|
can somebody please go on Mintpal and knock down that wall !
tx
0.00800000 17150.33239954 137.20265917
|
|
|
|
User Actions Following Kristov Atlas @anonymouscoin Coming soon: Electrum-DRK, a lightweight Darkcoin client baed on Electrum. http://electrum-drk.org/what is the deal with the Electrum DRK wallet ?!? I did not read that in Evans update ?! Is the plan since a couple of weeks back, although I think instant transactions might be first. Here is what the roadmap was before the instant transactions Eureka moment. What is the roadmap for Darkcoin after Darksend+ is perfected and open sourced?
As was stated by Darkcoin's lead developer eduffield today:
Darkcoin will focus on providing a host of anonymity services using the Darksend implementation. This would mean my next project would be to rewrite electrum to use the masternodes to anonymize funds, then an android wallet that can use Darksend, then iPhone, etc. The foundation would also be tasked with trying to get businesses to accept Darkcoin and expand the user base.
It means that ALL users will have an out-of-the-box nearly perfect anonymous payment solution, which could be a big deal in the near term future.
Ok tx i still think we should get the Wallets and Electrum on the way soon as without that we can not work on (OB) market adoption ! Wish there was a C++ person out here who would step up and Evan does not have to do it himself !!! |
|
|
|
User Actions Following Kristov Atlas @anonymouscoin Coming soon: Electrum-DRK, a lightweight Darkcoin client baed on Electrum. http://electrum-drk.org/what is the deal with the Electrum DRK wallet ?!? I did not read that in Evans update ?! |
|
|
|
payment per node/DRK: 0.642;
So same same then ?!
Ya. That's the way it is calculated on that page. The estimate is assuming enforcement. cool tx |
|
|
|
Masternode payments per day is the question, they will go up no ??
Any idea to what/and where ?
I promise i understand you. Here is the answer. ".6" is what the value would be if enforcement were in place right now. So right now, because there is no enforcement, the real value is lower. Once there is enforcement, if the number of masternodes were the exact same, the daily value would be ".6". TLDR: If there is enforcement, the daily value WOULD be ".6". Because there is no enforcement, it is currently lower. HaHaaaa 09/17 10:36:11; node count/len(set(poolhash.org): 904; payment per node/DRK: 0.642; payment per node/$: 2.199; DRK/$: 3.422; last 576 blocks supply: 2904 So same same then ?! |
|
|
|
Have to ask 1 more time (as nobody ever replies to the) regarding the enforcement what does that mean for MN payments ! We are now on 0.6 DRK per day, is that gonna go up then  Tx Hey brother, I responded to you last time you asked... Umm you're not gonna like this but that is what it would be if enforcement were true. I can feel the squeeze on supply. As the masternodes increase the supply is drying up.
It is actually less than the value you are looking at right now. Tx man sorry missed you answer last time ! I am NOT talking about coin supply or MN values, Masternode payments per day is the question, they will go up no ?? Any idea to what/and where ? |
|
|
|
Have to ask 1 more time (as nobody ever replies to the) regarding the enforcement what does that mean for MN payments ! We are now on 0.6 DRK per day, is that gonna go up then Tx |
|
|
|
- So regarding Darksend+ - Everyone with Darksend enabled, every 10 blocks their coins are automatically "tumbled" with eachothers (as diagram shows) and when you send via Darksend, it waits for the "tumble-interval" and the receiver receives the DRK via the end masternode in multiple amounts? Please tell me I'm correct because that's pretty awesome.
But what (if anything) is stopping this scenario: UserA sends userB a pretty specific amount of 528 DRK. Mass blockchain analysis - UserA's wallet decreased 528 and userB's wallet increased 528 within a 20 minute period. How couldn't those be linked, or why would it be harder than I seem to think (for someone with the tools/knowledge)? You see a specific amount leave a wallet, and how many users wallets are going to increase that exact amount within 20mins? I'm not trying to be critical or anything btw I'm just trying to better understand.
It doesn't work like that. Read Kristov's paper for full understanding and see how attacks would work: http://blog.anonymousbitcoinbook.com/2014/09/paper-an-analysis-of-darkcoins-blockchain-privacy-via-darksend/He seems to be still working on the review, maybe the final paper ??  |
|
|
|
Looks like we cracked 900 Masternodes  so did 903; payment per node/DRK: 0.662; payment per node/$: 2.057; DRK/$: 3.106; last 576 blocks supply: 2990 0.662 payments are so freaking low what would happen if we get enforcement ? What would be the payment then ?? |
|
|
|
Then people realize it won't come before weeks = sell walls again.
You are too optimistic guys, it was strictly the same with each RC, and each news...
Depends how complex it is. If it (and it probably is) works off the masternode network this is huge news. Instant transactions and because of that extremely quick denomination? That's huge! And not priced in. That is one thing. The other one is - market has a tendency to react positively on news about the technology rather than implementation of the technology. Last time when masternodes were announced price could not stop increasing for days Somebody is really trying to keep us bellow 0.007 ! wonder what is going on there |
|
|
|
Ahh!! Evan you spoiled my pattern analysis with your instant transactions news!  Now this looks good. Downward channel broken finally! Hahaaaa see, you and your charts man honestly in this crypto world they do not work you never know what might hit you tomorrow !  |
|
|
|
9/14 8:51 pm <evan82> I just solved one of the largest problems facing Bitcoin. Instant transactions. I know how to do it... 9/14 8:52 pm <evan82> It'll be compatible with Darksend too. So we'll have anonymous instant transactions. 9/14 8:52 pm <evan82> Oh and there will be no bloat, that is the problem with POS. I bet we can get a confirmation within 10-20 seconds in most cases. 9/14 8:52 pm <evan82> It also fixes the finney attack, which is another huge problem for bitcoin 9/14 8:56 pm <eth2> =) thats some good news 9/14 8:56 pm <eth2> lemme know when you need testers 9/14 8:57 pm <evan82> Yeah, I'm obviously pretty excited about it. I just had a eureka moment 9/14 8:58 pm <evan82> It's simple, elegant, instant and will cost a ton of money to subvert. Perfect  9/14 8:59 pm <eth2> does that have any technical implication on how transactions are processed and blocks? 9/14 8:59 pm <eth2> from a pool standpoint 9/14 8:59 pm <evan82> nope. 9/14 8:59 pm <evan82> It's not even a hard fork [...] 9/14 9:25 pm <moli> interesting.. https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/4942/what-is-a-finney-attack9/14 9:27 pm <evan82> It could possibly stop a finney attack. It's funny you post that, it's what I'm thinking about righ now 9/14 9:27 pm <evan82> right* 9/14 9:28 pm <evan82> It can definitely stop all other double spends, but finney attacks require the client to reject blocks. WHOWWWW this is great !! now we just need an official statement from Evan to make this Public for real !!!! Yes, it's real and the solution is really cool I'll be publishing a paper soon to explain all of the details. Nice post to wake up to! LOL +1000 panic buying allowed Already happening 3.04 US$ Catchiiiing |
|
|
|
9/14 8:51 pm <evan82> I just solved one of the largest problems facing Bitcoin. Instant transactions. I know how to do it... 9/14 8:52 pm <evan82> It'll be compatible with Darksend too. So we'll have anonymous instant transactions. 9/14 8:52 pm <evan82> Oh and there will be no bloat, that is the problem with POS. I bet we can get a confirmation within 10-20 seconds in most cases. 9/14 8:52 pm <evan82> It also fixes the finney attack, which is another huge problem for bitcoin 9/14 8:56 pm <eth2> =) thats some good news 9/14 8:56 pm <eth2> lemme know when you need testers 9/14 8:57 pm <evan82> Yeah, I'm obviously pretty excited about it. I just had a eureka moment 9/14 8:58 pm <evan82> It's simple, elegant, instant and will cost a ton of money to subvert. Perfect 9/14 8:59 pm <eth2> does that have any technical implication on how transactions are processed and blocks? 9/14 8:59 pm <eth2> from a pool standpoint 9/14 8:59 pm <evan82> nope. 9/14 8:59 pm <evan82> It's not even a hard fork [...] 9/14 9:25 pm <moli> interesting.. https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/4942/what-is-a-finney-attack9/14 9:27 pm <evan82> It could possibly stop a finney attack. It's funny you post that, it's what I'm thinking about righ now 9/14 9:27 pm <evan82> right* 9/14 9:28 pm <evan82> It can definitely stop all other double spends, but finney attacks require the client to reject blocks. WHOWWWW this is great !! now we just need an official statement from Evan to make this Public for real !!!! |
|
|
|
Is there a guide how to update the MN Wallet to the newest version for MAC Tx |
|
|
|
Is there a guide how to update the MN Wallet to the newest version Tx For MAC please ! Tx |
|
|
|
Is there a guide how to update the MN Wallet to the newest version Tx |
|
|
|
|
what would Masternode payments be
if payments are enforced ??
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
