Question.
In the pool stats it gives a best-share of :5,457,984,292
My pool stats show a bestshare of : 96,813,886,812.256165
??
Best share resets after someone finds a block. Bestever doesn't reset. |
|
|
|
|
Absolutely no computer of any size shape cost or form can produce bitcoin in any meaningful capacity whatsoever any more. Even the most powerful supercomputer is useless. You need dedicated ASIC bitcoin mining hardware to mine bitcoins. The computers don't do the mining, they just run the mining hardware.
|
|
|
|
[2016-05-06 19:51:20.519] Possible block solve diff 188396785947.533081 !
[2016-05-06 19:51:20.665] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2016-05-06 19:51:20.665] Solved and confirmed block 410586 by 1KGLgnQT83uoGzix3XQm9EZ4SNFQ7Gv1k6
[2016-05-06 19:51:20.665] User 1KGLgnQT83uoGzix3XQm9EZ4SNFQ7Gv1k6:{"hashrate1m": "26.1T", "hashrate5m": "26.5T", "hashrate1hr": "26.7T", "hashrate1d": "19.9T", "hashrate7d": "5.09T"}
[2016-05-06 19:51:20.665] Worker 1KGLgnQT83uoGzix3XQm9EZ4SNFQ7Gv1k6:{"hashrate1m": "26.1T", "hashrate5m": "26.5T", "hashrate1hr": "26.7T", "hashrate1d": "19.9T", "hashrate7d": "5.09T"}
[2016-05-06 19:51:20.665] Block solved after 155033733099 shares at 86.8% diff
Block by 26TH miner  https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/block/000000000000000005d607fea818705f6d99676c1f678184533551915cbb6b27 |
|
|
|
|
Repeat after me: There is nothing wrong with the pool. There is no way to game the system. The big pools can't do anything to small pools. There is no spoon conspiracy.
The only thing that's happened is a run of bad luck and fighting orphans with an overwhelmingly large pool.
Back to mining.
|
|
|
|
Is there a known smallest (hashpower) miner which found block at solo.ckpool?
300GH if I recall correctly. |
|
|
|
Sacrifice here to appease the spirits of the dark pool
Everything will be fine now
You forget who owns the pool. It would be more something like this:  |
|
|
|
BUT where do CKPool users have a choice on how much they 'donate' in fees ?
You're confusing the ckpool software which kano was talking about with kano's kano.is ckpool. But now we're way off topic. To make it on topic, note I have on numerous occasions suggested ckpool can be used as an intermediary to make part of p2pool scale better, but that adds yet another layer of complexity to setting up p2pool. |
|
|
|
HOLY CRAP!!! I just got the popup window!!!!
Congrats!!! [2016-05-01 07:30:02.951] Possible block solve diff 1088694185600.859131 !
[2016-05-01 07:30:03.099] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2016-05-01 07:30:03.099] Solved and confirmed block 409719 by 1EnFgD1z8Qhz5jLT2Dsqbf1w2pGkt5XZmD.0
[2016-05-01 07:30:03.099] User 1EnFgD1z8Qhz5jLT2Dsqbf1w2pGkt5XZmD:{"hashrate1m": "49.1T", "hashrate5m": "47.7T", "hashrate1hr": "46.9T", "hashrate1d": "61.6T", "hashrate7d": "77.4T"}
[2016-05-01 07:30:03.099] Worker 1EnFgD1z8Qhz5jLT2Dsqbf1w2pGkt5XZmD.0:{"hashrate1m": "49.1T", "hashrate5m": "47.7T", "hashrate1hr": "46.9T", "hashrate1d": "61.6T", "hashrate7d": "77.4T"}
[2016-05-01 07:30:03.099] Block solved after 363623669827 shares at 203.5% diff
|
|
|
|
|
Unless you're also planning to put a full bitcoin node there or solo mine on-site, then it's not a problem as mining on a pool uses very little actual bandwidth itself.
|
|
|
|
Has anyone else noticed that the transactions in the Mempool have skyrocketed over the last two days -- 16000 transactions - could there be some kind of attack that is preventing us from hitting blocks ?
No |
|
|
|
Well I rented 3.5P for 5 hours, didn't even improve on my 2B share I got with 40T. Oh well... That's why it's called the lotto.
New to renting and want to try it out. when i sign up my pool im going to use solo ck pool under user name do i just put wallet address only? or address.worker1? i dont need a password do i? thanks Welcome. Just address is fine if you're only going to have one worker. You don't need a password but if your rental service demands one, just put anything in, like x . The only difference between direct mining and rentals is that rentals often need you to use port 3334 in the configuration. |
|
|
|
|
This isn't the first time and won't be the last. On every occasion a high fee mistake has occurred in the past that I can recall, if a known entity has mined the transaction - i.e. a pool - if the person who sent the transaction has come forth, the pool has returned their BTC. There is no reason to suspect bitclub would do otherwise here.
|
|
|
|
 Unfortunately the issues remain the same as they've always been and the suggestions for how to get more people to use p2pool haven't changed in years but none of that is working. I don't see a revolutionary way out of this predicament unless it's totally redesigned. Alas I don't think anyone has solutions for the existing design even if they were to start from scratch again. |
|
|
|
[2016-04-24 22:41:40.284] Possible block solve diff 524082661828.536682 !
[2016-04-24 22:41:40.666] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2016-04-24 22:41:40.666] Solved and confirmed block 408810 by 1CnUJWBEXuTtzemXymJRqY3vcAUmUxnNZt
[2016-04-24 22:41:40.667] User 1CnUJWBEXuTtzemXymJRqY3vcAUmUxnNZt:{"hashrate1m": "3.48P", "hashrate5m": "3.48P", "hashrate1hr": "2.32P", "hashrate1d": "475T", "hashrate7d": "77.5T"}
[2016-04-24 22:41:40.667] Worker 1CnUJWBEXuTtzemXymJRqY3vcAUmUxnNZt:{"hashrate1m": "3.48P", "hashrate5m": "3.48P", "hashrate1hr": "2.32P", "hashrate1d": "475T", "hashrate7d": "77.5T"}
[2016-04-24 22:41:40.667] Block solved after 22173486604 shares at 12.4% diff
|
|
|
|
 congrats to 1A3zSCyd3FRGJKzrzRsrtGtdoRh4ZQXEx8 for the Block! [2016-04-24 13:30:58.121] Possible block solve diff 613309784492.757080 !
[2016-04-24 13:30:58.246] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2016-04-24 13:30:58.246] Solved and confirmed block 408758 by 1A3zSCyd3FRGJKzrzRsrtGtdoRh4ZQXEx8
[2016-04-24 13:30:58.246] User 1A3zSCyd3FRGJKzrzRsrtGtdoRh4ZQXEx8:{"hashrate1m": "2.26P", "hashrate5m": "2.2P", "hashrate1hr": "1.46P", "hashrate1d": "101T", "hashrate7d": "38.6T"}
[2016-04-24 13:30:58.246] Worker 1A3zSCyd3FRGJKzrzRsrtGtdoRh4ZQXEx8:{"hashrate1m": "2.26P", "hashrate5m": "2.2P", "hashrate1hr": "1.46P", "hashrate1d": "101T", "hashrate7d": "38.6T"}
[2016-04-24 13:30:58.246] Block solved after 220176049035 shares at 123.2% diff
|
|
|
|
Does anyone know with any empirical knowledge whether weekends tend to be below, at, or above average on average? Or is it all just one day as lucky as the next with the randomness of Pool blocks.
I can tell you with 100% certainty that overall all days on average are average. |
|
|
|
pool down ?
Pinging de.ckpool.org [139.162.154.13] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Ping statistics for 139.162.154.13:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
The provider in DE is under DDoS attack. Please use the main pool as backup. |
|
|
|
|
You're wasting your time. You can get any miner to connect to any algorithm pool if they use the same communication protocol but there is absolutely no crossover in the results of mining a different algorithm.
|
|
|
|
Do they plan on changing the Donator Status requirements soon? The donator status looks nice and it helps contributes to the forum but $4,418 (as of right now), is way too much to pay for it considering how much 10BTC was worth a couple of years ago.
Considering this question is answered on average every 4th post in this thread, I suggest you do some back reading before posting. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
