I no longer find suchmoon interesting. Besides, over the last few months I have studied the "why's" various users have negatives and posted those observations in this thread - I don't follow the squabbles going on in DT1 unless there's ample salt, butter and popped-corn on offer (and sadly there hasn't been any of that these last twelve months) Reminder: The system is for handling trade risk, not for flagging people for good/bad posts/personalities/ideas. It looks like he's being held on DT1 by an excluded DT1-member, if he's inactive he should drop off DT at the next reshuffle. Great! by leaving suchmoon (abusive) negative feedback for his/her opinion? If that's the case, can we do something about the 100% of negative trust feed-backs (and quite a few neutral ones too) I've received that are all retaliatory? The system is for handling trade risk, not for flagging people for good/bad posts/personalities/ideas. I seem to recall asking @theymos for clarification in that thread at that time, but like all missives from theymos, it went unanswered.
|
|
|
Take care @blackjack.fun, humbertin's alt is using retaliatory DT distrust in an attempt to silence anyone exposing their alts and scamming. I cant share more because we have different ways to protect against alternative accounts and I will not share any personal information. Can you share the full evidence with me? I've "known" Humb for years and I don't believe he's the same person as webtricks.
Would you be prepared to share your further evidence with @LoyceV (who is well trusted on the forum) that you haven't posted because of respecting privacy issues?
|
|
|
I know it isn't considered wise to leave retaliatory feedback but I think you deserve at least neutral feedback I wouldn't call neutral feedback retaliatory, I'd say it's proper feedback usage by not responding with negative feedback.Whist overlooking the retaliatory DT distrust?
Yeh, that's what humbertin does, goes on a retaliatory distrust feedback spree - this time it's retaliatory DT. A gambling website is protecting it's own financial interest by exposing scammers, but I'm the one being attacked? I still remember that time DavidXXXX had the DT1 Trolls eating out the palm of their hands convincing everyone that they weren't an alt of Humbertin, then went on to scam. (Had a look, can't find it) Nothing changes.
|
|
|
*edited* due to unfolding events.Less than 24 hours ago I stumbled upon this thread and added to my list of "bad words" in LoyceV's [Active] Finding spam and scams by keyword thread. Within a day blackjack.fun had posted the following, but when they presented their evidence, it became less likely there was a connection due to inconsistancies in blackjack.fun's "evidence" Note: Post truncated. We have a protection for alternative account. If the system will find the alternative account then it lets me know.
System told me that Webtricks=Hello I am Humb
I can share part of the info of both accounts. I cant share more because we have different ways to protect against alternative accounts and I will not share any personal information.
...
It was very interesting discovery. That one person can have very different reputation in bitcointalk. Vary sad to see complain that I didnt give extra 1mbtc from good will after this.
We continue with honesty no matter what.
blackjack.fun is claiming to be able to provide more proof after the 17th of December.
|
|
|
This is a serious request to add SexCoin to your site. ( Forum Thread ) - ( LiveCoin Exchange link ) We have an Android App (with an update in the pipelines) and the coin is being merge mined with LiteCoin to ensure stability of the block-chain. Ideally we would like to be added to the instant and traditional exchanges and would also make coins available for the faucet. Hope to hear back from you soon.
|
|
|
If a Casino offers the user the option of being able to set their own TX fees (admittedly, I haven't looked, so it may not be a thing) then a user can view one of the many TX fee estimator sites and get an idea what a reasonable TX fee for the time frame they want/need the funds in.
|
|
|
Please tell me what to do or in what topic I should write if I published a report on Ratimov and he left me an allegedly neutral negative review.
You can open up a topic in the reputations board concerning the feedback left to you thou I don't think it's necessary. There's nothing like "a neutral negative" review. It's just a neutral feedback and there's no need to create a topic about it because neutral feedback doesn't matter that much. If only he had left you a negative feedback, and by negative I mean a red tag, then it would be ok for you to complain about it. Make that two neutral trust feed-backs on your trust feedback wall... Clearly you've bought a throw away UID (that posted just once back in the day) to go on the war path against a few users, so it's little wonder you've got the attention you sought.
|
|
|
Lauda, congrats on taking the 4th most recognized place post forumulously - well deserved in my opinion! Shouldn't that read regaining the 4th place? Given that's where they were the day of their announcement. Quite an achievement indeed. You are right! This is a missing dataset; LoyceV is probably compiling the records right now! In the meantime, I followed Theymos' template and present The official top 4 recognized people in bitcointalk statistic thread!If BPIP kept a note of the top score a user has had in each ranking, then we could see the best scores users have had (I topped most reconised at rank 30 on the 3 rd of February 2020 ) Lauda's merit circle score is now 111 th (it *was* 99 on the 6th of May 2020) and will probably slip more as other users merit old posts of theirs.
|
|
|
Lauda, congrats on taking the 4th most recognized place post forumulously - well deserved in my opinion! Shouldn't that read regaining the 4th place? Given that's where they were the day of their announcement. Quite an achievement indeed. As I said in a previous post over night: Goodbye Lauda. You had a great innings. I've also archived your PGP thread post & am checking if there are any other posts of yours that should be archived before you go. Screen shot taken just now: I estimate I'll overtake Lauda's most active rank in about August 2021 with a rank of about 98. (At that time Lauda's rank I estimate will be about 8 with their most active score dragging them down, but recent meriting of Lauda might keep their score up a rank or two)
|
|
|
I additionally have the pundiX tokens ...
I never got into any tokens as they seem to me to be counter intuitive to the mantra of "being your own bank" instead of governments issuing the money. The problem with tokens is they are all pre-mined and sold for a song, then the group behind the ICO/IEO (call it what you will) vanish into the night, or, dump their bags if the price actually goes up killing the price.
|
|
|
I like such things, the fun with the colors and finding other nice characters or letters that are similar to ours. Here is an example for the name of your thread. If you like, you can use it : ↬Ƙɴʘผɴ ₳Lτﻛ ʘᵮ ₳ɴyʘɴ℮ ⇔ ₳ Uﻛeʀ ʛ℮ɴ℮ʀατ℮Ԁ Liﻛτ↫Do you know I was playing around with the title for the Known alts thread the other day using the three core colours that are in the signature at the moment (and the image that keeps disappearing) [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.0][b][color=#0a80b1]Known Alts of any-one[/color] - [color=#f8ae23][i]A User Generated List[/i][/color] [color=#c81c8f][sup]Mk III[/sup][/url] I was going to unveil the fruits of my labors on new years day - I might have to go back and revisit that work.
|
|
|
...
As much as I enjoy playing Texas Hold Em, I couldn't help but notice you table in the OP is all over the place, I could have a look at simplifying it for you, if you like, otherwise I'll leave it be if you are happy with it the way it is.
|
|
|
Hopefully I can imitate your big and kind steps.
I wonder how many forum users will be inspired by the OP's decision to quit smoking by emulating their goal and improving their own (and their families) lifestyles with this important first step. (will they also buy crypto week-in week-out??)
|
|
|
Congratulations on making a healthy living choice for yourself. At the moment, €56 is the equivalent of BTC 0.00379158 which is more than the minimum amount needed to set up your very first Lightning Network channel. You'll need to sort out some incoming capacity (I advise against buying the channels being touted in the Forum and elsewhere - if you have a static IP, then others can connect to you giving you inbound capacity) If you use a program such as Eclair or Zap and once a week open a Lightning Network channel, you'll be helping establish a solid set of channels for yourself - you can reclaim your funds fairly quickly, or, you can look at the time lock method to lock away the funds for a month, year or even longer.
|
|
|
I sold just about everything I had this time last year, so what little remains are very tiny amounts of some very old scrypt coins that I'd managed to mine myself plus a couple of others:
100 Crypto Bullion, a few hundred World Coin, a few thousand Earth coins, I've got a paper wallet somewhere with about five or six diamond coins, a couple of dozen ruby coins (that never stake) another one called KARMA - the first of about five coins or tokens that have had that name. about 100 DEM (Deutsch eMark) Can't recall off the top of my head any others that are still active (Maple etc isn't active, so isn't included) - I have some swapped TAG coins in a wallet that were in exchange for my TAG coins that were burned. I don't know what email I used to set that wallet up let alone the password, but I don't think they're worth even one Peso combined.
Not worth nada...
|
|
|
I saw you posted a link to another patrol page: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=recent;patrol Can you just outline how your patrol page differs from the other? I'm still looking over that other one. could the patrol page be narrowed down to a specific section (e.g. meta or reputation (not very good examples, but still...) ? ) ??
|
|
|
The admin and mods don't have any kind of oversight (checks and balances) to ensure their work is appropriate - one admin/mod will respond to a post, another admin/mod will then delete the very post replied to by the first admin/mod citing the post as being off topic.
About a full third of all of my reports are marked as "unhandled" which means none of the admin/mods we currently have can make a decision on my reports - my reports are predominantly "bump" or "multiple successive posts" (and yes, I too get lots of reports that are marked as bad simply because of who the admin/mod is in a certain section).
|
|
|
We can make use of DOGE and TRX instead if it is available on the site you were playing then that would be a good option if you cant take to pay up high fees with BTC.
The trouble with a Casino offering multiple crypto alts that can be exchanged for other crypto is that the Casino could end up being a dumping ground for lesser value alts then the Casino will have to find an exchange to clear out the alts to balance their books back to fiat/btc etc. (not to mention some users may not even gamble while preferencing favorable crypto exchange rates on offer by the Casino)
|
|
|
|