Not defending Clintons if they actually had done crimes. But what makes you glorify the current p**** grabbing, daughter ba*ging, ra*ist and racist POTUS so much?! Lol I think Trump would be long in jail had he not been a billionaire and had the influence and support of gulliable supporters in the country  There's a GIGANTIC difference between the trail of curious events the Clintons have, and that of Trump. Let's just say there are quite a few curious, mysterious and unsolved murders in the Clintons past. |
|
|
|
I am just not understanding the meaning of this thread and what discussion you want and the word used here Muslim filth. This thread is created by filth mind I think .
the thread is reasonable and about real issues, but I too disagree with the use of the phrase "Muslim filth." |
|
|
|
...so first question, is he a pedo?
Says the pedo_troll. |
|
|
|
...
Once after the stepping into moon and placing the US flag video got telecasted to the common people more controversy existed out of the same for some reason. If we begin to go through different sources related to the planet moon then only it is possible to get a deep vision how this can be achieved when most other countries associated with it hasn't took any decision about the righteous of the incident.
Righteous? I think it's pretty cool they planted the flag. Other nations have no say in the matter.
...
Once after the stepping into moon and placing the US flag video got telecasted to the common people more controversy existed out of the same for some reason. If we begin to go through different sources related to the planet moon then only it is possible to get a deep vision how this can be achieved when most other countries associated with it hasn't took any decision about the righteous of the incident.
Righteous? I think it's pretty cool they planted the flag.
Other nations have no say in the matter.like the children raped on pedo island? 50 years after the moon landing, the us gov is the first to run a pedo island for very important pedos... or maybe not... you stuck on pedo? need to include the word twice in each sentence or something?
Actually, the technical reason why we didn't land on the moon is, it's only "land" if it's on the earth. Moon substance isn't land.  In case you had not heard, "Land" is a verb and a noun. |
|
|
|
^^^ I said any questions, not the most biased opinions possible from somebody who's (I'm assuming) based their entire life and career around a lie and the biggest conspiracy in the history of the mankind bar-none.
Wait, so you don't want to look at three dimensional trig? |
|
|
|
Well your description of these alleged people is unconvincingly vague. If true, its probably on them then. I'd say they need to learn how to better manage money. Either that or they have astronomical healthcare costs.
I'm not interested in your judgmental, hypocritical comments on people you don't know. No more than your judgmental, critical attitude in assigning "super wealthy" to people making > 300k a year. |
|
|
|
Ridiculous rambling, attempting to see things in photos that really aren't there. That website is garbage. |
|
|
|
I'm starting to think your goal is just to derail the thread because your alleged gripe with the graphs don't have anything to do with the points that were being made and at this point, you are ignoring most of what I say. Its like a mercator projection is being used to show the path from Florida to Mexico and you are arguing that I am fooled about the size of Greenland. No it is not the "standard" way to make graphs, graphs are literally just pictures in a set scale that can take any form the creator desires. Standard way to make THIS graph as I have demonstrated from multiple sources. You are ignorant because you don't understand the mechanism used to create more visual impact using a specifically formed graph than the actual number support. Its just not relevant in this case because that visual impact is actually contrary to my the main arguments pre-derailment. a. There aren't many people making around 300k b. 300k is far above "middle income" The graph you desire to see would actually present both of those points in a more clear way. You might have a relevant argument point if my original argument was something that matched the visual impact you are describing like " People making 250k+ are one of the largest groups of earners" / "Greenland is one of the largest land bodies" . Me being unaware to it being used that way would be completely irrelevant unless we were talking about the size of Greenland. That should also give you more insight as to why so many organizations make the same graph the same way. Its practical. There just isn't much useful information by splitting all those people out to barely visible bars while making the graph several times bigger AND STILL having to do the same thing to a lesser degree at the newly defined "end". The one you posted does it at 250 and the one I posted does it at 500. Context, motive, and relevance are always important aspects of critical thinking "Who is doing it?" "Why are they doing it?" "Who is it benefiting?" and "How does it apply to this discussion?" are questions you should think about before derailing the thread. I know people making >300k who are just getting by. There's no reason to doggedly pursue your claim that they are Super Rich. They're not. |
|
|
|
All the evidence points to the fact that we did. For example Russia and other countries having the capability to know while it was going on whether we did or not. It's really not something you can hide and thus pretend that you did.
There is no doubt that the launching of the Saturn rockets could not be hidden, and in space they could be tracked by radar. Ultimately the proof is the >800 lbs of rocks and dirt that was brought back. Microscopic examination shows it cannot have been produced on the Earth. Also there are the reflectors left at the landing sites. |
|
|
|
^^^ You already stated 1 degree = ~60 nautical miles in the flat earth thread and guess what, the Moon measures 32'. Now you're just a faggot who has to backtrack to maintain his master's lie.
At sixty feet, one degree of arc is about one foot wide. So this 1:60 ratio applies, and at 3600 miles, 1 degree would sweep 60 miles. But three dimensional trig allows accommodation for hills and valley on the earth. It's far more precise. Given that your measurement errors are a substantial part of the measurements, this would be the way to get it right. For example, from three points on the earth, say Manhattan, Los Angeles, and Miami, measure the angle to the moon at the same time. The four points form a triangle on each of four sides. What is the sum of the angles between the three ground points? |
|
|
|
I prove the Moon is a close and small object by detailing its direct measurement...
Hahahah no, you haven't. You also have not explained how that Moon changes in apparent size periodically. And you're going to have to do trig in three dimensions, not two. But that shouldn't be a problem. Right? |
|
|
|
|
The Moon isn't hollow, not yet.
It will take a while for us to dig all the ore out and make spaceships and starships.
Maybe after a couple thousand years, it will be hollow.
|
|
|
|
.....
I'm measuring the Moon's diameter directly using the distance to a horizon vanishing line formed by the 1 minute resolution limit of the human eye; the Moon is ~32 nautical miles in diameter. This direct measurement conflicts with the story that NASA landed man on a ~1876 nautical mile wide sphere, and you're telling me stories ABOUT FUCKING SANTA CLAUSE!!!
But you can't measure diameter using just the fact that the moon is about 0.5 degree in width, the diameter changes with the proposed distance of the Moon from the Earth. That horizon vanishing line stuff is bogus, too many changes in land, hills and valleys, etc. You can do better than that. ^^^ How the hell do you land a plane on ball spinning a ~1,000 MPH below it, you fucking idiot?....
Pilots do it all the time. Just like birds. You know bugs do it also. Is it spinning at 1000 mph? I didn't say that. I was asking only about geometry of a dog leg flight path on StupidFlatEarth versus great circle flight path on a round globe. Now answer the question, you fucking idiot. There's an atmospheric jet-stream moving at unknown hundreds of MPH and the aircraft is flying in, riding this stream, and you want to use flight times across the axis of rotation of a theoretical spinning sphere while riding a jet-stream as some kind of proof that debunks, angular resolution limits? The eye has an angular resolution limit of 1 minute thus, a 1 foot object can be seen at a maximum distance of 1/2 nautical miles before it's too small to resolve. I'm measuring the Moon's diameter directly using the distance to a horizon vanishing line formed by the 1 minute resolution limit of the human eye; the Moon is ~32 nautical miles in diameter. This direct measurement conflicts with the story that NASA landed man on a ~1876 nautical mile wide sphere, and you're telling me stories ABOUT FUCKING SANTA CLAUSE!!! Well, the jet stream runs west-east, so on a globe, the jet would pass through it headed toward the pole, or travel in it on it's way directly east or west. On the flat world, I don't how how you conceptualize jet streams. But I doubt you have a scheme in which the jet streams dogleg like the jet does. So what exactly are you arguing here? A) the earth is flat (blah-blah-blah) B) the moon is a 32 mile reflected light thing c) both of the above Because (B) could be alleged to exist above a globe. And (a) would of course imply (b). Santa isn't going to answer these FUCKING QUESTIONS FOR YOU so you gonna have to answer them. |
|
|
|
^^^ How the hell do you land a plane on ball spinning a ~1,000 MPH below it, you fucking idiot?....
Pilots do it all the time. Just like birds. You know bugs do it also. Is it spinning at 1000 mph? I didn't say that. I was asking only about geometry of a dog leg flight path on StupidFlatEarth versus great circle flight path on a round globe. Now answer the question, you fucking idiot. |
|
|
|
I think that his many war-hawk neocon advisors basically ordered the airstrike for him, but he realized that it was insane and called it back. From reporting about the inside of the Administration, I get the sense that everyone is just doing whatever they want, often ignoring what Trump says, and Trump himself is a pretty weak force on most issues. I'm glad that he pushed back on this one, but I still see the machine of war moving constantly in the direction of Iran.
I honestly think Trump does not want any kind of war with anyone. He tried to be friends with kim jong, with putin, stopped the iran thing too. Right, but Iran knows that and can take advantage of it. The little dog nipping at the elephant, sort of. But there are a lot of ways to "get even." The more interesting of those the public never hears about. The out in the open, transparently stupid game Iran is playing isn't going to work to their advantage. |
|
|
|
How long will they stay in this temporary housing? Thats the issue. At 775 per day, it only takes 3 months ....
I'd leave them there until they turn around and go back. |
|
|
|
....
My prior claim still stands and was supported by all of those zillow links. Those aren't maybes. Those are properties on the market that could be bought right now at less than 28% of gross monthly income. Its not my fault that you confused yourself by using income after taxes instead of gross income to make the rich seem poor.
...
Its a million dollar home at a cost of 5400
That is 22% of the gross monthly income of someone with an annual income of 300,000
and of course the expectation is not that any wealthy person can buy any house. ....
You started off claiming that the 300,000$ person could buy a home in the most expensive districts. Then you backed off that claim, and talked about how he could buy the AVERAGE home at 1.7M. Now you've found some junker likely next to the neighborhood crackhouse, for 1M. Plus you are now claiming " not every super wealthy person can buy a house."Purchase price = 1.7M... 1.7M * 90% = 1.53M .... Assumes the person can pay 170,000 down. Few people can do that. 4.25% /12 ... Interest per month, taking midpoint of recent rates (taxes, insurance, HOA fees) = 0.012% of purchase price per month Payment for the average SF house of 1.7M would be = Interest (5757) + taxes, insurance, HOA (1700) = 7457 This poor "SUPER WEALTHY" guy's available income for all expenses after his house payment would be ... 11250 - 7457 = 3793 But it's the nature of communism to go after and persecute the small businessmen, and take what they earned. One way to start would be to call them the SUPER WEALTHY. I think you've defined SUPER WEALTHY as someone you'd simply like to gorge and take their money away. |
|
|
|
I fully support Williamson ! Why? you should really listen to her official announcement speech ! she is the only one (with gabbard) to understand that something is wrong on the issue of health (gmo, electrosmog, toxic vaccines for the proles / clean one for the elites and most importantly she gets the forces seeking to end Mankind, furthermore she is the last chance of this boomer generations to do something great.
For now trump has only been talk...
america has better to offer than trump, even gabbard would be better...
but if williamson can apply mattew 11 to the enemies of love, kill the vip pedo, move on to declassify 911 and go after those having committed it... maybe america will have a future.... otherwise, it has already been trademarked !
Williamson is wise and definitely has a lot to offer. I hope she gets more exposure, and what ever happens I hope she stays in politics. I was thinking she'd make a great secretary of state, or another member of the cabinet...For instances, she would make a great Sectrtary of Education. She has a real grip and clarity of the real history of the U.S. and how it impacts us. Gabbard is a favorite, I think she will go far. But also every day, Harris is looking very insightful. When said she wants to concentrate on the things that keep us up at night with worry, like our health, our families health, or how as are going make ends meet, and have enough to retire on, so we are not below the poverty line, she hit the nail on the head. So for me Gabbard Harris, Williamson, and also I am keeping an eye on Michael Bennet. He is sounding really promising. Biden, should step down. He's is a good guy, but needs to retire...into the background and be a consultant, if anybody needs one. I do have to hand it to the Dems, to front a groupthinked club of candidates who succeed in making Trump look like the voice of sanity and reason. |
|
|
|
The predictions for a globe and thus the Copernican model break down when accounting for angular resolution limits. The horizon is provably not the physical object predicted by the globe.
The Moon's diameter can be measured directly and it's 32 nautical miles across, this is the end of the bullshit claims made by our absolutely corrupt government who say they put men on what is only a small plasma light.
I'm waiting for your response on my flying over the N Pole USA--> Asia. In your flat world this would have been a much longer flight, taking 25-30 hours instead of 15. But the pilot chose that route because it was shorter, given the winds on that day. That's obvious, if the origin and destination are pretty much on opposite sides of the globe, then the pilot can go any which way he chooses. DIRECT - 9724 miles VIA North Pole - 9174 miles at 500 mph 18 hours. But in StupidFlatEarth, he'd be making a big dogleg. How far? 15,000 miles? At 500 mph that's 30 hours. The trip didn't take 30 hours. It took 18. |
|
|
|
I am really confused why someone would consider an income of $300,000 per year would be considered part of the "wealthy" class. I would think that would be the expected income of a successful doctor, lawyer or small business owner. I always thought people in these professions were considered Upper Middle class....
They are, and you are correct. Coinsforcommies, in his own mind and nobody else, they are Super Wealthy. Not only that, but all those type of statistics look at family income, and the typical family earning over 300,000 have slightly more that two wage earners. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
