Yes, Techy has been trolling for years.   Thank you for providing a place to build our trolling case to Theymos.

I'll start with a recent one.  Techy made an unfounded accusation against marlboroza.



Marlboroza, public pressure is forcing you to re-add the justified negative, at least until Techy stops making false accusations like this.   We've all been a victim of him, and it is very unfair to new members if they can't see it in his trust.  

Two lions and a lamb deciding what's for dinner.

Can you identify even one forum member from that photograph?

This is my thread.  If Lauda is a tumor, then you are in the blood.  That is a fact.

The following re-post should have been made in this thread.  It explains I have no double standards.

No, it means I do not support people who post PMs simply because they are ignored, then lie about the reason.

Posting complete threads like Lauda has done is OK if necessary.  Lauda's trust will suffer if he/she does it often and maliciously.  Picking and choosing what you post, even removing context from a post, is not OK.


I will miss a wishy washy friend like you.  :/

Never heard of it. 

Fuck you and your cloth addiction.  I identify as a boob licker - don't try to change me man!!

Edited to clarify this message was posted with love.

You can PM me with your idea, and I will tell you honestly if it will fly.

I will not share your words with anyone else.

That was a good guess, but experience shows us the people who post PMs out of context tend to go unaffected.  :/

I actually PMed the moderator to look at those posts, which were just trolling.  They went unhanded for a long time.

He/She did not touch the posts of yours that were on topic.

Your claim of censorship when the posts are here and readable, is idiotic.

Edit:  There you go again, posting off topic garbage.  You are dense.

Reflect poorly on me?   Who cares - as long as people still "trust" me.   

I can go into my PMs at any time and cut out a portion of what you wrote me, and then pretend you meant something else.   You are OK with that?

What about cutting out vital context and then pretending you never received it?  You seem to trust people who do that.

I'm questioning kzv's judgement here.  Tag Lauda for posting everything with no malicious intent, but don't tag someone who cherry picked words to attack someone maliciously?  

Techy is grasping at straws now.

Just yesterday he admitted he made an accusation just to harass. 

He is not a noble hero defending this forum - he is just a hypocrite. 

Yes, as a hammer.   

When shit hits the fan,the first thing to go will be electricity.  Few people have the knowledge to set up their own power generation.

How would one publish the message without receiving it?   

---

I can see dumping an entire PM chain to defend oneself - I don't think a person would be guilty of a moral crime.

Consider another example that happened to me - a user took a link I sent him in the middle of a conversation, stripped out all context, made me look like a pervert, then innocently asked "Vod, can you provide us some context? "

Post all of the thread - or at least all of an atomic post - or post nothing.  If you pick and choose words, that should be considered malicious.

So @peloso and @kzv - if you believe Lauda's actions deserve red trust, consider what that user did to me.  :/

Edit... this is a good quote showing malicious intent.

Show me your law degrees guys, or stop playing pretend internet lawyer.  

How many years could one get for "doxing"?

 

No.  Your trust list is yours, as are your reasons for it.

You'll do fine if you stick to facts and leave out the insults and exaggeration.

That post will be deleted, as will this one.  :/

Ask a question without insults and wild assumptions, and we can have a discussion.

Techy admitting he made an accusation with no evidence means the "forced" comment was just trollbait.

Same with his comments about trust abuse.   We've spent way too much time entertaining the idiot.