Best of luck to you, its getting way to crowded here.

Also, the address in the pm DID receive the coins:

http://explorer.litecoin.net/address/Lh9A1zCcQqWgvAe81XGYYs5o6AzJLaMq4C

again, whether or not that is really Breen's address is not confirmed, but before a tag would be applied, a global mod or theymos could confirm via pm.

You are free to defend your case. But your words are pretty damning.
Also, moderators have no official duty to play any role in scams or scam accusations, so all I did was bring the thread to attention and move it to the correct board. Normally how these things work, is the OP posts some evidence, and you post evidence proving they are wrong, I would get on that.

Alright, well they kind of admitted to it here, so I don't think you will have a hard time proving your case, I will move your thread to the scam accusations section, and see if I can get a scammer tag applied.

I'm incredibly confused right now, it looks like a serious scam accusation until Breen posted this


followed by you posting this


This is either the first time someone has been so calm and collected after being scammed, or a setup thing to demonstrate the necessity of escrow. Killiz, which is it?

So this isn't all a joke/lesson for others, its an actual scam accusation case?

Why would you admit that you scammed the coins...? Or was it a sort of lesson to teach people to use escrow and a staged thing?

If you left the coins unfunded until after they had passed through customs, you could declare about a $10 value per coin, and mark it as Collectable. You could probably declare them as $10 even funded, because I'm not sure how the post office would value Litecoins, but that could get messy I suppose. Also, that way, if something happened in transit, either the package got lost, or some jerk of a customs agent decided to keep the coins, your buyer would at least get 10 LTC back. From experience, the only time that I've ever had a package lost while shipping silver was sending it to Europe.

If you don't pay your taxes in the U.S, depending on severity, you either get fined, jail time,  or they can put a lien on all of your assets including your house, car, etc. Not to mention, just about anything can drop from your credit report after like 7 years, or whatever the amount of time is. Bankruptcy, missed bills, late payments. But IRS issues stay on for life. So I suppose that means no more loans, or if you can find them, they are the high interest ones you see on sleazy T.V commercials.

Quoting this for laughs. FYI, I wouldn't be admitting to prostitution, that's something that is kind of frowned upon.

Yes


Again, it doesn't have to be an illegal casino (assuming there are any legal gaming sites in the U.S) at the state level, it is banned in many states from going into a licensed government run casino and gambling with welfare. Because you are gambling online, it falls under federal law, which is much more strict. You cannot gamble with welfare money at all, legal or not. You can however go into an Ohio run casino and gamble, for a little while longer anyway.

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2012-07-08/welfare-purchase-restrictions/56100508/1'

But like I said, its only a problem if someone reports it. I'm not really involved enough to call myself, although I would like to see Austin's funds returned. It is kind of irritating me your sense of entitlement. The guy gives you a 1 BTC loan that you know you can't pay off, and now its a terrible inconvenience to you, that he wants his money back?

Yep, a cards MH/s is generally fairly close to a card's KH/s for Litecoin mining. Zack's reply pretty much sums it up, although I would like to make note, that for some reason 69xx cards do incredibly well Litecoin / Scrypt mining. A 6950 will do 280-300 MH/s generally, which isn't too great, but I've seen them do 400-500KH/s Litecoin mining (depending on clocks) but yes, people tend to recommend 7950s, but if you are looking for a little bit cheaper setup, I would advise at least taking a look at 69xx cards.

7950s - Cost more, better energy efficiency, can get around 700KH/s, newer card sell to gamers if mining is no longer profitable

6950s - fairly cheap, lower energy efficiency, gets around 400-500KH/s, older card more difficult resale

There are tons of other factors to take into account, but those are some basic ones.

Well, to be honest, I've been watching this thread because for some reason it amuses me. By the way, Joey you are incorrect when you say


I looked into it, and if anyone bothers to file a claim, you can be barred from receiving welfare. Someone would have to make a call though, because they have no email. http://www.ocowf.org/TPage19.aspx
Online gambling is strictly prohibited within the U.S, and the use of welfare benefits to purchase illegal goods or partake in illegal activities, will have your payments taken away. Depending on state, purchase of alcohol can also have your welfare taken away. (The state doesn't want to feed drug/alcohol/gambling addicts)

Sure would suck if you pissed someone off enough to make the call, and you lost your living because of a $100 loan online.

Edit* Forgot to mention all of the prostitution offers. Pretty sure that wouldn't look to good either.

I shall post without reading the first post. How did you lose $10,000?

I will back this statement up, Mush is a personal friend of mine, and should he decide to cheat you out of the .07BTC as promised (not that he would) I'd kick him in the nads for you, and record it for you to enjoy over and over.

I don't think you can send a single satoshi after the last BTC Client update. The minimum transaction is 54 uBTC I believe.

Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=196138.0

edit* Try that source, a bit better

twas not me, if I ever edit a post I'll put a *edited by SaltySpitoon* or if I delete a post, I'll pm you about it.

Maybe you could contact these people and ask if they will accept it http://www.shitsenders.com/

Its a prank site that sends packages of exotic animal feces to people's doorsteps, and then tricks them into reaching into it to find out who sent it, but it doesn't actually say who.

I was talking about chaang. You said goat never got banned, but he did, he just came back after some time off.

Whoops, moved to the Romanian Off Topic, I appologise