Think no further, my friend, just sign up at Stake.com and you will enjoy all the benefits you can dream of in sports betting, more than all other sportsbooks that can be suggested to you here and even more than what you think is possible. What you "are preparing for" is what Stake "had prepared for." You can see the difference between the two, so don't take it lightly.

According to what I've seen so far on the platform, your Euro 2024 expectations should certainly be met by the preparedness of Stake.com, and I am sure you will not regret your choice.

Nonetheless, read the terms and conditions to be certain of terms of service and restrictions. All the best!

I understand you quite well and you are right at the same time, but his generalizing it is what I was trying to point out. Of course, many would do that to fill up their weekly needed posts, but how do we know it is so for everyone just because we feel so? That was my plight. Even if some people did not construct themselves well, it's not a yardstick that they are just bumping up to fill up, some may not even be good at writing, while others may be stressed at that time but still want to contribute (I advise against posting at that time).

My point remains that there are thousands of threads to post in to complete our weekly post, so anyone may still choose to abandon the scam accusation thread if they like because it is never mandatory. For them to reply there does not necessarily mean that they want to bump up in some cases but just write what they believe is right in their own capability. It is not everyone that can be guilty of such allegations even if they do not make so much sense there, that's my point.

I quite understand you bro and you are making enough sense here, but at the same time, gambling is beyond that, you can gamble based on many factors and reasons, but it mustn't always make sense or profits driven per se. This is why I like you to read about Sentimental betting, yes, this is real and it is not necessarily about any objective betting but a bias towards what you love in most cases due to one reason or another which you may not even be able to prove aright since you may just be emotional about your decision.

This was why I chose Joe Biden and that is the least I can do as a fan against what I perceived to be a tyrant not only to the US people but also to immigrants. We all saw what happened in Trump's first term, I will never support such a person who is selfish and inciting just for his personal gains. But again, Joe Biden has his many faults as well, still, a better choice as far as I am concerned.

So regardless of any other factors that will determine the election possibilities, I am betting based on what I believe is right even if there are scarce objectives/basis/factors to back that up (Sentimental betting).

Emotional, how? I don't feel it that way. I see, that's the way you sensed it, it's a choice and it's normal, but I am happy to tell you that the author doesn't feel towards that direction whatsoever. You see, in life, we have different beings and characters, so our behaviours and personalities, and also the immediate and future plans may not be the same thing due to these factors. What I wrote is what I want for myself which I am determined to carry out even without remorse or regrets, since gambling is just an extra activity, I will not even regret letting go when I am at the age of 60 or there about (65 max.).

In case you don't know, this has been peculiar to me since many years ago, and at that age, I want to occupy myself with only those things that give me a free mind to think and breathe without worries. By that time, I would like to invest more in the humanitarian aspect of life and social welfare and activities. I mean those things that will be productive to myself and humanity in general, so it's all about individuality here my friend, it's nothing personal or emotional as you made it look.

Talk is very cheap, so I don't give someone like him a thought. But one thing that is annoying is for some people to be running their mouths but only to claim they speculate. Speculation without a constructive reason for the claim? All I can see is a clown who doesn't even know what he is saying and why he is saying it. You can imagine Bitcoin that is still struggling to hit back its current ATH at about $73,850 talkless of breaching it towards a higher level and hitting the milestone psychology level of $100,000 which is now more expected by people reaching $350,000 just like that.

The struggle of the coin to proceed higher can only be because of the lack of more liquidity. How will it easily hit $350,000 which is multiple times its current ATH in August which is barely 2 months ahead? This is a joke! To make matters worse, he has no useful reason but to blame Joe Biden, Janet Yellen and Jerome Powell who are partly controlling the power of the USD. Could it mean that the USD will be so useless and fall so much to the point that BTC will be able to rise higher since the two are paired together (BTC/USD)? If this happened, then the whole financial market would have been in trouble.

This guy should just be disregarded in all senses.

I don't think you constructed this well as they look looped together and expose that you might not really be a trader, or you are not deep in it. First, having the perfect setup before you pull the trigger has nothing to do with a "guarantee," (no one is preaching that in this context), but a means for you to have a trading system and plan and also strictly follow them with all determination. This doesn't mean there won't be challenges in trading as no one can vouch for a 100% winning system, so that's not the point. The point is for traders to be patient for their trading setup to fully align and I am certain that the trader who does this frequently will have an increased winning percentage.

However, fine, traders can lose at any time as no trader or system is perfect, but the shortcomings that the trader could lose at times will be covered up with viable money and risk management. That is trading for you! There are already laid down rules if one can explore them properly. Nevertheless one thing that is certain is for the trader to ensure that he first fully understands what he is doing before totally giving in to trading. Once you know it and your system is working fine, trust it and follow it without doubts or change of plan which makes many traders lose their money through impatience, greed and fear.

 

I've always been careful about crypto projects, be it airdrop, bounty chase, NFT freebies and anything that will make me comprise my wallet and engaged on social media for one task or the other. Except for lately, when I started participating in tapping projects on Telegram, this was because of the success of Notcoin, other than that, anything free is not even my thing because it could cause issues later through various demands or compromises. After this tapping of a thing, I will stop entirely as I can only see that it is controlling.

Do this, or do that is certainly not my thing, but if you do not do it, your efforts will not be maximized, that's the temptation. Notwithstanding, one has to be very careful in the crypto world lately, there are too many projects and they are not verifiable, which makes it extremely risky. Binance has also been issuing a warning on the limitation we should give to any project no matter how true what they preach could be, this is a real warning that should not be disregarded. One could lose enough through phishing activities and other susceptible vices caused by the temptation of the freebies, we should be warned indeed and thanks to you.

Can you now blame gambling for this? I bet not, you would be very mistaken if you did. Am I not gambling? Are others not gambling whom you will not even know they do if they never told you? What I see here is individual irresponsibility, desperation, recklessness and greed, it is your elder brother who needs to keep his sh*t together and you should stop blaming gambling. If he is responsible enough, wouldn't he have earmarked the money for himself and the family aside from the money he would gamble with?

Let us stop celebrating weakness and idiocy, and find something to put the blame upon. It is gambling this time in this context, for some people, it is women and frivolities, and to some others, it is drinking and drugs, etc. All these are by choice my friend and they tell of whom we are. Some people would do something at times that you will be wondering within you whether they are completely insane, that's how I view this. What we can't learn to control will control us and also define us, so this is not peculiar to gambling, it is what your brother is.

You guys should try your best to deliver him of this mess, I hope he will cooperate.

I wish this project of yours very good luck but since I can't find it in any of my popular exchanges, I do not think I can give it huge attention for any reason. Many crypto projects have been hyped in the past so there is nothing you can say of this that will be surprising. The fact that it went to lend the popular name (HODL) that was first used for Bitcoin doesn't mean that it can keep up with that name.

Even the WSM which lent the name from the popular Wallstreet was unable to replicate the success, so I will not bother myself much on this. Oh, I see! I just checked the CMC now, this is still a very shitcoin, so people should be very careful about it. The coin that you claim to be promising still has a $9.9m market cap, this is still very little to even dare to say it's promising.

Frankly, memes are very risky to hold for too long, and just like most other altcoins, they drop like crazy when they decide to fall. So extreme care should be taken while dealing with them.

I will always say that gambling is a choice and how you approach it is a choice as well, but whether you have the free will to choose or not, you still have to make sure you are doing the right thing. Although I am not against gambling every day but I am against irresponsible gambling, they are two different things. You may be gambling every day and not be irresponsible, you might have had your budget and limited sessions to gamble, if you now adhere strictly to it in such a way that it will not take hold of all your time on that day and still have other productive engagement to point today, why not? This subject is not so general as many would take it and there are some gamblers who may not even gamble every day but can be so irresponsible with it.

Take for instance, I am worth $7000 and I gamble between $1-3 daily from it. Of course, this can't affect me, and there are days I will win and there are days that I will lose, but still, the risk has been reduced to a level that will not be shoked to my finances. But here comes another person with the same worth but doesn't gamble every day, nevertheless, when the guy gambles, he gamles at least $2,000 at once. Can you see that the latter is riskier than the former despite not being regular about it? So this is indeed relative and should never be general. Some may just like to gamble, and once they have good plans and be responsible doing it, they will be just fine despite engaging in it daily.

I'm 100% with you on this. Has anyone thought of the reason why casinos are just flooding the internet like a mushroom? This is the reason, the business is booming and the risk is very low. Once you can do the marketing well and have some sizable loyal customers, you are RICH, my friend, it is as simple as that. The only risk there is when their customers abandon them and that can't be good because, they will have to pay a lot of bills which include maintenance, insurance, employees etc. This is why you see casinos being up to date with their advertisements, even if they stop for a while, they might start again because they will be internally checking the active customer base which is the heart of the success of the company.

Talking about the playing, many gamblers are not just winning, they are regular losers and the few that win cannot replicate it as though they have mastered it, so it is clear that more losses will happen and it is to the advantage of the house who in most cases know how to tweak the system in its favour. So the edge in their advantage will always be there.

There is no way elderly people will not be gambling in any country where gambling is permitted because there is no country in this world where you will not see mixed behaviours and personalities. I also see nothing wrong with elderly people gambling if they are not losing money and focus to it to the point that their lives will be miserable because of it. But for me, it will get to a certain age when I will stop gambling altogether, this is a personal determination that I will surely fulfil.

As for how it is in my country, well, the elderly people are not gambling as such, there is no way they will be gambling so much that I will not know about it as I move around more often. It is the middle-aged people who mostly gamble in my opinion, and if the elderly ones are gambling indeed, then the population will be lower than 0.05% here.

It is easier said than done, but the moment you have a viable means of income aside from gambling, oh yes, you can actually make it a fun-filled activity for you. Mine is not so different from yours, only that I do not take my betting with sportsbooks lightly like in casino bettings. I make sure that I wager a reasonable amount that will be worth the return since I know my percentage profitability. And if you are serious about sports betting, the context of luck should be reduced to the barest minimum. Just try to polish your means of analysis and speculate well and you will be surprised that you will mostly be winning your bets.

This is so me because I like to go for the odds that are so convenient and I do not combine bets to avoid risking higher than necessary. If I bet five matches, you can be rest assured that all the matches will be independent and this has helped me so much in reducing my gambling risks. Though, as you said, the profit can be as high as those who are looping bets together, nevertheless, the risk is little so the consistency of winning will be high too. Now tell me, what do you stand to lose if you are good at it? Owning to this, I advise you to continue this way unless it is not positive for you. Winning a little is better than losing everything most of the time.

The internet connectivity context in gambling has lingered for long but it is not something that is persistent, it happens once in a while. If you are such a gambler with a bad internet connection, just make sure that you change your ISP before you gamble or try as much as possible to stay away from gambling to avoid issues for yourself. The moment you are forcing yourself to bet despite the slowness of the internet connection, you've automatically signed up for the condition as it is, so crying foul later regardless of the consequence doesn't make any sense.

This issue is also a two-way thing, it could be a curse or a blessing. There are gamblers who would say that it is the internet connection that made them miss a certain game, otherwise, they would have lost bitterly. The same thing goes for those who would say that they lost a good game due to a poor internet connection.

However, what I will not agree to in one of what you write is for anyone to claim that the internet connection caused them to make a bad input, how? Is the poor connection also shaking your gambling platform or what? We should try to take responsibility and I am sure that this is one of them as far as gambling is concerned.

Oh, I see, Donald Trump has an odd of 1.70 and Joe Biden has 2.55 on Stake, that's nice and the person(s) who prepared this table might have had some beliefs to have made them think that Trump will win. But for me, I choose Joe Biden to win, more money to my bag...

To be honest with you, I don't have a serious reason for that because Joe Biden has made a lot of mistakes this time, even as Trump continues to leverage on division preachings as usual. Nevertheless, I just don't like arrogance, so regardless of losing my money, I must bet on Joe Biden and the election will be keenly contested like before.

I will always say that gambling on its own is not bad but the way many people approach it, this is why people are now stereotyping it. Can you imagine yourself, for instance, you went ahead to spend all day gambling, is that good at all? Didn't you have other productive things you can do other day gambling? Just because your country had an industrial action doesn't justify you gambling all day, and by you including that industrial action means that it was never at the weekend, there are many useful things you can do with your free time.

Fine, you can gamble as well, but it should have its time and limit, it should not be extensively as that, otherwise, you will appear irresponsible. Personally, I feel guilty if a day of my life is not lived as planned, perhaps you should also have plans for the day and also query the plan before finally accepting it, it will help you so well.

At the same time, for you to discuss a thing like this shows that you are not even comfortable with it, so it is a good one, since you have a bad mind about it, you might avoid it next time. Generally, people living a life like this should stop, spending the whole day gambling or being desperate about it will take us nowhere, it is good to take gambling as a passive income in a non-desperate way but rather find a good job and other responsible daily engagements.

This is serious judging by your experience in gambling, notwithstanding, thanks for throwing it on board, at least, some people who are confused like you, or who feel they are confused may find answers.

From what you narrated above, I am confident that you are gambling for the money, and here is why. First, it's clear that you are not gambling for fun since you don't seem to be taking it easy with gambling. You are such that risk so well and also conversant with it, so that can't be for the fun part, because those who gamble for fun will take it easy, which will naturally cause them to wager lower amounts per bet.

Now, it doesn't matter if you have a target before you admit you are gambling for the money, in as much as you like gambling and are not satisfied and still pressing high figures or somewhat higher figures than an ordinary fun-seeking gambler would do, then you are for the money even if you do not admit that. Having a target in gambling is a choice, it is never compulsory the way you make it a basis to decipher.

Mine is clear, I seek my fun through casinos and try to make money through sports betting. Also, I've never been aggressive with my betting to make the money and I am a conservative bettor any time, any day.

As you can deduce from the above, mine is mild, so I do not really give gambling that thought since my focus for money making is elsewhere. However, I have a low betting plan on casino games and I strictly manage my sports betting even as I go for the least possible difficulties.

Nah, bro! Far from it. But it is not too late for you to put the pieces together and have a goal and the plans to achieve it.

This advice is generally good and can save a whole lot of gamblers if they adhere to it. But the only issue with it is that those who would adhere to it can't emphatically call themselves gamblers because it is such that discourages regular gambling. You can imagine gambling today and lost, and taking a break of two weeks afterwards while others continue to gamble all the same. That will surely keep your sanity for you but you can't always have that fun or achieve that core goal you might have wanted to start gambling for in the first place. This is not to discredit this point of yours but to show that many people will not adhere to it because it will not just be their thing simply because they want to gamble freely.

They would have loved to stay more connected with gambling than giving it too long a break. However, if I should share my own advice, I would say that gamblers should be the person to be careful from the beginning to avoid causing issues that could warrant them taking too break from it. They should learn about gambling sanity and keep responsibly gambling intact. This is possible by gambling with the money you can afford to lose, and not only that, such money should be ridiculous, so that you can manage your gambling portfolio without fear or greed and still preserve your gambling psychology rightly at the same time. It is those who are desperate for the money or trying to revenge their gambling loss with huge amounts that are mostly affected badly by it.

You are making so much sense here, this 1% depends on the gambler, his plan and the amount he earns, as it could be too much to gamble at once in some casinos due to their terms and conditions if it is a huge amount of money or too small to gamble if the gambler is such that makes a very low income. This is a good reason why it can't be a basis for everyone, and in my last replies here, I made it clear that whether or not it even goes in line with my income, it can never go well with my personality and my gambling plans, so it is dead on arrivals as far as I am concerned.

I do not measure my wagering amount in gambling with any modality, based on my discretion, I only earmark a certain amount that is convenient for me to gamble and that I can lose without being hurt. That is the money I gamble with, and it's so far so good for me, which I ever intent to keep. However, I know this is so precious to the OP according to how he has shared his view and it is not entirely bad as well, which is why I say we should go for whatever we love in gambling so long as it is convenient and working for us.

Well, I have heard over and over that gambling businesses have their terms and conditions and it is subject to change, agreed! But did you read the OP mentioning they updated him about the terms and conditions different from what he signed up for?That is the issue here. The last time I read the OP, he claimed that the casino's terms and conditions clearly indicateed that he can withdraw $50,00 monthly. If this is correct, it means that he has the right to withdraw far more than $500 daily alocated to him daily. This can only be cheating and nothing else.

Also, I like you to know today that there are approaches to doing things, casinos can't be lawless and be using the terms and conditions to back it up the way you pointed it out here. There are laws which both the establishment and the customers must follow to avoid cheating each other, they must also agree with terms of cooperation and be notified if there is a change. If at all there is a change, the change shouldn't be so wicked to the point that someone who deposited $10,000 will have to wait 20 good days to withdraw his money, what if he has profits included? It will now be way more, which is wicked.

Charging such casinos to court will not end well for them as whether they have changed Ts&Cs or not, the judge is not a fool and this kind of a thing is what even angers them the more, and more reason they side the complainers in this kind of cases. They would have sensed forcefulness where the casinos is lording itself on the customer no matter the update in their terms of service.

However, it's the lack of good regulation that emboldens some of them to do that.