EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner

[lokko]

You need to give any pool about 24 hrs to normalize.

As I said, I give myself a lot of effort and invested a lot of time and you can count on me ! Let your miner time a 24 in the F2pool you can in the seconds run clock as your earnings rises Best Regards from Germany






and finally, I am very happy about every donation ! t1VADKGszY9uUnns7FJQXinDm1ioZau6at1

Stop advertising in other peoples threads.

Best Zcash pool I've been on is flypool, absolutely rock solid. Dwarf would be a close second, but they don't have enough hash.

I'm not advertising you nose :-))
and flypool is bullshit :-))
you have unfortunately understood nothing :-))

You are definitely advertising your pool.

nonsense, I speak from experience and give the information to the miner are not cheated, and fair pay.
I didn't have to make Mate !

Yeah, it's pretty easy to see that you were referring to your pool as 'yours' off and while advertising it.

Speaking from experience, flypool is definitely the lowest variance pool currently with close to 100% earnings every day. I mine with a pretty decent amount of hash so it's not nearly as prone to variance as well.

Dwarf pool is a very long and time tested pool. Flypool is from Ethermine and Ethhash, both very long running pools.

F2pool is... random Chinese guy in a shack trying to make some hash? You're also totally not german, pretty sure you're chinese based on how you put together your sentences and respond.

If you're earning more then you should be getting paid that means there is a lot of variance there and it will bite you in the ass.

PPS/PPLNS/RBS has absolutely nothing to do with pool variance, pool variance can only be minimized by large amounts of hash. This is putting aside the pool code being garbage, block times, skimming, and connectivity issues with the pool... all that factor into a 'good' pool. If you run long term on a good pool who has a large amount of net hash you'll get very little variance.

After testing this pool for a few hours (f2pool), i don't like it much, lots of timeout, lots of latencies on shares, and fishy hashrate report. Going back to dwarf ! Not saying it's bad since they seems to show quite a bit of hashrate in their pool, but it just doesn't work for me.

I tested also on another rig flypool, but it doesn't seems to show proper hashrate, im about 150 less sol than in reality after 2hours running. Dunno if it's normal or not, but i find it odd.

Usually i'll have to agree, but the discrepancies were far too important (at least on f2pool), anyway

Peace Mate !
😂😂😂😂😂✌️✌️✌️💪💪💪🖖👍

and finally, I am very happy about every donation ! t1VADKGszY9uUnns7FJQXinDm1ioZau6at1

[1713572348]

1713572348

[1713572348]

1713572348

[1713572348]

1713572348

[1713572348]

1713572348

[xyburcoin]

Merry Christmas!   

t1Y6N3AHfGarNVEvvnkcNzCV7hKzeBgauRC

[bensam1231]

No you should donate to me and use my pool! Matter of a fact I just got a donation for the work I've done here.

[ocminer]

You need to give any pool about 24 hrs to normalize.

As I said, I give myself a lot of effort and invested a lot of time and you can count on me ! Let your miner time a 24 in the F2pool you can in the seconds run clock as your earnings rises Best Regards from Germany






and finally, I am very happy about every donation ! t1VADKGszY9uUnns7FJQXinDm1ioZau6at1

Stop advertising in other peoples threads.

Best Zcash pool I've been on is flypool, absolutely rock solid. Dwarf would be a close second, but they don't have enough hash.

I'm not advertising you nose :-))
and flypool is bullshit :-))
you have unfortunately understood nothing :-))

You are definitely advertising your pool.

nonsense, I speak from experience and give the information to the miner are not cheated, and fair pay.
I didn't have to make Mate !

Yeah, it's pretty easy to see that you were referring to your pool as 'yours' off and while advertising it.

Speaking from experience, flypool is definitely the lowest variance pool currently with close to 100% earnings every day. I mine with a pretty decent amount of hash so it's not nearly as prone to variance as well.

Dwarf pool is a very long and time tested pool. Flypool is from Ethermine and Ethhash, both very long running pools.

F2pool is... random Chinese guy in a shack trying to make some hash? You're also totally not german, pretty sure you're chinese based on how you put together your sentences and respond.

If you're earning more then you should be getting paid that means there is a lot of variance there and it will bite you in the ass.

PPS/PPLNS/RBS has absolutely nothing to do with pool variance, pool variance can only be minimized by large amounts of hash. This is putting aside the pool code being garbage, block times, skimming, and connectivity issues with the pool... all that factor into a 'good' pool. If you run long term on a good pool who has a large amount of net hash you'll get very little variance.

After testing this pool for a few hours (f2pool), i don't like it much, lots of timeout, lots of latencies on shares, and fishy hashrate report. Going back to dwarf ! Not saying it's bad since they seems to show quite a bit of hashrate in their pool, but it just doesn't work for me.

I tested also on another rig flypool, but it doesn't seems to show proper hashrate, im about 150 less sol than in reality after 2hours running. Dunno if it's normal or not, but i find it odd.

Usually i'll have to agree, but the discrepancies were far too important (at least on f2pool), anyway

Peace Mate !
😂😂😂😂😂✌️✌️✌️💪💪💪🖖👍

and finally, I am very happy about every donation ! t1VADKGszY9uUnns7FJQXinDm1ioZau6at1

To add something useful to this funny pool discussion :

There is a merry Christmas special on https://zec.suprnova.cc with 0%fee

Edit : oh and payout scheme is pplns

[bensam1231]

You need to give any pool about 24 hrs to normalize.

As I said, I give myself a lot of effort and invested a lot of time and you can count on me ! Let your miner time a 24 in the F2pool you can in the seconds run clock as your earnings rises Best Regards from Germany






and finally, I am very happy about every donation ! t1VADKGszY9uUnns7FJQXinDm1ioZau6at1

Stop advertising in other peoples threads.

Best Zcash pool I've been on is flypool, absolutely rock solid. Dwarf would be a close second, but they don't have enough hash.

I'm not advertising you nose :-))
and flypool is bullshit :-))
you have unfortunately understood nothing :-))

You are definitely advertising your pool.

nonsense, I speak from experience and give the information to the miner are not cheated, and fair pay.
I didn't have to make Mate !

Yeah, it's pretty easy to see that you were referring to your pool as 'yours' off and while advertising it.

Speaking from experience, flypool is definitely the lowest variance pool currently with close to 100% earnings every day. I mine with a pretty decent amount of hash so it's not nearly as prone to variance as well.

Dwarf pool is a very long and time tested pool. Flypool is from Ethermine and Ethhash, both very long running pools.

F2pool is... random Chinese guy in a shack trying to make some hash? You're also totally not german, pretty sure you're chinese based on how you put together your sentences and respond.

If you're earning more then you should be getting paid that means there is a lot of variance there and it will bite you in the ass.

PPS/PPLNS/RBS has absolutely nothing to do with pool variance, pool variance can only be minimized by large amounts of hash. This is putting aside the pool code being garbage, block times, skimming, and connectivity issues with the pool... all that factor into a 'good' pool. If you run long term on a good pool who has a large amount of net hash you'll get very little variance.

After testing this pool for a few hours (f2pool), i don't like it much, lots of timeout, lots of latencies on shares, and fishy hashrate report. Going back to dwarf ! Not saying it's bad since they seems to show quite a bit of hashrate in their pool, but it just doesn't work for me.

I tested also on another rig flypool, but it doesn't seems to show proper hashrate, im about 150 less sol than in reality after 2hours running. Dunno if it's normal or not, but i find it odd.

Usually i'll have to agree, but the discrepancies were far too important (at least on f2pool), anyway

Peace Mate !
😂😂😂😂😂✌️✌️✌️💪💪💪🖖👍

and finally, I am very happy about every donation ! t1VADKGszY9uUnns7FJQXinDm1ioZau6at1

To add something useful to this funny pool discussion :

There is a merry Christmas special on https://zec.suprnova.cc with 0%fee

Edit : oh and payout scheme is pplns

At least you don't go out of your way to hide the fact you work for Suprnova. ~_~

[dwarf0]

We need speed-up! new eqm release shows 420s/s per 1070.

[Lucky - Luciano]

We need speed-up! new eqm release shows 420s/s per 1070.

For me it's even 435 Sols / s.

[ioglnx]

To add something useful to this funny pool discussion :

There is a merry Christmas special on https://zec.suprnova.cc with 0%fee

Edit : oh and payout scheme is pplns

At least you don't go out of your way to hide the fact you work for Suprnova. ~_~

Did he ever hided it? No.
Merry Christmas and peace.

[mirny]

thanks for the tip about updating bios on Gigabyte Micron boards.. i had old bios and i couldnt make more that 270 sols with this miner.

I´ve just updated. Lets see if theres any change...

Me too, I updated bios, two weeks ago on gigabytes, and till now no crashes, it improved stability a lot.

Can you link the GIGABYTE bios fix for micron VRAM, because I only know of

ASUS
MSI
EVGA
Zotac
Palit
Gainward

bios updates for micron vram.

I took it from here:
http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=5916&dl=#bios

[Amph]

We need speed-up! new eqm release shows 420s/s per 1070.

For me it's even 435 Sols / s.

what settings and model you have?

[_javi_]

We need speed-up! new eqm release shows 420s/s per 1070.

For me it's even 435 Sols / s.

what settings and model you have?

even on updated bios, my Gigabytes g1 1070s still make 300 sols at most with this miner.

360 sols with nicehash one.

i cant find the sweet point of theses cards.. i´m getting tired of them.

[lokko]

Some info for you : Msi Gtx 1080 OC settings with and without MSI Áfterburner.
Standart : Without 2x GTX 1080 OC EWBF 0.0.6 b  625 - 640 sol/s

With OC
Core Clock 150 MHZ
Memory Clock 600 MHZ = 730 -745 sol/s
Temps: 81°
Stable


and Power Limit 110 %
Core Clock 185 MHZ
Memory Clock 885MHZ = 780 -795 sol/s
Temps: 86°
Stable


caution with this setting, only mining is possible !

Nice Regards,

My Hashrate : 1050 - 1100 sol/s
Best Pool and my Personal Pool Statistics:
https://www.f2pool.com/zec/t1WeeA3kjwtGZ77fm7vH12RXznxgBnpz1xQ



and finally, I am very happy about every donation !

[Amph]

We need speed-up! new eqm release shows 420s/s per 1070.

For me it's even 435 Sols / s.

what settings and model you have?

even on updated bios, my Gigabytes g1 1070s still make 300 sols at most with this miner.

360 sols with nicehash one.

i cant find the sweet point of theses cards.. i´m getting tired of them.

exactly gigabyte seems to perform worse here, but if i try 80% tdp two instances with 125 core and 400 mem i get a total of 2500 sol with 6 card, so i'm there

still 435 sol is out of my league

[lokko]

We need speed-up! new eqm release shows 420s/s per 1070.

For me it's even 435 Sols / s.

what settings and model you have?

even on updated bios, my Gigabytes g1 1070s still make 300 sols at most with this miner.

360 sols with nicehash one.

i cant find the sweet point of theses cards.. i´m getting tired of them.

exactly gigabyte seems to perform worse here, but if i try 80% tdp two instances with 125 core and 400 mem i get a total of 2500 sol with 6 card, so i'm there

still 435 sol is out of my league

Fuck of Nicehash ! But with Oc Settings

EWBF Miner

and Power Limit 110 %
Core Clock 185 MHZ
Memory Clock 885MHZ = 780 -795 sol/s
Temps: 86°
Stable

EQM Miner  2x Gtx 1080 940 - 980 sol/s

[m1n1ngP4d4w4n]

We need speed-up! new eqm release shows 420s/s per 1070.

For me it's even 435 Sols / s.

what settings and model you have?

even on updated bios, my Gigabytes g1 1070s still make 300 sols at most with this miner.

360 sols with nicehash one.

i cant find the sweet point of theses cards.. i´m getting tired of them.

exactly gigabyte seems to perform worse here, but if i try 80% tdp two instances with 125 core and 400 mem i get a total of 2500 sol with 6 card, so i'm there

still 435 sol is out of my league

It's funny i can reach this speed (2500 sols@80% tdp) with EQM of nicehash, but not with EWBF, how do you setup your instancing ? using the cuda-devices switch and listing only half your gpu's per bat file right ?

[Amph]

We need speed-up! new eqm release shows 420s/s per 1070.

For me it's even 435 Sols / s.

what settings and model you have?

even on updated bios, my Gigabytes g1 1070s still make 300 sols at most with this miner.

360 sols with nicehash one.

i cant find the sweet point of theses cards.. i´m getting tired of them.

exactly gigabyte seems to perform worse here, but if i try 80% tdp two instances with 125 core and 400 mem i get a total of 2500 sol with 6 card, so i'm there

still 435 sol is out of my league

It's funny i can reach this speed (2500 sols@80% tdp) with EQM of nicehash, but not with EWBF, how do you setup your instancing ? using the cuda-devices switch and listing only half your gpu's per bat file right ?

ah yes sry i was talking about the nicehash miner of course, not possible to reach it with this miner

[m1n1ngP4d4w4n]

We need speed-up! new eqm release shows 420s/s per 1070.

For me it's even 435 Sols / s.

what settings and model you have?

even on updated bios, my Gigabytes g1 1070s still make 300 sols at most with this miner.

360 sols with nicehash one.

i cant find the sweet point of theses cards.. i´m getting tired of them.

exactly gigabyte seems to perform worse here, but if i try 80% tdp two instances with 125 core and 400 mem i get a total of 2500 sol with 6 card, so i'm there

still 435 sol is out of my league

It's funny i can reach this speed (2500 sols@80% tdp) with EQM of nicehash, but not with EWBF, how do you setup your instancing ? using the cuda-devices switch and listing only half your gpu's per bat file right ?

ah yes sry i was talking about the nicehash miner of course, not possible to reach it with this miner

Ahah ok, that's what i thought xD i was like "wtf" for a second here xD

[lucasan123]

i noticed that the miner uses only the 83% of the card.....................................couldn't ewbf mine at 100%

btc donation address 1Kmst2XKGUhWjGRM2WjXKFgV1u67BJi2iu

[m1n1ngP4d4w4n]

i noticed that the miner uses only the 83% of the card.....................................couldn't ewbf mine at 100%

btc donation address 1Kmst2XKGUhWjGRM2WjXKFgV1u67BJi2iu

try multiple thread (like putting only 2 card per miner instance) also use the usual environment variable to make it use the whole cards (as much as possible)

SETX GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
SETX GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
SETX GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
SETX GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
SETX GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

[ioglnx]

i noticed that the miner uses only the 83% of the card.....................................couldn't ewbf mine at 100%

btc donation address 1Kmst2XKGUhWjGRM2WjXKFgV1u67BJi2iu

try multiple thread (like putting only 2 card per miner instance) also use the usual environment variable to make it use the whole cards (as much as possible)

SETX GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
SETX GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
SETX GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
SETX GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
SETX GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

These settings make just sense with opencl. They do not have any influence on CUDA.
And certainly they are for AMD..