In the end we must realize that if we expect Chelsea to become champions it is an impossibility and something like that will never happen so there is no need to expect something uncertain because we must know from the beginning of the season we already realize that Chelsea will not be able to get it especially with the overhaul where there are so many new players and new coaches there.
Chelsea's focus now is not to win but as much as possible they should be able to restore their form that was lost in the Abramovich era and improve their position to be better than last season.
This is a difficult job with new players and coaches where in addition to them having to adapt, they also have to build chemistry from scratch so the discussion of Chelsea and the championship in the EPL will sound ridiculous for now because after all with their current performance expecting them to win is an impossibility especially when discussions like this are done now where we know Chelsea still cannot be consistent with the performance they run in matches this season.

It all depends on yourself but it would be better if it is a sacred thing then don't leave it. As long as you and your partner have no problem with celebrating your wedding anniversary then it is up to you but if in the end this becomes a problem and causes a rift because you decide to be in bitcoin instead of celebrating then I don't think it needs to be forced.
Because after all when talking about sacred things like marriage and celebrations like this then it is a joint decision and you have to involve your partner in decisions like this so as long as it is not a problem if it is not celebrated then indeed your decision is quite good but otherwise in this case if it is a problem then you are doing a risky thing.

Don't be too forceful about something if you are still not able because being in bitcoin is not a compulsion and there is no need to force yourself too considering that in this case there are always priorities that must come first apart from investing. Just do as much as you can don't push yourself too hard.

Therefore I say their advantage is only based on home matches, besides that there is nothing that Roma can excel at, because in terms of the game and the performance of the two clubs they are still quite equal, there is no difference that can really be made that Roma can win in this match.

But on the other hand, surely Roma will try to get a victory in the match later because after all now De Rosi is being demanded to be a good successor to Mourinho's replacement and qualify for the Europa League Round of 16 phase of course it is a very good thing for them.

But indeed things like this are not easy we know what Feyenoord's game in the first leg was like and I think for the second leg they will definitely play more insistent than before because after all this is a decisive match before they start the round of 16.

As i said earlier although it is a thing that is not wrong because playing home will give more strength but in the end such a thing is only a probability that can be obtained if their performance is smooth but it is still uncertain whether in the end De Rosi can or not maintain the consistency they have. Facing club whose level is smaller in domestic competitions they are indeed quite visible differences but on the other hand this is also still not a guarantee that De Rosi is more able to bring Roma to a better direction because however sometimes there are some condition that can cause changes that are very pronounced in terms of increase and decrease in performance.

I have experienced this and indeed the case is also the same where I was asked about my income when trying to increase the bank account that we have because the transfer we made exceeded the limit given and inevitably we have to try to reason as best as possible so that it returns.

Talking about one's own income especially if it's to the bank then actually this is a little difficult but surely in some cases we will definitely be asked the same thing like this. as for how safe or not this is still complicated because indeed on the one hand this is a privacy but on the other hand the bank's policy is like that.
It's actually quite risky too but when the regulations have been set then it's difficult for us even though it's not dangerous in my opinion but the question is quite annoying.

But indeed what @Marykeller said in this case is also true because even though their ball control was poor in the match against Manchester City some time ago but when talking about opportunities and utilization of counterattacks by Chelsea in this match it was actually a very good thing and there were indeed some pretty good opportunities that they managed to get despite their minimal possession because of the difficulty of getting out of the rhythm that Manchester City did in this match.
The defense line, especially for the right side of Manchester City, was easy to penetrate in this match and it led to some good opportunities such as 2 chances from Jackson and 1 from Chilwell, it's just that Jackson's finishing was not very good, making Chelsea keep the spotlight to be able to lock in the victory.

Jackson's 2 chances could not be utilized properly even though he was face to face with Ederson but Jackson was unable to convert it into a goal actually I think it's quite unfortunate.

With Roma drawing the first leg it was still a good thing but when it comes to probabilities I think it remains the same when it comes to who will qualify for the Round of 16.
Indeed, in leg 2 at this time Roma do benefit because they will play home in the match later but it also cannot be a guarantee that they will be able to win easily because after all their opponents are Feyenoord, which of course we certainly know in terms of performance and the strength of the team is still very similar to Roma at this time.

Looking at their h2h in the last few matches they are still quite balanced and Roma's advantage is only playing home for Leg 2.
I think with the current conditions of the two clubs it will still be very difficult to say with great certainty who will qualify in the play offs this time.

In the end, even if we are already in a marriage relationship or just in a relationship without a marriage bond with our partner, privacy will also be a very important thing to think about.
It is not wrong to always be open with your partner but on the other hand we also have to be able to know that sometimes when dealing with money, no matter your partner or family, it is possible to stab you in the back so that the importance of privacy must be maintained because we do not know the intentions of the people around us even though it is our own partner.

This can be used as a good lesson because in the end not everyone can be sure we give the secrets we have especially if in the end talking about bitcoin we voluntarily give a wallet or anything related to our assets because it could be a blow to you in the future.

But can it happen without any obstacles at all? because in the end this is talking about money and it is impossible for PSG to release Mbappe for free when Mbappe's value is now more than 150 million so negotiating with Mbappe when he is on a free transfer will indeed be an easy thing but in fact something like this will not be easy because there will definitely be the same drama as last season where PSG will press harder for Mbappe in order to benefit from the sale made.

Technically, PSG is currently in a difficult time because sooner or later PSG will definitely leave PSG, it's just that they don't want to get a very big loss because after all, if the worst possibility is that Mbappe leaves then they will definitely try to get a lot of money to be able to find a replacement for Mbappe in PSG's attack line.

Almost everyone will predict this because it refers to Chelsea's performance which is difficult to guess and with the condition of Manchester City, which is always superior, especially playing at home, it will definitely make the thoughts of a lot of bettors be on Manchester City in this match and I don't think it's a wrong thing even though the results are not too good and not too desirable for us.

Manchester City played so well that they even locked up the Chelsea players in half the field for 90 minutes of the match but in the end the tight defense by Chelsea made Manchester City hassle to penetrate the bus parking defense style they did in this match.

Poche realized that if they took more initiative in this match then the same score when Chelsea met Liverpool could have been repeated so they were better off playing it safe and in fact this scheme was successful in reducing the attacks made by Manchester City.

I think in this case it is not a matter of whether it is new or old but where the progress is good because in the end if indeed the new project is better then it must be a very appropriate choice to be in a new project rather than forcing an old project that is unclear in terms of its prospects so that the old or new project is not the initial benchmark for investing.

But when talking about tokens, especially in altcoins, actually regardless of the project, everything is still speculative where courage determines everything because we know for sure that being in a token is just hoping for luck even though no matter how good the whitepaper or roadmap is built, in the end it is the pump and dump scheme that always determines the fate of a project in altcoins, especially for new projects.

Nice tried their best in the second half this time in order to equalize the score but Lyon did not want to miss the points just like that at this time because however by looking at what is happening now even in terms of possession they are still balanced but it looks like Lyon continues to try to secure their 1 goal so as not to be avenged because indeed this could be an important point for Lyon even though they have been freed from the relegation zone but their position has not changed much and with this victory it will consolidate their previous 2 matches and of course this will make them more confident.
It's already halfway through the season and of course with 1 goal in hand I think Lyon will try to hold on and try not to be provoked by the intimidation of the Nie players who are starting to feel a little troubled in the remaining time.
I didn't bet on this game but I'm happy to watch it and quite happy with Lyon's win in this game.

IMO its too big if the minimum is 5 goals in this match.
Indeed for now Manchester City has always been a club with a pretty good situation and can score a lot of goals if they cannot be stopped but the problem is with Cheslea. Not to say Chelsea is bad in this case because some of the wins they get are a very good thing its just that in this case we must be aware that Chelsea is a club that is difficult to guess at this time.

They can play very well and can score more than 2 goals when meeting a fairly strong club but on the one hand sometimes they also become a bad club.
I will still continue to support Manchester City in this match because after all for now Manchester City is the favorite before the match starts regardless of the goals scored I just want to see Manchester City get 3 points again in the match later.

Don't be too complacent friends, indeed when buying at low prices after a bearish run a few years ago until the beginning of the year this month there were indeed a lot of blessings when we bought bitcoin and started to continue doing DCA but in the end when the word profit is short actually don't be too happy with this because even though it's very good for now but you only get the sweet thing now and have never gone through a phase where you have to fight in the turmoil of the mind when bitcoin has decreased and as much as possible your brain stays awake so as not to sell it.

Indeed, buying bitcoin at a low price and selling it at a high price is still the ideal form until now but if in the end you only focus on the profits that you say are short like today without learning more I will make sure it is difficult for you to resist the temptation that occurs in the end.

Menurut saya sistemnya tetap sama tetapi caranya yang memang berbeda karena di periode 2019 atau periode 2024 kali ini skemanya tetap sama dimana amplop dan isinyalah yang memegang kendali dalam pemilihan kali ini hanya saja memang caranya saat ini lebih terang-terangan dimana ketika pemilu yang bahkan sedang dalam masa tenang justru itu dimanfaatkan oleh para timses untuk menggaet suara untuk calon mereka.
Di tempat yang saya tinggali sekarang h-2 dan h-1 bahkan hari H pemilu justru dijadikan ajang dimana uang menjadi faktor penting ketika uang mana yang besar maka kans mereka mendapatkan suara sangat besar.
Di pemilihan DPRD KAB/KOTA yang sudah terjadi terdapat beberapa timses yang bahkan datang kerumah saya dengan membawa ragam isi amplop dari mulai 25k-100k untuk bisa menyoblos calon yang mereka usung dengan embel-embel uang adalah sebagai transportasi dan memang saya cukup yakin bahwa hal seperti ini tidak hanya terjadi di daerah saya tetapi hampir di keseluruhan daerah.
Padahal sudah ada larangan dan sudah ada panwanslu yang ditugaskan untuk mengawasi kecuragan seperti ini tetapi justru terkadang panwaslu sendiri ikut andil dalam melakukan pergerakan seperti ini karena memang mereka juga tidak ingin kehilangan momentum untuk mendapatkan uang dari calon yang membutuhkan suara sehingga dengan sistem yang sebenarnya flat karena terus sama setiap pemilu tetapi untuk cara kali ini lebih brutal dari biasanya.

Mungkin yang menggelitik dan tidak mengeluarkan uang yang besar tetapi bisa menang dengan mudah hanyalah Komeng yang memang tanpa bekingan partai tetapi karena kepopularitas yang dia miliki dia sangat unggul di DPD Jabar dalam pemilu kali ini .

Not to belittle Mourinho in this regard but when Roma sacked Mourinho and replaced with De Rosi now it actually proves that Mourinho is not that big now.
Indeed he is a good coach but in the end Mourinho's prime has now run out which makes the situation uncontrollable for Roma which makes Roma look for other options by firing Mourinho as coach as for his current replacement De Rosi indeed this is a condition that can be considered a gamble because Roma are bravely looking for a new coach who does not really have big experience because De Rosi is a new coach. De Rosi is a new coach who lacks experience but when Roma has determined then they realize what they are doing now because in the end some new coaches who lack experience are also sometimes very good because they know what he has to do especially Roma and De Rosi is nothing new because De Rosi is one of the living legends in Rome.

When talking about this match I think the draw at Feyenoord stadium is not a bad thing because after all this is a good thing because the first leg match and it is away is still very good especially when looking at h2h when Roma was coached by Mourinho the results were not much different from this time.
Regardless of whether or not Roma is doing it right now, I think it depends on a matter of time and perspective because after all, by looking at what is happening now, Roma's performance under De Rosi is still quite good if you look at the results of the match.

It's a modest target for Roma but it's too big a target for De Rosi who is the new replacement coach at the moment.

Even if it is a good enough target but of course we must realize that for a new coach with minimal experience then something like this is a difficult condition and actually adds to the pressure even greater.
Replacing Mou with De Rosi I think the goal is not for the top 4 at the end of the season but trying to hope to improve the results to be even better. As for them being in the top 4, it's very good therapy if not as long as they finish in a higher position than Mou gave then it's also a good thing for Roma.

The match has entered extra time but the score is still unchanged and indeed looking at some of the results of previous Roma and Feyenoord matches, a draw is a natural thing.

Exactly, I believe that most traders who have just come or I mean they are beginners come with the aim of making a profit, I understand that all traders have a goal to make a profit and that is natural but the problem is that most beginners come too focused on the profit opportunities so it is like ignoring the aspect of possible risks that exist in the world of trading that will actually continue to lurk them.

Lack of experience and knowledge is usually always the main problem for most newbies who just come and I think it is a fact that most beginners come because they see the benefits that are successfully obtained by others or one of their friends so that it becomes a motivation for them to jump in and get involved, but unfortunately they do not pay too much attention to the possible risks that exist in the world of trading which makes them come without doing a lot of consideration from various sides and without bringing careful preparation, especially in terms of risk management, and this of course makes them really have problems when it turns out that losses are far more dominant than profits, it is not uncommon for us to find some traders who end up with a lot of losses that can even stress them, so the point is very important to be rational in seeing everything because with this then you will understand that trading is not just about profit.

Overall I honestly can't say for sure about who is more addicted between gamblers who have rich or poor backgrounds, but it seems quite interesting and I also agree with you that poor gamblers are more likely to become more addicted gamblers than rich people. We can see the reason from their financial situation in real life, which of course the financial situation is the main reason that can encourage a gambler to act more aggressively, such as poor people who as we know that they have a below average financial situation and most of them misunderstand what is meant by "winning opportunities" in gambling, they think that gambling can change their fortunes for the better when in fact gambling is not a place that can be used as an alternative to overcome financial problems but instead gambling with the wrong approach will make you suffer more financial problems.

So the financial situation that poor people have in my opinion can really be used as an excuse for the idea that "poor people can be much more addicted than rich people", on the other hand it is quite reasonable and I believe that rich people treat gambling as nothing more than a place of entertainment when they have a little free time in the middle of their busy lives, and also in my opinion rich people will not make gambling a place to earn because usually they will consider something from all sides and announce something that has the certainty to be truly profitable or profitable such as investment or business in real life.

The point is that we must be able to understand what gambling is really about because by understanding the real facts about gambling then I think indirectly you will be able to become a responsible gambler in the sense of being able to accept whatever the results at the end of the session because someone who has the right understanding as well as being responsible they will never dare to put an amount of budget that they cannot be responsible for especially for losing at the end of the session because they are more concerned with risk management than chasing something that has absolutely no certainty.

One of the reasons why we are not advised to make gambling a place that produces because obviously in the end such an idea will only make you experience more downturns and feel a lot of regret, I can already confirm that when gamblers carry the intention and purpose to produce then obviously they will definitely do a lot of experiments based on beliefs and hopes that will indirectly drain their money slowly, so actually the victory you get if calculated with the number of defeats during the trial period must be a much greater number of defeats or the intention is difficult to get out with a truly intact state. So let's make eyes and make gambling nothing more than an activity to fill your spare time without putting hope or seriousness, if you really want to earn then it's better to look for other ways such as work in general that does have certainty and guarantee.

True, most of them, especially those who are addicted, are trapped in a circle of illusion in their minds because of the hope they put on winning, as you said that they cannot distinguish between feelings and logic, what I mean is that they are too prejudiced for gambling which is actually full of logic. and when you put hope in gambling then indirectly without realizing it will create confidence in yourself by saying that "I can win", And when you put hope in gambling then indirectly without realizing it, it will create confidence in yourself by saying that "I can win", especially when they see or hear some victories that are successfully obtained by other people or one of their friends which of course this will further motivate them to act more crazy and aggressive.

However, healthy gambling is when you are able to balance everything, and you can only get that balance when you understand the concept of gambling, especially in terms of possible risks, which basically can never be separated from the name of gambling. So you will only be able to make everything balanced and avoid the bad possibilities that exist in gambling when you are able to turn yourself into a gambler who is responsible for any possibilities that will occur, you will not be too difficult to take some recommended actions that are indeed the best decision for yourself such as stopping when the situation is not possible.