Artificial Pump , don't worry the Dump is coming before the end of Jan 2017.  possible but it may increase even more before that, i don't mind for example another increase to 2k, and then a big dump to 1200 or whatever, it would still be a success |
|
|
|
I store Bitcoin in my hardisk wallet so it is impossible to steal my Bitcoin. My wallet is secure enough even if my harddisk has been stolen, there will be a way to recover those Bitcoin
i hope those hard disk are not powered or connected in any way to the internet, otherwise you can't call it secure is this a new trezor thing? look cheaper though, if it has the same security level and not like those "usb trezor" it would be better |
|
|
|
-i 26 seems to give the best hash/w ratio but 50% tdp is still the most interesting.
Yes. Nice find. so best results with Voltage +20% Intesity -i 26 tdp 50% memclock -500 coreclock oc'ed. +150 core clock yes , of course to find the best settings i would have to test over a much longer period of time, but it should be close  that +20mv is the key here, it's equal to running at 60% the core, in fact is above 1800, but of course you get lower wattage if you put 50%/+20mv instead of 60% PL can you try without the +20mv and tell me the core, i want to know if we have the same one, i have 1720 without the 20mv |
|
|
|
If you already have a 1070, it's definitely worth mining with it.
If you do not, it is NOT competative on the basis of income generated vs. cost of card - even on ZEC which is currently it's BEST income generation, the AMD RX 470 and 480 beat it fairly easily on a cost/hash basis.
If you plan to use the card for something OTHER THAN mining on the long term, it can me worth mining with it to help pay for it.
It is NOT in fact a more recent card than the RX 480 - the 1070 introduction PREdates the RX480 introduction (much less the 470) by 2-3 months.
this is wrong how the amd 470 and 480 are beating the 1070 on zcash? just look at the hashrate, the 1070 can do 380 sol at 100 watt against 200 sol at 90 watt for a 470 even if the 470 cost half of one 1070 it's still not better to go with amd, especially if you are going to have many rig where density matter a lot also by the look how people consider cost/hash they always forget that 4 rig are always far better than 8 rig(if they both perform similar, 380 sol x 6 x 4 vs 200 sol x 6 x 8 ), because you save on computer components that do not mine so you save on cost/hash in the end not to mention that you save on the consumption as well, 700 watt x 4 rig against 600 watt per 8 rig...no question nvidia is far better, amd is trash at the moment on zec 470 at CURRENT pricing is closer to 40% of the cost of the 1070 not half AND HAS BEEN DROPPING due to competition from the 1060, *AND* is quite a bit more efficient on algorythms OTHER THAN the one used by ZCash - making yourself reliant on ONE specific coin to achieve ROI is a fools game when the coin has shown NO staying power on price and as many core ISSUES as ZCash has had. Insisting on the 470 mining ZCash *right now* when it's more profitable on ETH and a pair of 470s ON ETH are pulling in about 20% MORE than a single 1070 on ZEC blows your numbers completely away. Most miners are NOT going to lock themselves into a less profitable coin for any significant length of time, and that doesn't even factor coin-switching multipools into account. System cost ends up being at best the same per hash, in MY calculations, on 4 card rigs - you can't get away with or COUNT on that "100 watt for 280 sol/s" figure on ZCash for the 1070 as MOST 1070 don't achieve that, more like 140 watts based on MY stable of various 1070 cards, so you DO end up having to put a beefier PS on a 1070 rig - especially if you don't COUNT on ZCash being profitable for the long run (which is the SMART play). For the 1070 to become competative on XMR, it would have to achieve closer to 1400 h/s not 900 h/s - 470s RIGHT NOW are widely posted to be achieving more than 700 h/s on that coin. I can see a faint possibility of that - the 750ti manages 250 - but if XMR is as memory-hard as ETH is that's gonna be a pipe dream. 40% is still bad when you factor density also you should not consider newegg special offer, not everyone can buy from there, here they are at half the price a 1070 is also better at other algo like spread and lbry so it's not about zcash only and yes the 1070 can do 380 sol 100watt, i've tested it with my rig(6 x 1070), 700 watt at the wall and additional 3 x 140mm fan, you can see other people with the same report |
|
|
|
~285MH for one solo GTX970 (stock, no OC)
~3000MH for one rig of 6x1070 (50% tdp, +150/+600)
I think 50% TDP is too low on the 1070 for skein. Try 66% or higher, and reduce the memclock -500 Revised numbers and more try @ different TDP With same OC ~2950MH - 50% TDP - 600W @ wall - 4.916MH/W ~3130MH - 60% TDP - 775W @ wall - 4.038MH/W ~3270MH - 70% TDP - 915W @ wall - 3.573MH/W ~3370MH - 80% TDP - 1050W @ wall - 3.209MH/W ~3430MH - 90% TDP - 1150W @ wall - 2.982MH/W so sadly for me as usual 50% is the way to go  A few try with -500 memclock +150 core gave me overall -5% watts +5% hash @ all tdp's are you using the +20mv on the core also? i get a lower result than your with those setting |
|
|
|
Auroracoin is currently paying $3,68 per day @560MHASH with the opensource skein sp-mod #1 what pool? yiimp is giving 0.0022 per gpu, which is only $2+, and zpool is a scam so... |
|
|
|
Oh my, eager to see this, any idea of your price or will it be fee based ? Expected hashrate ? Good luck I have already started on the cryptonote sp-mod #2. Version #2 will do around 900 on the 1070 600 on the 1060 6gb, 550 on the 1060 3gb But I think I can optimize more. I think I will add 2% fee and small donation to download. prerelease results with 1060 3gb @ 40 watt in the wall:  i think the fee is enough, the profit after all is the same as zcash |
|
|
|
i don't think so with win 10 i have 2500 sol for 6 card, that is 416.6 per card
probably has to do with the model or him not updating win 10, or simply he is running one instance only...
It's almost as if there is more then one algo to mine and you don't just swap OS's solely based on one algo. Woaw... MIND BLOWN. Jesus your idiocy never ceases to amaze me. Do you even think things through before you make replies or do you just reply with whatever the first thing is that comes to mind? please stop shit posting, you did not see that he is running one instance only, i get the same hash as him when i run one, it has nothing to do with the OS your posts give me cancer every time.... Quote who you're replying to when you make a ambiguous post then dumbass. it does not matter you said crap as usual without even seeing his post p.s. well your post isn't better pallas, as you see i replyed here so you can't say you added another "crappy post"... |
|
|
|
i don't think so with win 10 i have 2500 sol for 6 card, that is 416.6 per card
probably has to do with the model or him not updating win 10, or simply he is running one instance only...
It's almost as if there is more then one algo to mine and you don't just swap OS's solely based on one algo. Woaw... MIND BLOWN. Jesus your idiocy never ceases to amaze me. Do you even think things through before you make replies or do you just reply with whatever the first thing is that comes to mind? please stop shit posting, you did not see that he is running one instance only, i get the same hash as him when i run one, it has nothing to do with the OS your posts give me cancer every time.... |
|
|
|
|
i don't think so with win 10 i have 2500 sol for 6 card, that is 416.6 per card
probably has to do with the model or him not updating win 10, or simply he is running one instance only...
|
|
|
|
Where are you located? Just wondering about the shipping cost to Toronto, Canada - postal code M6S 3T8?
i'm just sending to a same location in canada, shipping is a bit high, but it depend on how many you order, maybe it can be around $35 only...just checked again, it's 47 euro Option 3: Make the bar that holds the back part of the gpu adjustable with a simple cut out on the inside the frame so you can slide it to the position you need and tighten a screw thanks! but then it would look ugly with the fissure in the alluminium bar, i think the last design do not have any problem anymore is the "last design" pictured in this thread, curious to see it. thanks! yeah the photo is in the first page scroll down a bit ...ok i've added it in the first post, that is the final product that you will receive, when you order one so you really have 72 gpu?  A bit less than that, as I haven't mounted cards on two frames yet Might plan on getting more frames from you in the future if mining profitability looks better. what is your electricity 5 cent? this might explain why you you are going big |
|
|
|
|
can the bot be fixed so it count only the post that will be payed? it's confusing now as it count eveything
|
|
|
|
Win 10 is very good , i have 390 sol with nvidia gtx 1070 .
what consumption? |
|
|
|
|
buying always the new equipment but only until the previous one is obsolete, which is not always when the new one come out
then selling the previous one of course and keep the enw one until the next one and so on, every miner should remain in the one year roi territory at worst
|
|
|
|
nah 2k is too low for me, waiting for the range of 5k-10k, which was my first goal since the ebginning, but i'll not cash out, i'll use it as a currency Bitcoin going 2000$ this 2017 is not feasible. It may possibly reach 1200$ but it will not climb up to 2000$.
With regards to the dump it is not going to happen this 2017. China has not launched their fiat virtual currency and even if they do it will took years for them to cover the whole of China before its full implementation. Even if there is dump this year bitcoin will climb up faster back to the current price and why when it will dump many people will buy it back.
Huh? $2000 is just as feasible as $200. and what does a chinese fiat have to do with anything? it'll make bitcoin look even more vital than before. well no, one require 2x value, the other 1/4, big difference, maybe you mean as $450... |
|
|
|
Still have time but looks like we're heading toward the mid 800s now.
i don't think so, it will hold the $900 mark for now, next pump is what you need to broke the 1k mark and go above the last ath i say so because $750 was reached two time, this mean that the stability is very high there, and increase of $150 is not that big, and it's sustainable, will not get dumped as a result |
|
|
|
|
i had not a goal for 2016 but it ended at a desire, my wish was for bitcoin to increase near 1k and so it happened, now all my btc have greater value, this is no different than earning more
|
|
|
|
BTCBTCReplace. Bitcoin is worth more than fiat, silver platinum and about to surpass gold. Who needs to replace it. It will cripple the counterfeit market. Thus proven in Venezuela. When fiat bills are not accepted, there is always digital crypto currency. Those who have the scam have to be stuck with it. This digital revolution is amazing. I always wondered how it would feel or what thing will be like during an era change. We are in the center of the new era. In ten years, fiat will be worthless or worth more in 100 years! BTCBTC
surpassing gold in a single unit value is oen thing but on the marketcap is another, still a long way to go for the latter what i believe is that bitcoin can eventully reach fiat level in the electrocnic payment at some point in history, maybe not usd but other minor fiat currency |
|
|
|
|
the fact that all these exchange can not learn anything from the mistake of the other and still leave a great amount of coin in a hot wallet, is telling me that the hacker is an insider
really they can't be that stupid, it must be on purpose...
|
|
|
|
Segwit's been out now, what, six weeks? And still 70% of block solvers are voting to keep block size at 1MB.
What a revelation.
they will be forced at some point to go with the 2MB hard fork, we can't remain forever at 1MB this is a 100% sure thing i want to ask what is the exact reason why miners are aginst segwit now? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
