.....
Yeah, riiiight... dream on. Moonlanding was staged in a hollywood studio at remote secret location. No one can land on the moon as it is not a solid object but lesser light created on day 4 of Lord's creation.
....
Meaningless images deleted.
Got any proof for your wild claim?
Listen you spentulus the zombie: -first, posted images are common sense facts, so they are not meaningless. -second, It is well established fact now that the moon landing was staged in a studio at secret remote location. No one can or will ever be, landing on the moon as it is not a solid object, but lesser light in the firmament of heaven. bonus hint: .... +reminder for treasonous badecker .... Nonsense images deleted. So you have no arguments, ... sock puppet.
^^^ What do you think is more reasonable, that the nautical mile used for navigation in conjunction with the sextant, a tool that measures angles between objects using the human eye was created based on:
(A) the angular resolution limit of the human human eye,
or
(B) the radius of a globe in a time when everybody knew the Earth was flat, and it's just pure (((coincidence))) that the radius of the globe matches the 1 minute limit of the eye?
Keep in mind that the globe model breaks down and is falsified when a zoom lens with a limit of less than 1 minute is employed. We haven't even got to question of weather the "rule of 60s" applies to celestial objects yet and your claim that the Moon is a giant sphere 240k miles away (((Copernican model))) is dead in the water.
I notice that you want to keep ducking and dodging numerous of my questions. As for your rambling above, you seem to be asking now about the origin of the "nautical mile." That does not matter, any consistent units of measurement can be used. You seem to think the angular resolution of the human eye is precise, but then people used to believe a red cunt hair was a precise unit of measurement, too. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hair%27s_breadth |
|
|
|
I think everyone in the world knows that this is the case. They can say that they're going to be 'anonymizing' my data ...
Basically they are just lying. |
|
|
|
https://youtu.be/znpwKBR2eDEMy position is: no. The baby is underage and should not be drinking in a bar. At home no one can see nor stop the future mom. The essential question here is not what should or should not the mom or the bar do, but what and when and if the government should get involved in an issue. The simple answer is no, this is not an issue that the government should get into. |
|
|
|
^^^ It's a ratio based on the angular resolution limit of the human eye (1 minute)....
No, it's just chance that is approximately one minute. Frequency of light divided by aperture. Your example is for the case of 2020 vision in full daylight. It's entirely different at night when the aperture opens wider, and for better and worse vision. (((coincidence))) Ridiculous pictoral distraction deleted. Yes. Coincidence that in the range of angular resolutions that occur with the human eye, under various conditions, with various persons, you have found the value of "1" and find it important. |
|
|
|
This has been known for several years. |
|
|
|
I have to admit to being surprised that the Mueller document DID NOT purport crimes and recommend charges or impeachment be brought against Trump. It seems to be a fair piece of work such as would be typical in a DA's office. Is it possible there were half way reasonable liberals on that all Demo team? Avoid mentioning or even saying anything bad about the existing power structure, string up a couple underlings, and move on. |
|
|
|
"two weeks" -- Josh Zerlan, BFL
@BADecker,
This discussion of bouncing a LASER off of the Moon (I purpose it's actually bouncing off the firmament) has me thinking this is the ticket to accurately measuring the distance to the Sun.
I theorize that the Sun is a projection made of plasma, scalar waves (a type of radio wave with a negligible transverse component) are produced in the polar region by a Tesla coil type device (cooled by sea water) and are transmitted to the firmament where they're reflected, and converge on a layer of dense liquid crystal gas to create a plasmoid (the Sun).
I think the distance to this liquid crystal gaseous layer can be measured with a specially tuned MASER that will create an "artificial" plasmoid. It's then simply a matter of measuring the return trip of stimulated photons to get the distance.
I believe the faggots at HAARP have all the equipment needed to perform this experiment.
Since you've claimed that a triangle's legs add up to 180, let's talk about my trip to Asia from the US via the North Pole. It might just be interesting. This is your chance to prove the Earth is flat.
^^^ It's a ratio based on the angular resolution limit of the human eye (1 minute)....
No, it's just chance that is approximately one minute. Frequency of light divided by aperture. Your example is for the case of 2020 vision in full daylight. It's entirely different at night when the aperture opens wider, and for better and worse vision. |
|
|
|
|
Another deleted post, from a flat-earther-of-not-free-speech.
Deleted Post
« Sent to: Spendulus on: Today at 06:39:32 PM »
Reply with quoteReply with quote Remove this messageDelete
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.
You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
Quote
Quote from: TECSHARE on July 25, 2019, 08:26:05 PM
In order for him to have obstructed justice, the original crime would have to have been valid to begin with, which it was not. The FISA warrant was based on manufactured evidence, the investigation was based on the FISA warrant, and the obstruction of justice charges were based on the resulting investigation. This was a fraud from start to finish.
No, you don't get it.
It's not whether he obstructed justice.
It's whether he obstructed.
|
|
|
|
^^^ I only need an approximate value for the distance to the Sun to prove my point. However, since all of you Satan worshipping degenerates keep harping on about accuracy I'll give it some thought, perhaps I can devise a more accurate measure with modern equipment.
You yourself said you could not calculate it, approximation or not, you never provided the calculation and resorted to saying, oh but I proved 1 min = 1 nautical mile, which you didn't btw. So yeah, you are a liar. A = sin(1 degree) = 0.01745241 60 * A = 1.047 (Note exactly 1, but close) It's a geometric ratio. Multiple by 60 to get a minute instead of a degree. Pilots and seamen have long known this "rule of 60s". No big deal. |
|
|
|
Trump's the man. I say no more.
Yes, but. Realize that being a man, he can be tripped up just like other men. We didn't make it. We haven't won in Trump. Trump is only the beginning.  TRUMP is our fulcrum. Tipping the balance away from evil. Tipping the balance toward us, the good people.We don't want the collapse of the whole system. We need a momentum toward a correction. Unstoppable once it goes beyond the point of... UP Like TRUMP  Definitely the guy I want representing the USA to the world. Wonder after Ivanka becomes POTUS if he might stay on as Sec of State... I would rather have Melania as Potus myself. Melania 2024 I believe you can't be a US prez if not born in the USA? Too bad for Melania  Ivanka is 37, so she could run.... |
|
|
|
Trump's the man. I say no more.
Yes, but. Realize that being a man, he can be tripped up just like other men. We didn't make it. We haven't won in Trump. Trump is only the beginning. TRUMP is our fulcrum. Tipping the balance away from evil. Tipping the balance toward us, the good people.We don't want the collapse of the whole system. We need a momentum toward a correction. Unstoppable once it goes beyond the point of... UP Like TRUMP Definitely the guy I want representing the USA to the world. Wonder after Ivanka becomes POTUS if he might stay on as Sec of State... |
|
|
|
,,,since "Certain beams of light, such as laser beams, can get very close to having one frequency", how does a LASER that's as close to monochromatic as physically possible get a distinctive monochromatic signature from this reflector NASA claims to have put on a Moon....
I already posted the link that explained that. If you can't find the link or it doesn't make sense just ask. I'm not going to claim this subject is simple. |
|
|
|
.... a source for your claim that LASER light is not monochromatic...
Please stop talking on subjects you know nothing about. Yeah, some random anonymous internet guy is going to refute your Brittanica. That's the way it is today. A light beam never has exactly one frequency. Even a single bit of light (a photon) never has exactly one frequency. It is fundamentally impossible for a photon to have exactly one frequency. Certain beams of light, such as laser beams, can get very close to having one frequency, but can never have exactly one frequency. https://www.wtamu.edu/~cbaird/sq/2014/05/08/when-does-a-light-beam-have-only-a-single-frequency/ |
|
|
|
Fox News isn't "right wing," and it isn't "propaganda."
Mr. Sayoc at a Trump Rally
Mr. Sayoc began watching Fox News religiously and following Trump
supporters on social media. He became a vocal political participant on Facebook,
something he had not done previously. He was not discerning of the pro-Trump
information he received, and by the time of his arrest, he was “connected” to hundreds
of right-wing Facebook groups. Many of these groups promoted various conspiracy
theories and, more generally, the idea that Trump’s critics were dangerous,
unpatriotic, and evil. See Ex. V (excerpting social media posts that Mr. Sayoc received Ah, more right wing conspiracy; "facts of the case don't matter!' Evidence for your crackpot theories really shouldn't come from lawyers struggling to defend some crazy guy. You need to do better, not that that would cause your ideas to be taken seriously. Fox News isn't "right wing," it's slightly to the right of center. Definitely not propaganda. For you to say that indicates you don't know the meaning of the phrase. |
|
|
|
BUCK: Let me just stop. You made the decision on the Russian interference [conspiracy]. You couldn’t have indicted the president on that. And you made the decision on that. But when it came to obstruction, you threw a bunch of stuff up against the wall to see what would stick, and that is fundamentally unfair.
MUELLER: I would not agree to that characterization at all. What we did is provide to the attorney general in the form of a confidential memorandum our understanding of the case, those cases that were brought, those cases that were declined, that one case where the president cannot be charged with a crime.
BUCK: Okay, but the … could you charge the president with a crime after he left office?
MUELLER: Yes.
BUCK: You believe that he committed … you could charge the president of the United States with obstruction of justice after he left office?
MUELLER: Yes.
I mean, if we would impeach him, we could charge him for obstruction now  |
|
|
|
^^^ You're a retarded liar, all LASER light is monochromatic. That's just how stimulated emission works.
"... In laser action the stimulating emission triggers a chain reaction in which the radiation from one atom stimulates another in succession until all the excited atoms in the system have returned to normalcy. In doing so, coherent monochromatic light (light of a single wavelength) is emitted. ..." -- Encyclopaedia Britannica
LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE!!
Nope. Laser light is close to one wavelength, but is not one wavelength. The central frequency of the emissions is cited as the frequency. |
|
|
|
Fox News isn't "right wing," and it isn't "propaganda." What "say his lawyers" is not factual. |
|
|
|
^^^ You're so full of shit you scientifically illiterate buffoon! All LASER light is monochromatic you fucking liar.
No it isn't. |
|
|
|
.... "...The first successful tests were carried out in 1962 when a team from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology succeeded in observing laser pulses reflected from the Moon's surface using a laser with a millisecond pulse length..." -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Ranging_experimentSpendy, how do you explain this contradiction? They were bouncing lasers off the Moon almost a decade before the first Moon landing hoax. It's not a contradiction. The retro reflector is highly monochromatic and has a distinctive signature on the photon returns. It is perhaps a thousand times more sensitive than bouncing off the surface. "The surface" varies greatly in it's distance from Earth, because of lunar hills and valleys. The reflector allows accurate distance measurement down to about 1.5 inches. |
|
|
|
...
This is why leftists can't be trusted in positions of power. Any time there is a problem, something wrong, or something that goes against their narrative they use censorship to make sure it is not discussed while they work on manufacturing a new distraction to draw attention away from their logical failures.
Although the case at hand involves ideological leftists, the problem extents to various other statists, fascists, communists and further. By the way it's not exactly a logical failure, but a refusal to use the tools of logic. That's inescapable when you were told what to think and just repeat and believe it. It's a belief system. Others tell the leftist what he should think and feel, what he should hate and be outraged at, and he is trained to feel hate and outrage. As a good puppet. It's a rare person that can scale from the bottom to the top and back down of a belief system with logic, and think nothing of it. The splashy pictures are just yet another attempt to obfuscate the logic and lack of. To make the arguments more substantive and understandable, those should just be deleted. I believe that we will see the best and the worst in these leftists, as they react to the debacle of the Mueller report, the Mueller hearing, the Kavanaugh circus, and their other total wastes of time of the people of the USA. The best, in some few, and the worst, in many of them. The worst includes silence and following the leader, as well as the arrogant attitude displayed by some. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
