Attention all Telegram campaign participants whose entries were marked as valid! You will be receiving a message on Telegram from either @VividPlatform or me (@GrumpyKitty) in order to swap your ERC20 address for a Vivid address. The deadline will be 2 weeks from the time that your message gets sent. If you fail to provide a valid Vivid address within that time period, then your coins will be forfeit and your entry nullified.
You can also DM me any time to swap your address (even before you get our message).
|
|
|
1) Make the code open source. 2) Host it somewhere.
Am I wrong or are you asking him to give it away for free? I see that preventing fraud may be beneficial for everyone involved, but you don't run those bounty campaigns for free, am I right? Nobody in their right mind is going to pay for this, especially not bounty managers and most especially not given that the majority of "BMs" run next-to-zero checks on their participants.
The real use of this isn't for a BMs, but rather for the people who are hunting down alt account abusers and tagging them.
|
|
|
Before i explain how to use it, code and details i would like to know if anybody would actually use it.
Yes. Now please: 1) Make the code open source. 2) Host it somewhere.
|
|
|
You must be fuckin retarded to call him the worst manager. Your attitude towards the reputable members on the forum and doubting their campaign management skills disgusts me.
Reminds me of this: Any offshore tech support guy can manage a campaign..
You really need to stop showing your exaggerated bias and spreading absurdly false information like that. Sometimes it seems that the super-majority consists of self-entitled Neanderthals.
|
|
|
Lightlord got negative ratings not long ago for not paying both campaigns, he refilled the escrow wallets, now lutpin is the one not paying, logic follows that he should get a negative rating as well until he pays.
There is no logic that can follow out of subjective tags from disgruntled semi-spammers. Those that tagged him can tag Lutpin if they want to. They don't have to, and doing so won't help them either. ''He can justifiably take his time, and your envy won't change any of that.'' Define Justifiably, specific number of days. Keep in mind this is 12+ weeks. And he could have paid since September 17th.
Are you blaming Lutpin, i.e. adding to his time, the time during which the funds were not deposited in escrow? "Logic follows" indeed. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
The solution seems simple, and is up solely to the employer. Find someone else, transfer funds to him and let them handle it. Although reading into the thread, there seem to have been issues with the other campaign as well.
|
|
|
Considering people gave lightlord negative trust, I don't see how this was unnecessary, your posts on the other hand are pretty useless.
Maybe you need to quit with your self-entitled bullshit? This thread is a bad joke at best. I wonder why he even kept you on board; maybe he indeed wasn't doing his job properly. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) edit: Also he is holding 1 BTC.
He can justifiably take his time, and your envy won't change any of that. Then you should tell him to replace the manager with someone who will run the campaign smoothly.
Read before sig. spamming.
|
|
|
He doesn't agree with it: ''There was 0.24 BTC in the address, easily several payments could have been made after that date enough to catch up to being only a few weeks late, so it wouldn't have resulted in a 10-week unpaid duration, and generally, I fill up the address when it reaches close to 0 after Luptin sends a reminder that the address has run out of coins. However, I should of checked on the campaign and Make sure Luptin was running the campaigns smoothly, and the payments every so often. It went smoothly for a long duration, so I didn't check on it as much lately. However I should of checked on it at least once in a while the signature campaigns, so I do agree it's partially my fault here. But I was expecting Luptin to resolve this as soon as possible and hasn't as of yet'' -snip-
Then you should tell him to replace the manager with someone who will run the campaign smoothly. This was unnecessary. /thread
|
|
|
One of the worst managers out there and he has 120+ trust.
This has to be a joke of some sort? Self-entitled sig. spammers are at it again. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) The guy has been afk for 12 weeks on both threads. Is that a joke to you? I know he always paid but having 2 weeks delays for like a year now is not very good, wouldn't you say? If his employer, lightlord, is fine with this then this isn't a question of "good or bad". If he agrees with it, then it is perfectly acceptable.
|
|
|
One of the worst managers out there and he has 120+ trust.
This has to be a joke of some sort? Self-entitled sig. spammers are at it again. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
The red tagging was for settling old scores. If everyone who bumps ANN thread is given a red trust, then half the members here will be having them. Red trust should be limited to those who indulge in fraud and cheating. What happened with me was abuse of the trust system.
Quoted for reference. You are now a confirmed liar; deleting posts doesn't remedy anything.
|
|
|
Any offshore tech support guy can manage a campaign..
You really need to stop showing your exaggerated bias and spreading absurdly false information like that. You there have a great analysis if i were not out of merit then you would had that from me.
Completely unnecessary; worth demeriting actually. The fact that e.g. I tagged some (or many) fake ICOs or PayPal scammers doesn't mean I'm obligated to tag them all.
But sir, why you tag me and not [insertRandomUser]? Must be this so called "nepotism". ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
To make matters worse, the whole deal behind that campaign is generating fake reviews: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F223kKKP.png&t=663&c=NnOFK-i13bqvrQ)
|
|
|
You are indeed right, even though you should even avoid doing that. I apologize for the delay of the removal. I doubt that it is going to be removed because the user who gave you the feedback was Lauda ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) but as a very veteran member of the forum who should knows about the forum rules before joining on bounties.So I think you have to live this life with that red trust forever. ![Lips sealed](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/lipsrsealed.gif) 6 years of hard work ignored for just one mistake? Spamming one liners is what you call "hard work"? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
Also - He was asking to borrow 0.3 BTC and repay 0.4 BTC.. That is a whole 33.333% interest! Quite high interest.. That's $650 in interest he is offering to pay.. Ouch..
It is somewhat the mark of a loan scammer to offer such high interest, so people are more greedy to fund the loan for them, put up with more risk for that profit, and the scammer isn't planning on paying back so they don't care what the interest is anyway.. Make the lenders rush to fill it, make them make hasty decisions..
Suspicious..
Stop spewing bullshit conspiracy theories. If mr. Atriz wanted to "scam", he would have done so as he had plenty of opportunities to do so with non-pocket change amounts.
Surprised given this thread.
|
|
|
Tagged. The three enrolled users were also tagged.
Transparency bonus: This project sent an inquiry for my management services some time ago, and whoever ended up managing it stole my thread layout.
|
|
|
Can you provide examples of such behavior?
|
|
|
Already out? That's faster than i expected. Can PSBT can be used from GUI or user must use Debug Window/bitcoin-cli?
There is no GUI support AFAIK. In most cases, a major feature is always released first without GUI support (those that actually need it). P.S. did you forget to make this thread self-moderated?
Prepare for the spambots and trolls like franky. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
Definitely: Yes. If you spot someone, please report them accordingly. Keep in mind that reporting accounts with 0 merit is almost always a waste of time.
|
|
|
|