|
this version is a bit slower for me than nicehash last version, getting 3% less speed compated to nicehash even with the two instances
|
|
|
|
So is Genoil miner "depracted"?
Will that be updated? no he said that there was no competition anymore with clymore and left this behind, if you want an amd miner for zec just go with clymor i was going to wait for a nvidia miner from genoil but he was not interested it seems...sadly |
|
|
|
it's wrong, the 1070 do 380 at 100watt not 330
With what miner? with the nicehash miner Hmm is this with some hardcore OC? I am getting 330 at 65% TDP - 120W and it still drops if I move to 60% or lower. Edit: I see that 1.7.3.11 has been released. Will check it out. Indeed getting 380 now. yeah just reduce tdp to 55% for 100watt, hash will be around the same |
|
|
|
Does anybody achieve 430 sol in 6x-rig per gtx 1070 (sum=2580)?
it's possible with very high memory oc, and core above 100, tdp and wattage also will be higher, but it also depend on the model of your gpu i'm at 2500 with 1000 watt at the wall, much better to do 2220 at 700 watt for me Agreed, rentability is better @700w, but it depends if you pay for electricity and if it's cheap or not, sadly for me it's expensive, so just like you i mine @50% tdp ^^ yeah if i had 5 cent electricity i would go with 2500+ sol 1000watt, as it will earn you more in the long term but it's not the case for me either |
|
|
|
|
you can do better on etheruem a 470 can reach 27 and 30 with some heavy tweaking, otherwise i would mine zec no question, has a better chance to be pumped, etheruem is done
|
|
|
|
Does anybody achieve 430 sol in 6x-rig per gtx 1070 (sum=2580)?
it's possible with very high memory oc, and core above 100, tdp and wattage also will be higher, but it also depend on the model of your gpu i'm at 2500 with 1000 watt at the wall, much better to do 2220 at 700 watt for me |
|
|
|
If it's free you will be 99% banned for crypto mining, btw you could share how you got it  i also have some vps but i think using it mine coin is useless they are but they were useful in the past to mine with cointellect and make tons of money in a short time, not the time anymore for that even mining cpu coin now is not profitable, unless you have a botnet not a single vps |
|
|
|
We need speed-up! new eqm release shows 420s/s per 1070.
For me it's even 435 Sols / s. what settings and model you have? even on updated bios, my Gigabytes g1 1070s still make 300 sols at most with this miner. 360 sols with nicehash one. i cant find the sweet point of theses cards.. i´m getting tired of them. exactly gigabyte seems to perform worse here, but if i try 80% tdp two instances with 125 core and 400 mem i get a total of 2500 sol with 6 card, so i'm there still 435 sol is out of my league It's funny i can reach this speed (2500 sols@80% tdp) with EQM of nicehash, but not with EWBF, how do you setup your instancing ? using the cuda-devices switch and listing only half your gpu's per bat file right ? ah yes sry i was talking about the nicehash miner of course, not possible to reach it with this miner |
|
|
|
No, now 430 hash for 1070...
See edits. Still isn't worth it... Further Edit: Efficiency Setup - at equal power use for comparison without power costs impacting the analysis. Edit: Edit: Card Price Hash/s Power (W) H/$1070 $400 380 100 0.95Fury $260 300 100 1.15Full Bore Setup Card Price Hash/s H/$1070 $400 430 1.075Fury $260 350 1.346The 1070 has a long way to go before it's worth a look. The entry cost of $400/card is just too steep to overcome without some serious hash. it's wrong, the 1070 do 380 at 100watt not 330 If you did a little math yourself you'd see at 380 it's still not wrong. AMD is still ahead of Nvidia in H/$ running efficiently AND running full bore. Even with the adjusted numbers the 1070 is still 20% less H/$. AMD dead?? It's still in the LEAD. Edit: AMD guys are quibbling over 0.5% using ssl and 2%-4% in pool variance. Nvidia guys are paying a 20% premium just to play the game and screaming victory. It would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic. it is because 380 sol is always better than 300 sol at the same wattage, you need 25% more uselesses components with 300 sol to have the same total hash you must remember than on large scale the less rig you haev that do the job the better You are right, Amph. Also, real prices are not listed. AMD Fury is much more than a listed prices. Here is the actual price at the same shop in the EU:  On ebay there is some fury at 260 USD: http://www.ebay.com/sch/Graphics-Video-Cards/27386/i.html?_from=R40&_nkw=fury&rt=nchttp://www.ebay.com/itm/SAPPHIRE-NITRO-Radeon-R9-Fury-100379NTOC-SR-4GB-4096-Bit-HBM-TRI-X-OC-UEFI-Vi-/291648915692?hash=item43e7a148ec:g:A8QAAOSwu1VW7qbd, also on newegg: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814202186btw I never bought or tried fury as I know its consume 300W so I prefer to buy 290 or 290x @ 200USD (used). So i wonder if fury consumes 100W man read the description, that gpu was tested, tested for me is equal to used, it's not brand new then, so the comparison must be done with a used 1070 a used 1070 can be found for 300-350 at worst
it's wrong, the 1070 do 380 at 100watt not 330
With what miner? with the nicehash miner |
|
|
|
We need speed-up! new eqm release shows 420s/s per 1070.
For me it's even 435 Sols / s. what settings and model you have? even on updated bios, my Gigabytes g1 1070s still make 300 sols at most with this miner. 360 sols with nicehash one. i cant find the sweet point of theses cards.. i´m getting tired of them. exactly gigabyte seems to perform worse here, but if i try 80% tdp two instances with 125 core and 400 mem i get a total of 2500 sol with 6 card, so i'm there still 435 sol is out of my league |
|
|
|
We need speed-up! new eqm release shows 420s/s per 1070.
For me it's even 435 Sols / s. what settings and model you have? |
|
|
|
Did anyone try 1050 and 1050 Ti with the latest version? What's the hashrate at stock?
it should be at least 1/3 of the 1070 so 140 sol with 35watt, it was 120 before if i'm correct Yup, check power numbers. New version uses 10% more... but still more efficient then the last version.
it give me the same power as before but hashrate is 12% higher at least, same settings as before |
|
|
|
|
i don't like to ship a full rig, it may be damaged or something, the best solution is to just give you the money and you build the rig that i want
let's say i want a 6x1070 rig with h81 pro btc ssd 60gb 8 gb ram and g1840 + 6 risers, how much woul cost me there?
a rig like this would do $300 a month gross minus electricity(1000w per hour), will be $270, minus 10% for you, would be $243
buying a 470 rig would do around half of that(200-220 sol per gpu), so i don't see the reason to go with amd here, i would only waste money in components that do not mine
|
|
|
|
For me it work as good as older revision, but price is higher.
I was going to buy this, however, I have just noticed the first PCIE x1 slot next to the x16 slot will be blocked by the fans/heatsink if I put a card in the x16 slot. I already have 5 USB PCIE x1 -> x16 risers and don't want to buy a single x16 -> x16 riser. Anybody know of a mobo that doesn't have this problem with room for at least 6 gfx cards? how it is blocked it's the same as the old h81 pro btc? if you ean the cpu ehatsink it will be fine |
|
|
|
No, now 430 hash for 1070...
See edits. Still isn't worth it... Further Edit: Efficiency Setup - at equal power use for comparison without power costs impacting the analysis. Edit: Edit: Card Price Hash/s Power (W) H/$1070 $400 380 100 0.95Fury $260 300 100 1.15Full Bore Setup Card Price Hash/s H/$1070 $400 430 1.075Fury $260 350 1.346The 1070 has a long way to go before it's worth a look. The entry cost of $400/card is just too steep to overcome without some serious hash. it's wrong, the 1070 do 380 at 100watt not 330 If you did a little math yourself you'd see at 380 it's still not wrong. AMD is still ahead of Nvidia in H/$ running efficiently AND running full bore. Even with the adjusted numbers the 1070 is still 20% less H/$. AMD dead?? It's still in the LEAD. Edit: AMD guys are quibbling over 0.5% using ssl and 2%-4% in pool variance. Nvidia guys are paying a 20% premium just to play the game and screaming victory. It would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic. it is because 380 sol is always better than 300 sol at the same wattage, you need 25% more uselesses components with 300 sol to have the same total hash you must remember that on large scale the less rig you have that do the job the better |
|
|
|
No, now 430 hash for 1070...
See edits. Still isn't worth it... Further Edit: Efficiency Setup - at equal power use for comparison without power costs impacting the analysis. Card Price Hash/s Power (W) H/$1070 $400 330 95 0.825Fury $260 285 95 1.096Full Bore Setup Card Price Hash/s H/$1070 $400 430 1.075Fury $260 350 1.346The 1070 has a long way to go before it's worth a look. The entry cost of $400/card is just too steep to overcome without some serious hash. it's wrong, the 1070 do 380 at 100watt not 330 |
|
|
|
why shipping? i come up with a better alternative, you just give him the money and he build and host your rig there, you then pay for the electricity cost and give him an additional 10% of your earning for the hosting
Georgia's prices on rig's parts cannot compete with Amazon and Newegg amazon do not sell to georgia? |
|
|
|
well a rig don't occupy that much of a space, especially if you stack them up
isn't better for you to charge a % on the hosting instead? like 5-10% on the total revenue of the hosted rigs?
what about trust? how can we trust you?
The percentage might be better for me. I'd be willing to give him let's say 10-20% of what the rig produces and up to 33% if he can pay for the shipping. Ii would cost something like 77$ to ship 12kg, so might be worth for him or not. There's something to do here I believe. why shipping? i come up with a better alternative, you just give him the money and he build and host your rig there, you then pay for the electricity cost and give him an additional 10% of your earning for the hosting I already have rigs that I can't run here because of the high price of electricity. I've already spent too much money on those rigs that have been turned off for now. I don't want to invest a penny further into something that will break even in so much time. currently even with 40-50 cent electricity you cna make profit, you have really an electricity higher than 40-50 cent per kwh? this is crazy |
|
|
|
Stock GTX 1070 = 360 Sol/s @ 150 W OC GTX 1070 (clock @ 2050, mem @ 4500) = 410 Sol/s @ 170 W Efficient GTX 1070 (TDP 50%, mem @ 4500) = 330 Sol/s @ 95 W dead AMD its near  Nvidia rules 35% more expensive for 35% more hash. We know. You are not unleashing secrets here... wrong, cost double of a 470 but it hash at double the speed or near that, the difference is the efficiency which is far greater my 470 nitro 8g samsung mem are doing 260 each when properly tuned, so eff is lower but hashrate is more than half the 1070's still not worth it because of density, better to have 4 rig than 9 rig doing the same, you waste money on uselesses components on large scale the 1070 win without doubts |
|
|
|
well a rig don't occupy that much of a space, especially if you stack them up
isn't better for you to charge a % on the hosting instead? like 5-10% on the total revenue of the hosted rigs?
what about trust? how can we trust you?
The percentage might be better for me. I'd be willing to give him let's say 10-20% of what the rig produces and up to 33% if he can pay for the shipping. Ii would cost something like 77$ to ship 12kg, so might be worth for him or not. There's something to do here I believe. why shipping? i come up with a better alternative, you just give him the money and he build and host your rig there, you then pay for the electricity cost and give him an additional 10% of your earning for the hosting that's why i was talking about trust before Trust is always an issue I know, but In fact I do this for living. I maintain BTC and other cryptocurrency farms in and near Tbilisi, Georgia.
I thought more people would be interested in low electricity price and ready environment that's why I'm planing to get a place with all necessary stuff and offer a service like this.
Also everything will be official.
Charging % is also an idea, but needs calculations.
Also you are right Rig doesn't require much space, but what if you want to fill up 100sqm? How much are you willing to pay the rent for 100sqm with air flow and conditioning and no power limit?
I know I need a lot of calculations to do
if we can overcome the trust thing i'm very interested in this, but i'll build it slowly, let's say i'll try with one rig to see how the thing go and then add the others rig would be controlled remotely with teamviewer for example, and like i said i pay for the electricity and an additional % that must be calculated right, so we both have a nice deal |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
