|
How did you handle CHF? Did you have many loses? Do costumers have to pay for negative balances?
|
|
|
|
How low can this possibly go? I'm thinking 160ish
I would speculate 180'sh . Because if it goes to 160, then we are definitely going to see a more lower point after that. Yep. Tons of stops are placed at 200$, market is still in despair phase, testing of even 140$ is highly possible now. Yes lets totally ignore the fact that the dumped coins were borrowed (levereged shorts) and even if they could come up with just another 30% downpayment to dump again, they can't cause there are only about BTC3k left total on finex. Oh i'm sorry another newbie predicting the doom and gloom of BTC without anything to back it up, on ignore list you go Better sell now, else you will be panicking below 200. Btc is very bearish, just look at the candlesticks - hammers on daily, 3-day, weekly and nobody is buying. Why the hell do you think we are again at 200 and not above 300? |
|
|
|
namely Bitcoin miners who, below $400, likely operate at a loss.
[ ] operate at a loss [ X ] do not operate if below 400 they operate at loss, then we would see a big fall in the hashrate. But it keeps increasing Hashrate is quite stable for some months now. This means that miners are not really adding. Miners have very different operating costs - some of them still need to pay off for equipment while others only pay for electricty and some other costs like rent. |
|
|
|
Dammit, I guess we can now continue with downtrend.  |
|
|
|
The owner was already busted.
Today, every time there has been downward movement on stamp, bitfinex locks up and takes longer than usual to load, preventing a position from being taken or exited quickly.
My imagination or the owner is filling his orders first.......
I noticed the website locking up but the API did not. I guess the slowdown was caused by web traffic spike. They use so called "circuit-breaker" which prevents malicious dumping and stop-loss hunting (remember spikes to 100 back in 2003). When trader wants to crash price, lets say by dumping 5000 btc at once, their trading engine prevents crash by locking all current orders (you cannot cancel your order in the meantime) and slowly execute all buy and sell order by matching them without jumping the line. Without this market sell order of 5000 coins would crash price by 30% in a second. Because they use this breaker the result is now that it first dumps 1000k coins and now buy orders at this price gets activated and matched with dumpers order. Then it proceeds with selling to the next order and so on until all coins gets sold and then trading gets back to normal. |
|
|
|
|
Previous week on Localbitcoins was the highest or the second highest BTC volume in history for many currency pairs (AUD, CAD, EUR, GDP, HKD, INR, MXN, RUB, SEK, USD, ZAR). Interesting and volatile times ahead.
|
|
|
|
|
I guess now is good time to buy XMR.
Prices are very low, I got ridiculed for warning people not to buy when XMR was trading around 0.003 BTC or $3. Now prices are around 90% of this in $ terms. Almost 1/3 has been mined, inflation is still high but significantly lower. I am not sure we are ready for new bubble, but market cap is ridiculously low. Longer we stay at this levels bigger the rise as coins will be in strong hands.
Just to get to 10 biggest coins by market cap it needs to raise at least 5x in value...
XMR and other anon coins will slowly start to gain attention when more people will go to jail for transmitting BTC in connection with illegal activities.
|
|
|
|
They just completely fucked over their export business.
And many more people that have loans denominated in CHF, contracts in CHF, hedge funds... Black swan event. |
|
|
|
Well, I've always wanted to own 1/1,000,000 of the bitcoin economy (that's 21 bitcoins for you tards who can't do math), and I got close once before, but sold most of them. If we hit double digits, I'll probably buy a dozen or so BTC just so I can have 21.
... and put them on the wall? |
|
|
|
Litecoin:  $1.14 I'm shocked Me too. From $48 is like 97% drop If bitcoin is similar we have a long way to go. |
|
|
|
Any update on where are we now? Is this the bottom?
Let's put it this way, if $150 isn't the bottom, then god help anyone still holding coins... and hello double digit BTC. $150 is a really really strong support level, breaching this would mean capitulation. I've even bought some coin at $160-$170, so if I see that potentially happen, I will be selling these new coins along with everyone else. And what would this mean for longterm potential if we get to double digits again? Isn't this supposed to happen in C wave (death and despair)? You know it's bad, when the Gavin is selling his bitcoins and investing in stock market, Bitstamp CEO is buying cows and farm.  |
|
|
|
|
Any update on where are we now? Is this the bottom?
|
|
|
|
BFX is goxing. Of course at critical time  |
|
|
|
Went out mostly long due to bitstamp incident
Isn't this the opposite of what people usually do? Sorry, don't get it.
You were long but now you sold or you bought and get out of Bitstamp?
Sorry, don't get it.
You were long but now you sold or you bought and get out of Bitstamp?
He prolly means he won't risk trading. pretty sure he means that he took his bitcoins out of bitstamp as soon as he could, leaving him long. I read this because of his posting of support, not because of the way his sentence is necessarily phrased  Truly the enigmatic master lucifer. Only confusion after his posts. |
|
|
|
Der SImon Hausdorf wird jetzt fuer eine Regierungsstelle arbeiten und alle Strafanzeigen werden warscheinlich neutralisiert.
Source? Source gibts nicht aber das ist doch die Norm, die Regierungsstellen brauchen auch Zuwachs mit Krypto Hintergrund, da bietet sich Simon doch nur zu Perfekt an. Aha, und welche Regierungsstelle ist das? |
|
|
|
Der SImon Hausdorf wird jetzt fuer eine Regierungsstelle arbeiten und alle Strafanzeigen werden warscheinlich neutralisiert.
Source? |
|
|
|
Yeah, no need to be nasty, just use ignore button. If you use it correctly you will end up with the best and most valuable comments + your life expectancy will increase due to the lack of stressors. |
|
|
|
At least participants are not wantonly dumping with recent sell-off, yet anyway. Grrr.
Pray for these guys not dumping any time soon before a big rally. If they do, massive selloff and lose of confidence in bitcoin will begin. Hm, in order for any hope of a new rally weak hands must sell. There is no other way around. The question is what is the price at which early adopters will sell (like 30k we saw at 275 on bitstamp). |
|
|
|
When the State removes the effects of the free market and attempts to establish women as equal to men (which they are not), then fertility and society collapse. Watch 2016 onwards the horrific outcome...
I agree that women are not equal to men. Women are more compassionate, more loving, more social, and more self sacrificing. A strong argument can be made that they are the superior subgroup.You fell for propaganda. It's pretty much the other way around or equal in some cases. They are not more compassionate and loving, I would say they are... more violent. Self sacrificing? I mean where do you get this stuff, Hollywood? Men, women, and murder: gender-specific differences in rates of fatal violence and victimization. Journal of Trauma 1992 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1635092Federal Bureau of Investigation Uniform Crime Reports data on homicides in the United States between 1976 and 1987 was analyzed. Although women comprise more than half the U.S. population, they committed only 14.7% of the homicides noted during the study interval.Yes, you forgot the wars... VIOLENCE != MURDER I'll just leave this here: http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htmIn short, women are more aggressive and violent. Scientific fact! Below this video are many additional sources: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pw_UlUGoUV4 Statistics of single mothers and their childrens are horrific. Let's just say if you want to fuck up the future of the kid, just leave it to the mother and forbid father from having any connection with his kid and you get a fine gangster. And don't get me wrong, there is violence in both sexes, it's just media/state propaganda that boys are bad/violent and women are saints/virtues who just have to put with silly men. The murder stats are interesting, and seem to point towards males being more prone to violence. But who were the primary care givers for all these men when they were most impressionable? I think women hold at least some of the blame for the boys that they are responsible for.
Not to say fathers are not responsible too. I've been back in London just a few days and the British seem to be leading the way in Western Europe in terms of disregard for their children's wellbeing (threats of hitting and verbal abuse). I am not in the poorest areas of London either./b]
Exactly! In the West women chooses their partners and chooses to have kids. Kids learn how to be violent and what is "normal" by watching and experiencing interactions with his close enviroment (mom, dad, other kids in childcare,...). Threats and hitting are sadly their normalcy. If you punch or threat a woman you get to jail, but if you punch or threat a kid you are a good parent! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
