Genuinely laughed out loud at this. One scammer who has failed to remove their red tags asking to be hired by another scammer who has failed to remove their red tags. You'd be perfect business partners. You are accusing me of being a scammer? do you have any proof? or are you trying to shitpost just to get paid money?
|
|
|
Tag merit senders if you want to tag these people @DT2 members please. do not tag merit receivers as they have no saying in receiving merits.
|
|
|
Well, my report has been marked bad for the second time so apparently masternodes are ok on the mining board. Go figure.
By posting this topic you are questioning the ability of moderator(s) and are trying to enforce your own rules. stop bitching and start reporting obvious garbage posts first.
|
|
|
Just to be clear. I have tagged them based on your words. if it turns out that they were innocents I will tag you for accusing people.
|
|
|
What now? who said anything about you? You should think about what you're posting before you do it. I mean there is not a single reputable member with no signature here to tell me that whatever I say is wrong
Who the fuck is Don hilary? Marlboroza's master.
|
|
|
We can see that at least one of the DT1 members has an alt account included on DT2, what makes you think that other DT1 members are not doing the same? normal members are giving their alt accounts merits, what makes you think that DT members are not giving their own alt accounts positive trust?
I'd like to advise against trusting suchmoon, actmyname and marlboroza with anything. this is based on my own personal interactions with them, I believe that they are not honest and are abusing merit and trust system for their own personal gains, whether it to be for bullying other forum members or to give their friends merits and +trust. suchmoon has given positive trust to counter a negative trust given by a reputable forum member. he/she is abusing his DT power.
If you read the reference of his red trust on me, there is no attempt of scam. I have asked for money in exchange for my time, however after seeing the community's reaction to my behavior I have decided to change my behavior and now am offering a free service, yet suchmoon insists on holding my reputation hostage. this person shouldn't be trusted.
|
|
|
I only applied this signature 2 days ago, and I was telling him long before that that he is an idiot and his posts make zero sense. He didn't listen to me then either.
He's clutching at straws because he knows he is wrong.
What now? who said anything about you? maybe you forgot to post with another account? Marlboroza still refuses to comment about the matter, what an irresponsible person! Don hilary doesn't have the balls to tag me himself, he has his slave to tag me!
|
|
|
We need a moderator in off-topic section. people are posting 100% garbage. I'd like to suggest to people start reporting a few of totally garbage posts on off-topic and any of the other forum boards with no moderators. let us clean this place together. you certainly don't want me to tag you all and ask you to report garbage posts do you? if I see nobody cares I might use force to make you all campaign shitposters to help a bit. I forgot to add. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) please don't tag me. these are my ideas.
|
|
|
tell me why do you think my posts are trolling? I have never trolled anybody, what I have said are criticism and not trolling. You admit it yourself: [...] I'm intentionally trolling you(refer to ~blah~) [...]
Are you trying to be funny, trying to level us, or are you just incorrigibly contradictory? Go shitpost with your signature elsewhere man. did you tag me for trolling? funny how you chipmixer criminals are saying the same thing. I mean there is not a single reputable member with no signature here to tell me that whatever I say is wrong. fucking cartels man. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) That is for after I got tagged. don't be a shitposter. you are here to shitpost just like when you were on another thread. EDIT: How is this relevant? I have started trolling after getting tagged for trolling.
|
|
|
Bump. The Others a.k.a digaran at your service. I will manage your signature campaign. hire me and let us have a spam free forum.
|
|
|
Good riddance. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Why? Now, that's no way to say good-bye. ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Whatever your mutual disagreement, if any long-term member is thinking of bidding Adieu, the only good thing to do is, say: We do hope You reconsider that decision. Maybe, start afresh with a new account. We will miss You. Good bye! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Hey man that is my alt account. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) this topic was first to get a sympathy from people and then to troll my stalkers. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
then tagged me red after I talked with Lauda This is news to me. I'd say that you are either her alt Well, of course. It's been proved and confirmed by all negative-trust users on the forum! or you have a crush on her like I do. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) I don't think being attracted to a person on a forum (whose gender is unknown, by the way) is exactly my forté. I'd say that you have something on Blazed cough you know who is his alt cough. otherwise you are not helping anybody here. we all know that you want to use DT status to bully others and would tag anybody who'd speak with your alt accounts. if you were truly a good person you could have tagged me 2 weeks ago. you waited until I talked with Lauda. I have already explained about your motivation for tagging me. I truly believe that you don't deserve to be on DT. keeping you on DT2 could mean that you have something on Blazed. as he already is aware of this situation, I will tag him in one week for being an indifferent and irresponsible individual. you guys only care about your shitposting on signature campaigns and you are holding your DT positions with your teeth and claws and wouldn't let go. typical cartel behavior. You have taken this community for granted and even when you are called out you'd keep insisting on your shady practice of power abuse. now keep shitposting on other threads to pile up your shitposts which you are getting paid per post for it just to hide the truth. now go and act like a judge and keep calling your victims butthurt trolls. you have perverted this community with your power games and would never care to stay objective and judge people fairly.
|
|
|
You got yourself a thread to shitpost and earn 0.00075 BTC per post, you have posted on other topics just to shitpost and then tagged me red after I talked with Lauda, I'd say that you are either her alt or you have a crush on her like I do. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
You are not tagging marlboroza for giving me free pass.
Forgive my intrusion.... but can you explain to those of us trying to follow this, how exactly marlboroza is "giving you a free pass"? ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FKgq2X4l.png&t=663&c=nq1LLwzRlg0JYQ) This user continues to spread lies, harassing forum members, DT and moderators/stuff, running very shady law practice service which consist of trolling DT members and spreading lies all over the forum.
I have the "default" trust settings... and as far as I can see, marlboroza has tagged you with negative trust. I wouldn't call that a "free pass" He changed red tag to neutral. according to actmyname's standards, that is giving me a free pass. actmyname were also aware of the situation, he didn't tag me back then because marlboroza had me tagged already. marlboroza already gave me a neutral trust as a troll but he tagged me again. I'm practically a target practice for these cartel members we call DT members. they know that I have no power here. EDIT: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.auplod.com%2Fu%2Faldupoa955a.png&t=663&c=WCsO7xglGwaT4A)
|
|
|
we know that actmyname is an alt account and is colluding with other DT members Damn, your superior deduction skills have finally caught me now. No wonder you offered mediation services for people with negative trust! There's no way that you're completely wrong. otherwise there is no need to keep him on DT. there are people with more tags than him and yet they are not on DT2. Show me these users and the valuable tags that they have (directed toward neutral/positive-trust users). If they have tagged shady individuals that are still roaming around then you should highlight them. However, some people approach trust very differently (e.g. TBZ) and that can cause hesitation with including others into DT. he has DT1 members in his pocket or has something against them and they are afraid of him. I'm glad you think that I have so much power but extortion is not my thing. otherwise why the hell would they keep this power abuser on DT2? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) I bet that actmyname would expose some of the DT members if he is excluded. if he is excluded then he wouldn't be able to use this account to settle personal issues with people. I have no personal issues with people before I tag them. It's only really afterward that they get all butthurt and riled up about it, creating threads about me and my abuse. You are not tagging marlboroza for giving me free pass. because you trust him, right? yet his action should be taken into account as untrustworthy by your standards but you don't want to tag him. because you are part of a same cartel, you trust each other and distrust outsiders. therefore you are not fit to hold any power. those who would give you this power are also unfit and untrustworthy and should not be trusted by anybody. you are willing to close your eyes for those who you trust, the same people you trust are the ones keeping you in power. a.k.a cartel. you have been called out several times for abusing your power and yet you are still on DT. keeping you on DT could mean that you are in bed with other DT members. Even after forum admin excluded you, still you are on DT, DT1 member who has kept you on DT2 is a rogue individual and doesn't care about other people, you all only care for the people in your cartel. If you think that what I have said is against the rules you should report me to authorities, I haven't actually asked anybody to pay me money in order to remove my red trust from them. there has been no actions taken by me to make me look guilty. show me one instance where I have asked for money for myself, if you don't like my policies regarding how to deal with people you have no right to tag me red for everybody to see me as scammer. I said something and then I saw the reactions from community and stopped to continue down that road, why are you holding that against me and are trying to keep me down with your DT power? I didn't keep at saying that we should take money from people I even removed my tags where I have asked for money from people to be paid to the forum in exchange of removing their tags. how is this for change of circumstances? After marlboroza removed his tag on me, I didn't say that anymore, why would you bring that issue up again and tag me for it? Now I'm telling you even if you remove the tag from my account I will tag you for abusing your power, if you keep the tag on me, I will try to kick you out from your position, you have had your chances of making this right yet you have refused to listen to reason. if I don't listen to reason as others have pointed out, I have no power over others, so my actions are not damaging anybody's reputation. your actions are however damaging our reputations. Even if I have said something, I haven't done anything wrong, I have just said it, you on the other hand are not only saying but you are doing. damaging my reputation. if you don't have the balls to tag marlboroza, you don't deserve to hold your DT power, you are weak and are afraid of people in power. you can just tag me because you know that I have no power to make you pay for your mistakes. but you know if you tag marlboroza you could lose your position.
|
|
|
That post seems like pretty solid evidence to me that you are not even reading the replies within your own thread. If I were them and knew this to be true, then I wouldn't waste time explaining myself to a brick wall, either. Enjoy throwing your tantrum in the corner; whenever you are ready to come back and act like a person we will all be here waiting.
Who is we here? you mean the usual cartel? This is abuse of power, you keep telling yourself that you are better than others. waiting here like you own this place. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
No. I have no reason to waste hours of my time explaining to you why your behavior is perceived the way it is. Then such a person shouldn't hold any power over others. just like marlboroza, he is refusing to comment here, he is irresponsible and is using his DT power to harass me.
|
|
|
The question "Why did he tag me for trolling?", answers itself. If a user feels that your trolling deserves a negative trust, then a negative trust you will receive from that user. There are no rules about trust moderation, so why do you feel entitled to an explanation in the first place?
"This user continues to spread lies, harassing forum members, DT and moderators/stuff, running very shady law practice service which consist of trolling DT members and spreading lies all over the forum." That should answer the question of why they have tagged you with negative trust. Reporting a "troll" post to moderators will do nothing. Suggesting that as a course of action tells me that you have never even read through the moderation policy that is publicly available and stickied.
Marlboroza has answered your questions, but even if they didn't they are under no obligation to do so. You are acting entitled and are wishing the rules, moderation policy and DT inclusions were based around yourself. This is not going to happen.
One by one, tell me why do you think my posts are trolling? if I say that people shouldn't leave positive trust with no reference, that is not trolling that is my personal opinion. I have never tagged anybody for not doing their jobs. if I have criticized a moderator that is not trolling. Btw, what is stuff? did he mean staff? I have the right to defend other people if it is within reason, I haven't yet defended anybody, so how does he know that my practice is shady? I had my own terms in exchange of defending wrongfully red tagged people. I haven't said which red tag was wrong yet. only they have tagged me to harass me and prevent me from defending others. Did anybody pay me? did I run with people's money? I haven't started to defend anybody yet, how do you know if that is a shady practice? I haven't said which tag is illegit. only my own tags are illegit and a sort of harassment. DT members shouldn't tag people just because they don't trust them. I haven't scammed anybody. I haven't cheated in bounties. tagging me red after I have decided to defend people against abuse of power is abuse of power.
|
|
|
|