This is the way of advertising faking signal groups in the forum. Either OP is the owner of this Twitter account or he is promoting that. I am really not sure how this kinda twitter signals. There are a ton of accounts providing predictions, some of them sometimes become true and most of them are false. So is that possible to identify who is providing legit signals? I don't think so.

Just I am wondering they should become a millionaire since they know what will happen. Sometimes a few billionaire signals become true somehow like Elon. They are already a billionaire and people follow them and that's the reason we experience an impact on the price.

Hope OP got your expected answer from here. Feel free to ask if still you have any questions or confusion. Let's make it more simple for you. If you store your Bitcoin in a non-custodial wallet means it's like your own wallet that you are using in real life. So you can spend it anywhere you want or exchange it anywhere you like. You are the owner of whatever you are holding there, no third party can handle your funds in a non-custodial wallet.

Let's make it more simple about the transaction. Let's assume you get one USD from your friend and one USD from your girlfriend. So you have two USD in your wallet now but there is two note of USD. Same you received Bitcoin in two separate transactions means you have two unspent transactions which are worth two Bitcoin. Now if you want to spend $1.5 from your real-life wallet you have to give $2 to the receiver and he will return the change $0.5 to you. The same Bitcoin wallet will work. If you send transactions of 1.5 Bitcoin then the wallet automatically sends 2 Bitcoin to the node, and then 0.5 Bitcoin will return to your change address after deduction the transactions fees.

Hope I made it easier for you.

I have a worst-than-worst experience which is unrecoverable at all. If I can recall correctly in 2018 after dumping Bitcoin I bought two altcoins. One of them was delisted from the exchange from where I bought. So ultimately I lost a lot there. And another coin dump hard as well that hasn't recovered yet. My 1.5 Bitcoin become just $1K now. So I left them as it was rather than sold. This is a costly lesson for me, it's just not the worst.

The lesson and experience made me ZERO today rather than Hero. I can't forget that ever. During that time I didn't have much experience to choose a cryptocurrency hence selecting the worst coin.

I think Best_Change would help you here. I am not sharing because I am wearing their signature. I am suggesting you because a few of my known people have been using Best_Change for such as exchange like Neteller or skrill. As far as I know, they hadn't faced any issue yet and they are using Best_Change for a long time. A lot of options you can find there. Choose who offers the lowest fee. Just be careful if you deal peer-to-peer, perhaps there is a dispute that would happen in Neteller.

@_BlackStar, It's hard to understand your post. Please be transparent always. If we need to investigate again after your post then it doesn't worth posting here with a lot of details. The correct posting behavior of an allegation makes a post with all the evidence and we can just verify by clicking or reading your post. This is an incomplete post.

So please write more details once you are accusing someone of alts. If you do not share what you found in the investigation then how we would know? Your above post is still uncompleted to me though it's true.

What is negative there? It's just clueless FUD and panic seller became panic. As a result, we are experiencing a little correction in Bitcoin & other altcoin markets. Asking report to IRS above $10000 isn't and wouldn't be negative. To be honest even this isn't an easy task expecting a perfect report from cryptocurrency users unless they are using any centralized wallet or exchange.

This is nothing actually nor should affect Bitcoin price. The US at least not preventing its users to use cryptocurrency. Rather than they want to monitor and that is a behavior of centralized organization like government. We shouldn't be panic about that as well.

No, it's become a scam allegation when @stompix discovers the fake team photos. But such topics more fit into the investigation section if not any evidence either the project possible scam or not.

Anyway, since they have been using fake photos, means I can't trust them with a penny. It didn't matter to me if there was no team, it doesn't require a team for a decentralized cryptocurrency project. But they are trying to make us fool and skip with the funds. This is an immediate red flag. Just stay away, no need for any future investigations.

In the beginning, I thought the same as OP. But at the end of the day, I realized this isn't really easy to do that moderating scam. The main reason to prevent abuse is forum moderation. Each other will blame then this forum ban us illegally because we didn't pay to the admin or moderators. Which is a strong valid point IMO. And if in case the forum moderate scam then you or me would blame to the forum admin and moderation in the event of being scammed. Users will claim how we are being scammed since the forum moderating scam and would ask for compensation from the forum.

Here is what the trust system works for. Believe me, even 1xbit has many red flags and negative feedback, still gamblers are using that. Because humans like to play with luck. We can just make awareness, but the person has to decide whether he should trust or not. Since the trust system is decentralized currently, let it be as it was. Admin will never concentrate on moderate scam as I am pretty sure from previous experience.

For a few days, most of the posts in the altcoin section about CheckDot. I am not familiar with this project nor I am interested. But I am suspecting CheckDot somehow spamming on the forum. And users misusing the right of the "freedom of speech". Most likely all of the posts are paid.

Anyway, let's come to the point. Investing in a young or so-called developing project is high risk as we know. Almost 95 percent of projects are fake, a few of them skip with funds, and a few get listed on the exchange then skip. Only 5 percent of projects reach the goal that they had promised. Now imagine how difficult is to discover a legit project lately. So I do not support this kind of project. Just invest in an established or highly potential project where is less chance of getting scammed.

How do you feel when see a user called 'waybesuricata' making posts continuously? Sharing potential news posts isn't bad, but doesn't mean we should create multiple threads for each short of news. They are just getting news from a site and sharing it here. What's the problem if you merge all today's news to one thread and add the link. So the reader could click the link to read desired news. That's the issue. One or more news sites just spamming with their links. As a result, a few potential news went down and down.

I am curious, did you read all the news provided by waybesuricata? If not who are reading actually?

Then spammer will choose Bitcointalk and Bitcointalk SV will be ignored 😉. Because scam fork of Bitcoin so-called Bitcoin SV has ignored by the community.

Anyway, often I do not visit that press section unless I manage any campaign. Because nothing useful there. Just spamming from various sources. Rank limit to making a post in the press section is only the way to reduce spam. Let only allow the above Hero Member to make a post there but keep open for reading to all users.

Good see OP did what he was looking for though it eats a night. I am just curious even 100 BTC wasn't enough to withdraw within 24 hours? Since OP mentioned using Binance means he had verified KYC which will allow at least 100 Bitcoin. My account is verified with KYC and seems I have a limit of 100 BTC for cryptocurrency and a $50K limit for fiat. So OP should have same limit as well.

Anyway, you can't fund any exchange with unlimited withdrawals. There would huge risk for the exchange if they allow it. Because in the event of hacking exchange would lose all the funds from the hot wallet in a single transaction.

So are you gonna take action against 1xbit in your country? What kind of evidence are you expecting then? Isn't a ton of accusations of the forum is enough? Are you looking for any hard copy of the evidence? Then you have to make it yourself. I believe you can discover a lot of victims from your country. Gather all the evidence if the forum accusation isn't enough for you.

I believe the forum gambler isn't gambling on this scam site since they are aware of it. But outside the forum, it's hard to spread about their scam. Forum gamblers care about scams since they know how casinos scamming us. But outside forum gamblers would know after only being scammed.

Anyway, we should welcome if you can take any action at least in your country.

It's taking me half hour to understand the case (LOL). The fault didn't happen from the user end. It was done by Binance and they should carry the compensation as well. What is the user with the same issue who has no balance and has not been using? Definitely, Binance has to carry the compensation there. Its looks like scamming user. Since Binance cares about reputation, just continue to contact support and social media as well. They are the ones who could help you here.

Imagine how they are feeling those who received the fund 😳

Your statement is conflicting with each other. You are new to cryptocurrency but directly jump into the casino. It's hard to believe that, even I am a long time with cryptocurrency but still have not much experience with casinos nor I am interested. Anyway, we can't say what happened exactly if you do not share your transaction id. If you have a privacy issue then don't share it since it will expose your Bitcoin address. You can check with any explorer whether your transaction is confirmed or pending. If confirmed but the casino declined to add in your balance means you are being scammed. If the transaction is pending then wait or increase transaction fees if you are using the non-custodial wallet.

If I had 2000 Bitcoin then definitely I would be capable to handle it. Normally I have been using Ledger Nano X, So I think it's enough to store 2000 Bitcoin. But definitely, I will use Multiple wallets with or without the same seed. What device or software are you using to store Bitcoin doesn't matter, then the fact is how are you going to keep safe your seed phrase. Protecting your seed phrase is the key save your Bitcoin. Usually, I wrote the seed phrase of my Ledger Nano in 3 sheets as they provided along with the device. I keep them in 3 separate places. So even I lost one I would find another. Besides that, I wrote my seed phrase in my crypto notebook. So even I lost three sheets with the device still I can access my Bitcoin.

They know very well. But they don't like a decentralized ecosystem where they can't control everything. That's the main issue why Bitcoin haters stand against Bitcoin mining. All other sections do not have a problem those have been using renewable energy. When it's come to Bitcoin mining they raise the question.

If renewable energy is only the issue for Bitcoin mining then why they aren't interested to solve it? Isn't there a renewable energy source like hydrogen fuel? Why are they not implementing this plan? This renewable energy could use in a lot of sectors even without Bitcoin mining. But they will never do it because simply they hate decentralized cryptocurrency Bitcoin.

Let them try. Do you believe it's possible to ban Bitcoin? I don't know about other cryptocurrencies nor interested as well since most of them semi-decentralized. They could ban mining, but couldn't ban the use of Bitcoin. If one bans mining then others will allow it. That's the game of cryptocurrency. Those who don't like decentralized ecosystems won't support Bitcoin or mining it. Nothing will happen, even a big country like China has banned Bitcoin mining couldn't discourage to use that nor they could control. They just don't like decentralization and they want to control everything in the world.

How do you believe that El Salvador's government isn't aware of Bitcoin technologies and doesn't know which is the best for their economy? The cryptocurrency industry isn't evaluated based on the stable coin, mostly evaluated based on Bitcoin and other established coins. El Salvador adopting Bitcoin means they don't want to miss the decentralized cryptocurrency train. Is a stable coin is decentralized? Most stable coin minting whenever they want. It's not a decentralized cryptocurrency at all. It's just a built-in blockchain, not a true decentralization. The stable coin wouldn't help you to make you wealthy. There are too many technical differences between Bitcoin and stable coin.

As a merit source, I look only for a good post at least those are contributing to the forum, especially for lower ranks. Because most of the active higher ranks have been creating a good post. So during sending merit for higher ranks most of the time I look for quality posts definitely. Although they don't need merit for rank up, I believe the merit deserves a post. Merit isn't only for rank up, rather than it bears how is your contribution to the forum. Sometimes I give a decent amount of merits to lower ranks who definitely need to upgrade ranks. It depends on real-time situations.