Suppose I place a sell order for 1 btc at $45k on your favourite exchange. Next, I place a buy order for 2 btc at 46k, will the exchange execute the trade?
You are creating two different orders. You can only create both orders if you have at least 1 BTC + $46k*2 in your exchange balance. Assume btc price is under $45k. Once it hits $45K your 1 BTC gets sold and your balance become $45k + $46k*2 but at that time $45k will just seat idol. |
|
|
|
|
I don't think it's everyone. There are people who have seen bitcoin to drop under $3.5 from $20k not long ago. Bitcoin history and volatile price movement is attached closely. It's the noobs who are panicking, and they will always panic until they spend a few years in this space. There will be new noobs all the time though.
|
|
|
|
How is it a risky job for them? There are no other funds on my ETH address other than PaxGold worth of 10K$... It is not like a collective ETH address with millions of funds from other users on it. You only need to deposit enough ETH for gas and a private key. Should only take a few minutes. I understand because of complex audits and security measures it may take a while to arrange. But once it is all set, accessing my funds does not put other users' funds in danger.
And this is not like the case of BTC recovery from a BCH address. It is all on one chain and ERC-20 tokens are fully compartible with ETH addresses.
Assume you own an exchange. Who has the private key of all the address of the exchange? You or other employees who you trust (maybe). I do not know how they handle the private keys, but I know for sure that it requires them a special team. A random employee can just steal all the coins from those address if they have the private key. Now to protect assets this special team obviously knows the risk and reward factors just to give away a private key to a client. Maybe they require complex protocol which is expensive or they would not emphasize too hard warning their users not to send coins to a wrong address. |
|
|
|
My days in Bitcoin are coming to an end indeed.
You may or may not feel it, but there isn't any loss associated with it.
Markzuckergsdogtalk.org
Maybe you can book the domain and after few years you sell it to Markzuckerg LOL Anyway, do what feels you good. Clearly you are not in peace. |
|
|
|
A grand welcome back party!!! :-P
Yeah, party to celebrate the return of the cheater. Who are you? A party pooper. :-D |
|
|
|
I mean look at Mark Zuckerberg, the guy named his dog Bitcoin while probably probably owning zero Bitcoin!
I named my dog Facebook and my cat's name is Zuckerberg. How it's related and why would Zuckerberg himself will give a shit about it? You really think bitcoin community care about what these people are doing? They are just random people for the community. There are noobs everywhere and those noobs are making them visible. Bitcoin became so big that these people now considering to have their own business in it. Do you see my point? You need a citizenship and an ID to sell Bitcoin, that is controlled by the government along with their USD currency
Don't use USD. Find an economy where you do not need to use those printed papers. |
|
|
|
They don't pose a threat to their money and females and social influence and control
They should be thankful to you for your concerns about them but don't you need to pay attention to improve your personal developments instead of worrying about others? |
|
|
|
I can think of a solution: every few years, an exchange can replace all deposit addresses by new ones, and give each user the private keys to all addresses they've used. But that would lead to other problems: some users will still keep using the old address, and many people can't handle private keys in a secure way.
So I get they're not very forthcoming about this.
Good idea but let's improvise it. List all the complaints that are coming from the users who made mistakes like received wrong coins in the wrong address. Like this current case. Give the private key only to these users and give new address to them only instead of all. This could be a good solution. It's good that the USDT are there. Contact CoinList customer service again with the reference of this explorer and ask them if they can do anything for you since this time our showing the assets are there, maybe they will now try to do something for you. |
|
|
|
There are people out there who could delete this website and forum for good.
You should try harder. But before you do let me shitpost around for the last time before the forum is down for good :-D |
|
|
|
It makes me wonder how much money was lost by people using made-up tokens on the wrong chains!
Most of the people are not designed to do things by their own. They always need assistant from others. if the amount is huge then you can take legal action against them. I've never seen legal action taken in such a case. I like to compare it like this: you go to a bank, and drop a valuable coin on the floor. It rolls into a crack in the floor, and you can't reach it anymore. Now you want the bank to break open their floor to recover your coin, and even worse, their safe is right under it so they risk their security. Honestly speaking when you make the mistake after having warnings everywhere then you can not blame the bank for it. They need to assure that the funds are safe. Your mistake is just a collateral gain for them which maybe they don't want it either. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin has become a ponzi scheme and a scam anyway, I remember when it used to represent anonymity and freedom.
Gayboys don't like you = bitcoin is ponzi. Nice :-D PS: Why do you go to gay bar when you do not like them? |
|
|
|
Let me understand. You sent USDT from Binance to CoinList but instead of a USDT address, you sent it to a bitcoin address. Binance are correct when they say that they can not do anything assuming the coins are gone from their wallet. What I understand is that Omni is a layer which works with bitcoin network. But I have never made any Omni transaction, so I have very little idea how it works but if this is something like you give a BTC address and the USDT goes to that address then Omni are correct when they said you need to have the private key of the address. -> because you have deposited the funds to an address CoinList does not own! This is my BTC address on their exchange not an unknown
one If it's not like just send the usdt to the btc address then I guess they are meaning that it was not the USDT address (ERC20) that they own. Do you know what I can do because they make me desperate Chances are very slip but if the amount is huge then you can take legal action against them. But you need to have it in mind that you made the mistake. By any chance can you post the transaction ID or the bitcoin address? Or Go to this url: https://www.omniexplorer.info/address/<Put the BTC address> You should be able to see if you have any USDT balance in that address. For example check this : https://www.omniexplorer.info/search/1BBj2gVtiKXVvfNTkgtVCC2t4PEPCBkA2j1BBj2gVtiKXVvfNTkgtVCC2t4PEPCBkA2j is s bitcoin address. |
|
|
|
My blockchain.com account is saying.
Non Spendable
0.051Btc is required for $485,053.00 to be available into your bank account.
Any help please. Thanks
Did they ask it on their website in your account section or you received any email or something? Can you take a screenshot and post it here. His URL seems fine to me but sure something is wrong. |
|
|
|
is this legal?
How is it not? You think Satoshi will sue them?  Maybe Craig F*** Wright, Craig F*** Wrong, Craig Steven Wrong, Craig Steven Wright :-P Possibly he still has not noticed it yet, or he would have a file in the court already LOL |
|
|
|
2) How many copies of each seed should be stored? Would there just be one for each seed so e.g for 2 of 3, there would be 3 in total, or would there be multiple of each? Maybe if that is a consideration, then a different quorum should be chosen.
Consider 2/3, all three needs to have back up of their own seeds. It depends on them how many they will have. As long as the seed is not lost the wallet is good. The wallet is still good even one cosigner lose his seed because to use the wallet you only need two cosigners. I am still trying to understand you first question.1) Instead of using seedpicker.net for the 3rd emergency key, wouldn't it be better to generate the key on another hardware wallet e.g a trezor? This would not be used to sign. The xpub would be imported into the multisig and the multisig would never know of the hardware wallet that generated that key. This would only be needed for recovery if 1 key was lost in a 2 of 3 for example. You do not need any third party service. Whoever is the author he has overdone it I guess. All three cosigners can be created using the same software. It's three different device, if a hacker wants to get access of the wallet then he needs at least two devices to access or two cosigners to convince out of three. |
|
|
|
Sheet has been handed out to the team for W4. At the time of token generation you will get paid. This campaign ends here however there is a possibility for it to reopen as from my conversation with CEO yesterday, I felt that they need to reevaluate everything to see everything sorted for them first. Feel free to show some love to them. For any inquiry related to the project please feel free to visit their ANN thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5331066.0It was a pleasure managing this sig campaign and working with all of you who participated. |
|
|
|
finally I came back again, after 2 years I fell asleep
Account age is 4 years and you were sleeping two years. Half of your lifecycle has been wasted in sleeping! I guess Rip Van Winkle was better than you because at least he has not slept half of his lifespan :-D A grand welcome back party!!! :-P |
|
|
|
Turns out my assumption is the very common one. Till now no one thought otherwise and assuming the mods will have the same understanding. However, if there is any mode who have a different opinion then you are welcome to PM me about it. I am locking this topic. whoever complained. Honestly, someone out there will hate anything you do no matter what.
No one complained. Honestly speaking 99.99% users on this forum so far are very nice to me. |
|
|
|
I have a question. Did you check with any of the mods if that shortened link in your personal text is allowed? Shortened URLs aren't allowed on the forum, but the rules might be different for sigs, avatars, or the personal text field. This was asked by a user privately and I realized that I never had a thought about it but assumed that it's fine to use a URL shortener on personal text. I am still confident that it's absolutely okay to have it on the personal text unless any mod suggest otherwise. Looking forward to know the exact rule. Cheers, PS: If I recall correctly then I have seen shortened URL in many signature campaigns. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
