Most schools no longer accept Wikipedia as a valid source for citation in universities.
Armstrong's logic is utter nonsense. First it is obvious that Wikipedia cannot be quoted in research because it is dynamic. How could you possibly quote something in research that is subject to change? But people do not read Wikipedia because they want to quote it. They want to learn something quickly, get some ideas and links to further information and then, perhaps quote the information Wikipedia links to. So he is trying to discredit Wikipedia with something that Wikipedia is not even trying to be. He hates Wikipedia simply because he cannot control it. He can control his own site because nobody is allowed to write a comment on it. And he can get the Forecaster Movie made for him where he controls the narrative. The Wikipedia article exposes the Forecaster movie for what it is simply by quoting free press articles. Then he creates that conspiracy theory that the deep state is after him controlling Wikipedia. This is a joke. Wikipedia is controlled by rules not by individuals. Nobody in the deep state cares about Martin Armstrong. The idea that someone with an agenda would infiltrate Wikipedia for the purpose of harming that Martin Armstrong moron is ridiculous. Imagine the risk such an agent would take for a zero benefit. Doing this and being exposed would raise Armstrong's profile so much in the alt-conspiracy world that this would thoroughly defeat that hypothetical purpose. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
@AnonymousCoder, Armstrong asks if you could please stop decorating his name into a wikipedia link:
Wikipedia is a professional propaganda organization that allows fakes news and outright illegal propaganda to dominate the internet.
Most schools no longer accept Wikipedia as a valid source for citation in universities.
The only areas where Wikipedia may be accurate are where the topics have nothing to do with a political agenda.
Where there are any controversial political topics, current events, conspiracy theories,
and biographies of people who are anti-government, then the fake news and outright propaganda dominate the sensitive pages.
Thanks Traxo. I feel flattered. Gives me an opportunity to comment on it. In this case, I think that the Wikipedia is closer to the truth than it is not. That is why I am quoting it. There are certain guidelines in Wikipedia in a sense that when the article is about a person which applies here, then nothing can be written in that article that does not quote another major source like an article in a news magazine. And that article must not be on a hate site or a site that is blacklisted such as bitcointalk.org. If you look at the edit history of the Martin Armstrong article, then you find that perfectly valid facts, simply facts of failed forecasts, were rejected because the forecasts were reported on the Armstrong site BUT the FAILURE was not reported by an accepted source while the evidence is available everywhere. That is very convincing. So what Armstrong is doing, he is effectively attacking the mainstream media through Wikipedia by extension only. No surprise here because he has an axe to grind with the justice system. The fact that he hits Wikipedia very hard in the process will not give him any points because most people like Wikipedia. Again, this discredits Martin Armstrong. Whatever this guy is doing in that direction, it is bound to backfire. He has tried it in this forum, and we collectively defeated him every time so he is not posting here any more. Which is ok. Let him post his rubbish on his own site, that is ok. I am in no way simply pro-establishment, and I can in fact agree with some of Martin Armstrong's points which are well-known otherwise. But he mixes things up and uses cherry-picking to hide is own agenda. He is very much like the pot calling the kettle black. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
How to copy Socrates Private Blog Text
What about just using print screen?  But it's strange that gold will be going down as well in that kind of situation.
Illiquidity causes deflation in everything; see gold in 2008. Not advisable, some of the haters here would love to report you and Armstrong probably has a team of lawyers to deal with copyright infringements, just a thought. Really enjoy the constructive contributions, Armstrong has made some very good calls over the years, but only a fool believes all things, he is the most accurate by far, but not infallible. Only Gods word is that.  Martin Armstrong is probably the worst person of all times when it comes to practicing copyright infringement. His associates are best advised not to act on such infringements. Let sleeping dogs lie! Apart from that, how do you want to build a history of reports for back testing if you don't copy them, in clear text of course. Don't worry. This site is full of copies, and as far as I know, nothing has ever happened. And the guy is broke. No way he can afford to go down this rabbit hole. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
..
But I can see the markets going into a big top in the coming weeks. Looks like the markets are getting pumped into year-end.
But the macro numbers are definitely not improving. At some point something has to break. So Armstrong might have a good point.
I have been profiting from this in the last few weeks, and still keep my positions on now. I will probably start selling early January and/or use options to play a possible downturn.
But it's strange that gold will be going down as well in that kind of situation.
Sure the markets are getting pumped higher. By WHAT that is the question. Are we getting a sharp decline / correction after that? I am not convinced we will as Martin Armstrong "predicts" just because it has been moving higher. What we need for a sharp decline is something like last time when Hillary called for the end of civility. That is what it was. Not because the market was overbought. It wasn't even a correction because the price bounced back sharply after that. Martin Armstrong doesn't have a point. He did not even make that point as we can see here. It is your interpretation. Think about it. He is a con artist and he plays games with your mind. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
How to copy Socrates Private Blog TextSocrates is designed to prevent copying the report contents to the clipboard. Obviously, this is not helpful in case you want to build a track record. You need to copy the text to archive it. There are two ways to do it: 1) Save the entire page 2) View the source code of the page in your browser, copy the text part and remove the HTML tags and save the raw content as text file. I prefer this option because a text file or text snippet is easier to manage. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.
|
|
|
|
So we are lead to believe that Martin Armstrong has institutional clients. There is no evidence of that. Given Martin Armstrong's track record which is extremely negative, no institution would even consider his services. There is no reference to any clients on his corporate web page AE Global Solutions, Inc. which has at this time an expired security certificate. Apart from that, he simply does not have enough resources to serve institutional clients. Not enough resources to even to get Socrates out of the bug stage after years as evidenced by the banner on it: Thank you for visiting Ask-Socrates.com. We are in the process of updating our site, migrating data, and transitioning to a new infrastructure.
You may experience delays and discrepancies during this time. We appreciate your patience and understanding.At best, the Institutional Clients myth and the USD5,500 Bond Bubble Report which nobody is ever going to buy, is a ploy, a facade. Perhaps so as to make his potential Socrates clients feel good that they save themselves a lot of money when they buy the Socrates trash which for years nobody in this blog has been able to prove to be effective. People have asked me what's wrong with his guy, why does he have to lie about everything? A long time ago I didn't quite see it that way but the more I look, the more I find that it is his way of life. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
Armstrong is a scammer. I recently reviewed one of his articles where he claims that his cycles can predict earthquakes. His claims in that article are demonstrably wrong. It is so wrong and misleading that he looses all credibility, and I would have no confidence in his economic predictions. Please find it on reddit or follow the link below: https://www.reddit.com/r/aec/comments/e8jvja/review_of_climate_change_earthquakes_caused_by/I urge you to demand evidence, and be skeptical. Thank you. Your conclusion that he is running a scam is absolutely correct. He applies his so-called "model" which is no more than a primitive curve fitting machinery to whatever he can lay his hands on and then claims his computer has already predicted what scientists spent their lives on exploring. Climate, earthquakes, sports betting, election outcomes, economics, stock markets, currencies, commodities, everything. His Socrates software has been written to provide the ambiguity that allows interpretation in hindsight in such a way that the "model" is always right. He creates with his forecasts doom and gloom scenarios which he offers his clients to survive or profit from when they buy his services, reports and seminars. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
...
For the record
The most recent call by Armstrong on his private blog is if we exceed the November high this month we can rally into the ECM(18 January) price target on the Dow is 30 000. IF we see a high in January in line with the ECM, Armstrong calls for a drop going into the 1st quarter 2021.
...
That's bullshit like everything else. If we see a high in January then we see a drop into the first quarter. Of course. There MUST be a drop after the high otherwise it would not be a high! So how do we know about the January high? Only ever possible in hindsight after the price has dropped into the first quarter! That is the definition of a high - that the price is lower before and lower after it - do I need to say that? But not only that, before, he says "we can rally". Notice CAN. He truly must think we are all idiots (and pay the Socrates subscription to read this junk). This is how many Armstrong "Predictions" work. We need only this one example to show it. See for yourself and check everything else. If, after so much debunking here in this forum, you still can't see that Socrates is a scam, then you deserve to pay 10 of the most expensive Socrates subscriptions for the rest of your life. So what is the tactic here? He decorates this statement with so much other irrelevant fluff that the superficial reader gets distracted and cannot see the nonsense in the statement. It is pure nonsense. This is Martin Armstrong in person, no doubt, the charlatan-in-chief. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
The way to use the model is the merger of Reversals and TIME(array)
Can you elaborate this? How to "merge"? Thanks! Before he replies, this has been answered before in so many threads that I can summarize past responses easily as follows (sorry): If the reversal was good in hindsight: Without turning point, no worries. With turning point in the array we say the turning point was a cycle inversion. If the reversal was bad in hindsight: With turning point, we say the turning point negated the reversal so it was your fault if you traded it. With no turning point, we look into arrays of the next lower and next higher time frames and we will sure find a matching turning point so again that turning point negated the reversal so it was your fault if you traded it. If all of the above is not true than we will sure find a nearby major reversal in the current or higher time frame that was just not elected, so we say that all 4 reversals need to be elected for a change in trend so again it was your fault that you did not consider this. If all of the above does not hold then we will surely find an elected reversal on a lower time frame so we should have traded that and should have exited the failed reversal trade at the same time, generating a net profit. If all of the above is still not sufficient to explain the failure of the reversal, we employ the rule that a reversal trade duration is between one and 3 time units and you traded the wrong number of time units. If again all that failed to explain the failure, then perhaps you did not exit the reversal when the price level of the next reversal was reached (which could happen within a fraction of a time unit not just between 1 and 3). This view is numerically backed up by the fact that on average, the number of turning points in an array is usually quite high relative to the number of columns in it, so if you use multiple time frames then you are likely to find a turning point in any given situation. To sum it up: This designed ambiguity makes it extremely easy for Armstrong to follow the above script and always claim that the system is right even when the reversals fail, which they do in 50% of all cases. It should be fairly obvious that these complex decisions cannot be made in advance because the future price movement is not known ahead of time. If we wanted to execute the complex rules without knowing the price ahead of time, then we are faced with a dilemma: The rules contradict each other, and there is no mother of all rules that would tell us which of the contradicting rules applies in any given situation. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
Collins Dictionary meanings
Gumbie
So true
 |
|
|
|
Now Gumbi writes that it is worthless to spend thousands of dollars on a Martin Armstrong WEC seminar / conference because what Martin Armstrong says there is meaningless. Even while he says he does not know about this EURCHF trade. Who wants to even consider these people who try to promote themselves with such nonsense? How much worse can it get? More. He says that Martin Armstrong is innocent because "the federal conviction rate exceeds 98%". Meaningless nonsense. This has already been discussed here
- no point repeating. As previously said, Gumbi's posts get replied to in a way that will remind him of the context in which we showed him that he is a charlatan. The context is the ambiguity that he uses to defend his ever changing position, claiming he is always right and we are wrong. He does this by picking any one of the many conflicting signals that suits his agenda. Let him be reminded again that we have a model case where this behavior is documented in much detail. It actually saves time and effort to repeat this as opposed to wasting the time trying to argue this same type of thing without end. Whatever smokescreen Gumbi and cohorts are coming up with now, they get this reply. I know Gumbi just wants this message to go away but I am not going to do him the favor. I am just not taking his baits for more nonsense any more. The pattern is the same again and again: Pick one of the ambiguous conflicting Socrates signals in hindsight to argue the case. For us, there is no need to formulate a custom response to that. We use this model case as a standard response reply to show what these charlatans are doing. I have an obligation to spread the message for the honest people, and as painful as it is for me, I am going to persevere until the Armstrong promoters shut up. So they are warned. The honest people have all the facts on their side. AnonymousCoder"Quarterly reversal time unit is one quarter. Gold rallied before the quarter was over and no other signal in the opposite direction was available to indicate change of direction.The time span is 1 to 3 units in time so the quarterly bearish reversal had 1 to 3 quarters before time was up. Armstrong wrote on his private blog on the first of March our quarterly level of the model generated a bullish reversal at the end of the year reversing its short position and going long. This also signaled that gold would rally from the $1060 area and should test the next bullish reversal at the $1347 level." Not sure if you are aware or not but you are losing this discussion.  Here we go. You are providing the proof of my assertion yourself!
Hindsight, Fraud. This hindsight message is fraudulent misrepresentation of performance, pure fraud!
Now here you are saying, and I know you are speaking for Martin Armstrong, that
He had this information, this bullish signal, the fact that his model went long - at the end of the year - but at the same time failed to tell his clients?
In fact he sent the opposite signal to his clients at the time!
If he knew this at the time when he claimed the system went long, and let's assume for the sake of argument that what you say is true then he could have been trading against his clients because he published this signal only three months later.
You are not worth the respect of a single honest being on earth! You are a fraud!
And yes, I have all the reports. How could I otherwise quote them? I have everything!
More importantly, all other people who lost, they have everything as well.
Here is a detailed time line of the events: Quarterly Superposition Event in Gold 2015Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
Well Gumbi I would like your comments on the video Mr A posted a while back on EURCHF. It missed a 2000 pip 1 month move and is currently miles away from Armstrongs forecast some 5 years later.....surely socrates couldn't be so wrong? Or it could have been a suppository event like the gold short....they are quite painful sometimes.....  BTW that was Martin Armstrong answers questions about the Swiss PEG at the 2014 WECMartin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
I wonder what is Gumbi's motivation for defending Martin Armstrong and writing one nonsense post after another. He is presumably so knowledgeable about Fake Socrates but cannot show how to make a successful trade.
Me thinks that this forum is costing a lot of subscriptions to Martin Armstrong and MA knows this and is sweating.
I will not be surprised if Gumbi is Martin Armstrong's hired aid or even The Charlatan Forecaster himself. LOL ... how awesome is that!
Gumbi has admitted here in this forum that he is part of the Armstrong team: ...
But I think in the end you are doing Armstrong a great service regardless because he has more than enough followers and subscribers to his service and probably would not be able to handle the influx of new people so on behalf of Armstrong and his team we thank you.
In his latest posts, he does not try to hide this fact any more. The most obvious proof that he is actually part of the clan is that very much like Martin Armstrong himself, he argues based on the ambiguity of the system. You need years of experience and practice with this, to be a good charlatan. Unfortunately for him, this is the place where all this is being debunked. Some days I have engaged him here non-stop full time, so he is wasting a lot of his time posting at bitcointalk. He complains that I am taking over this forum, but when we count his posts ... Apart from that, he would be better off not posting here any more. Every time he posts, he either talks nonsense or blames other people. This is not good promotion. Without him, this forum would be very quiet because most subjects have already been covered. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
AnonymousCoder
Armstrong wrote on his private blog on the first of March our quarterly level of the model generated a bullish reversal at the end of the year reversing its short position and going long. This also signaled that gold would rally from the $1060 area and should test the next bullish reversal at the $1347 level."
Key word is "signaled" it did not confirm the move, It could only be confirmed by electing weekly reversals/ which were given on January the 29th
Again, same behavior. You picking a phrase and try to use it to invalidate everything else. You are ignoring that everybody dealing with this subject knows how to read English, and Armstrong's well-documented statements do not need your special hindsight filtering and interpretation to be digested. You and Armstrong say the model reversed its position at the end of the year, and that fact is used to promote the Socrates service as being always correct. However, that fact is the one the clients should have had but it was not available to them at the time. We can't have it both ways. Everything is documented and quoted. As previously said, Gumbi's posts get replied to in a way that will remind him of the context in which we showed him that he is a charlatan. The context is the ambiguity that he uses to defend his ever changing position, claiming he is always right and we are wrong. He does this by picking any one of the many conflicting signals that suits his agenda. Let him be reminded again that we have a model case where this behavior is documented in much detail. It actually saves time and effort to repeat this as opposed to wasting the time trying to argue this same type of thing without end. Whatever smokescreen Gumbi and cohorts are coming up with now, they get this reply. I know Gumbi just wants this message to go away but I am not going to do him the favor. I am just not taking his baits for more nonsense any more. The pattern is the same again and again: Pick one of the ambiguous conflicting Socrates signals in hindsight to argue the case. For us, there is no need to formulate a custom response to that. We use this model case as a standard response reply to show what these charlatans are doing. I have an obligation to spread the message for the honest people, and as painful as it is for me, I am going to persevere until the Armstrong promoters shut up. So they are warned. The honest people have all the facts on their side. AnonymousCoder"Quarterly reversal time unit is one quarter. Gold rallied before the quarter was over and no other signal in the opposite direction was available to indicate change of direction.The time span is 1 to 3 units in time so the quarterly bearish reversal had 1 to 3 quarters before time was up. Armstrong wrote on his private blog on the first of March our quarterly level of the model generated a bullish reversal at the end of the year reversing its short position and going long. This also signaled that gold would rally from the $1060 area and should test the next bullish reversal at the $1347 level." Not sure if you are aware or not but you are losing this discussion. Here we go. You are providing the proof of my assertion yourself!
Hindsight, Fraud. This hindsight message is fraudulent misrepresentation of performance, pure fraud!
Here you are saying, and I know you are speaking for Martin Armstrong, that
He had this information, this bullish signal, the fact that his model went long - at the end of the year - but at the same time failed to tell his clients?
In fact he sent the opposite signal to his clients at the time!
If he knew this at the time when he claimed the system went long, and let's assume for the sake of argument that what you say is true then he could have been trading against his clients because he published this signal only three months later.
You are not worth the respect of a single honest being on earth! You are a fraud!
And yes, I have all the reports. How could I otherwise quote them? I have everything!
More importantly, all other people who lost, they have everything as well.
Here is a detailed time line of the events: Quarterly Superposition Event in Gold 2015Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
Now we are getting raw insults without facts, based on nonsense. Interesting: ...
You must try defend your own stupidity regarding your claims with links to reversals and arrays.
As previously said, Gumbi's posts get replied to in a way that will remind him of the context in which we showed him that he is a charlatan. The context is the ambiguity that he uses to defend his ever changing position, claiming he is always right and we are wrong. He does this by picking any one of the many conflicting signals that suits his agenda. Let him be reminded again that we have a model case where this behavior is documented in much detail. It actually saves time and effort to repeat this as opposed to wasting the time trying to argue this same type of thing without end. Whatever smokescreen Gumbi and cohorts are coming up with now, they get this reply. I know Gumbi just wants this message to go away but I am not going to do him the favor. I am just not taking his baits for more nonsense any more. The pattern is the same again and again: Pick one of the ambiguous conflicting Socrates signals in hindsight to argue the case. For us, there is no need to formulate a custom response to that. We use this model case as a standard response reply to show what these charlatans are doing. I have an obligation to spread the message for the honest people, and as painful as it is for me, I am going to persevere until the Armstrong promoters shut up. So they are warned. The honest people have all the facts on their side. AnonymousCoder"Quarterly reversal time unit is one quarter. Gold rallied before the quarter was over and no other signal in the opposite direction was available to indicate change of direction.The time span is 1 to 3 units in time so the quarterly bearish reversal had 1 to 3 quarters before time was up. Armstrong wrote on his private blog on the first of March our quarterly level of the model generated a bullish reversal at the end of the year reversing its short position and going long. This also signaled that gold would rally from the $1060 area and should test the next bullish reversal at the $1347 level." Not sure if you are aware or not but you are losing this discussion. Here we go. You are providing the proof of my assertion yourself!
Hindsight, Fraud. This hindsight message is fraudulent misrepresentation of performance, pure fraud!
Here you are saying, and I know you are speaking for Martin Armstrong, that
He had this information, this bullish signal, the fact that his model went long - at the end of the year - but at the same time failed to tell his clients?
In fact he sent the opposite signal to his clients at the time!
If he knew this at the time when he claimed the system went long, and let's assume for the sake of argument that what you say is true then he could have been trading against his clients because he published this signal only three months later.
You are not worth the respect of a single honest being on earth! You are a fraud!
And yes, I have all the reports. How could I otherwise quote them? I have everything!
More importantly, all other people who lost, they have everything as well.
Here is a detailed time line of the events: Quarterly Superposition Event in Gold 2015Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
@ Traxo you don't seem to mind that Anonymouscoder has recently posted 12 almost identical messages in the forum with a lot of screaming (captital letters) and tries bullying other forum user.
Well I guess it bothers me a bit because maybe somebody missed the link to the blog I posted. Other than that... No man, I don't care. I just wanted feedback on my blog post, and coherent refutation if I made any mistakes therein. I asked him multiple times to quote clear text (i.e. not ambiguous) and source to it. He failed to do it. I have great respect for you Traxo. So I feel sorry if I disappointed you. It's a while since a link to your blog has been added to Quarterly Superposition Event in Gold 2015and I add it here again: Martin Armstrong - Gold Bear?Alex11, the repetition of my message, the template, usually after a specific response, is on purpose - a clear match for the Armstrong tactic of posting meaningless ambiguous ECM and Socrates bullshit. No point to change the general message. You write meaningless stuff, I write the consistent template. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
Gumbi, too late. Ambiguous nonsense. Another insult. 1) GMW: Now you are contradicting yourself again even mentioning GMW pattern recognition which according to all of Armstrong's and your own recommendations cannot be traded. 2) Private Blogs: I have all private blogs and these do NOT contain anything contradicting our message. You did have the chance to quote any relevant private blog messages but you failed to do so. Do yourself a favor and read the private blog posts starting from 2016 and all will be revealed. Have a look and see what reversals were given and see for yourself whether they worked or not. Its right there a record of everything Armstrong posted on his private blog. You will have to discover the truth on your own I cannot do it for you... Now you think that we are all idiots because you are inviting us to try proving your point, something you failed to do? What a miserable idea. Thank you for posting this junk so everybody can clearly see your state of mind.The fact is you claim the system went long end of 2015 (see quote below) with that bullish signal PUBLISHED months later. That is all that counts. It does not add up. No smoke screen now! Whatever smokescreen Gumbi and cohorts are coming up with now, they get this reply. I know Gumbi just wants this message to go away but I am not going to do him the favor. I am just not taking his baits for more nonsense any more. The pattern is the same again and again: Pick one of the ambiguous conflicting Socrates signals in hindsight to argue the case. For us, there is no need to formulate a custom response to that. We use this model case as a standard response reply to show what these charlatans are doing. I have an obligation to spread the message for the honest people, and as painful as it is for me, I am going to persevere until the Armstrong promoters shut up. So they are warned. The honest people have all the facts on their side. AnonymousCoder"Quarterly reversal time unit is one quarter. Gold rallied before the quarter was over and no other signal in the opposite direction was available to indicate change of direction.The time span is 1 to 3 units in time so the quarterly bearish reversal had 1 to 3 quarters before time was up. Armstrong wrote on his private blog on the first of March our quarterly level of the model generated a bullish reversal at the end of the year reversing its short position and going long. This also signaled that gold would rally from the $1060 area and should test the next bullish reversal at the $1347 level." Not sure if you are aware or not but you are losing this discussion. Here we go. You are providing the proof of my assertion yourself!
HINDSIGHT, FRAUD. THIS HINDSIGHT MESSAGE IS MISREPRESENTATION OF PERFORMANCE, PURE FRAUD!
I love it.
Here you are saying, and I know you are speaking for Martin Armstrong, that
HE HAD THIS INFORMATION, THIS BULLISH SIGNAL AT THE END OF THE YEAR BUT AT THE SAME TIME FAILED TO TELL HIS CLIENTS?  ?IN FACT HE SENT THE OPPOSITE SIGNAL TO HIS CLIENTS AT THE TIME!
IF HE KNEW, AND LET'S ASSUME WHAT YOU SAY IS TRUE THEN HE WOULD HAVE BEEN TRADING AGAINST HIS CLIENTS BECAUSE HE PUBLISHED THIS SIGNAL ONLY THREE MONTHS LATER.
You are not worth the respect of a single honest being on earth! You are a fraud!
AND YES, I HAVE ALL THE REPORTS. HOW COULD I OTHERWISE QUOTE THEM? I HAVE EVERYTHING!
MORE IMPORTANTLY, ALL OTHER PEOPLE WHO LOST, THEY HAVE EVERYTHING AS WELL.
Here is a detailed time line of the events: Quarterly Superposition Event in Gold 2015Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
I don't need that is at least, you have no trading/investor experience or you're lying.
If you look into the report every month, you will notice when a buy or sell signal is given. The critical support/resistance numbers are NOT TA but Rev. It's not that I tell you that you don't need the energy indicator, it's what Armstrong says. Anyways, it looks like you are done with Socrates - so there is no point to continue the discussion. It's a waste of time for both of us. Support and resistance are not MA reversal and he has separated them many, many times. So he's misdirecting. Of coarse he's not giving it to you, he wants you to move up in levels, no thank you. So the validity is no longer relevant since I'm not a member? The point is that members of this outfit are bashing their clients. They have always done that. Armstrong's support staff abused me even while I was a member. Same people. These guys would be better off leaving this blog for good. They are their worst enemies. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
