1) At the beginning of makefiles (for netcoind .exe) add if necessary:

# Copyright (c) 2009-2010 Satoshi Nakamoto
# Distributed under the MIT/X11 software license, see the accompanying
# file license.txt or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.

CXX ?= g++

USE_UPNP:=0


2) then change every appearance of g++ with $(CXX)


3) Below obj/noui.o add:


    obj/noui.o \
    obj/zerocoin/Accumulator.o \
    obj/zerocoin/AccumulatorProofOfKnowledge.o \
    obj/zerocoin/Coin.o \
    obj/zerocoin/CoinSpend.o \
    obj/zerocoin/Commitment.o \
    obj/zerocoin/ParamGeneration.o \
    obj/zerocoin/Params.o \
    obj/zerocoin/SerialNumberSignatureOfKnowledge.o \
    obj/zerocoin/SpendMetaData.o \
    obj/zerocoin/ZeroTest.o


4) In makefiles (i am interested in makefile.mingw ) below obj/%.o: .... add commands for compiling obj/zerocoin/%.o : ...


obj/%.o: %.cpp $(HEADERS)
   $(CXX) -c $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $<

obj/zerocoin/%.o: zerocoin/%.cpp
   $(CXX) -c $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $<

Those 2 guys from Aug 4th, 2014 chat still make selling pressure with their millions Quarks?

Mining monopoly does not touch me at all

Market and market manipulation will judge all.

I am not impressed with biggest mining farms. They will be worth nothing without permanent new hardware updating and permanent marketing connected with bitcoin production and future (higher) values of bitcoins.

Imagine new coins with 100% mined coins in 1 week followed by PoS. By what that coins are better or worse than Bitcoin? I am not sure about technical advantages or failures, but theoretically and by simplifications they are the "same" as bitcoins.

What makes Bitcoin advantage is: Bitcoin is first (?) virtual coin type, Bitcoin is symbol, it is biggest (still), it has biggest virtual coins economy (still very small and unstable compared to fiat), it has biggest marketing (and price manipulations) and something else likely.

Finally, we all are thinking about, reading about, trading about, speculating, gambling with the "future".

At first place we need every update information at this forum.   Other forums are less important for general attention

Let's correct some mistakes in the source code because I can't compile Windows wallet.

Source code is from https://github.com/netcoinfoundation/netcoin

1) In the source code it is missing folder
        src/leveldb

2) and in the source code it is missing files
        src/leveldb.cpp and src/leveldb.h

3) in the source code it is missing 2 folders:
        src/obj/
        src/obj/zerocoin

For 1) and 2) I used files from Litecoin 0.8.7.4. Very likely you can use files from the newer versions of Bitcoin.

Adjust configuration files too.

Quark is in good positions in this MapOfCoins.com

http://mapofcoins.com/

Much better than the current price valuation.

Researching history of some coins is not supporting conspiracy theory.

It should be done for every coins.

Can you make new Rainbow Charts for Bitcoin?

It seems Bitcoin is below lower blue track.

What tools do you use for making Rainbow?

Where could I find source code of this updated version of Netcoin?

I found:  https://github.com/netcoinfoundation/netcoin 

I noticed big discrepancy between the size of the wallet folders of QRK and DRK.

QRK is 14 months old and folder size is 2.14 GB
DRK is  8  months old and folder size is  0.4  GB

I think we should reduce the speed of folder growth.

We should do both (not the only one):
   -reducing time between generating blocks
   -rising the size of the block proportionally to the reducing block time generation

For example,
      -instead of having 1 QRK/block we should have 10QRK/block.
      -instead of time between blocks 30s we should have 300s

Time for confirming transaction has to stay as it is now.

This way Quark parameters such as volume of Quarks, the new Quarks generation per year and the transaction confirmation time stays the same, while the growth of wallet folder will be significantly reduced (approximately 10x).

Is my suggestion or reasoning valid?

Is this idea good?

I don't press anybody.

Some quarkers should try to do what I did and report if the results are good or bad. I think the wallet made using the newest libraries works good.

My 1 small finger made compiling quark wallets using the newest libraries:

   http://quarkcoin.orgfree.com

Last time nobody visited that website! My small finger is angry

The main cause is very much bigger market capitalization of BTC compared to QRK.

Will you sell at more than 90% loss? Do you wait for 97% loss again?   

id: coinerer

Let's try game!

Everybody sold

New Shaq Fu website is online  www.alegendreborn.com

From Facebook  https://www.facebook.com/ShaqFuALegendReborn

"Dear Shaq Fu-natics! The official Shaq Fu: A Legend Reborn website is now live and online!

View the cast, buy perks and join the community forum!
Shaq Fu: A Legend Reborn - The official video game site
www.alegendreborn.com"


And Indiegogo campaign is successful https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/shaq-fu-a-legend-reborn

I modified and joined 2 of my previous posts



Eeeehhh, don't know why, but I made new by librares updated
             Quark wallet version 0.8.25
             Quark wallet version 0.9.2.1-test4



All the newest libraries, see them:

   boost_1_55_0
   db-4.8.30.NC
   libpng-1.6.13
   miniupnpc-1.9
   openssl-1.0.1i
   protobuf-2.5.0
   qrencode-3.4.4
   qtbase-opensource-src-5.3.2
   qttools-opensource-src-5.3.2

Newest MinGW &GCC version 4.9.1.

Wallets are compiled from official Quarkcoin Max github:

  quark-master-0.8
  quark092-master


Direct links to the Windows exe version of the Quark wallet and deamon:

           http://quarkcoin.orgfree.com/quarkcoin-0.8.3.25.7z
           http://quarkcoin.orgfree.com/quark-0.9.2.1-test4.7z

or at webpage:      http://quarkcoin.orgfree.com/


Tested at virustotal.com, no viruses found, detection rate 0/58:

     https://www.virustotal.com/en/url/bb15beda89d9d644fd6cdde87605a5b1be531fec2b8c58d231492c324842a25a/analysis/1410900925
     https://www.virustotal.com/en/url/8aad016ede9463c3c022f142e23ba41b7357b43616e684337dd15c7f66975799/analysis/



New Quark wallet is v0.9.2.1, just like Bitcoin v0.9.2.1. Test and help Max to make new official wallets!

Tell your results! Response here!

Remember to backup your current wallet!!!


Report errors if you can find it I wasn't successful.


Does somebody know which coin has all the latest dependant libraries (bug fixes) included, and which coin is compiled with the latest official gcc 4.9.1 ?   I don't know, this Quark wallets maybe (Bitcoin and Litecoin does not have)


All free here      http://quarkcoin.orgfree.com/  Free commercials from domain provider too!




Always backup your current wallet.dat file before installing this or every other wallet too!!!
Your Windows QuarkCoin Wallet is at c:\users\insertyourusername\AppData\Roaming\Quarkcoin\wallet.dat 

What does it mean Quark distribution for Quark community?

Boring days and I need to learn something. Maybe something new?

I see now, CAPS has PoS 200% yearly and HBN has PoS 2% every 10 days.

Netcoin has more moderate and more appropriate PoS of 10%-100% at next 1st year. It depends on netcoin amounts in wallets.

It shot down almost "overnight" from longer term perspective. If coin has no developing economy or user base at pace of at least of PoS, average coin value will fall. Only big buyer can save us