Can i ask you if you exchanged a pm from op before filling this loan? I saw some users that are willing to give this and looks like in the middle of conversation to op and you suddenly came and send the loan. IMO its not good what you did
Hmm.. No, I didn't. I saw the trust and his rank and sent him the coins. He isn't online yet. I hope he returns the coins within tomorrow  I'm pretty sure OP will repay the loan. It's pointless to waste a Sr. Member account on ten bucks.
I hope the same  Yes I agreed him to give this loan and waiting for him to provide a singed message from the old btc address. Have you seen that message but in the middle you just sent the loan without even waiting for the OP reply. I think you just sent coins to earn some profit. It should be OK but follow the guidelines to protect yourself in future. He didn't signed message means he is a new owner of this account. Good luck. I saw his trust and sent him the coins since it was just $10, nothing big and i don't think that OP will scam me and spoil his/her reputation for $10. A senior member with a +ve reputation costs much more. But lets wait and see what happens |
|
|
|
Well i just created the thread regarding the QS drama going on the thread. Do you suggest me to move it to the Reputation board? It'd be better if i can get a reply from a staff member |
|
|
|
Can i ask you if you exchanged a pm from op before filling this loan? I saw some users that are willing to give this and looks like in the middle of conversation to op and you suddenly came and send the loan. IMO its not good what you did
Hmm.. No, I didn't. I saw the trust and his rank and sent him the coins. He isn't online yet. I hope he returns the coins within tomorrow I'm pretty sure OP will repay the loan. It's pointless to waste a Sr. Member account on ten bucks.
I hope the same |
|
|
|
|
I am just curious why is there so much drama going on the thread for Quickseller and not for Tomatocage?
They did the same mistake but TC has still so much +ve trust and QS has so many -ve.
Is it because QS lied about getting banned from the forum?
|
|
|
|
he can easily take loan and after sold account and gone.(From my practice)
Oh  I didn't think of this! Perhaps this is the first time i am loaning someone on the thread. Hope he doesn't have any bad intentions |
|
|
|
This Site https://bitcointalk.org is the reason for all the money i lose on gambling sites Like: http://Satoshibet.comhttp://coinroyale.comhttp://bustabit.comhttp://primedace.comhttp://dadice.comAnd ALL The other gambling sites are : Scammers, Evil , NO FUCKING PROVABLY GAMES , THE BOT CAN RECORD YOUR BETS AND ALSO SENS YOU CLICK THE BET BUTTON FIRST YOU WILL ALWAYS LOSE , AND DONT TELL ME PLAY WITH WHAT YOU CAN AFFORD Cause SOME PEOPLE LIKE ME GAMBLE CAUSE THEY DONT HAVE A FUCKING OPTION......AND THEY ARE MISLEADED! Why do i think bitcointalk is the reason: Cause they DONT review these random Sites And all they care about is money from ADS and other Things. And if i know where the owner of this site lives i would take his life  and all other gambling site owners ,. If you are going to reply to say if you win you wont open a thread , well geuss what ive never win MOTHERFUCKER. Now lets listen for Shit greedy Evil Replies But np JUST WAIT. I thank god " You don't have enough money". Why do you gamble with something that you can't afford to loose? And suppose you got enough money, how will you sue Bitcointalk? Your post is clearly BS! |
|
|
|
Wait..... I thought everyone got something in prizes expect 2 people who participated (one is me) but.. but now there are 25 friends to join me  lol Congratulations everyone  |
|
|
|
I didn't find a bug at crypto-games, someone else did; I was merely acting as an "escrow" for the bug.
(that means I was an independent third party, in case you're unclear on that point) Wasn't that person asking for 1 BTC for himself and .5 BTC for you for a separate bug? If that is the case, I don't think that would make you very neutral.  What wrong did doog do when someone else asked for 1.5 BTC bounty from DogecoinMachine and the one who found the bug just asked by himself that 0.5 BTC out of that 1.5 will be given to doog because he helped verify the bug. And whats wrong if doog put a red trust on someone who lied(or didn't fulfill his part of the deal) and again changed it to neutral after he(DogecoinMachine) completed his part of the deal? You're suspecting that he is selling trust just because he acted as a neutral third party and put negative trust on a liar and again changed it to neutral when he(the liar) started being honest? |
|
|
|
I think we are talking about two different instances. You had said that dooglus removed his negative trust after crypto-games paid the non-existent bug bounty that they did not agree to prior to the bug being reported. I cannot see any way that is possibly the right thing to do. And I cannot see how that is anything other then selling trust.
Maybe you should make it clear what you are talking about. I'm pretty sure you have your facts wrong: I didn't find a bug at crypto-games, someone else did; I was merely acting as an "escrow" for the bug. (that means I was an independent third party, in case you're unclear on that point) I neither left nor removed negative trust for crypto-games. When I remove negative trust I replace it with neutral trust so a record stands but it no longer counts against the account. I didn't sell trust. I understand that you're mad because I didn't remove Vod from my trust list, but stomping your feet and making things up to try to get me into trouble isn't going to work for you. I wish there was a 'like' button in the thread. I would 'like' this reply 100 times (Especially the last line) Anyways since Vod has already left this thread and he is certainly not going to get removed from the DT, i guess this thread must be closed and the ongoing drama should be stopped. |
|
|
|
What are you talking about? therefore they never agreed to pay any kind of bug bounty.
They did agree and they did credit Dooglus' account at their site but they never processed the transaction. While it might be reasonable to ask for a bug bounty, however not paying one certainly does not make them a scammer.
Come on, they run a casino! If they can't complete their part in a small deal, how can you expect such kind of people to run legitimate casinos? |
|
|
|
There's nothing wrong with that, but there is something wrong with leaving negative trust if someone does not pay you a bounty (when they have no bug bounty program).
You're mistaken. I agree the site didn't have a bug bounty program but you can clearly see that they had a deal! Dooglus reported the vulnerability but the owner of Balloonbit didn't fulfill his part of the deal by crediting Dooglus' acoount but at the same time, not processing the withdraw. |
|
|
|
Did the site have any kind of bug bounty program? I did not see any one published anywhere.
I don't see anything wrong in reporting a bug and asking for a bounty if the site " doesn't" have a bug bounty program. It's not that a site without a bug bounty program isn't vulnerable, is it? |
|
|
|
You think a site should be forced to pay for something at a price they did not agree to prior to the fact? Note that I previously backed dooglus's actions however after further consideration I have change my viewpoint on the matter.
Dooglus asked for a fair amount considering the severity if the bug he found! I don't see anything wrong in this. So if you are driving around in your car and I see a safety problem with your car, I should ask you for 1 BTC to tell you what is wrong with it (without you ever agreeing to pay this or any amount) and when you don't pay up, I should call you a scammer? From wikipedia: A bug bounty program is a deal offered by many website and software developers by which individuals can receive recognition and compensation for reporting bugs, especially those pertaining to exploits and vulnerabilities. FYI, The bug was a critical one. Dooglus wasn't a thief so he reported it to the owner of the site and asked for a 1 BTC bounty. He could have withdrawn 2 BTC but didn't. There was a deal between them. The BalloonBit owner credited his account with the Bitcoins but never processed his withdraw. What's wrong with putting a -ve trust if the balloonbit owner didn't fulfill his part of the deal? |
|
|
|
You think a site should be forced to pay for something at a price they did not agree to prior to the fact? Note that I previously backed dooglus's actions however after further consideration I have change my viewpoint on the matter.
Dooglus asked for a fair amount considering the severity if the bug he found! I don't see anything wrong in this. |
|
|
|
Unfortunately the profit has been all eaten up by the transaction fees it seems. You have got a total of 0.3546 btc gambling profit, but for LB to send you the payout, they have to deduct 0.0001 btc for each of your 8690 bets which is 0.869 btc in total.
Maybe you're wrong People who gamble at LB send several transactions at once with a single fee, I saw Mkr sending almost 100 bets on every transaction |
|
|
|
Only 2 people who entered the contest didn't win anything And one of them was me  Lucky fellow |
|
|
|
i'm sorry, i'm currently moving ( from one country to another ) so internet is horrible.
i'm going to give you guys a big clue now.
Amazing. I'm onto it again after a week |
|
|
|
Guys my guess was 0.99 So does it count close to 97.01 or i am too far? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
