Nuova versione
# Release 2.5.3 (bugfixes) * installwizard: do not allow direct copy-paste of the seed * installwizard: fix bug #1531 (starting offline)
|
|
|
Beh mi pare ovvio, questa sarebbe in lingua italiana
|
|
|
La chat di gambling non va già bene?
|
|
|
L'acquisto di Bitcoin, attraverso il loro servizio, infatti non è una buona idea. Proverei a valutare i costi senza considerare la parte acquisto, che si può fare in altro modo.
|
|
|
Sia ref che faucet sono vietati da regolamento, quindi sarei ben incline alla cancellazione.
|
|
|
Mah, forse facendo richiesta, o forse no.
Che problema ci sarebbe a lasciarlo li, inutilizzato e vuoto?
|
|
|
Blockstream is a private company lol (and Bitcoin Core is now their project), BIP101 isn't (and XT is just an implementation, you can even use Bitcoin Core + BIP101 if you prefer)
|
|
|
I was referring to the centralisation as a harmful situation for the network, the thing that everyone is afraid of. The next time I will not write "centralization", but I'll write "centralization-AND-where-miners-do-bad-things"
|
|
|
It was the day of the two pizzas (and as I remember I was already lurking the forum from two weeks likely)
|
|
|
@Lauda While you suggest me (or others) to watch videos, you should at least watch the one where we were talking about
|
|
|
A fraudulent attack from the "miners" against Bitcoin will be only possible if there will be a competitors of egual value or more. The attacking miners will be a part of the competing one.
This is the only situation where it is possible, because it wont be anymore the major network, and so users will just move to the working one during and after the attack. (as it has already happened with some altcoin attacked)
|
|
|
L'unica cosa che si è venuta a sapere in più (o meglio, una quasi certezza, visto che in questo forum ce lo si potrebbe aspettare) dall'aver disassemblato CAT, è che gbianchi aveva un account su uno o più degli exchange supportati da CAT. Praticamente c'era la possibilità di considerare che gbianchi avesse comprato il programma, ma poi non ne avesse fatto alcun uso. Essendoci delle chiamate alle API (pubbliche), si è praticamente certi che gbianchi avesse un account su questi/alcuni exchange, pur continuano a non sapere se ne faceva uso. Anche questa però non è una certezza, visto che l'API trovata su CAT non è comprovato che sia di gbianchi, c'è solo scritto Stiamo comunque sempre parlando di un software disassemblato.
|
|
|
Finally, changing the POW would involve rebooting the security of the network down to 0 which has ENORMOUS implications that could certainly be mitigated but definitely isn't some no brainer as Greg makes it appear in the video. It's increasingly evident you're not suited intellectually for this type of debate and I suggest you leave it to more competent people Well, while I think that Greg is easily in a situation of conflict of interests, I weight more his opinion (and Gavin) than yours Now after what you wrote, I'm not sure if you are just a alt-coin holder or more a gov. agent (or just an idiot)
|
|
|
Yes i was watching the video, the thing is the community is very number dependant as we have seen with XT falling out of favor with only 1% nodes making less want it, the exchanges aren't going to transfer over if only 10% of nodes are switching because the mining company has smudged the numbers to make it look like nodes are with them and the current version of the coin.
This is another problem, I was just poiting out that the centralizing of mining can't exist, because they have no power to achieve it.
|
|
|
Did you see the video?
How can they "fix it" if the nodes change the POW and so even the nodes of the exchanges?
|
|
|
Are you afraid of centralisazion of mining? They can't https://youtu.be/0iQSRGT3nfE?t=3285As I've already said, nodes have all the power, if miners are going to do something bad, well, then they'll be cut out of the network and lose everything (their prize and investment)
|
|
|
No, non ho accesso agli IP.
|
|
|
brg444 has probably his pockets full of alt-coins
|
|
|
|