I suppose what you're describing is you being a passenger for all of the activities you got involved with, which in its own way is good because you're not addicted to any of those things. However, there are types of people who would be happy to just play their favourite game 24/7 each day and everyday and for these types of people the lockdown has been nothing but a mere event.

On the more +ve side, with all the time the lockdown provided for many of us one great way to make the best use of the time is to invest in yourself in whichever way you seem fit. This may be education, relaxation, sports or just being lazy and heavy online tournaments. It's an opportunity for improvement and realisation of the freedom we kinda all get for granted!

I'd say yes and no. At the moment, I'm not leaning towards negativism as I've dealt with them and I can't say I can complain. However, their accusations have increased lately and going forward I think given that this platform is 100% centralised it is best to be cautious like with any other centralised platform.

I'd say as a word of caution that can be applied to anything you can think of, is that there's always some risk and nothing is risk free.

As for holding stable coins, hell yeah there's a risk. The platform could get hacked or the people might shut down and either way you lose your money. Always think that if you're not the one holding your own money then that money is at risk. It really is that simple!

I agree that out of the exchange platforms mentioned in this post Binance is among the top most popular ones, and even coinbase is rated pretty good. I personally, have used both and for large withdrawals I prefer to use Binance whereas for coins and token interchanges I found bestchange to be quite decent.

Obviously, which exchange platform you use depends on your work so best to look into these properly before committing to them.

The fact that you don't even give any proof of how the system works but instead advertise the 50% profit margin is a little on the line of mistrust. There's no guarantee what the software does and how it works or whether there are any loops holes you could exploit. This is why proof of performance should come first, without legitimacy everyone reading your post will think nothing but 'scam', even if this may not be you!

That's correct, BTC is so volatile so it will always attract investors and the like. The fact that major cryptocurrencies like BTC and ETH have even been added to platforms like eToro used for regular investment in stock and shares, bonds etc just shows that crypto investment is becoming more popular or at least is attracting more curious people. I'd say that't definitely a sign of growth rather than shrinkage.

A thesis on BTC would only be possible if an educational institution would endorse that and probably if the student is self-funded and willing to be 'self-taught' also. As it is there aren't many institutions teaching or having a course in crypto or BTC but in theory if the above criteria are met this could be possible.

I do have my doubts that even after accomplishing the writing of one such thesis, the impact won't be that great and I'm not sure even if people would trust it as unbiased information unless somehow it was reviewed by a well-known expert in the field and even then it may carry its own levels of doubt.

On my end, the webpage doesn't go to coinflip but instead to the intended page but similar to you there's hardly a review there 
The site looks nice and glamorous but doesn't really contain the content you describe at all, in fact the list of casinos under your so called review is 'super' limited and bias and you guessed it 'no review'. So at this stage, I'm not sure what it is you're after, this is not looking like a review site to me.

In a sense it is clear that no matter which casino you got to and which strategy you use as a gambler or an occasional player you're deemed indeed to lose at some point even if you probabilistically happen to win at first. The reason for this is simple - house edge.

Of course, this doesn't apply to casinos whose algorithm can be exploited and manipulated such that you always win even after considering the house edge.

I'm not sure I agree with you that crypto has become unstable, specially in terms of long term holding of coins. ETH like many other coins are going to improve but it will take some time until the market picks up more momentum.

At the moment most coins aren't going through their best times, instead are withstanding the unprecedented toll of the pandemic. This has also been obvious for the traditional stock market, and taking into account BTC price crypto isn't doing bad...

You've hit it right in the spot!!! As a proclaimed trader this maths shouldn't be a problem or else I have no idea how you got your profit in trading   
And even if someone was to provide funds then there's no guarantee that 1st you'll not run away with the money and 2nd that you'll even make any profit and 3rd whether you'll even share that profit. Brokers are there for a reason and you can't act all on your own.

Warning to the 'greedy' ones on here reading this ridiculous 'post', don't give your money to this person or if you're thinking about it at least have some collateral or assurance in place before engaging in business, though this is not something many people would recommend.

In addition to the above, there really isn't any point in paying these 'bad' reputation exchanges a penny in the hope that they can lead and manage and IEO. This is just asking to get kicked in the face! Instead, if you want to go through the IEO route then the best word of advice is to consider looking at exchanges with a good and credible portfolio (I won't name any) but a few of the big exchanges supported a few IEO...

I think as long as you're happy then that's fine. To take this up a notch, it is the general consensus that if you can take a profit you can be happy with then go for it as the market could always go bearish. However, at the end of the day you take as much risk as your comfortable with and that's a good approach to trading

I suppose this pressure acted in weeding out the amateur miners and only those with enough resources and who were proficient enough remained. This turn out of events is not completely unexpected as even if the pressure is felt by others the gaps will be sealed, especially when taking into account the grand scheme of things. The halving only restrained resources, made it more difficult for miners but the rewards are just as measurable, and I feel that the industry is one in which adversity won't win.

I agree in that BTC cannot be regarded as a safe asset to invest in due to large price volatility which at times of price dumps slumps 'consumer's' confidence.
Indeed, BTC is the most valuable asset to have as a coin but this also attracts a lot of fraudulent activity. So while there are clear advantages to owning BTC (as above) the risk is just as high and because of this BTC isn't a safe-heaven asset.

It will never go up the only way it can go is way, way down. The announcement thread made it obvious that this is not a worthy project and that in fact some people are convinced this is a scam.

In any way, it is still better worth your time looking at other more prominent altcoins rather than ones with >99% failure rate 

Despite BTC and crypto in general being increasingly under-recognised among most people (worldwide) which again links back to us being more active about increasing adoption, there are so many different ways to spend BTC from the retail industry, to leisure, food and even postoffice. The list is just enormous but there's still a lot more we need to do.

Is there a correlation or just coincidence? I doubt that this reflects a correlation between wallet upgrade releases and coin price change, even if there is a tiny correlation that is not significant enough to be trusted. The reason for this is that traders and others heavily involved in the market don't really use wallets, they instead use exchanges. The pumps seen cannot be as a result of wallet upgrades, as only holders really use wallets.

You say that the wagered amounts have actually been close to 9 BTC and given this the hype of contests is on the lookout but perhaps they're waiting to see how high it can actually go without having to pay any of it back I'm not saying this is exactly what this sounds like, only postulating the different scenarios.

In the same respect, while BTC is tightly linked to how the Altcoins behave, as history showed in the event of large BTC drops some of the Altcoins are likely to follow. This is because the BTC in a way determines the strength of the crypto coins markets and is an indicator of people's confidence in the industry.

That is to say that maybe not all altcoins will drop if BTC drops, but the ones with a high market cap will likely follow BTC's trend, whilst other smaller coins might still keep on pumping, often as an act of artificial pump.[/list][/list]