FIFY @Royse777: you can't just empty your Trust list and then complain about incorrect negative feedback. The improper way to handle this, is by excluding him from your own Trust list. That's how the Trust system doesn't work. Having anyone in my trust list either trusted or distrusted does not effect in the DT voting because I volunteered to blacklist myself from DT1 voting. What I said still applies. DT1 is (trying to be) a democracy. You can't step out of the democracy and still expect it to work. Yeh about that - you should have vetted The Sceptical Chymist' 3000+ trust feedback ( as I did) before encouraging him to rejoin the DT lottery his trust feedbacks are primarily a mixture of note book anecdotes or similar to my ONE trust feedback you are all agonizing over. Check them out, they don't conform to your own instructions. By rights on your yard arm he should be "~" by you. You seem desperate to regain your DT-position.
Even you seem to fail to grasp the nuances of DT1
You can't chant " do as I say, not do as I do" then have the gall to complain if I review my trust feedbacks according to your demands. (I thought you pinky promised to stop Trolling me?)
|
|
|
There was an eerily quick follow up email by GT which bordered on rambling followed by a second email from the above essentially reiterating the offer.
IN A NUTSHELL (their words, not mine): are owed less than $500 in dust - take the offer. Are owed more than $500 in crypto, take your chances with GT who are (again, their words) draining the funds with their fees.
GT are attending court as we speak.
|
|
|
It seems he's... revamping his feedback?
Correct. (As yahoo already knows): Archive [ a.t] [ w.a.o] I can respect you wanting your feedbacks to be accurate though.
And I'm not finished - had you continued scrolling, you might have noticed all of the negatives have been *rewritten* verbatim leaving just a mixture of neutral and positives pre-this week - next up are the neutrals to be rewritten verbatim. The positives can stay as is to give context as to when they were first issued. (that doesn't mean I'm finished with them, rather they have been grouped (or will be grouped) together - subject to further review) The OP is again playing the victim knowing full well the original trust feedback was posted on the quoted date (yet he's just waited until now to burst into tears) - IIRC he even made mention of it in one of his previous grandstanding threads. But thanks OP for going on the record as saying of the 137 negative (and overall 443 trust feedbacks) that is the ONLY trust feedback that you consider to be incorrect. (that's less than a quarter of one percent)
OTOH Feedback is correct: I don't trust the OP and wouldn't do a trade with the OP.
|
|
|
Some of you really daydream a lot.
Maybe they need to change their dealer... ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) They changed their OP: Fuck You All
A little bit of scrutiny goes a long way...
|
|
|
76 - Timelord2067
Regards,
|
|
|
I've just seen in my notes there was also a connected UID TeamJamal [ B.o] who was Last Active: April 09, 2018, 03:07:25 PM [ a.t] [ w.a.o] while Zapo [ B.o] [ a.t] [ w.a.o] was created Date Registered: April 08, 2018, 09:42:24 PM some 18 hours earlier.
|
|
|
Yes, I've always heard good things about Connacht so I thought I'd go with them. I'll have to be more mindful of Edinburgh as the weeks go on.
... Ah well, Maybe next week.
|
|
|
0- Suzuki Matt
Thank u.
And we have a winner! Thank U so much kro.
Congrats Matt - you picked the bulls eye!
|
|
|
Some highly respected members seem to think that aTriZ = Zapo and I know Jamal owns the aTriZ account so 1 could conclude they are all 3 owned by the same person IMO. True, but the three threads get bogged down in discussions at one point concerning when ownership transfer occurrs. All 3 accounts are already tagged so you having yours there or not doesn't really make a huge difference. I guess to those that directly trust you I suppose. I can respect you wanting your feedbacks to be accurate though.
After consideration, I've amended my previous trust feedback to now read: | Timelord2067 | | 2023-11-12 | | Reference | | It would appear Zapo is jamalaezaz through their shared connection to aTriz - see ref link for clarification. (Delete) |
Feel free to point out if this (or any) are wrong.
|
|
|
Does it matter?
Indirectly it does. I've been reviewing (yet again ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) ) my trust feedbacks to ensure they are accurate and saw both names and noticed the two connections.
|
|
|
I think I'll go with the Ospreys, Scarlets, Connacht and Leinster
Ospreys - Glasgow Warriors 12 Nov 2023 03:15 Money Line Ospreys @ 2.11 Taken Amount: 0.05 mBTCPossible Win: 0.055 mBTC Scarlets - Lions 12 Nov 2023 03:15 Money Line Scarlets @ 1.48 Taken Amount: 0.05 mBTC Possible Win: 0.024 mBTC Edinburgh - Connacht Rugby 12 Nov 2023 05:35 Money Line Connacht Rugby @ 3.24 Taken Amount: 0.05 mBTC Possible Win: 0.112 mBTC Dragons - Leinster 12 Nov 2023 23:15 Money Line Leinster @ 1.04 Taken Amount: 0.05 mBTC Possible Win: 0.002 mBTC
No parlay though...
|
|
|
Where is the book now? Is it finished?
Perhaps it would be best for the book to be returned to aoluain so that he can make a decision as to what becomes of the book and we can have a side discussion thread to make suggestions as to the book's fate.
|
|
|
Not so fast...
I've noticed a couple of my wallets have had strange invitations in my NFT - send a token get USDT back. They don't work and look to be nothing more than click bait.
I'm wondering if the OP thinks he's going to make a fortune snapping up these dubious NFT's ??
|
|
|
TRC20 - USDT address: TE02YJ152fS15DA6oH3TGajYYjmt2Zg8NB
This doesn't appear to be a valid address.
|
|
|
87 - Timelord2067
Many thnks
|
|
|
I'm not sure of the whole New Zealand team's composition, but there were NRL players not just in the Auckland Warriors, but a sprinkling of other players in various NRL teams.
Odds? I think it was about 5:1 🤔
|
|
|
LOAN AMOUNT: 100 USDT REASON: I lost a lot of money gambling last week(a few oversized bets), and I need to pay my bills till my next salary(1000usdt 9 of November) REPAYMENT: 115 USDT REPAYMENT DATE: 10/11/23 or earlier COLLAT: Stake account, platinum 1, weekly, monthly will be big, since I lost a lot last week
Your loan application looks a whole lot like this one: LOAN AMOUNT: 0.031 BTC/ $1650 REASON: PERSONAL REPAYMENT: 0.035 BTC REPAYMENT DATE: 08/11/23 COLLAT: 1150 USDT
Right down to "collat" in the title and application... Not to mention your Date Registered: 2023-06-21, 22:50:54 with just four posts in that time... Just like hedgeprx Date Registered: 2023-07-02, 19:34:31 and just two posts this week.
|
|
|
Getting desperate with your defense of your ban evasion wouldn't you agree?
Just a suggestion: drunk less, and start to enjoy your life.
How true it is - the only defense the scammer has is the put down.
|
|
|
I have to ask: for the past 2 years, I've seen you take larger and larger loans. It looks like you're getting yourself in a deeper and deeper debt, and only governments can keep that up forever. I've probably said it before, but aren't you better off spending a bit less, saving up for $1000, and never paying interest again?
You're asking the wrong question - "How's your ban evasion defense going?" is what you should be asking...
|
|
|
|