Genau genommen gehört BTC hier auch dazu, nicht zu vergessen die 1 Million Premine coins welche dann bald mal scharf geschaltet werden  Satohis Coins könnten oberflächlich betrachtet drunterfallen, da er sowohl "inventor" als auch der "issuer" der ersten Blöcke war.  Aber sonst war es natürlich kein Premine, denn soviel ich weiß hat Satoshi seine Absicht schon 2008 kundgetan, Bitcoin zu starten. Und zumindest Hal Finney war ja wohl schon vom ersten Tag an dabei, ist also auch kein "Instamine". Er ist also eigentlich eben doch kein "issuer", da theoretisch ja auch andere mitminen konnten, also nur ein Miner unter anderen auch - nur war das Konzept halt noch zu unbekannt. Offen bleibt aber für ICOs vielleicht immer noch der durch Steem bekannte Stealth-Mining-Ansatz: Einfach irgend einen Allerwelts-ANN eines unauffälligen Bitcoin-Klons ins Altcoinforum setzen, und dann klammheimlich 90% der Coins minen, und sobald man die Kontrolle über die Mehrheit der Coins hat, einen Hardfork zur "richtigen" zentralisierten Software durchsetzen ... Das ist jetzt Ansichtssache der Politik und immer dann wenn die Politik die Ansicht hat, liegt die Betrachtung der Dinge meistens komplett daneben, aber wir werden sehen   |
|
|
|
Bitte einfach eine Seite zurückblättern, dort wurde der Bericht diskutiert. tl:dr; Manager-Magazin hat zur Reuters-Meldung wohl aus Clickbait-Gründen einfach "Bitcoin" dazugekrakelt, eigentlich geht es aber um Libra und Ähnliches. Im Dokument, das 600watt verlinkte, wird stark differenziert: - "Globale Stablecoins" (Libra ...) sollen erst erlaubt werden, wenn eine globale Regulierung existiert, da große Risiken für die Finanzstabilität gesehen werden. - "Coins, die zur Geldwäsche verwendet werden" - hier wird auch Bitcoin erwähnt. Es wird aber nirgends ein Verbot verlangt, sondern es soll "studiert" werden, ob man AML-Bestimmungen nicht nur auf Crypto-to-fiat-Exchanges anwenden sollte, sondern auch auf andere Krypto-Unternehmen wie (gewerbliche) Crypto-to-Crypto Exchanges, Krypto-Finanzdienstleister, P2P-Plattformen mit Escrow, und eventuell ICOs. Klargestellt wird, das "non-custodian wallets", "crypto inventors"* und "miners" keiner Regulierung bedürfen. - dazu kommt noch ein Abschnitt über Banken, die Kryptos halten - dort soll die Regel gelten, dass diese wie Hochrisiko-Assets behandelt werden und von den "eigenen Mitteln" abgezogen werden (ganz habe ich das nicht verstanden, Finanzexperten her ...). *hier gibt es einen Satz, der vielen Shitcoin-Erstellern nicht schmecken dürfte: "unless of course the coin inventor would also be the coin issuer". Das heißt, Premine-Coins - wie wir wissen, zählt dazu auch Ethereum - könnten wie ICOs behandelt werden und eventuell einer AML-Regulierung bedürfen. (Wobei es wahrscheinlich kaum nachträglich gefordert werden würde, aber ein "neues Ethereum" wäre dann schwieriger zu realisieren.) Genau genommen gehört BTC hier auch dazu, nicht zu vergessen die 1 Million Premine coins welche dann bald mal scharf geschaltet werden |
|
|
|
Thank's I had issues getting a transaction in the mem pool and verified on 0.16.0.3. After 45min i flushed the tx_pool, tried the same on 0.16.0.1, same issue so switched back to 0.16.0.0 and everything run smoothly in a few minutes. What i want to express is the fact, that if you make small tweaks in the main version (0.16.x) and this is not broadly used, you can not use the upgraded version as soon as you have the next upgrade to 0.17.x, st least that is my feeling after the weekend. |
|
|
|
I bought 2000 XMR at $130, I'll be holding it for the long term. I will re-evaluate 3 years from now and report back to this thread. I'll keep buying the dips and hold at $70, $40, $10, $1, $0.5 if it ever reaches those levels. Just bought another 300 XMR at $102.
I do believe XMR will reach a minimum of $2,300/XMR and possibly even $13,000/XMR if not more 36 months from now.
Unlike other coins, it is the only coin that has practical use and is used widely today, it is #2 in my eyes after BTC (#1).
All other coins are pure speculation at this point in time.
Three years have passed since I made this post. I had sold 50 BTC and bought 2000 XMR at that time and said I will report back in 3 years. The current price of XMR is $88.85. I took a huge loss, I haven't sold yet but it is a floating loss. If I had kept my BTC and not bought XMR at that time with it, I wouldn't have been -$386,084 today. I still have high hopes for XMR, will report back to this thread 1 year from today. It's annoying, sorry about the bad trade - I think we will see Monero ATH in USD terms at some point, BTC maybe not as likely, but getting back to 0.02 or so seems possible. @Q4 2020 late of November is the uprise, so don't worry, just hold another year and you will be VERY happy with your monerujo |
|
|
|
snip
It is post about a bunch of coins that died 3 years before you registered. There are few people that would ever remember that post.
Who are you?
just-mike
look for elrippo Thanks Offtopic: Even after three years i still do not have any conversation with bitcointalk.org of restoring my initial account that got hacked in 2017.... waiting until after the new forum is announced... New forum  The billion dollar forum software that I assume is still under development Aaahhh ok, the Winklevoss premium forum |
|
|
|
snip
It is post about a bunch of coins that died 3 years before you registered. There are few people that would ever remember that post.
Who are you?
just-mike
look for elrippo Thanks Offtopic: Even after three years i still do not have any conversation with bitcointalk.org of restoring my initial account that got hacked in 2017.... waiting until after the new forum is announced... New forum |
|
|
|
never used to be. Didn't they shill dash once upon a time? I recall them posting positive stuff about bytecoin and its clones which was complete crap. The coins were all from the same group. Yeah, some trash or other. I never went back. Do you mean cointelegraph? I do not know many legit sites in the crypto world, hence everybody has a subjective view on things, so ... I don't want to come off as a crazy old man but... Coin Telegraph was started shortly after ByteCoin was "discovered". Apparently, ByteCoin had been around for years but was just found. It claimed to only work on CPUs, not GPUs or custom stuff. It was a scam. CT were proponents of ByteCoin and ran positive stories. Someone associated with them bought my CPU hash website (see above) and quickly added CT advertising which is still there. Why is that old, outdated site still alive? Read this old post regarding ByteCoin and the related coins. There may be a few small errors but is generally correct. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.0just-mike I know that thread quite well, but thanks again for sharing As i said, there are a ton of sites out there and the "coincidents" are readable but not prooven, so i think we should skip bytecoin as it has evolved to monero. As i recall an interview with fluffy he said "The DEV of bytecoin was brilliant but an asshole!" I think it is time to move on and leave bytecoin with the other copies of monero behind, hence those are nowhere near monero, so that is enough proof for me  You "know that thread quite well"? Why? It is post about a bunch of coins that died 3 years before you registered. There are few people that would ever remember that post. Who are you? just-mike look for elrippo Thanks Offtopic: Even after three years i still do not have any conversation with bitcointalk.org of restoring my initial account that got hacked in 2017.... |
|
|
|
never used to be. Didn't they shill dash once upon a time? I recall them posting positive stuff about bytecoin and its clones which was complete crap. The coins were all from the same group. Yeah, some trash or other. I never went back. Do you mean cointelegraph? I do not know many legit sites in the crypto world, hence everybody has a subjective view on things, so ... I don't want to come off as a crazy old man but... Coin Telegraph was started shortly after ByteCoin was "discovered". Apparently, ByteCoin had been around for years but was just found. It claimed to only work on CPUs, not GPUs or custom stuff. It was a scam. CT were proponents of ByteCoin and ran positive stories. Someone associated with them bought my CPU hash website (see above) and quickly added CT advertising which is still there. Why is that old, outdated site still alive? Read this old post regarding ByteCoin and the related coins. There may be a few small errors but is generally correct. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.0just-mike I know that thread quite well, but thanks again for sharing As i said, there are a ton of sites out there and the "coincidents" are readable but not prooven, so i think we should skip bytecoin as it has evolved to monero. As i recall an interview with fluffy he said "The DEV of bytecoin was brilliant but an asshole!" I think it is time to move on and leave bytecoin with the other copies of monero behind, hence those are nowhere near monero, so that is enough proof for me |
|
|
|
---quote--- “We assume that CipherTrace has developed a novel method to trace Monero transactions, but I am not quite sure of what they can do, so it’s hard to interpret the legitimacy of their claims. Saying you have a method to look at Monero transactions doesn’t mean this is now as transparent as Bitcoin transactions.” “Not wanting your spouse to find out you bought jewelry for your anniversary is very different from keeping the government from tracking your illegal drug empire. Most people are simply looking for ‘good enough’ privacy, and I don’t think professional tracing capabilities affect most people in any meaningful way.” ---unquote--- In my opinion early transactions and sweep transactions, probably exchange info can be shared but that's it |
|
|
|
never used to be. Didn't they shill dash once upon a time? I recall them posting positive stuff about bytecoin and its clones which was complete crap. The coins were all from the same group. Yeah, some trash or other. I never went back. Do you mean cointelegraph? I do not know many legit sites in the crypto world, hence everybody has a subjective view on things, so ... |
|
|
|
48 hours above .008
Does it hold?
Let's have a cup of tea and see |
|
|
|
Get ready for all the phone calls from distant family members.
Definetly |
|
|
|
Ich will ja nix sagen. Aber irgendwie sehen diese Zeichnungen schon merkwürdig aus. Könnten glatt Hänge****** darstellen. Von mir aus kann die Linie aber langsam schräge nach oben gehen. Und das am besten bis 2022 Das steht wohl jemand auf Hänge******* Yihu, die lang ersehnten 12k haben wir geschafft. Denke das die 12,5k noch schwer werden und dann to da moon PS: Bin mal gespannt, wann mezzomix mit seinem U-Boot wieder auftaucht. Freue mich schon darauf Wenn Mezzo wieder auftaucht, dann gibt's unter Garantie eine neue Wette |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
