Permabulls are putting their money where their mouth is.
They will be laughing all the way to the bank when the next rally breaks out.
Permabulls have no money left to put where their mouth is. They spent it all on BTCeanie BTCabies Bitcoin a long time ago   |
|
|
|
...
There is absolutely no cheaper way to send money Bitcoin around the world than bitcoin...
FTFY  |
|
|
|
...
LOL. I was invested in NEOBEE for a whole day and I sold my shares in ActM near the height of the share price in summer 2013. I then invested them into Labcoin and sold them off not long later too. I was also trading DMS around that time too. I used to trade securities all the time on BTC-TC and BitFunder. I don't pretend that I've never made mistakes. I'm not perfect.
Lambchops claims are complete nonsense though, as proven by the fact that the negative feedback was left over half a year to a year after the events under discussion. If you look through his posting history, it's nothing but trolling. If there was an Internet Troll of the Year award, this guy would get my nomination. If you ran such a poll on this forum, I have no doubt whatsoever that NotLampchop (or one of his older accounts) would win. I wouldn't be surprised if his accounts were the only nominees. The only reason he posts to this forum is because he loves winding people up.
"Winding people up" is exactly what needs to happen when said people are getting fleeced. Looking at the date, I remember why you've left me that vindictive feedback: I interfered with your pimping of your AM "investment," which continues to tank to this day @Quickseller: Mabsark leaving me negative trust is well within the forum rules. The problem is not Mabsark, but the rules. Attempting to grow a relevant trust system from a default trust seed is fundamentally, conceptually flawed. Edit re. "feedback was left over half a year to a year after the events under discussion": The chart starts on June 11th, when I got the vote of no confidence from Mabsark for suggesting that AM prices would tank:  |
|
|
|
...
A few weeks ago I had to send some money to a friend in Florida. I sent him 100$ and moneygram took 11.50 out of that.
... You sure got some broke-ass friends... Why didn't you send Bitcoin instead? He wasn't a bitcoiner. Bitcoin will be atleast 2000 by the end of 2015, mark my words. You missed an opportunity to turn him on to Bitcoin--the fastest, cheapest way to send money Bitcoin  |
|
|
|
How does warning scammers securities issuers
you just can't help yourself, can you? The securities forum is a festering cesspool of scam. Not going to whitewash it. Re. your edit: Nothing has "been clarified to be legitimate," the offering was pulled because people stopped falling for this shit. Hopefully, in a small part, thanks to me. |
|
|
|
...
meanwhile...
It's actually like this: The issue here is that you feel people are unable to make up their own minds. This is your own flaw, not Mabsark's. I have had a few discussions with Mabsark regarding a couple of issues and not once have I felt that he has tried to sway me one way or another.
There is a huge difference between discussing your opinion, and forcing your opinion on others. Where I have found Mabsark to be the former, you are the latter.
You sir are merely a troll who feeds on other's indecision.
Unless you feel I can crawl through the intertubes, I have not forced my opinion on anyone. How can posting on a forum force anyone to do anything? heavy trolling: one thread example. @Havelock; provasic; cbcm.co: I warned you to hunt responsibly, now it's too late. The noble Bitcoin Investor has been hunted into extinction  The American Passenger Pigeon, once a staple food of American Indians, is now extinct. Consider the chilling parallels between this noble bird's tragic tale and the plight of the Bitcoin Investor. "At a nesting site in Petoskey, Michigan in 1878, 50,000 birds Bitcoin investors were killed each day for nearly five months. The surviving adults attempted a second nesting at new sites, but were killed by professional hunters before they had a chance to raise any young."[1]
...
"Still another way [of hunting Bitcoin investors] was to simply set a nesting tree on fire, cooking the doves investors or collecting them as they tried to escape."[1]
...
"Two farmers from the vicinity of Russelsville, distant more than a hundred miles, had driven upwards of three hundred hogs to be fattened on the pigeons Bitcoin investors which were to be slaughtered. Here and there, the people employed in plucking and salting what had already been procured, were seen sitting in the midst of large piles of these birds amateur financiers. The dung lay several inches deep, covering the whole extent of the roosting-place."[1]1. Passenger Pigeon, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passenger_Pigeon#HuntingHow does warning scammers securities issuers to curb their greed by highlighting the similarities between Bitcoin investors and the Passenger Pigeon force my opinion on anyone? |
|
|
|
...was mabsark invested in any of the securities that were behind any of the scams that were called out?
Of course! Several. Why do you think he left me negative feedback? if you can document this then it seems that he has a history of using trust to further his own financial incentives. He is using trust to prevent securities that he ownes from declining in value. Not sure how this would work. He was "invested" in NeoBee and Active Mining, but he can always claim that his feedback was unrelated to these "investments." |
|
|
|
...
meanwhile...
It's actually like this: The issue here is that you feel people are unable to make up their own minds. This is your own flaw, not Mabsark's. I have had a few discussions with Mabsark regarding a couple of issues and not once have I felt that he has tried to sway me one way or another.
There is a huge difference between discussing your opinion, and forcing your opinion on others. Where I have found Mabsark to be the former, you are the latter.
You sir are merely a troll who feeds on other's indecision.
Unless you feel I can crawl through the intertubes, I have not forced my opinion on anyone. How can posting on a forum force anyone to do anything? |
|
|
|
...was mabsark invested in any of the securities that were behind any of the scams that were called out?
Of course! Several. Why do you think he left me negative feedback? |
|
|
|
he left me this feedback:  ^ true though.  In the securities section, I have had 100% accuracy rate. Even my opinions, once considered the fringes of pessimism, are now mainstream. The negative feedback I received was my reward happy christmas. IMHO, from what i've seen of your trolling... you have caused a lot of damage to some very legitimate securities; and your reward is, just. tip: orchestrating hate campaigns does in no way make you a prophet. Please name the "legitimate securities." there have been a few threads i've seen you trolling in, feel free to go back over your own posts to enlighten yourself, i'm not your secretary. You accuse me of starting "hate campaigns" against "legitimate securities." Asked to validate your accusation, you demur with "I'm not your secretary." Typical yup, i'm just your typical btc enthusiast, nothing special here. IMHO Mabsark called it rightly. It's like this: If you listened to the people who left me negative feedback, you are now poorer than you would have been, had you listened to me. So yeah, I guess that makes you a typical BTC enthusiast. |
|
|
|
he left me this feedback: ^ true though. In the securities section, I have had 100% accuracy rate. Even my opinions, once considered the fringes of pessimism, are now mainstream. The negative feedback I received was my reward happy christmas. IMHO, from what i've seen of your trolling... you have caused a lot of damage to some very legitimate securities; and your reward is, just. tip: orchestrating hate campaigns does in no way make you a prophet. Please name the "legitimate securities." there have been a few threads i've seen you trolling in, feel free to go back over your own posts to enlighten yourself, i'm not your secretary. You accuse me of starting "hate campaigns" against "legitimate securities." Asked to validate your accusation, you demur with "I'm not your secretary." Typical |
|
|
|
he left me this feedback: ^ true though. In the securities section, I have had 100% accuracy rate. Even my opinions, once considered the fringes of pessimism, are now mainstream. The negative feedback I received was my reward happy christmas. IMHO, from what i've seen of your trolling... you have caused a lot of damage to some very legitimate securities; and your reward is, just. tip: orchestrating hate campaigns does in no way make you a prophet. Please name the "legitimate securities." P.S: "Hate campaigns"?! How, exactly, do you respond to scams? Don't tell me, rhetorical--you turn the other cheek. How's that been working out for you, tho? |
|
|
|
he left me this feedback: ^ true though. In the securities section, I have had 100% accuracy rate. Even my opinions, once considered the fringes of pessimism, are now mainstream. The negative feedback I received was my reward |
|
|
|
Mabsark's use of the trust system is a bit curious. I warned him about two of his "investments" being scams. When those investments turned out to be scams, he left me this feedback: Not sure if this is how the trust system was intended to work. |
|
|
|
... Why are we going up  ? ... We are not.  |
|
|
|
...
A few weeks ago I had to send some money to a friend in Florida. I sent him 100$ and moneygram took 11.50 out of that.
... You sure got some broke-ass friends... Why didn't you send Bitcoin instead? |
|
|
|
...
The majority of taxes are really nothing more then transfer payments that are designed to take from the successful and give to the lazy (aka "poor")
Exactly what the rich want, you mean. You don't think that the lazy poor somehow managed to become the ruling elite in position to levy taxes, do you? |
|
|
|
NotLambchop and falling: Guaranteed future laughin stocks.
 |
|
|
|
^ Keep dreaming, Bitcoiner. Dreams you can still afford. But keep your creepy hands off 9-year-old children, you sicko. Or I'll give you a little talkin' to  |
|
|
|
>Is Havelock Investments a registered exchange where you are listed (I can't seem to find this anywhere)? Here: https://www.havelockinvestments.com/aboutus.phpTL;DR: Havelock Investments is a Canadian co., allegedly sold to The Panama Fund--a Panamanian shelf co. The Panama Fund is registered as a private investment co--different animal from a securities exchange. >What happens to investors if Havelock Investments is shutdown? Havelock Investments has been operating deep in the red, according to the financial statements released to investors. Havelock's own stock preformance [ticker:HIF] is representative of all the other securities listed on Havelock. Here:  TL;DR: If Havelock goes down, your only legal recourse is reporting it to Panamanian Securities Commission, i.e. "lol, none." |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
