Well, I believe this judgment can be a little subjective and relative for some poker players.
I believe that some platforms these days still ask (obligation) to perform KYC, but I don't see great reasons for doing this, because as already commented by other users, I believe that gambling activities should not be taken so seriously, compared to other platforms that need the use of KYC.
They do ask it because they're also asked to do so by the government that covers them. It's part of the regulation and that's why they're asking for KYC. But if there's an option and it's not mandatory, there's no problem with that as the players will just keep going without anything to worry. So if you find the site where you've been playing poker has been mandating KYC, you can go to another one that's reputable that don't force it. |
|
|
|
|
Well, I won't.
But with such solution to the problem that you've seen on onlyfans is needed for those customers of it that are also in cryptocurrencies. You can take advantage of it as an alternative to that platform but having you accepting payment in crypto.
At the end of it, if they won't still accept crypto, there might another company that might emerge with the same products that accepts crypto.
|
|
|
|
|
It would still be the better idea to keep bitcoin if you're wanting a more reliable and stable cryptocurrency. There's more volatility with altcoins and you'll likely see some of the coins that have pumped today will be dumped badly tomorrow.
Watching out when the market is likely to end this bull market is hard but if you see that it's going there, you can make that decision of converting those alts into bitcoin. But why convert only when you're about to see the end of the bull market and why not just do that when you can do that in between and if there's the usual correction?
|
|
|
|
|
It is like a gambler's attitude and belief towards his losses. I've normally switching sides and coins when I'm losing but not most of the time. I think it's part of my mood to do that if I don't get that much wins anymore.
Well, if I don't have luck within the certain day, my new approach is just to stop and just forget leave the rest of the day and wait until tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
That's why stake and others have recommendation for the bots that their customers will be using.
AFAIK, Stake doesn't have any recommendation for which bot they support. They even remove the API key for the less tech-savvy users. Users were falling for scams with the API key. We have since removed it from visibility to prevent this. The API key is only relevant for users who use scripts / dice-bot, hilo-bot, etc. We do not support usage of these and inputting your API key anywhere externally will compromise your account.
If you were tech-savvy enough to know what you were doing, then you'll be able to find your API key easily. If you cant figure out how to find your API key now, then you shouldn't be using your API key. Simple as that. Locking this thread. I've based that from the quote that I've seen at the top. With the quote you've given, it seems that there were scam bots that have been applied to them and using their name to trick people. But anyway for OP and others that will try it for themselves, they should be careful in using such and be aware of what bot they're using. |
|
|
|
|
I'll think first what I really like with the selective courses but, if given a chance and I've got a lot of time to spend for most of those courses then I'll get almost everything of those courses until I'm satisfied.
Think about it if what you really need and what do you think will help you with your chosen career path. Since you're more with the business side, you can be flexible and even with those programming courses, you can remove them but they're also good skills to learn.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you to Fortunejack for the 1st week, I'm now leaving as I'm accepted to the other campaign that Hhampuz manages as well.
|
|
|
|
$46k-$47k are still good prices to be maintained so if ever it don't stay to $50k which is didn't when it got back there, that's not a big thing to think and worry about. If BTC is still near $50k and holding above $45k, then it does not invalidate the possibility of a second phase of bull run on continuation. We strongly believe that BTC would do wonders if it keeps on holding this area and gets accumulated because it will make this area as ground and continue higher from here.
We could be in the next phase after it had broken and got out of $28k-$30k too quick. We all probably thought that it would be staying there for so many months but it has broken those prices quickly. |
|
|
|
If you really want to be safe about this then you'll probably need to know and understand the code that is being used. There are plenty of people out there who might program you this sort of software with a backdoor they can trigger and send your funds to their own wallet. Not to mention they will probably end up reselling it because a professional version (that stays working) will likely require a lot of work and most people usually are not willing to pay the right amounts for it. If the programmer was to end up reselling it then your potential arbitrage profits are likely to drop over time as more people are trying to do the same thing. Be very careful who you trust with access to your wallets or hardware devices.
I reckon this. It's the first thing that I've thought of when he said that he's looking for a programmer to make this bot. That's why stake and others have recommendation for the bots that their customers will be using. But for sports betting, I don't know what they can suggest with that as there's a specific niche that they've given for such bots. |
|
|
|
|
There's no way to know how much bitcoin would be until it becomes stable and there's not that much fluctuation anymore. I think that its nature of volatility will never be removed from it. Even it reaches the peak that we can expect, there's no way that we'll get to see it stable a little by little by that time.
Because as the usual, we see it at the peak and then later, the dump will come and so on and so forth. So to know how much it would be for it to become is really unknown whether it reaches a million bucks, still nobody can say if it will be stable by that time.
|
|
|
|
As I'm about to welcome the OP, here's the next thing that I've seen upon looking at this thread. I don't recommend playing here, they have always had problems with withdrawal limits. This is done on purpose so that you lose everything back while you withdraw your winnings in parts.
If that's an actual experience from this casino, that sucks. Well, sure it is because if someone has already seen some feedback about withdrawal issues including the limits. That will stop them to even trying it. If you know something like this, someone has experienced how to play the game, it turns out that withdrawal limits are always a problem, of course people will be more likely not to try it and we are still waiting for how the OP responds to something like this. I don't want the OP to just leave ANN's trail without giving any clarification to the members who feel it. I also haven't tested this casino site test as there are a few things to ask after the OP responds. If a new casino comes out, one of the main concern of most gamblers is about the withdrawals. We don't want to see that usual problem whenever we withdraw because it's our winnings and money that are being put in trouble. But they have answered it with their recent reply so I think it's still up to you guys if you want to try it out and the another concern would be about KYC, they're requiring it. Hello, thanks for the warm welcome  You're welcome. |
|
|
|
As I'm about to welcome the OP, here's the next thing that I've seen upon looking at this thread. I don't recommend playing here, they have always had problems with withdrawal limits. This is done on purpose so that you lose everything back while you withdraw your winnings in parts.
If that's an actual experience from this casino, that sucks. Well, sure it is because if someone has already seen some feedback about withdrawal issues including the limits. That will stop them to even trying it. |
|
|
|
|
Yes.
It is the first rule of thumb that every investor has to remember. You invest in this volatile market with the amount you can afford to lose. Because you'll never know the altcoin that you've invested will start to dump.
And you're totally invested on it, you're about to lose 50%-90% of your money so that should be acceptable to you.
|
|
|
|
|
That is the thinking that usually someone is tired already with their losses and started to say some words out of their mouth due to the bad results.
It's not actually breaking the code and it's a typical expression that we do when we're frustrated.
|
|
|
|
Truth is truth, fortunejack sometimes really have some problems but it's a legit casino anyway. There even was one case when FortuneJack listened to the community to make the final decision. Overall, they always listen to the community and try to keep their image high there.
As I see, FortuneJack was the casino that was rarely asking for KYC but the situation has changed significantly. I can't swear about the reason behind this but have one suspect:
FortuneJack is a Georgian startup. They operate in Tbilisi, Georgia and some really good people work there that I personally know. Some months ago, Government pushed people to do KYC verification on paying bills, filling casino wallet, on currency exchange, etc. On every financial process, doesn't matter how simple it is, you need to verify yourself. Maybe that's the reason behind FJ's many recent KYCs.
Each casino does have their moments of having some problems and experience that doesn't seem good for the experience of their casino. But after that being addressed, they're doing better and giving a solution as soon as they can. I get the impression that more and more crypto casinos are now also demanding KYC (before withdrawal).
It is interesting to see those reviews why some casinos have been acting like that. What shield has said is likely the reason for most of those sudden compliance. |
|
|
|
|
For the P2E projects.
It's still unknown if they will be able to sustain what they're giving to their players. It's either as it has begun to become popular, those investors that got in early are always rewarded with the best returns.
But as its community becomes popular and keeps on growing, we'll see if they'll be able to sustain and reward all of their players.
|
|
|
|
Would you be able to do it? Playing the same numbers over and over again like this? Because I know that I will not have the patience to do this during 30 years.
Nope. That's about taking care of his numbers for so many years. I know that there were older folks than me that still does that to lottery and they're too consistent with it. But unlike this guy, luck is with him and did managed to see his taken good care numbers have given him the fortune of his life. |
|
|
|
|
It is already in the scene and mainstream lately. With those professional teams, they got most of their sponsors from the bookies. So the tendency, their fans have the idea of what their sponsors are, bookies.
It's been so long that esports has been tied with gambling and there are many crypto bookies that have always included their matches so for the teens, they're aware and as well as at the same time, they're also becoming open about cryptocurrencies due to the P2E features by NFT projects. So the scope of gambling and esports is wide not just in the future but it's happening today.
|
|
|
|
So yes, these are not pure losses if you gain experience and learning. I always see it like this too and appreciate that That's also looking at it at a brighter and better picture of what has happened and as well as remaining positive despite the losses that you've incurred whether it's big or small. We all have the same experience where we've learned a lot because with those mistakes that we did as we invest in the cryptocurrencies that we think have a good future. And as long as the money you put in has the right expectation (which is to expect to lose it all), then you never have that sinking regret that most people feel after a mistake/loss. You cannot be in the right frame to "learn" lessons if the expectation setting was never right anyway. So to recap: expect the worst and everything else becomes a positive silver lining  Some investors might not understand about expecting it to loss. They might think that why they have to invest if they're expecting to loss. But it's all about the mindset that you're fine to invest that amount in crypto and you can afford that even it is gone. Because some new investors are thinking of instant returns and they're not thinking about the impact of volatility. They're confident that their money will grow tomorrow quickly but not analyzing what's with the crypto and why everyone is telling the same thing about affordability. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
