I really like what inputs.io is trying to do, but it complements on chain txs, it doesn't replace them. No matter how good a BTC-bank is, it still contains counter-party risk.  Having low cost on chain transactions means you never need to store a sizeable portion of your wealth with third parties, and that is what BTC is all about.

Which essentially means off chain transactions are big f-you to the concept of Bitcoin. If you are okay with this, then you might as well just use USD and PayPal, what's the difference?

(Back to no comments on the gdocs monthly expenses, wtf)

Is my signature ok? I updated it now. Does this mean the past 30 days of advertising dont count anymore or will I get paid for those too?

Is there a maximum limit to the number of addresses that a blockchain.info wallet can hold? Is there a point where there are "too many" addresses and the service starts to get unreliable? I have a friend who is not very familiar with bitcoin, but he is developing a bitcoin-based site. He's using the blockchain.info API to generate addresses and a blockchain.info wallet to manage funds. I can easily see him needing hundreds or thousands of addresses in his wallet once the site launches if it gets popular. I'm just wondering if blockchain.info can handle the action.

coinjar.io/

I just tried it. Awesome site.

Would be pointless, there's no way to actually enforce it.

There's no real reason to suspect they aren't taking the hash of the hash is there?

I'll be signing up within a few days after my current sigs expire. How many months are you planning on doing this?

Whats the current referral count?

You most likely have adblock or noscript or something preventing the google auth JS execution.

Is this ok?