I gave a reply in your thread. I would be glad if you can help with:
92fedc84404843ff4d46c385aefb75b46e179668941107bcbfac795680b2af63
Thank you
you used a fee of 267 sat/byte, while at this moment the optimal fee for a 95% of getting into the next 3 blocks is 900 sat/byte. If you want me to give you some advice on how to potentially solve the problem, i need a lot more information, as stipulated in the very first post of this thread transaction id: 709c8e5894b8eb55b4a7dcc222c88a000578dcb179a5dff06db40af7630a99cb wallet software: Bitcoin Armory 0.96.3.99 (was 0.96.0 at the original time of sending) in conjunction with Bitcoin Core version v0.15.1 on windows 10 mempool: yes, i have checked http://www.mocacinno.com/page/getraw, entered my transaction id, and i was shown the raw transaction, so this transaction is in your mempool something strange: As far as I can tell, no. I tried clearing/abandoning the transaction after 3 days in Armory, and then tried to do a double spend, but there was a mempool conflict and it wouldn't let me broadcast the transaction attempt. So now I'm either stuck waiting for the transaction to be abandoned by nodes around the world, or just trying to push it through I guess? Any advice on how to proceed here would be awesome! Just not sure how long it's going to take to have the transaction abandoned, so if it's possible to push it through, would just prefer that then. Cheers! ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Armory is a fairly complex client... I suspect that the issue with resending is just that your transaction is still in the mempool of various nodes... Unfortunately you cannot do anything about their setup and when they choose to drop your transaction. Given your transaction is also in mocacinno's mempool, it would appear your transaction is fairly well propagated. Try ViaBTC... Very difficult at the moment, or wait it out... Not much else that can be done ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) Possibly try broadcasting your double spend via some of the broadcast services here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction_broadcastingThanks for that! Hmm, so there's no other way of going around creating a double-spend or CPFP transaction then? Guess I shouldn't have waited 3 days before abandoning the transaction from the wallet :/ Also, how would I know when the transaction gets successfully abandoned? When it shows up as transaction not found? I hope my constant refreshing of that page isn't actually rebroadcasting it haha: https://blockchain.info/tx/709c8e5894b8eb55b4a7dcc222c88a000578dcb179a5dff06db40af7630a99cbDon't worry your transaction doesn't get rebroadcasted by refreshing that page ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) As soon as you stop rebroadcasting, the number of nodes having your transaction in their mempool will start to decline. It'll take a long time before ALL nodes dropped your tx, but that shouldn't be a problem. If you're creating a double spend, i see no harm in starting to broadcast it once or twice a day, starting a couple hours after you stop rebroadcasting
|
|
|
You do not pay for an amount, you pay for transaction size. It will come through over weekend or Christmas. Next time use RBF option. But my friend said it will come next year by January. Is it true? and what is RBF option?BTW thanks for good information. The truth is that it's 100% impossible to tell when (and if) a transaction will (ever) be confirmed. When talking about confirmation times, you're talking about odds. At the time of writing, when paying a fee of 900 sat/byte the odds of getting into the next 3 blocks are 95%. You payed a fee of 134 and 135 sat/byte, https://bitcoinfees.earn.com/ teaches us that this fee has a big chance it'll never confirm. Offcourse, if the number of tx's in the mempools would drop, your chances would increase, if there are more tx's broadcasted, your chances get even lower... In order to give you some advice on how to proceed, i need more info... you posted on my thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1943939.120;topicseen , the original post of this thread tells you which info i'd need to help you out.
|
|
|
first things first, a chain of unconfirmed transactions != double spending.
What you probably have read is that when your incoming transaction uses the outputs of an unconfirmed parent transaction, there is a risk the creator of the parent transaction double spends the input of the parent transaction, and every other transaction in the chain gets cancelled. This is true. If you trust the person who is using unconfirmed unspent outputs to build new transactions, this does not HAVE to be a problem. However, it is true that your transaction can not be confirmed BEFORE all parent transactions of your transaction are confirmed (they can all be put in the same block tough, just not in an earlyer block).
Thanks for the reply. Any suggestions as to what, if anything I might be able to do to get things moving? In order for you to fix your first transaction (9d9123565f2900f0ea3cd4e7aa6d16736243ac4728d285bec6441e4eb67e2a22), transaction 3f9d89be1024c292c0cc832a41b25b458e834fe9037d7d3b758c54628eb380be has to be confirmed first. Can you give a bit of background information? Did you create these transactions? Which wallet(s) did you use to send/receive? Which addresses are yours? Thanks for the reply. Yes, I created both transactions using Electrum 2.8.2. Not quite sure which addresses are mine, sorry. No problem... I just noticed that 3f9d89be1024c292c0cc832a41b25b458e834fe9037d7d3b758c54628eb380be is opt-in rbf... This is great ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) . You can use electrum to bump the fee... Just right click on the pending transaction and chose "increase fee" .Don't enable the checkbox "finalise"! The second transaction is using an output from the first transaction, so if you RBF the first transaction, the second one will most likely be cancelled and will probably have to be recreated.
|
|
|
A big thanks to HCP for helping me get trough the many requests... Couldn't do this without a little help from time to time ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) It looks like this is the only question left open at the moment: If I understand correctly, I now have to create a new transaction from Electrum. I enter the same address in 'pay to' and the same amount. Then send the transaction and broadcast it? Is that all?
No. Double spending requires that you use the same inputs... If you just create a new transaction without knowing what you're doing, you could spend "different" coins and end up sending 2 payments! Best wait for mocacinno to help! ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Good thing I have not taken action yet, cheers for the heads up! I don't know then what the same inputs means, I thought it would be the address and amount you 'put in', but I'm just a scrub. I'll create a double spending transaction for you... The only thing i wanted to ask: could you tell me which output value i can take the extra fee from? You're funding 1Nejxrk4Y9Q2eQ6YTd3hMi46uSnnN4Ghbn and 3AbZaaKj4ZVomw4YKTTpraqQYbaesByTpJ, i'll have to reduce one of these outputs to leave room for a bigger fee... It's up to you to pick witch one. Once you tell me where to take the fee from, i'll create an unsigned transaction, since you moved to electrum, you *should* be able to sign said transaction with your electrum wallet and broadcast it afterwards. It's been a while since i last did this, so i hope it still works, but i don't think it'll be a big problem
|
|
|
I sent a support and ticket and it was answered pretty fast. They said they didn't expect the fees to rise so fast in such a short time and recommended I should wait for the transaction to clear. It's also impossible not to receive my btc, right?
Well.... As much as i'd like to say you shouldn't worry, i'd be lying... IF the sender is an honest person, chances of things ending badly are small tough, and a swift reply to a support ticket is usually a good sign. Basically: your unconfirmed transaction (and it's unconfirmed parents) are now sitting in the mempools of many nodes. However, the default node setting is to remove unconfirmed transactions from it's mempool after 3 days. If most of the network's nodes forgot about your transaction, the network will act like it never existed in the first place... If your transaction isn't in most of the mining nodes mempools anymore, chances of it confirming will drastically reduce (eventually to 0% chance). This isn't a complete disaster... If you save the raw transactions, you can always rebroadcast them (if the sender is an honest person or company, they might even rebroadcast unconfirmed transactions themselfs). The bigger problem lies in the fact that as long as the unconfirmed transaction chain doesn't end up in a block, there is always a possibility the sender re-uses the unspent output he used as an input for your transaction in a transaction with a higher fee. If he agressively broadcasts this second transaction, and it ends up in a block, your transaction will be "cancelled"... It becomes invalid the second the double spending transaction ends up in a block. But, like racquemis already said: the fee is high(ish) enough for your transaction to end up in a block sooner or later, and if the sender is an honest company, chances of things going sour are slim... I'd still save the raw transactions from the chain tough, just in case i'd need to rebroadcast them. In order to do this, look up the transactions on my site: https://www.mocacinno.com/page/getraw
|
|
|
first things first, a chain of unconfirmed transactions != double spending.
What you probably have read is that when your incoming transaction uses the outputs of an unconfirmed parent transaction, there is a risk the creator of the parent transaction double spends the input of the parent transaction, and every other transaction in the chain gets cancelled. This is true. If you trust the person who is using unconfirmed unspent outputs to build new transactions, this does not HAVE to be a problem. However, it is true that your transaction can not be confirmed BEFORE all parent transactions of your transaction are confirmed (they can all be put in the same block tough, just not in an earlyer block).
Thanks for the reply. Any suggestions as to what, if anything I might be able to do to get things moving? In order for you to fix your first transaction (9d9123565f2900f0ea3cd4e7aa6d16736243ac4728d285bec6441e4eb67e2a22), transaction 3f9d89be1024c292c0cc832a41b25b458e834fe9037d7d3b758c54628eb380be has to be confirmed first. Can you give a bit of background information? Did you create these transactions? Which wallet(s) did you use to send/receive? Which addresses are yours?
|
|
|
Do you know how much a miner would charge for this? Any recommentation of a reliable one right now with a not so expensive bounty?
Also, any idea if the free btc.com accelerator is working? I've tried about 20 times already when the clocks turns (i.e. 10:00:00am), but I always get the message that 100 limit has been reached.
Thanks!
There are 2 working ones with an easy enduser gui. tx: f78d950a689f8bd6835bbf50c987505f678751d520891c09411ce6d2d903033f size: 225 bytes https://pushtx.btc.com/ => $72 https://pool.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/ (paid service at 0.01 BTC/kb) => 0.00225 BTC (= about $40) Viabtc IS working, but heavily abused... Chances of succesfully pushing a tx are very slim How do I rebroadcast the transaction?
That's pretty easy, you just submit it to one of the nodes that created a gui for this task. As a matter of fact, Timelord2067 created a thread where he collects nodes that allow rebroadcasting transactions (it includes my node ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) ) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1938621.0;topicseenSo to be safe, I'm goona ask u. I will have to download the sharp pusher and input my raw transaction. And my raw transaction can be gotten from the mempool @ http://www.mocacinno.com/page/getrawam i right? I've never used that tool, but the author is a verified member of the community, so that should be safe, yes ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) sorry, but it's almost impossible to help you without knowing the basic information, as specified in the very first post in this thread. It's obvious why the tx is stuck tough: it has a 5 sat/byte fee, while the optimal fee is 720 sat/byte
|
|
|
I accidentally had too low of a fee selected, and didn't notice until after I sent it. My transaction has been stuck for 5 days. I haven't had luck with any of the free acceleration services because they are so bogged down with traffic right now. So I would like to pay to have this transaction accelerated today:
c47d3899c090dd7f1d6ac1ac8c783a6cfc8219b05e4a537289d4368c6a772b63
Please contact me with pricing.
I don't think those pools will browse the forum looking for people the can give a quote. It's pretty simple: https://pool.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/ => paid service costs 0.01 BTC per kb. In your case that's 1.113 * 0.01 = 0.0113 BTC (more info via link i posted) OR https://pushtx.btc.com/ => their gui tells me that at this moment, they'd ask $284.66 for an acceleration OR you can politely ask macbook-air or quickseller via PM how much they'd charge to push your tx to the f2pool priority queue
|
|
|
I would really appreciate any help. Kind of desperate right now. the transaction id: f78d950a689f8bd6835bbf50c987505f678751d520891c09411ce6d2d903033f addresses: 1As7nq1QPXG5QziN8ZhhZJLvFD27qyoaeu is the sender’s address, 19ABUkUmQ9N8GAiGMwNoYanb5QFq1jhxn4 is my address sender/receiver: receiver wallet software: really don’t know ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) mempool: yes tip: i'll be happy to tip once I have access to my BTC. Everything I have is in this transaction. https://blockchain.info/tx/f78d950a689f8bd6835bbf50c987505f678751d520891c09411ce6d2d903033fSince you are the receiver, there are 2 options for you: 1) contact the sender, request that he fixes his mess... 2) do a CPFP... A CPFP is basically using the unspent output from the unconfirmed transaction to generate a new transaction, this new transaction can only be included in a miner's block if he/she also includes the parent transaction. If the fee of the child is high enough to cover both the fee of the child AND the parent, some miners will actually mine both tx's and solve your problem. If you go for option 2, i REALLY need to know your wallet software. It's not hard: which program on your pc did you use to generate an address you gave to the sender? OR, which website did you surf to to generate this address (altough, if you used an online wallet, the odds of me being able to help you are small). Sorry, I wasn't clear. This was processed from an online exchange to another online exchange. As it's been already 1 day and a half and I have a fee of only 181.796 sat/B, is this unlikely to be processed any time soon as there are a lot of transactions with higher fees? https://bitcoinfees.earn.com/ estimates that at this point in time, it can take up to 143 blocks to have a 95% of getting your tx confirmed... However, if more tx's with higher fees get broadcasted, things might get worse for you. In case of an exchange to exchange (or online wallet) transaction, the only thing you can do is pay a miner to include your tx, wait it out, or contact the SENDING exchange and demand a sollution.
|
|
|
So because of the incompetent people who operate this particular exchange i could end up waiting even more? I guess waiting it out is the only option?
indeed... The only other option is to create a CPFP, a fourth transaction paying the fee of the 3 unconfirmed transactions AND the fourth transaction. The basic idear is that a miner can only collect the fee of the fourth transaction IF he adds the 3 stuck parent transactions in the same block. In this case you'll end up paying everybody else's fee, but your transaction WILL get confirmed. An alternative, political, idear is to put pressure on the exchange's support dept. They created this mess, let them fix it... ViaBTC is real, they only have 100 free slots/hour tough, i no longer bother trying, chances of getting your tx pushed are astronomically small. In the OP's case, it's useless anyway, viabtc does not accept tx's with unconfirmed parents. confirmtx: i've not seen any real evidence of this one working That exe you linked to: no idear what it is, i don't open untrusted executables.
|
|
|
I would really appreciate any help. Kind of desperate right now. the transaction id: f78d950a689f8bd6835bbf50c987505f678751d520891c09411ce6d2d903033f addresses: 1As7nq1QPXG5QziN8ZhhZJLvFD27qyoaeu is the sender’s address, 19ABUkUmQ9N8GAiGMwNoYanb5QFq1jhxn4 is my address sender/receiver: receiver wallet software: really don’t know ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) mempool: yes tip: i'll be happy to tip once I have access to my BTC. Everything I have is in this transaction. https://blockchain.info/tx/f78d950a689f8bd6835bbf50c987505f678751d520891c09411ce6d2d903033fSince you are the receiver, there are 2 options for you: 1) contact the sender, request that he fixes his mess... 2) do a CPFP... A CPFP is basically using the unspent output from the unconfirmed transaction to generate a new transaction, this new transaction can only be included in a miner's block if he/she also includes the parent transaction. If the fee of the child is high enough to cover both the fee of the child AND the parent, some miners will actually mine both tx's and solve your problem. If you go for option 2, i REALLY need to know your wallet software. It's not hard: which program on your pc did you use to generate an address you gave to the sender? OR, which website did you surf to to generate this address (altough, if you used an online wallet, the odds of me being able to help you are small).
|
|
|
first things first, a chain of unconfirmed transactions != double spending.
What you probably have read is that when your incoming transaction uses the outputs of an unconfirmed parent transaction, there is a risk the creator of the parent transaction double spends the input of the parent transaction, and every other transaction in the chain gets cancelled. This is true. If you trust the person who is using unconfirmed unspent outputs to build new transactions, this does not HAVE to be a problem. However, it is true that your transaction can not be confirmed BEFORE all parent transactions of your transaction are confirmed (they can all be put in the same block tough, just not in an earlyer block).
|
|
|
I recently bought off bitcoin off a local exchange and I received the certain amount yesterday@ 1pm EEST. I tried ViaBtc but to no avail and I also don't have any additional funds to pay for a tx acceleration. What can I do except wait for who knows how long? This is the tx:
17251d352922f5453bdbf2fc75d21c867f20dbb6974237f5c6164fb0a046a6a6
there are several problems with this transaction The biggest being that it's part of a chain of unconfirmed transactions. Your transaction can only end up in a block after all unconfirmed parents ended up in a block! In your case, your transaction will only be confirmed AFTER: 761a296f4186acf06e7569253b89c835b0b8cb2321e0ad7d0a85893639dc65b4 and 6e517de18049302ff28544dace215dd1ac4df5dd185b69f6676c1095be97ca1b The second problem is that altough you say your transaction has sufficient fees, it has not... https://bitcoinfees.earn.com/ recommands a fee of 730 sat/byte for a 95% chance of ending up in the next 3 blocks. Your tx AND the 2 parent tx's have a fee between 330 and 370 sat/byte... I know, in fiat terms that's a LOT of money, but it just isn't sufficient at this point in time.
|
|
|
--snip--
I'm only the sender of the amount of 0.0057 bitcoins. nothing else. In my country (Georgia) are not so many options to use ewallets (known to me at least). I will try to contact the company who owns this ewallet I used and hopefully they can solve this problem of unconfirmed parent.
That's a good idear... If you don't know anything about the parent transaction, it's indeed the problem of your ewallet, they should not use outputs of unconfirmed transactions to create new transactions. I did wanted to point out that bitcoin is a global currency, it's not bound to boundries. In general, it's a bad idear to use online wallets, so i think you should seriously consider running a desktop wallet (electrum is my favorite). If you run your own desktop wallet, you can fix a lot of your own problems, while using an online wallet requires intervention from a central authority.
|
|
|
transaction id: 3a3bac0345baecda7409c09e14dc7023bbc75dc1e8ec9d13782211ce44f2aa03 sender/receiver: sender addresses: 18JFZL46q8uGFSra1LHBkzFgneSAuuYVeo - my address, 18TkJ8c5Ag1o5t7WsZ3kuFSRpHV5ZA9HbG is the receivers address wallet software: to be honest no idea ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) mempool: yes, I checked it twice, this transaction is in your mempool something strange: unconfirmed input rectified situation: I need to find another wallet which I can use in my country. tip: I will find out how to tip you and will be done. hope you can help me. many many thanks in advance for your effort and time. best wishes, Maria Ok, let's see... you are the sender... This means that it was your wallet software that used the output of an unconfirmed transaction to build a chain of unconfirmed transactions... That's defenatly not good. Could you tell me if you're also the sender of the unconfirmed parent: https://blockchain.info/tx/3a3bac0345baecda7409c09e14dc7023bbc75dc1e8ec9d13782211ce44f2aa03There are 2 possibility's here: 1) you're also the sender of 3a3bac0345baecda7409c09e14dc7023bbc75dc1e8ec9d13782211ce44f2aa03. In this case, it's 100% up to you to solve this problem. If you want my advice, i really need to know which wallet you used. 2) you're not the sender of 3a3bac0345baecda7409c09e14dc7023bbc75dc1e8ec9d13782211ce44f2aa03, in this case, it might be a good idear to contact the sender, and ask him/her to fix his/her transaction...
|
|
|
Thanks for your reply mate. Looking back on my previous transactions they have been around 350 sats which I'm guessing is why they went through so fast compared to this one. It would give me peace of mind getting a confirmation sooner than later so if it's ok, I'd like post a help request below. Will tip gladly if this can get sorted in the next few hours and a confirmation is received. Hopefully I have filled this out correctly. Coins needs to end up in my Binance Exchange account. transaction id: cf338a3e99ae1759b1416d3faa0798b166bea8c2a9d427041c21325ba1902a6e sender/receiver: Both addresses: 127rB32uMuwEwnUyqukbLyUsYbQ7iJxoQj is the receiver address (Provided by Binance where I want to send my Bitcoins to). 17uwFt4XVmFwXYAi6ufwzNaKeNhML72ZfP is the sender address (Provided by BTCMarkets where I've sent my Bitcoins from) wallet software: Not Sure? I'm transferring directly from the BTCMarkets Exchange to Binance Exchange. mempool: yes, i have checked http://www.mocacinno.com/page/getraw, entered my transaction id, and i was shown the raw transaction, so this transaction is in your mempool something strange: no, i have checked for unconfirmed parents, dust outputs and double spends on blockchain.info, and could not find any anomalies rectified situation: yes, in the future i'll use dynamic fees, and set the slider all the way to the right AND i'll use http://www.mocacinno.com/page/feeestimate for a second opinion tip: yes, I'm happy to tip but 100% of my BTC are embedded within this transaction hence I need to get them confirmed please. Can then transfer you some https://blockchain.info/tx/cf338a3e99ae1759b1416d3faa0798b166bea8c2a9d427041c21325ba1902a6eKind Regards Steve You're sending from an online wallet to an online wallet... This severely limits the things you can do to speed everything up: - since your tx had a "reasonable" fee, i submitted it to antpool, chances of this working are small - you can keep rebroadcasting the transaction and wait it out - you can pay for an acceleration at one of the following pools: viabtc.com, btc.com or f2pool.com Good luck! Hi, my transaction has an unconfirmed input, can please someone tell me what to do? thank you in advance!
You need to give more info... Transaction TX? Your BTC address? the wallet I used is adding the fee automatically. Plus, I'm not that familiar with bitcoin, It's the second transaction I made. for the first one I somehow managed to accelerate it with viaBTC accelerator myself, for this one I have no Idea what to do. I tried to accelerate on viaBTC the transaction id of the unconfirmed input, however I did not succeed. I hope to get some advise from you guys. this is the transaction id: 3a3bac0345baecda7409c09e14dc7023bbc75dc1e8ec9d13782211ce44f2aa03 This one actually is part of a chain of unconfirmed transaction... Each parent transaction in your chain has to be confirmed before your transaction will be confirmed. I can give you some tips on what to do, but i'm still missing a lot of information i need in order to give you advice... Please read the very first post in this thread and decide wether or not you want to share this information or not.
|
|
|
How do I rebroadcast the transaction?
That's pretty easy, you just submit it to one of the nodes that created a gui for this task. As a matter of fact, Timelord2067 created a thread where he collects nodes that allow rebroadcasting transactions (it includes my node ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) ) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1938621.0;topicseen
|
|
|
transaction id: 0f68d3aea56ad8258e2d51d339f39bea8e3fd595572edf9334b2154248557219 sender/receiver: both addresses: 1Jt2zoENJmUTjs1a8cL7MoWuds62kWPnFx is my address(sending), 1BqAMyFLfSegiSwDcBDXnjZxDPKn2axoyn is also my address(receiving) wallet software: electrum on Debian mempool: yes, i have checked http://www.mocacinno.com/page/getraw, entered my transaction id, and i was shown the raw transaction, so this transaction is in your mempool something strange: no, i have checked for unconfirmed parents, dust outputs and double spends on blockchain.info, and could not find any anomalies. rectified situation: God yes in the future I will always crosscheck the wallet default fee with the recommended current fee (fairly new to all this and didnt know the default would bone me) and will even add a little to it as the trying every accelerator every time i can (viabtc every hour) and checking if it has finally been confirmed all the time is causing some serious anxiety. tip: not yet, once i am able to get more btc or if there is a different way i can tip (paypal if you could contact me this would be the best way) I most certainly will. What you are doing is amazing for someone new like me that has ran into this problem for the first and last time. Since you used a reasonable fee of allmost 300 sat/byte, your transaction will eventually confirm if you keep rebroadcasting the raw transaction: 010000000187e8aef937f129ada6c6e1c3cd9a6974fda700e9d8226bdf5746337b5f260058000000006a473044022036833bb22384754408e05d7018d6ef2f5c08e01ae961401ef1fd667336a0671f022025e62d3fcff9f39d3774445dbc142208376d6b4d366bd60f159288d344b4791c012103b8c168825214aa35152f237e7e453a230ff0e29c0222c1286b3881746ab03ebbfeffffff01a3bb0d00000000001976a91476cd09e3ad5c5ed592d857da6cb6e38be4c64f3988ac00000000 Since you're both the sender AND the receiver, you should be able to do a CPFP from the receiving wallet by right-clicking the stuck transaction and chosing "child pays for parent". If this menu is unavailable, it means you need to update your electrum wallet ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) I know i said i wouldn't push any more tx's to antpool, but since your fee is reasonable, you have a reasonable chance with antpool, so i made an exception and pushed it anyways... A small piece of advice: go to the preferences and set your wallet to always opt-in RBF, that way your problem could have been solved cheaper and faster ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
It seems i have a huge backlog in writing replys... I'll be adding new replies to this post by editing it! I wanted to extend a special thanks to both HCP and philipma1957 for helping me out, since the inflow both on the forum, in PM, my email, my twitter,... is more than i can possibly handle by myself. During this anwering round, i won't be able to spoonfeed answers to anybody... I'll try to push you in the right direction, but you'll have to do some of the grunt work yourself... I'm swamped with questions lately.If, for some reason, i forgot to answer your question (check back in a couple of hours after i'm done editing), don't hesistate to re-ask First Questiontransaction id: 29e9816c86691e0bd447416b52f7f679092249d2c9928f2494ba60942e50ba8e sender/receiver: receiver addresses: 1Fn4vRvXoL76Xx3dFv9AQvZrYdXpYW8XL4 is my address, 1KNZJAPxy5A1AY5ZKTQMgMqUZB9ahnGaz4 is the sender's address wallet software: my wallet is an exchange wallet. Not sure about the sender, maybe blockchain.info mempool: yes, i have checked http://www.mocacinno.com/page/getraw, entered my transaction id, and i was shown the raw transaction, so this transaction is in your mempool something strange: no, i have checked for unconfirmed parents, dust outputs and double spends on blockchain.info, and could not find any anomalies rectified situation: yes, in the future i'll use dynamic fees, and set the slider all the way to the right AND i'll use http://www.mocacinno.com/page/feeestimate for a second opinion tip: no, thanks and appreciate ur service tho. Since you are the receiver, that leaves you with a CPFP or paying a miner to confirm your transaction. If it was a huge amount of BTC, i'd probably contact your exchange's support dept, and ask them to do a CPFP, but since the amount is relatively small, the best thing you can do right now is keep re-broadcasting the raw transaction: 01000000019adfef30e3ec434b399a270c470e7631c9ff91c261d6446c0acc396179dce050000000006b483045022100e00dc96b68255e0ecee65e99655274e4355903fe7a2c046b71c473d3d16536720220361557ff846ddf2f38d79c6ff17a38219da386f47170ef81d11b024d4c83db9a012103f6b1f5135c64283f8dddabfbcebb49728d4f931b8cf3ff7d5db00ab85d33ba32ffffffff02e4da0400000000001976a914a217c0a45abc30f3bfeb148c210c27b60ceffad088ac280f0800000000001976a914e5c1cdf88a82f81267b748afe771d116ace3d46488ac00000000 Second Question--snip-- Transaction ID: 3bf2e0fdd4a9ad01b83c679f83c247d019ecfa6f18c4fd075978b2c47075200a --snip--
Appologies for the lack of intel.
I am both sender (from MultibitHD) and receiver (to Kraken). I have learned so far that the problem is caused due to low fee per byte.
I do hope to settle this transaction within the next few days, any idea what I can do best in this situation? Would waiting a little longer cause a the transaction to be refunded or what would happen if it doesn't get confirmed in the next few days?
Thanks for any help!
Since the receiver is an exchange, this pretty much rules out CPFP, the tx isn't opt-in RBF so that's out of the question to... Multibit HD is no longer supported, if you move away from multibit HD to electrum (tutorial can be found here: https://multibit.org/blog/2017/07/26/multibit-shutdown.html), you SHOULD be able to follow my wizard on http://www.mocacinno.com/page/feechecker to create, sign and broadcast a transaction double spending the inputs of the unconfirmed transaction using electrum Thirth Question--snip--
Thanks a lot for your fast reply mocacinno.
I think that unfortunately Mycelium rebroadcasts unconfirmed transactions as I can see you have the manual options to DIY in the interface, and it's been like 8 days (I have read most transactions drop out before 3 days but I may be wrong).
Also I have looked around and it seems there is no way to get the private keys for the input addresses you're mentioning unfortunately, even with the recovery seed... And Coinjar is an Australian exchange for BTC.
Seems like my only hope is to get in touch with a miner directly and get it sorted for a fee. Would you happen to have a preferred contact?
Thanks again!
I think you *should* be able to get your hands on the private keys by using the offline sourcecode https://iancoleman.io/bip39/ and the correct derivation path. I don't really have time to look up the derivation path myself (answering tons of questions). If you can't get it fixed, i do know btc.com, viabtc.com and f2pool accept such transactions for a big premium. the first two have a webpage selling their service, f2pool can be contacted on bitcointalk (macbook-air is the owner, and quickseller has push privileges) Fourth Question10 days the transaction has been stuck1. Transaction id: 9777d77394951cb87b9d07b93a32631d2b351c26fc34419258c3c87e7164a742 2. Sender/receiver: receiver 3. Addresses: 133aV7JThuKCYmBSJWdExZNeE15yMK3Vux is my address Wallet software: Bitcoin Core 15.1 Mempool: yes, i have checked http://www.mocacinno.com/page/getraw, entered my transaction id, and i was shown the raw transaction, so this transaction is in your mempool Extra Info: I have contacted the exchange support team, they told me to use an acceleration service that will cost me around $7,000 USD!! Please help!! The problem here is that this tx is using inputs from an unconfirmed parent transaction (e0f15412adeef065b24b184ef0def8495ee78cb1bf9815f9abe21a57333ae3cf). Your transaction can only be confirmed once it's parent is confirmed. You could potentially do a CPFP, but you'll have to pay the fee for both your stuck transaction AND it's parent... The total size of both tx's is 35502 bytes + 225 bytes + 225 bytes (for the CPFP tx) = 36 kb. The optimal fee at tis point is 700 sat/byte.. So the CPFP tx should have a fee of 0.25 BTC, which is about $4300.. You basically got a bad deal here... The other option is to contact the sender and force him to clean up his act... He used the outputs of an unconfirmed transaction as input for a new transaction, and that's not a cool thing to do! Fifth Questionwell many of your problems above are worse then mine. I paid 215 in fees and unstuck my major transactions. I used btc.com as they totaled more then 50,000 usd. and much of that was not truly mine to hold for as long as i want 215 was a bargain. I have used viaduct.com to move tx ids but now nothing works with them. I have 1 transaction left that is stuck d04fd0649f560f365247f3102fb2910748766132fd9cdeab3cb12e9c09f2bb10 tx id https://blockchain.info/tx/d04fd0649f560f365247f3102fb2910748766132fd9cdeab3cb12e9c09f2bb10So this was sent via blockchain.info wallet to one of my trezor wallets. it is about 300 usd I am not paying like 200 usd to unstick it. So does block chain wallet let it drop since it is one of my wallets to one of my other wallets and I don't care about that money at the moment will it drop out? raw info
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 So I now can't move fund without huge costs. That ends my escrow business. I can live with it ending. I prefer to mine, but this locked transaction shit is hard to deal with. https://blockchain.info/address/1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53VbtjeHi Phil, sorry to see you leave the escrow business... You were one of the guys i actually looked up to. I always loved guessing the next diff jump on your threads ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) As for your transaction, it has a fee of almost 400 sat/byte... I'm pretty sure it'll be confirmed sooner or later, i did push it to antpool for you, since the fee is reasonable, this one *might* actually have a chance of getting into one of their blocks! Sixth Question--snip-- How to prevent wallet rebroadcasting?Can I do CPFP with electrum wallet? How to double spend the unspent output?or Would you please help me to confirm? I need some instructions of manipulation. Thanks some much! Btw, the tipping sent to you successfully by paying 0.001BTC as the fee, so maybe you can only receive 0.00171645.
I really don't know bither... If you want to know wether they rebroadcast or not, and if they do how to stop it, i would suggest reading/posting in their Ann thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=498382.0doing a CPFP from electrum should be as easy as right clicking on the pending, incoming transaction in the transaction history tab. There *should* be an option "Child pays for parent", just follow their wizard and you *should* be OK... If the option isn't shown, make sure you run a recent version (i think they're up to 3.0.3 now, i don't know when this feature was introduced, but older versions might be lacking it). If you can't get CPFP to work, and you need some extra help, i'd like you to find out if you can use your seed words to restore your bither wallet in electrum. If you can, i can walk you trough doublespending (it might also be possible with bither, i just don't know, nor have the time to really dig into it). Thanks for the tip, it is greatly appreciated Seventh Questiontransaction id: 0cd5edf1c339ce6a5d8e62bc1897bdebf0b087e7a14cc49f06270e1b575ddf96 sender/receiver: receiver (and also sender, but from an online exchange service account on IndependentReserve so I dont fully control wallet) addresses: 1NwH7g6JSuyqNYfnJFS49dRTyZ6AdPuCkF is my address, 1J948EMDqPdEAqphjAGEbFDWHyFnDRo1rM is the sender's address (and their change address is 1Nhzwjrt7rmQUCcCob3umHcMMkEe2pNCyS) wallet software: IndependentReserve website mempool: yes, i have checked http://www.mocacinno.com/page/getraw, entered my transaction id, and i was shown the raw transaction, so this transaction is in your mempool something strange: no, i have checked for unconfirmed parents, dust outputs and double spends on blockchain.info, and could not find any anomalies rectified situation: yes, I wont use Independent Reserve for these, as they picked the fee, AND i'll use http://www.mocacinno.com/page/feeestimate for a second opinion tip: yes, once I can access any BTC, or can send LTC or BCH. Thanks! Well, the main problem is that you are using unknown (to me) independant online wallets... You're basically stuck with the feature set they provide (or with their support dept) UNLESS you can export the private keys of either wallet... Would it be possible to find out which feature sets are offered by the sending/receiving wallet, and if you can export private keys from either one? Eight Questionyou paid 267 sats it may go over night but your 267 sats may be high enough Thanks for your reply. At this stage it's been unconfirmed for 23 hours and counting whereas previous transfers (of lesser amounts) were confirmed within 1-2 hours max. The fee is the default fee set by BTCMarkets which they say is a 'fee charged that get's it processed with the highest priority'. Do you know what could be holding this up if my fee is high enough? Just want this sorted asap as some of the alts I've been watching are at a good buy in price and it's just a matter of time before I think they will rebound. Your fee is sufficient to get a confirmation sooner or later, but defenatly not high enough to have a decent chance of getting confirmed right away... The fee for a 95% chance of getting into the next 3 blocks is 700 sat/byte at the time of writing! Nineth Question1. Transaction id: 9b7b959579a4e52773b9a7a6597d0447e4eea42d958859af0485f7a91855a25b HAS BEEN STUCK FOR 14 DAYS ! 2. Sender/receiver: BOTH...Was unable to set the fees and it bit me 3. Addresses: 12xag4i7LyQ8KAmpsLPCtSNyqdL6y9RaVA is my address Mempool: yes, i have checked http://www.mocacinno.com/page/getraw, entered my transaction id, and i was shown the raw transaction, so this transaction is in your mempool Extra Info: Tried everything, accelerators, etc....No luck this my first stuck transaction, apologies for the noobness No problem, could you share witch wallet you used to create the transaction, and which wallet was receiving? Tenth Questionwhy are you doing this for free, is this for your own personal gain or is it because you want to help
(sorry for being so cynical but genuinely curious. I might start off a service like this as well)
or is it some bitcoin cash hack thing that i dont even understand how it works, electron cash deleted my walelt so i have no idea what is going on.
I did this because i could... I used to be able to help about anyone who had a problem in the past.. However, nowadays, a lot of the tools i used to use are heavily abused by people cheaping out on fees. It has come to the point where i'm happy when i'm able to help just 1 or 2 people a day. I'm not affiliated with bitcoin cash, nor with any of the pools i used to use. When i send somebody to a pool, i don't get a cut. I must admit i sometimes send people to my own site for more information, and i do get some ad revenue from that (about 0.005 BTC/year, i estimated)
|
|
|
on my prompt it says c:\user\user I cant seem to get back to the root C:\ it says C:\users\user even if I try to type \program files i.e C:\user\user\program files\bitcoin it says
"c:\ program" is not recognized as an internal or external command operable program or batch file
the path is C:\Program Files (x86)\Bitcoin and its the same, I cant get off the c:\users\user prompt . ahhhhhhhh
that's all pretty basic stuff... it looks to me like you did not include the quotes i specified in my example? Also, if bitcoin core is located in C:\Program Files (x86)\Bitcoin instead of C:\Program Files\Bitcoin, you'll need to adapt the example to the correct path. I googled this link for you, it's a basic tutorial on how to use the command prompt: http://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/spr05/cos126/cmd-prompt.htmlAn other option would be to use windows explorer, navigate to the folder containing bitcoin-qt.exe, right click, make a shortcut, edit the shortcut and add the startup parameter in the shortcut-edit-gui ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|