Publishing PM in public fully depends on the situation are you facing. PM with private information including but not limited to name,  address, or identity shouldn't post in public. A person who wants to trade with you really doesn't make sense to post in public. Either you should ignore or proceed if the deal isn't against forum rules or not against community standards. You can report admin if you receive a PM that is against the forum. You can post PM publicly if it's against community standards (like a scam). You shouldn't post PM publicly if the message included not to share with a third party.

However, I do not support tagging anyone for posting PM publicly.

From the article, seems Bitcoin will distribute through "Bitcoin Toss". Just not getting the process of how these two participants will be selected from the beginning. However, this will introduce Bitcoin to more people, not only limited to the students. This giveaway will help expand Bitcoin use in the education sector. And day by day we may see more real uses of Bitcoin like we are seeing a few companies paying salary their employees. We know education is the backbone of a nation. So students will learn about Bitcoin from school life which will help massive adoption in near future.

Welcome back to the forum. First of all, you need to spend more time reading forum threads. Then you would get proper knowledge from here. Good to hear you made some decent profit since the ETH price is good now. But I am a little concerned about storing your funds. There are many allegations about blockchain Wallets. I believe this web wallet won't be a true non-custodial wallet at all. Since you made a handsome profit from eth, rather than storing your funds in blockchain Wallet I will suggest buying a hardware wallet like Ledger Nano. So your funds will be under your control. Regarding mining, you should read the mining section to learn more, talk with those who are mining now. Don't invest in any so-called cloud mining scam.

It doesn't matter whether the message was a scam attempt or not. This is an unsolicited message with links anyway which is enough to ban the sender from reporting to admins. In the future, you can do it. Posting here isn't really necessary in that case. Rather than you may post on reputation or scam accusation board about that scam site. So others would be aware of that and can stay away. Report itself enough to punish the sender.

I am a little curious here. Where do you deposit exactly? Inside of trust wallet, right? Where Binance ask you for KYC but Safepal didn't. So I am interested to know after you deposit can you trade in the centralized interface? Or do you have to trade on the decentralized interface? Just I am not getting where Binance required KYC to trade in their Centralized exchange but how can you trade there without KYC through just a tool or apps. I think it shouldn't happen and we are missing something. I haven't been using Safepal wallet so I don't know exactly how is the process.

If it's possible to trade on the centralized interface from safepal wallet without KYC then everyone will do that instead of using KYC in Binance.

Most of the allegations against blockchain happen due to malware attacks, attackers stealing funds from the Wallet. But usually, we blame the Blockchain immediately where we are unable to save our assets. The first thing is we shouldn't choose a Web wallet to store our funds. Then blockchain won't steal as well.

Besides that, there is blame where blockchain staff is involved. There are possibilities to steal your seed. I have read somewhere how they do it. It's possible to change your email on Blockchain and it would be done easily by blockchain staff. Then they will brute force and request wallet files. So after stealing the funds they restore the old email. So the user even doesn't aware of how the funds have gone from his wallet.

This is the way of advertising faking signal groups in the forum. Either OP is the owner of this Twitter account or he is promoting that. I am really not sure how this kinda twitter signals. There are a ton of accounts providing predictions, some of them sometimes become true and most of them are false. So is that possible to identify who is providing legit signals? I don't think so.

Just I am wondering they should become a millionaire since they know what will happen. Sometimes a few billionaire signals become true somehow like Elon. They are already a billionaire and people follow them and that's the reason we experience an impact on the price.

Hope OP got your expected answer from here. Feel free to ask if still you have any questions or confusion. Let's make it more simple for you. If you store your Bitcoin in a non-custodial wallet means it's like your own wallet that you are using in real life. So you can spend it anywhere you want or exchange it anywhere you like. You are the owner of whatever you are holding there, no third party can handle your funds in a non-custodial wallet.

Let's make it more simple about the transaction. Let's assume you get one USD from your friend and one USD from your girlfriend. So you have two USD in your wallet now but there is two note of USD. Same you received Bitcoin in two separate transactions means you have two unspent transactions which are worth two Bitcoin. Now if you want to spend $1.5 from your real-life wallet you have to give $2 to the receiver and he will return the change $0.5 to you. The same Bitcoin wallet will work. If you send transactions of 1.5 Bitcoin then the wallet automatically sends 2 Bitcoin to the node, and then 0.5 Bitcoin will return to your change address after deduction the transactions fees.

Hope I made it easier for you.

I have a worst-than-worst experience which is unrecoverable at all. If I can recall correctly in 2018 after dumping Bitcoin I bought two altcoins. One of them was delisted from the exchange from where I bought. So ultimately I lost a lot there. And another coin dump hard as well that hasn't recovered yet. My 1.5 Bitcoin become just $1K now. So I left them as it was rather than sold. This is a costly lesson for me, it's just not the worst.

The lesson and experience made me ZERO today rather than Hero. I can't forget that ever. During that time I didn't have much experience to choose a cryptocurrency hence selecting the worst coin.

I think Best_Change would help you here. I am not sharing because I am wearing their signature. I am suggesting you because a few of my known people have been using Best_Change for such as exchange like Neteller or skrill. As far as I know, they hadn't faced any issue yet and they are using Best_Change for a long time. A lot of options you can find there. Choose who offers the lowest fee. Just be careful if you deal peer-to-peer, perhaps there is a dispute that would happen in Neteller.

@_BlackStar, It's hard to understand your post. Please be transparent always. If we need to investigate again after your post then it doesn't worth posting here with a lot of details. The correct posting behavior of an allegation makes a post with all the evidence and we can just verify by clicking or reading your post. This is an incomplete post.

So please write more details once you are accusing someone of alts. If you do not share what you found in the investigation then how we would know? Your above post is still uncompleted to me though it's true.

What is negative there? It's just clueless FUD and panic seller became panic. As a result, we are experiencing a little correction in Bitcoin & other altcoin markets. Asking report to IRS above $10000 isn't and wouldn't be negative. To be honest even this isn't an easy task expecting a perfect report from cryptocurrency users unless they are using any centralized wallet or exchange.

This is nothing actually nor should affect Bitcoin price. The US at least not preventing its users to use cryptocurrency. Rather than they want to monitor and that is a behavior of centralized organization like government. We shouldn't be panic about that as well.

No, it's become a scam allegation when @stompix discovers the fake team photos. But such topics more fit into the investigation section if not any evidence either the project possible scam or not.

Anyway, since they have been using fake photos, means I can't trust them with a penny. It didn't matter to me if there was no team, it doesn't require a team for a decentralized cryptocurrency project. But they are trying to make us fool and skip with the funds. This is an immediate red flag. Just stay away, no need for any future investigations.

In the beginning, I thought the same as OP. But at the end of the day, I realized this isn't really easy to do that moderating scam. The main reason to prevent abuse is forum moderation. Each other will blame then this forum ban us illegally because we didn't pay to the admin or moderators. Which is a strong valid point IMO. And if in case the forum moderate scam then you or me would blame to the forum admin and moderation in the event of being scammed. Users will claim how we are being scammed since the forum moderating scam and would ask for compensation from the forum.

Here is what the trust system works for. Believe me, even 1xbit has many red flags and negative feedback, still gamblers are using that. Because humans like to play with luck. We can just make awareness, but the person has to decide whether he should trust or not. Since the trust system is decentralized currently, let it be as it was. Admin will never concentrate on moderate scam as I am pretty sure from previous experience.

For a few days, most of the posts in the altcoin section about CheckDot. I am not familiar with this project nor I am interested. But I am suspecting CheckDot somehow spamming on the forum. And users misusing the right of the "freedom of speech". Most likely all of the posts are paid.

Anyway, let's come to the point. Investing in a young or so-called developing project is high risk as we know. Almost 95 percent of projects are fake, a few of them skip with funds, and a few get listed on the exchange then skip. Only 5 percent of projects reach the goal that they had promised. Now imagine how difficult is to discover a legit project lately. So I do not support this kind of project. Just invest in an established or highly potential project where is less chance of getting scammed.

How do you feel when see a user called 'waybesuricata' making posts continuously? Sharing potential news posts isn't bad, but doesn't mean we should create multiple threads for each short of news. They are just getting news from a site and sharing it here. What's the problem if you merge all today's news to one thread and add the link. So the reader could click the link to read desired news. That's the issue. One or more news sites just spamming with their links. As a result, a few potential news went down and down.

I am curious, did you read all the news provided by waybesuricata? If not who are reading actually?

Then spammer will choose Bitcointalk and Bitcointalk SV will be ignored 😉. Because scam fork of Bitcoin so-called Bitcoin SV has ignored by the community.

Anyway, often I do not visit that press section unless I manage any campaign. Because nothing useful there. Just spamming from various sources. Rank limit to making a post in the press section is only the way to reduce spam. Let only allow the above Hero Member to make a post there but keep open for reading to all users.

Good see OP did what he was looking for though it eats a night. I am just curious even 100 BTC wasn't enough to withdraw within 24 hours? Since OP mentioned using Binance means he had verified KYC which will allow at least 100 Bitcoin. My account is verified with KYC and seems I have a limit of 100 BTC for cryptocurrency and a $50K limit for fiat. So OP should have same limit as well.

Anyway, you can't fund any exchange with unlimited withdrawals. There would huge risk for the exchange if they allow it. Because in the event of hacking exchange would lose all the funds from the hot wallet in a single transaction.

So are you gonna take action against 1xbit in your country? What kind of evidence are you expecting then? Isn't a ton of accusations of the forum is enough? Are you looking for any hard copy of the evidence? Then you have to make it yourself. I believe you can discover a lot of victims from your country. Gather all the evidence if the forum accusation isn't enough for you.

I believe the forum gambler isn't gambling on this scam site since they are aware of it. But outside the forum, it's hard to spread about their scam. Forum gamblers care about scams since they know how casinos scamming us. But outside forum gamblers would know after only being scammed.

Anyway, we should welcome if you can take any action at least in your country.

It's taking me half hour to understand the case (LOL). The fault didn't happen from the user end. It was done by Binance and they should carry the compensation as well. What is the user with the same issue who has no balance and has not been using? Definitely, Binance has to carry the compensation there. Its looks like scamming user. Since Binance cares about reputation, just continue to contact support and social media as well. They are the ones who could help you here.

Imagine how they are feeling those who received the fund 😳