Actually, a Miocic vs Velasquez fight wouldn't be that bad at all. And if Miocic does win that, that would bring his stock up the roof. I can already see the media having a good time hyping Miocic up as potentially one of the greatest in UFC HW. Rightly so. I mean who else in the modern UFC era has beaten all the highly rated in the HW division? (Assuming he already beat Velasquez).
I believed that Miocic vs Velasquez fight will really tell who is the most dominant HW fighter now. But I don't know what happen to Cain now, is he still injured or just enjoying father time? I hope he came back because I think he is still in the height of his career. I still remember his workrate fighting JDS and how he destroy him. But it Stipe Miocic time to shine now unless Cain comeback and spoils it. Well, Stipe said he also wants to start working on a kid now so he might take some free time too  |
|
|
|
Recently I developed stricter version my gambling codex. There are only 2 cases when I stop my gambling session:
1. When I lost all my designated bankroll. I learned from experience that desire to get back and play until you will is the most destructive force in gambling, don't do it.
Definitely when we lost our bankroll, there is no othe choice but to leave the game. It would be crazy if we refill our bankroll for the sake of chasing loses. 2. When I win enough money. I usually consider 20% of my initial bankroll as a profit to be great result. We don't want to be too greedy.
I guess you have a big bankroll since you only need 20% of your initial bankroll to have a great result. I follow the same strategy just to make sure I wont lose too much and I will be able to book a profit when I am gambling. I followed the same strategy, 20% and that's it, I played even 10% sometimes You need to quit when you're winning, because you can't quit if you lose, then you just lost  |
|
|
|
@iluv I understand, but many don't. A YouTube video outlining all the controversy and the proof it is legitimate will be very good for the coin.
Hmmm, well sure, I'll add it. Please do! Maybe we can get that negative feedback removed and silence the haters  Well, it certainly will soon as ibminer has stated, he has sent the wallet on examination somewhere, so it's only a matter of time On the other hand TheTorcoin will need to edit the OP and that will do it |
|
|
|
@iluv I understand, but many don't. A YouTube video outlining all the controversy and the proof it is legitimate will be very good for the coin.
Hmmm, well sure, I'll add it. |
|
|
|
Can we have a new practical challenge? A YouTube video that proves TORcoin is not a virus..
that will clear quite a few things up
ESET and BitDefender have already proven this If you feel insecure, please feel free to submit the download to any of the major antivirus companies as a false positive and wait for their response I have recently submitted it as a false positive to Avira |
|
|
|
Paid |
|
|
|
The majority of TorCoin releases, and all main branch releases, are not integrated and it is extremely misleading reading the OP or the website because everything revolves around its integration with Tor.
If the website and OP get changed to reflect the truth more clearly and I hear back from some of the companies I've contacted regarding possible false-positives on the windows version being detected as a trojan, I will consider modifying my feedback.
I completely agree with this |
|
|
|
Chances are you were short on blocks.
Can you translate this to the common tongue? |
|
|
|
TOR: TFiX6L2Arsp2kUkYnfqa7bkwgu8udYEvdJ
BTC: 1FowGTphMGKoPd35pZ4m9anan8hJnPedrn
Sent some |
|
|
|
This task one time only or welcome done this task every separate days?
One time only! |
|
|
|
I'm not sure if it really is a false positive, but I think all of you have already forgotten that I was the one that submitted the false positive report to ESET. After they cleared it, it was my first time installing TorCoin. For some reason you keep calling me a FUDDER but I was initially trying to help TorCoin.
How can you not be sure when ESET has researched on the subject  Who called you a FUDDER? I'm not sure because I did not test to see if it generates the files that CoinStealer generates. I have faith that it's clean because I trust ESET but I'm not sure because I did not look to see for myself. TheTorCoin keeps calling me a FUDDER, even though he admitted to exactly what I was saying. TorCoin client does not connect to Tor. It's a fact. I'v also submitted a false positive to Avira, they replied they'll test it out in their lab I'm positive with trusting ESET and Bitdefender |
|
|
|
It was wrong from TheTorcoin not to state this in the OP Torcoin however is indeed TOR integrated: https://github.com/TorCoinProject/torcoin/tree/torI agree it was completely wrong not to state this in the OP However I also think it's a bit of an exaggeration to leave a red tag on him Torcoin IS being developed and will implement more features It's a mistake, however a scam accusation is a bit too much since there actually is https://github.com/TorCoinProject/torcoin/tree/torIf there weren't it wouldn't be too much since it would be a flat out lie This way however, the OP was just wrongly formed |
|
|
|
I'll just leave this here I submitted a False Positive report to ESET (NOD32, ESET Smarty Security, etc...) They replied to me today and confirmed that it is a false positive. They have already updated their virus signatures. TorCoin no longer shows up as a Trojan in ESET. I verified this by running another scan of the file directly. I just loaded up TorCoin and generated my first wallet address. TDk2oNSXEzmP3voog2y6HtmcDiEZD9aLLm   |
|
|
|
I'm not sure if it really is a false positive, but I think all of you have already forgotten that I was the one that submitted the false positive report to ESET. After they cleared it, it was my first time installing TorCoin. For some reason you keep calling me a FUDDER but I was initially trying to help TorCoin.
How can you not be sure when ESET has researched on the subject Who called you a FUDDER? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
