | Free BTC on: September 14, 2016, 08:05:05 AM
There is another thread on here called "100% primedice win rate" and in the video the guy keeps betting on 98% and he keeps getting 98.0 as the result and wins, is this a bug?

Here is the video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REMOVED as requested
I think he messed up the slider with his script. He's rolling > 1.99. If he would really get 98.0 only all the time, he would bet >97.9 and win a lot.
Pages: « 1 ... 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 [1302] 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!