Up until yesterday. Bookmaker's rules this season stated they held the bets for 7 days. They are in Costa Rica, no?

And

the online world is much bigger than Costa Rica and Vegas who are actually relatively small players in the grand scheme.

And

as long as the rule is consistent that one is fair.

I'm not sure their rule but some books keep changing the suspended game rule on the fly. About a year ago there was a dispute with Bookmaker.eu because the first time this happened in a while they changed their rules specific to that game. In this case the bets carried over to the next day but wasn't what the rules said would happen. Then later they changed the rule again. It was a very valid complaint but SBR banned the poster and deleted the thread.  At the time was "don't worry it will work out for you next time". Well Bookmaker has altered their rules several times since and neither here nor there. Well this past week there was a game that restarted the next day. When the bet was made, till after it settled, till the player requested to talk to managers multiple times, Bookmakers rules clearly said that if the game is scheduled to resume within 7 days the bets stand (so they keep the bet pending up to 7 days if known will be replayed). This was shown both on their live wager rules and on their main baseball rules. A player has a dispute over a large sum. Guess what happens? Bookmaker alters the rule page and adds word playoffs to imply this only applies to playoff games. That is NOT how the rule read. By what was published on their website they owe a large payout.

Anyways Pinnacle has also had different rules at different times but were fair. Didn't change them after the fact. So point is, yes some sites do or had held bets up to 7 days (let alone 3) so that is far from universal. Secondly, bonus points to a site that is consistent with their rules on how that is handled as it is not standard. (it is a big world out there and bitcoin is global - nothing wrong with that baseball rule, and thus is not an issue.

The dead heat rule however is so unorthodox and something I never heard of before. It is also not fair. It doesn't just net out. The reason is because the push probabilities held are not equal on each side. It adds a new dynamic to handicapping where people always just cap push+win together. It's not one of those oh wow I didn't know okay next time I know and it was fair. Unless this is bold in red and a way players completely understand, I would call that one bordering on being a dishonest attempt to profit by including unorthodox rules. It is their business and they are free to do as they like, but would certainly view them negatively for doing that.

Looks like Webetcoins has now paid all players.

The odds closed -137 at ToteSport and BetFred (the online division of the 4th and 5th largest UK brick and mortars). It closed at -133 at Tipico (largest servicing turkey). At William Hill (largest in UK, Largest in USA) it was -137 hours before the match but closed -125. There was for sure better out there, a lot better. But Pinnacle had a 6 cent line on this match (-103 base) other bookies operate with vig. The odds were valid and similar to what many other sources had, and even better than those closers at major books I mentioned. The bet is valid. The terms are valid, the odds are correct. Not sure the issue here?

Cloudbet are betting live on all NFL games this season. Check us out!

With those odds the bet makes no sense.

A pre-tourney No Djokovic would mean player has to win or finish 2nd if Djok wins. But, that's pretty fked up for a tennis tourney with Nishikori on the same side of the draw. He can't finish 2nd to Djok, so any cut odds for eliminating Djok from the field is just a theft for guys on his side.

The odds were a bad price for the final today (closed -110 at pinny). I'm guessing something got fked up and it was a price for todays match just entered into the wrong event?

Of course it won't be refunded. The bet was lost fairly.
You're saying that the odds were low? It was his own choice to make this bet.

You are way off base tonight. It's written as the U.S. Open began on 8-25.
Every ticket for these types of events (if you remember the Wolrd Cup), every single one lists the opening day of the event.

You were caught being wrong. I posted the blockchain timestamp. You're better off leaving while you're way behind.

No, look up the transaction...from blockchain transaction of the bet: Received Time 2014-09-08 20:57:56  

He actually sent in the bet within seconds of the finals starting (couple days after Djokovic was already knocked out).





Whew. Glad we're all on the same page now.

Event : Mens Tournament

Start Time : 08/25/2014 10:00

Competition : US Open 2014

Bet Type : Winner W/O Djokovic

Your Selection : Kei Nishikori @ -131.6 or better

Your Selection : Kei Nishikori @ -131.6 or better

Bet Received :
Amount Received : 0.9998 BTC.

Bitcoin Transaction ID : ec2eddc09e2bbc4f9acff68d8d5e9a8046c8692b61e0b64cc025967e3d80899b

Confirmed Odds : -131.6

Yes, as long as they are at least a JR. member.

Do you have a good rating here?

Do you need a line of credit?

I will fund player accounts up to $5,000.00 USD. or in BitCoin, Dodge, or any other method. 5% FLAT RATE


Thanks,
Don.

It was handled in the most professional matter. I respect nitrogensports for doing what they did. This is why they are the most legitimate book for btc.

I currently have a large pending issue with nitrogensports

Action that was taken late is always refunded on their site. However they definitely had lopsided action on a side and decided not to cancel late wagers. Bet was placed 8 minutes into the start of a match and lost. The bet was available on the board 20 minutes into the match because it had the wrong time listed on nitrogen. I was unaware the match had started when I placed the bet, but figured out immediately after when I went to check the score.