Not that the “Where WO” must be played only from fancy, exotic locations. You can also play from DUKE NUKEM levels! Funny, I did try narrowing it down with that exact tool! I see three letters missing before the "rtin" and one missing after. This means "Martini" doesn't work nor does "Zertin" but you have to start somewhere - I like the 80's signage idea. Nobody knows how Europe works, in fact, we have yet to discern if it works. I found a "Hotel Smartino" in Germany and a "Hotel Sporting" in Andorra - neither matches the hotel in the image. Are there more clues to come or do I have to keep making up words to search? Name feels a bit shady. Maybe like "Hotel Courting" ? .. or "Cortina" (something more towards latin since it is Portugal)
|
|
|
Not that the “Where WO” must be played only from fancy, exotic locations. You can also play from DUKE NUKEM levels! So how was the stay there? For some research purposes, can get location anyway?
Based on the graffiti, I think it's in Portugal. I see "períneo crew" scrawled on one of the windows - períneo is Portuguese for perineum. "Pussy Coast" (also scrawled on the walls) could refer to the perineum and it's a short walk to Vulvodynia Street from there. Three of the top ten nudist beaches are in Portugal so based on the perineum and "pussy coast" idea, I'm searching out all the naturalist beaches in Portugal to find nearby hotels that might match the image.
Hey xhomerx10 this might help you in narrowing down your search. e.g. hotel fartingEdit: My bad it’s not seven letter but 8-letter word You probably don't know how Europe works. Probably its Hotel: "meeting", "visiting", "springrting", "cocorting" , "chewbakarting" .. etc... Maybe its: "Zertin"
|
|
|
Don't bother with Juanita, sHe has brain damage.
Kettle black, no? Really gotta consider the source of this brain damage assessement information... It seems that you are probably going to kill me with the ongoing intensity of your accidental humor.. At some point you gotta stop this for sure. Essentially, I won't have any dust remaining on any parts of my floor from rolling upon it too much... I might even accidentally inhale some of that dust, and only you will be to blame for that kind of an outcome.For now, you treat my attempts to discredit you with humor. But when your journalism of spinning around the tail fails and no one will listen to your taunts of misdirection, the spiritual awakening will fall upon you!
|
|
|
[Edited to eliminate immaterial excrement.] But we'll get to see some crazy shit in the next few years. This being 2022... Just kinda hits different, yo... Just Hits Different. You might need to explain yourself. We get all kinds of bullshit ways that people strive to make money and scam others through techologies that have become more possible after bitcoin because bitcoin (and then the various copy cat improvements upon bitcoin) have facilitated more ways to transfer digital value - and sometimes centralized and other times creating impressions of decentralization - and sure it was not ONLY bitcoin that made this more possible, because there were other kinds of quasi-centralized game tokens prior to bitcoin, too... but seems that some of the scamming and ponzi schemes became more possible in recent times, and surely a lot of creativity contained therein - so even if the exact mechanisms to scheme people out of money are not the same... they frequently will take features from previous schemes or even building confidence that this or that project is legit (or the next new sliced bread or whatever)... So, maybe you need to explain why you believe there might be some kind of meaningful difference that causes matters to play out differently - in terms of various crazes that get way more hype than they deserve... but also might facilitate a certain number of scammers to get richie through those smoke and mirrors deceptive products that are likely to come into being.. and maybe through a kind of "meta" marketing angle. [Edited to eliminate immaterial excrement.] WT actualF are you going on about?!? I was just saying, after 2020, 2021, and thus far in 2020too... the phrase "we'll get to see some crazy shit" is a completely different statement than it was in say... 2019? No? I mean fake insurrection, Covid, lockdowns, "transitory" inflation, and simulated WW111??? Please, let's go back to boredom! NO MORE CRAZY SHIT! Don't bother with Juanita, sHe has brain damage. Also sHe is working for some blog/journalism fake news company that spews a fake agenda narrative on different forums. sHe will try to rattle you. But you just tell her that you have a big black beautiful d!ck that needs to be shiny with chatty mouths.
|
|
|
go 40k+ Buddy!!
|
|
|
That's definitely going to be the new craze. People will go bananas over metaverse properties. No joke. It will crash and burn eventually, of course. But we'll get to see some crazy shit in the next few years. This being 2022... Just kinda hits different, yo... Just Hits Different. The problem with "The Metaverse" is that only a few big names have potential and are worth having land inside of them and some of them do no allow you (for now) to own land in their games. And those games with potential, the biggest ones out there are : FFXiV, WoW, Call of Duty, Hallo, GW2, Dota2, LoL... maybe Minecraft, etc. Only the ones with an internal economy and tokenomics will not be a bad investment. So I would bet on Microsoft. The Force is strong with Gill Bates on this one.
|
|
|
Look !! We Time Traveled. And the price in 4 months is just 4K difference or 10%.
|
|
|
Rookie mistake that they removed the 500 Euro bill.
|
|
|
Hopefully, you'll find it interesting:
The expensive average transaction fees in the article you posted is not correct, from my understanding and experience it is centralized exchanges that charge outrageous fees like that and maybe their high fees is also used to build up this statistic, if you use non-custodial wallets you will pay a normal and cheap fee especially when you use a segwit address, consolidate your inputs, check the mempool first, and use lightning network in exchanges that have integrated it. Banks like high fees. It's their MO.
|
|
|
CasaHODL went woke SJW, so, it's nice to see they are looking to lose so much business with their bravery.
See Twitter, tl;dr: "we need more womens and colored hoomanz working 4 uz!"
Fucking retarded space rock.
What's wrong with robots??
|
|
|
Journalist Juanita is a piece of toxic ass floppy-dangling piece of cunt. sHe is never happy with anyone. sHe is so much against and speaks often against so many people. [...] I was hoping that we (not royal in this instance) would not end like this. [...] Who told you I was/am not a royal??
|
|
|
{edited out]
{edited out] -snipped and edited- (dont worry about)Hypotheticals(stack sats) dyor stronghands Journalist Juanita is a piece of toxic ass floppy-dangling piece of cunt. sHe is never happy with anyone. sHe is so much against and speaks often against so many people. Like sHe is never happy, and working for some shills that pay her to troll this forum. And sHe is in deep regret that sHe sold her BTCiTcoin(s?), because sHe couldn't pay her expensive rent in New York city.
|
|
|
That guy in the paperview looks like a top notch pussy licker for the fraudulent 'old banking system' elite.
|
|
|
SO F^CK YOU Juanita and your toxicity. .... I WANT YOU TO SHOUT FROM ROOF TOPS : THERE IS NO RISK IN BTCiTCOIN !! !! !! !Even though you are purposefully throwing out nonsense talking points, there is some validity in any assertion that bitcoin likely remains amongst the best of asymmetric bets to the upside that we currently have, but even having a very good bet in front of us, like bitcoin, does not come with a variety of risks whether it is risk of the asset itself or various risks that involve the way that any person might manage timelines in terms of managing personal cashflows in respect to ongoing bitcoin volatility. One of the most inevitable dynamics of bitcoin happens to be its likely ongoing volatility, including that we are likely to continue to have ongoing battles in terms of bitcoin's role in society - especially since bitcoin seems to be part of an escape vehicle that is likely ongoingly continuing to facilitate the largest transfer of wealth in history. I doubt that any of us can expect such a process of wealth transfer to go smoothly and potentially even to have a decent number of casualties and injustices along the way.. There's likely no risk-free way to completely play this game of taking a stake in bitcoin and figuring out how much to hold and how much to keep on exchanges versus private wallets versus some other ways of trying to balance one's own involvement in trying to benefit from such ongoing wealth transfer without potentially becoming a casualty or suffering a lot of injustices along the way.Hey motherf^cker. I'm gonna keep cutting all the quotes you take from youtube or from where the f^ck you take them and copy+paste them here. There is no risk and there will be no violent transition. If you keep entertaining those thoughts and promoting those words, it is because you want bad sh!t to happen. You piece of sh!t dipsh!t. YOUR WORDS ARE JUST FALSE !.
|
|
|
Lol "experts" 😅 That term only has ironic meaning left it's been abused so much these last decades and it's going crescendo. There are no "experts" . There are only manipulators that have an agenda of where the price their beliefs want to go. These people with atrocious negative views should be toned down to 0.1/10 not given attention in "main manipulation media" articles.
|
|
|
In your recent posts, even skimming through your ramblings, you seem to have been somewhat in agreement with the message that there is value in gaining some stake in bitcoin... so for sure, any newbie in bitcoin has to determine how to get started exactly and then to create a somewhat reasonable approach towards building such BTC stake based upon his/her own assessment of his specific individual circumstances. I doubt that anyone of us can push anyone towards how they engage in such early stages of BTC accumulation, even though DCA seems to be amongst the best of place holder approaches, and for sure lump sum investing and buying on dips can have some risks in terms of the possibility that the BTC price could go down before it goes up. There are ways to balance all three approaches, but likely ONLY after some internal assessment of ones own individual circumstances which includes looking at cashflow, other investments, timeline, view of bitcoin as compared with other investments, risk tolerance and time, skills and abilities to plan, strategize and to learn along the way, which also may well involve tweaking strategies along the way, too. There's also an element of determining establishing initial BTC stake - and then once achieving such initial BTC stake - which also could take a year or more to establish... then to determine how to manage such stake.. or to perhaps adjust the stake upon reassessments. An initial stake could also involve putting 1% to 25% of overall investment portfolio value into BTC, and for sure the amounts are quite discretionary including that each individual might well end up having quite a different approach from another individual based on some minor differences in the individual circumstances (as I have already mentioned above). Capisce? NO !! to "Capisce?" ... !! I had a bit till the brink while reading that techno babble and thought you were gonna start talking about reverse lending and how the importance of the federal banks sustain the integrity and the blood sucking stock markets is a hallmark to humanitarian goals in sustainability. Are you f^cking kidding me?? Stop spewing negativity ! There is no risk in BTCiTcoin. I bought long ago and now I'm over 200x . And for those that buy small amounts, who gives a sh!t about those people?! .. Your 'techno babble' caters to someone that might actually 'invest' and would have a more substantial manifestation in that said investment. SO F^CK YOU Juanita and your toxicity. .... I WANT YOU TO SHOUT FROM ROOF TOPS : THERE IS NO RISK IN BTCiTCOIN !! !! !! !Stop spewing excuses for deterring people from investing. Excuses like "cashflow", "other investments", "timeline", "individual circumstances". THIS IS SPARTA!
THIS IS BTCiTCOIN!
You buy and you share it with your family if you DIE !! ! ! ! !BTCiTcoin is not a g reedy thing for g reedy p eop le. BTCiTcoin is communism and sharing. Those that joined the club out of greed, they are in for the wrong reasons. Karma will come and it will come with bells & whistles. There is no risk in BTCiTcoin if you are not greedy and have no greedy intentions. .. You are safe. "Capisce?" (and I love kimchi)
|
|
|
It is probably a bank, a country or a pension fund. Or some sort of insurance company. Most likely it is an health insurance company.
|
|
|
Damn.. I have no more merits to give!
|
|
|
|