Would love to help your project as community manager or help with promotion.
Are you good at web server management? |
|
|
|
- You posted in the wrong board which means you didn't read the forum rules.
A new user of the forum may not know proper use of the boards as we do. So I will not give him discredit for it. He will learn. - It is best to display your past experiences in a way that the user can verify. I take this. If a user is offering service then he at-least present it with some efforts. OP haven't put any effort at all. @ahmazoo, I would like to see some past work you did and details about your skills. |
|
|
|
By their own admission, as with Dabs, they haven't actually corrected their misuse. In this instance, they have simply had themselves removed from the DT1 vote.
Like Dabs, tranthidung is ignoring the expectations of their peers.
Please stay on topic.
I am on topic. I would love to see Tranthidung understand the idea of using feedback and trust setting. Give him time to understand instead of poking him. It's not a place we blame each others. The Dabs case was not clear to me as I did not have time and mind to involve in other things because of the situations I was in for the last few months. |
|
|
|
Timelord2067's (quoted) question isn't clear. If you would have said for instance: "Have you asked others to remove their posts too?", there wouldn't be any confusion.
Tranthidung answered your vague question by stating the request didn't come from someone else. Don't blame non-native English speakers for being confused on vague questions. He didn't say he did not contacted anyone else.
Timelord2067 has some weird sense of humor. Being suspicious is not bad but it's not good to stick to it when there are some clear explanation. I am with Tranthidung. He may be did not use the system how it should be but he did not do anything wrong to go under the sword too. |
|
|
|
PS
JollyGood if you want to ask your 1001 question to Royse than ask him with private messages.
Royse, for the last time I am asking you to chill, because you are not going to help your case like this.
There will be no PM between JollyGood and me. I do not trust him. I will say dear he will make it deer, I will say beer he will make it bear. Then new open topic to explain dear and beer then another new drama. I hear you buddy. Thanks. I would like a peace. |
|
|
|
I believe I read another member quoted 10% but did Royse777 ever state the percentage voluntarily? I tried searching but that part remains elusive.
Unimaginable! Mr. Bitcointalk forum Lawyer, do you even do your case study? May I ask you now, you keep rumbling all these what to achieve? I question your motive. If you think you are wannabe Lauda then you have a long way to go to meet her/his standard. |
|
|
|
- what percentage of the Bitlucy company given to Royse777? I think it was 10%. May I remind For the record I spent over $3.2k out of my pocket, from GGR I was supposed to receive around $1.5k plus and for the current month, since we were having problems with the site we decided to give me $2k salary not the GGR. Today is the 22nd. He sent me 400$ and 200$ but after a few days he needed some payments done and took $240 from me. That $600 that I received from him all together. The above $3.2+$1.5+whatever it is from $2k for the month are still due. I was not stressing for my money but stressing for staff and customers withdrawals. This was important for me more than anything.
Please don't consider that it was given. I believe you overlooked yahoo's change from red to neutral?
This is no longer a Royse777 name-clearing thread (the proof was shown about 2-3 pages ago), now it's a Royse vs. yahoo drama. And Don't forget JollyGood who is not satisfied yet with all the answers. He want some special treatment from Royse777 While Royse requests KYC from a customer for a company that doesn't exist anymore while insisting on keeping potentially relevant information private on her own. Hm... Sounds kind of special to me as well. Please don't sound it like it happened today. When I was in contact with the user then bitlucy was up and running. (my hands are still tied and considering the situation it will be for good)
Do you give attention to everything I say? I hope you are not feeding JollyGood only for entertainment. |
|
|
|
~Royse777
You are welcome, anyone is. But, I really hope you did not misunderstood my words. Reading through this thread my thoughts were indifferent, then I read this: It does not bother me anymore. You should be happy that I did not use my DT status against you that I did not paint your wall red.
In other words, Yahoo should be happy because I never sent any retaliatory tag or even supported it against anyone. I had very good chance to paint yahoo's trust page if I was supporting retaliatory feedback. Any negatives by Royse777 against myself from this point on I will consider to be retaliatory.
Why would I leave negative to you? Because you made above post. No! You have raised a valid concern but as usual Royse777 has not answered questions she finds difficult to explain. Bitlucy does not exist. Under which rules and under which jurisdiction is Royse777 asking for KYC?
It seems KYC or not, Royse777 stated she will not send the victim money that was scammed by Bitlucy even after Royse777 promised to return to all victims.
He got his answer within 5 to 10 minutes of asking it. |
|
|
|
My tag on you just needs reworded and it's still valid.
You should have the reworded tag in the first place before making it sounds a way of demanding apology in exchange for it. I cared for the lie you were spreading against me. You even emphasized that I was the same as the mixing service and plain unprofessional.I don't bother to "~yahoo62278" because it's not accountable anymore. Bottom line, I got pissed at the way you act like a child towards me and decided to remove myself from the situation and readd the red tag that I gave you when the situation started.
In your mind when a DT member is pissed then they word/reword their argument and leave a red feedback (2nd red feedback) for others? Unfortunately, you are misusing the trust inclusions of others.IMO are obligated to answer any goddamn question that I might ask as long as it pertains to the situation. Instead of trying to answer questions with a cool head, you decided to be hotheaded and childish and not only not answer my inquiries, but also accuse me of stealing clients lmao. Your client contacted me for a 1 week campaign. What do I owe you? I was trying to be sympathetic in the beginning but you changed my feelings. Do we have a love like relationship? Sorry to break your heart. (broken heart symbol) Do you deserve an apology? No, maybe a pacifier. Do I deserve 1, a case could be made both ways. You dragged me back into this disaster acting like Koil and creating a thread and locking it showing the community even more of your childish behavior. Stop calling childish behavior. This does not make you a mature adult.
I'll lower my tag to a neutral, but not because of anything you did. I got my answers in the next post from AnotherAlt whom I merited if anyone wants to check. Are you sure you lowered the tag (2nd tag) because you got your answer in the next post from AnotherAlt? Sure it is not. You knew your answer long before the post you are referring. Stop rewording and escaping. Since you want anyone to check then here: => This is the post made on July 03 (yahoo's reference post) => June 17th a post from a reputed manager, yahoo even merited. I posted about it in the next response if not immediately. Question of me being the same guy as Bitlucy? 1. This does not make sense. The campaign manager is a liar? Yahoo even merited the post. Okay considering he did not read the post. 2. dkbit98 is confirming. 3. A confirmation here. 4. Another user confirmed somewhere. 5. Another one here. 6. He could ask the designer I mentioned in the OP. When you are saying you lowered the tag then be careful it was not for AnotherAlt's post. It now sounds like you were looking for a good excuse to lower it. Your intention to give the tag (2nd) 1. Slandering. 2. Wanted an exchange. I explained all in the locked thread. Go try and enjoy life instead of blaming everyone else for your mistakes. Stop using the word everyone too whenever you get a chance. Where did you get the idea of I being blaming everyone for my mistake? Sorry, I wanted to digest all blames on me but some of you were taking the opportunity to overdo it.
Clearly I said some of you. And these some of you includes you and JollyGood with maximum 2 to 3 more users. Does it sound like a blame by the way or more of pissed to find nonsense demands? Your implying of everyone is wrong. It sounds like everyone gave you a job to speak for them. In your past you have your mistakes too so don't wash your hand and say hey look! I am clean! I don't know what you expected to achieve,
Sorry dkbit I really wanted to live in peace after all these happened to me but some users are taking away my sleep. This is an emotional place for me. Long years. It's been a part of my everyday life. I am fine to take criticism based on the facts but I will not allow anyone to spread lie against me. If I do not reply then after few years when everything will cool down then they (who had no idea what happened) will make it guaranteed that these lies were true. @suchmoon, how to you copy and paste an entire feedback please? |
|
|
|
First I thought to leave a red tag (same as he did) then changed mind because leaving red will be completely a misuse of current trust rating. Edited
Don't forget to complete your quest by ~yahoo62278 in your trust list. I'd at least like you to look like you have a clue. It does not bother me anymore. You should be happy that I did not use my DT status against you that I did not paint your wall red. |
|
|
|
Right, but you already created a thread, why not leave it open instead of making people look for context elsewhere? Now here's what happens: someone sees a trust rating on yahoo, they follow the reference link (possibly months/years from now when the memory of this current dispute has faded), and there is only your opinion in a locked thread. That's kinda misleading. It would be more fair to leave it open at least for a couple of pages so that yahoo and/or others can respond, then you could lock if it starts getting off rails.
I hope you will consider the annoying users like JollyGood and some others who will give their everything to make the reader to forget what they read in the main reference post after reading two pages of conversations if I unlock the thread. Besides the post is full of references linked to various posts. If anyone is genuinely interested then they will take the time to visit the some of the links. However, if yahoo has anything to add then ask him to apologize first for saying misinformation about me (If I could be disrespectful to the trust system then I would ask the apology in the same fashion). Then I will give him a chance to reply to the topic (only for him) before locking it again so that JollyGood does not get a chance to write their nonsense arguments to mislead the reader. |
|
|
|
First I thought to leave a red tag (same as he did) then changed mind because leaving red will be completely a misuse of current trust rating. Edited the title. I'm not sure Betesports can be said as a troll since I see his accusation was legit.
Anyway it's already a month, any news about the refund to those victim especially those who have been filled the google form?
Betesports removed. My mind was tricking about him being one too. Two never replied my email. One observed everything and insisted me that he / she is fine and understand my situation. Thank you if you are reading it. One ended up being too hostile and decided not to co-operate me. I was asked to KYC him (my hands are still tied and considering the situation it will be for good) because he was threatening to kill the CEO and confirmed hiring professional killer from darkweb. He denied even after I had evidence of the conversation he was posting in his private social channels to his audience. But using a locked thread (although "legal" for trust ratings unlike e.g. for flags) is a dick move to say the least. It would be better to point it to the actual post that triggered the rating (or an archive thereof), or at least have an open thread for it.
I agree. In the feedback page we do not have option to create discussion. Following that setting, whatever comment left on the feedback page - if anyone wants to defend then they usually create a new thread or continue in any existing thread which is related to the case (like this thread). I did not want to hijack the topic to post off-topic. |
|
|
|
This is not a discussion thread. The thread serves for detailed reference of the feedback to yahoo. Hence, it's locked.
1. Slandering. He claims - I decided to be a big asshole to anyone who had questioned on bitlucy ANNRoyse had claimed to be a partner and the site had some questionable issues pop up. Rather then answer users with a cool head, Royse had claimed to be a partner and the site had some questionable issues pop up. Rather then answer users with a cool head, Royse decided to be a big asshole to anyone who had questioned them. Same as this mixing service if ya ask me, just plain unprofessional.
I made 54 (+/-1) response to the ANN thread which had over 38 pages of conversation log. Troll like bislom, Betesports and few others were hurting their best from the beginning. After 17 pages: - I had a response for a case which needed to be responded ( 1, 2). There are no sign of I was being an asshole in the response. I was providing a solution. - Explaining the situation to a user ( 3). Again with a good manner. - Reply of an argument with providing solution again ( 4). - Announced the termination of bitcointalk with bitlucy and highlighted the google form to get better visibility for it ( 6). - It does not look like cool head is absent ( 7). 8 pages of response and I made 5 posts on the 1st reputation thread before I created my own thread (call it 2nd reputation thread) to give the brief of the story. - I wanted to make a point of the users that they had problems with other casinos too, it's nothing new etc before I was providing them a solution ( 8). Nowhere I was being asshole to response. - Posting an update for a concerned user with an apology ( 9). - Maybe I sound a bit of asshole when I said I don't need to prove myself to others too but it's no near than yahoo's claim of being big asshole to anyone. I was polite enough to express how I was feeling ( 10). I became an asshole ( 11) to Yahoo and JollyGood (5*20) + (7*20 + 6) + (38*20 + 11) posts. They were crossing the line with their bullshit arguments for example the lamest one is demanding the chats to be in public. I know what I did and how I did. Only saying word seems unfair so I found it's best to spend enough time to collect reference. Yahoo's claim of me being a big asshole to anyone (indicating to ANN thread and probably on the 1st reputation thread) is completely lie.Yahoo's intention is clear that he is slandering. 2. Wants to exchange the negative feedbackThen Royse opens the thread explaining their side. If you bothered to read the thread, I was very empathetic and was supporting them at 1st. Then, Royse decided instead of answering a few questions and trying to clear up my concerns, to attack me and basically say I was stealing their business. I'm sorry but that company contacted me, I didn't contact them. If ya act like a baby, i'll treat ya like 1. Royse fucked up and instead of handling the heat, they decided to make it personal. If they wanna act that way then I have no more use for the situation. Maybe an apology from Royse should happen. The red tag was left few minutes before or after the comment from him but 100% after the response I had for him. I will not respond here again, it looks like you just want to get smug with me. Good luck with your ventures on the forum, make better decisions!!!! Trust feedback are not exchangeable to benefit ones own interest like keeping hostage for some demand or in exchange for money.
Yahoo wants to exchange the red tag for the apology he is demanding now. |
|
|
|
@Royse777
On January 22nd, did you think that @JollyGood is an important asset to the Bitcointalk Community?
Without being dramatic you could quote it. I am not in a situation to solve puzzles. Was this ever actually addressed by Royse777? Was a straight answer ever posted addressing this issue about the dinner? If so, can anybody provide a link before Royse777 locks this thread.
Was there an actual in-person dinner between Royse777 and Bitlucy where they met or was it an online chat only. I am confused, did they ever meet in real life to discuss Bitlucy as a business? Were they actually friends in real life or was this specifically a cyber friendship where the two main protagonists never met in real life?
I highly doubt it since Royse claims they started communicating again shortly before the BitLucy casino launched. Considering the time period and that they apparently live on different continents, it is highly unlikely that they ever met in person. Royse mentioned that he participated in some meetings with potential partners, but these could very well have been virtual meetings only. Thank you for the information. Can you provide a link for where Royse777 made those comments apart from in the OP? So the moment I was offensive aggressive to you, you prioritize your emotion over facts and whatever you are trying now is to feel better for yourself? You are factually incorrect on several fronts.... my emotions never got in any way of anything related to Bitlucy therefore you are clutching at straws and are trying misdirection tactics. Let us be clear, it was you who created this mess with Bitlucy therefore why should I be making myself feel better? I was not a part of it, all I did was point out that I left negative trust for you long before your outburst therefore accusations of bias should not be levelled at me yet you take the opportunity to post incoherent ramblings. It's amazing how you are suggesting others to join you. Where have I asked others join me and exactly what would they be joining for? You are in serious need of a reality check. Learn from my experience. A single slip will take away everything from you. You are right when using the single-slip analogy, I cannot argue with that advice. I hope others read it and take heed too. Yeah when I say hangout then you interpret it dinner date in person. Bud! you have not even looked at the details I have posted publicly (forget about private) yet you are here arguing BS to establish your thoughts. After reading your walls of text, it seems mostly created by you with a view to garner sympathy for yourself, it is easy to miss parts or not remember others. Having said that, I asked a question if a dinner took place and asked for clarification and did not establish my thoughts. What would have been the harm if you replied stating you used the word hangout when you should have instead elaborated fully what you interpreted that word to mean considering the circumstances and what was at stake. What would have been the problem is you had simply provided a link? It was this same type of aggressive yet nonsensical behaviour akin to a tantrum that has alienated some members. I will keep this thread alive. Good news you are keeping this thread unlocked. Since it will not be locked now, I would like to take the opportunity to go back to something yahoo62278 asked about before you started your conspiracy theories. I partially defended your reasons for not wanting to show blockchain transactions between yourself and Bitlucy on the basis of you maybe having some reasons however his questions and concerns in the post below are valid therefore maybe you should at least consider providing some blockchain transactions as evidence to show you are not connected to Bitlucy far more than some are suggesting or thinking: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5403679.msg60500366#msg60500366Let's start with blockchain transactions. I could care less about any address you might have had money sent to or sent from. Sounds like an excuse to me, but the blockchain is public, not private just in case you weren't aware. Regardless I have never asked for an address I don't believe. I'm also not asking for your home address( another thing I do not care to know).
What is being asked for is you to prove you are not the owner of the casino(which most of us do not believe you are), prove via conversations with this mystery person whom you are so good of friends with that you are innocent. I don't see any reason why you wouldn't want to prove that.
BTW I'm using no strategy here. 1 company contacted me due to your rep for a 1 week campaign. Don't get yourself in a mess and companies wouldn't wanna stop associating with you. I did not cause your mess so don't try to blame me for your mistakes.
You called yourself a partner, people lost money, I think you are lucky you aren't painted red by 50 users at this point. Most of us are trying to give you a chance to clear your name, but IMO you are letting anger get the best of you and not solving much of anything. Because you are having so much fun so here you go: - Blockchain transactions that you and yahoo wanted to see https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/f58c549959b0d064e92966475c59d3c25db8f423f7c510f97f8639e72b2d2ba5https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/1bea9d558d80b1e38549f9435d4bc783aaae6c0e8c3dda04c3607990a77678efhttps://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/b06b24911432d1e9adaa89c6f366ffe3e262bd32f8d312123c9c10cc17ccb67eI will not provide ownership of any address, make me. It's amazing how you are suggesting others to join you. Where have I asked others join me and exactly what would they be joining for? You are in serious need of a reality check. For clarity sake I should express I am surprised at the amount of good faith, pity, sympathy and compassion shown here by members towards Royse777. Don't tell me you do not know how auto-suggestion works in our mind. Reality Checked. my emotions never got in any way of anything related to Bitlucy therefore you are clutching at straws and are trying misdirection tactics. After looking at the facts as I saw them much earlier, I had a degree of sympathy too but that has subsided because of the way Royse777 has posted with an offensive aggressive stance which resulted in alienating herself from several members including myself but my red tag was given impartially before that happened.
Do you still say your emotion was not effected? You edited your post after my response and added the tag thing. Do you really think I am concern about the tag you left? I am concerned to see your desperate approach to harass others and using the trust system in your favor. If you are doing it to me when I have a long history of the forum, how would I now not be concerned that you are not doing it from years against the weaks. |
|
|
|
For clarity sake I should express I am surprised at the amount of good faith, pity, sympathy and compassion shown here by members towards Royse777. After looking at the facts as I saw them much earlier, I had a degree of sympathy too but that has subsided because of the way Royse777 has posted with an offensive aggressive stance which resulted in alienating herself from several members including myself.
So the moment I was offensive aggressive to you, you prioritize your emotion over facts and whatever you are trying now is to feel better for yourself? It's amazing how you are suggesting others to join you. Learn from my experience. A single slip will take away everything from you. Others conduct their own responsibilities in the forum how they deem appropriate, there are no wrongs or rights, it is about interpretation. Yeah when I say hangout then you interpret it dinner date in person. Bud! you have not even looked at the details I have posted publicly (forget about private) yet you are here arguing BS to establish your thoughts. I will keep this thread alive. |
|
|
|
If I remember correctly then the KYC team already sent token to the eligible users. After submitting the spreadsheet they also checked the work done by all of you. They only paid those worked without spamming the social media. I will check the spreadsheet then I will contact KYC team before giving you any final update.
|
|
|
|
once again your motives for sending them to a selected circle make no sense unless you state your intentions for sending them.
You did what you had to do. I owe you nothing and I feel nothing to make you understand too. Edit: I will close this thread after 24 hours from now. PS: @Everyone, If I owe anything to anyone then it's the group of people who are still putting trust on me. I had a rough time but I hope you understand that I have given my best for it. Cheers, |
|
|
|
He claimed to have ownership of bL4nkcode, Docnaster, Royse777, pawel7777
Excuse me, not even a week and account is already for sale? Im selling my legendary high trusted account for some personal reason, if someone is interested
Nickname = Royse777
Selling for 0.1 BTC
not accepting anything else other than bitcoin
i'm accepting escrow of course
I can prove the ownership by signing an address Cheap :-( |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
