Perhaps, the custody of property should be in the control of multiple randomized reputable  people distributed across the globe to make this decentralized? I think the keys for accessing the property could be decentralized/distributed in this manner.
 I do not completely understand other part of your post. Just responding to clear the quote above^

I assume that after a match is played, spectators and others, point out bad decisions with their evidences (probably from their cameras) and official cameras. I wonder if this happens? If the evidence is compelling, then a match is replayed and victory reverted.
I think evidence would need to be authentic, and uploaded immediately on a public site as they are gathered. Such site would need to be decentralized I think, so evidences can't be tampered.

Interesting.
Mine is fair except for few short outages I experienced few days ago. I used another isp during the period and it worked fine.  I'm not sure about speed though. I watch videos or listen to audios occasionally and their download speeds are fair.

I guess in this situation what is important is that those who don't do very useful things with the internet reduce the amount of time they spend on the internet doing those things,so that those who do very useful things can spend more time doing them well.

True!
 It actually helps me whenever I have headache or bodypain that is difficult to stop. Most times I take a bottle of cold beer, it just disappears immediately and completely.
Such stubborn body paid comes occasionally... Probably once in few months/weeks, and am hardly addicted to those drinks. I guess drinking it to get high and happy is one of the reasons people get addicted.

I think a combination of PoW and PoS (mixed with rules and reward/punishment) would do.
Staking doesn't necessarily have to be with Coin. Everyone should be able to stake anything valueble to them to be able to participate in consensus and earn merits/reputation based on how well/bad the rules are obeyed or disobeyed....
You stake something, go to work, complete your work, prove your work, and get rewarded with both coin and merits/reputation depending on how well you do your work. If you don't work according to the rule, you get de-merited with the attachment of specific rule broken close to the demerit.
As you earn coin/merit/reputation, you climb up rank with more responsibilities and higher hardware/stake. Rewards earned as you climb up the ladder should buy you better hardware or stake.
This is a more efficient and fair method.

On a level playing field, yes. If developers build truely decentralized applications on Defi and regulators do their job well/legally/morally,  CeFi or centralized finance will cease to exist and true DeFi will flourish. I think this will likely happen in a Just Society with people strongly following Just Law.

In addition to this^, if you recieve donation from someone online, it would be good to go through the person's posts history or internet activities and probably have his/her real identity recorded somewhere  openenly, or privately (if he/she chooses to be anonymous/private) before accepting it. If the donor has questionable/immoral characters or posts, you send back or reject the donation with reasons. If your donor has no post/internet history, you research or ask some questions while his/her donation remains untouched. If the answers aren't satisfactory, you return the fund back.
This ^ should well best on well decentralized network

Well, I wouldn't accept donations from people I don't know not to talk of accepting from people who steal from others. If you steal from the rich to give to the needy, it's still evil/immoral. I think the only one that can be justified is taking back exactly what was stolen from you and denoting to the needy.
By the way, I never really like the idea of donating money to organizations that help people in need, unless they very transparent and use all the donated funds for exactly what they are donated for. Prefer to give directly and physically.

I guess it will be pretty easy to prove if a referee intentionally officiate in certain way in favour or against a team. But it'll be abit hard to prove if two experienced teams agree to play in certain way to achieve a predetermined score/result.

This is part of the problem. Sometimes I wonder if they are taking the risk to entertain their fan or it's for the sake of the money or both. I wouldnt mind if they are taking the risk for the sake of the fans, as long as they follow the safety rules/protocol.

Both look similar but I don't know much about them. Ludo is actually quite popular where I live. It's more like a dice game played on a small square board.



Well, it depends. The question is can people be addicted to good thing? And whether it's a good thing to be addicted to good thing?

Well, the value of fiat currencies are typically measured against prices of goods and services. If prices of goods and services in a particular country rise sharply it's most likely that its fiat currency lost it's value.. possibly due to inflation of the fiat currency or scarcity of goods/services . Stablecoin backed by the fiat currency will be affected if it really follows the price of the currency. 
This won't be the case with deflationary currency like Bitcoin.  As price of Bitcoin increases due to high demand, prices of goods and services become cheap and affordable for people who own bitcoins. This is why good deflationary currencies are better Store of Value than stablecoins.

I would trust it if it's well decentralized, transparent, immutable, censorship resistant, permissionless/trustlessness, privacy-friendly/anonymity-friendly, secure, etc

Full advice on what to look out for before trusting a crypto project:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5281774.msg55370333#msg55370333

In my opinion, the DeFi experiment has given the name (defi) a bad name just like was with ICO. Doesn't mean Defi is bad, just that they haven't figured a way to make it work without compromising on the decentralization. Or they know how to make things work but are scared it will take away too much powers. Maybe we would go for another word if DeFi becomes a dirty word.

I think it should... as long as it has been copyrighted, and people that copied it are making money from it for themselves. Perhaps,  artists who wish to make money from this should used something different and unique  that is clearly not batman nor has been copyrighted.
This^ doesn't mean I support copyrighting things or  making them difficult for others to use right, for the benefit of others and themselves. It's just that some laws are made for sensible reasons (which people end up abusing).

There are people who would copy free things, modify them, make them look like their unique/original work, copyright them and make them hard for others to copy for their own benefit. This is totally immoral.

The World is deteriorating. It's due to sin and lawlessness. We are not meant to live like this. Human greed is destroying the world. Humans live immorally and abuse Earth's resources.
Imagine human cancer cells. They are said to be humans cells breaking good rules and behaving abnormally. The whole body suffers as a result of  the abnormal behavior of the cells. The CREATOR of the body gave the cells rules to follow but they follow the wrong ones and become lawless.
The CREATOR of Heaven and Earth gave humans HIS rules to follow but they choose to follow their own rules. The problems suffer by the world, humans and other creatures is the consequences of us abandoning GOD's Law.

Any bettor with sufficient information and acting on it will have better chances of winning than bettors without sufficient information. This is basically what reduces the risk for the skilled/successful bettor. And it applies in many areas of our life. The most prepare or informed will do better than the unformed/less-prepared.

Interesting.
Is that (the bolded) just an observation or it certainly happens? Will be disappointed if it does happen in major football/soccer leagues.
It's bad to prevent the most prepared/qualified from winning. Unfair "moderation/regulation" of a game could be the main cause of this unless the players agree to let their game end in a particular way they want.
 The latter is still bad because the fans or spectators think the game is real competition. You don't decieve in the name of entertainment unless you always and specifically tell the fans/spectators that it's not real.

Isn't the 8ball pool thesame as a game called snooker? Or is it a virtual version of physical snooker? I guess I know what Ludo means. Sounds like a game that is quite popular where I live. You could find it in lots homes for siblings, parents and their friends.
If they can be quite addictive without betting, I wonder what it will be like if people bet on them. Would be better if the game is informative or improve people who play then, so that even if they become addicted to them they would be getting improved at the same time.

Interested to know why you think so.


Have you tried advertising on Facebook groups? There should be lots free Marketplaces in form of Groups to sell things on the social media. There could be groups specifically for the type of products/services you want to sell. I don't know how the groups work these days though. Been long I advertised things for sale on a Facebook group.