you're a weak faggot if you let yourself get beat up by a female unless you're into that sort of thing and you asked her to do it
Amazing. Everytime I think you said the most stupid thing ever, you manage to rise the level! It's like you're actually trying to have the most fucked up speech possible! ^^ |
|
|
|
To be filed for future reference... ---------------------------- This could be one of the dumber things Hillary Clinton has ever said Twitchy by Greg Pollowitz 3:19 pm We’re not sure this is the best route for Hillary Clinton to take while trying to attack Donald Trump, especially with FBI agents reportedly getting set to interview her staff’s actions regarding her homebrew email server. But, alas, self-awareness never was her thing: Hillary Clinton says Donald Trump is responsible for his staff's actions: https://t.co/troowMAacq— Capital Journal (@WSJPolitics) March 30, 2016 She really doesn’t see where this is going, does she? @WSJPolitics So that means Hillary is completely responsible for her illegal e-mail server? — LetItBurnUSA (@LetItBurnUSA) March 30, 2016 Exactly. Let’s save this tweet just in case we need to remind her of what she said in the very near future: Clip and save this for when she throws staff under the bus for her server https://t.co/jQr6s0LCxo— Jonah Goldberg (@JonahNRO) March 30, 2016 I wonder if Hillary really thought through this statement carefully… https://t.co/yXF9txNr8I— Michael Q Sullivan (@MQSullivan) March 30, 2016 @WSJPolitics Good Then she will take responsibility for Mills, Sullivan, Abedin and her own crimes endangering nat'l sec #ClintonEmail — Kim Seefeld (@KAS_SB) March 30, 2016 @WSJPolitics this is a saver. #tcot — Bill Baar (@BillBaar) March 30, 2016 @WSJPolitics oh I can't wait till this comes back to haunt her!! — Rebellious Mom (@jenladkins) March 30, 2016 And what about Bill’s behavior? @WSJPolitics Any mention of responsibility for Bill's actions? — Momo be tweet'n (@mcg0958) March 30, 2016 @WSJPolitics and who is responsible for her husband's actions or her email action or her Benghazi actions or her ….. — John Woods (@redeyebrody) March 30, 2016 Based on her record, this is the more likely response: Politicians shouldn't blame staff for failings. They should blame a YouTube video, then try to walk it back later. https://t.co/jVvDPls4Ff— Logan Dobson (@LoganDobson) March 30, 2016 You just now that’s coming. *** The post This could be one of the dumber things Hillary Clinton has ever said appeared first on twitchy.com. This should be posted on the clinton thread. I feel like I don't feed it as often. Poor lonely harpy cactus.  There is a Clinton thread? There are actualy real people voting for Clinton? |
|
|
|
Donald Trump: Punish women for illegal abortions
BBC News - 24 mins ago
Presidential candidate Donald Trump has called for "some form of punishment" for women ...
Next up for Donald Trump? A circumcision ceremony
USA TODAY - 2 hours ago
Border Patrol union endorses Donald Trump - CNNPolitics.com
CNN - 3 hours ago
Corey Lewandowski's scandal instantaneously old news. TRUMP still on every single channel all the time. 24/7. Until the next shocking thing he'll say. On an on and on and on. It does not matter what, TRUMP has to be stopped. I have never seen this in my life. Total domination. Even with more than $500M against him. And that's just from the GOPe, not from the democrats yet. Amazing. I don't understand, what do you think is amazing in a man always ready for a new scandal? What's the point here? It's cool to see a candidate never out of another idea making him on TV and newspaper? If someone is always ready to fight a new scandal, that's amazing. No teleprompters. No notes. It is amazing he is fighting TPTB with little investment, compared to them. Close to 20000 negative ads thus far. Mostly all from the GOPe to stop him. 1/100000th of that war chest would have stopped any other politicians a long time ago. Don't forget: TRUMP is ALWAYS the one creating the scandal, ALWAYS controlling the narrative. The media jumps on it. He is playing chess with himself... This whole election will be studied centuries from now. We are too close for this event to truly appreciate it. This is a game changer. $565 or so millions against you, from you own clan? come on! You do not have to like him to find this amazing. Hmm... Again Idon't understand what's amazing here... Yeah he's just yelling on everyone and everything like a raging dog. And of course he needs no notes! He's not saying anything with the slightest amount of logic, why would he need notes? ^^ What you're saying is "it's amazing that someone always saying nonsense is still in the political course and even leading"? The correct word for that is "terrifying", not "amazing"  |
|
|
|
A wall can`t stop immigrants.
It`s just a waste of money and resources.
Certainly it can. It's wrong what you say. But we all know it's not the ONLY tool in the shed. Yeah sure. Because actually ready to risk there life in the sea, giving out everything they have for a better life, are of course going to be stopped by a fucking ridiculous wall... Huh? Any of them that want can try the sea route. That has nothing to do with the wall. The wall would stop the desert routes where a lot of the illegal immigrants DIE. Oh, so your solution is "let's build a wall on a part of the borders"? And what will you do when they'll all go through the sea route? |
|
|
|
roslinpl works with Betcoin and manages the signature campaign among other things. He does an excellent job. I help manage the forum presence. There really is no need to constantly spam this thread with questions for him or the forum rep especially when they have no relation to the forum topic. If you don't want to be a member of the signature campaign, then that's fine. Also, you are free to create as many threads as you want throughout bitcointalk and discuss whatever else you want. This will be my last response to you in this thread on any matter non signature campaign related.
On another note the signature campaign is doing quite well and is very popular. After discussing this with Staff, we do appreciate you keeping all of our threads in the top spot of each page because it helps us generate more interest in our signature campaign and bring more customers to Betcoin who end up staying. If you had your affiliate link in there you could be earning some good coin. Indirectly, you are our number one affiliate here at BitcoinTalk and for that we are very thankful.
Ahahahah xD That's like a totally crazy argument. If you stop bashing betcoin they win. If you continue they win too cause you make adds for them. And people can see for themselves that they offer a great service. Perhaps they aren't really winning. (duh) Maybe. probably. But the fact is simple. They provide a great service. You wanna convince people not using it? Compile simple evidence of their vilainous intents and processes. Otherwise just do something ese with your life. |
|
|
|
I believe that gun control will not work.
First, I believe that guns are not weapons, they are tools. How they are used is up to the person holding it. Guns themselves can't do anything it is the person with the gun that decides where the bullet goes.
Great. But a tool designed solely in order to kill or harm someone is called... A weapon. With your argument we could totally say "we should legalize missile ownership. It's a tool. Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent. Taking guns away from violent people will not make them less violent. It might make them more violent.
? What? How taking a gun away can make them more violent? Violent people can use anything to be violent. Taking guns away from violent people is no more than just taking one out of a thousand more ways to hurt, rob, or kill you.
The very little difference being that you have much less victims and much highest chances to survive if they use a knife than if they use a gun... Also, gun control will not work because we already had something like it a few times and each time it has failed. Remember the Prohibition? From 1919 till 1933 owning, producing, and selling alcohol was illegal. Some people believed that alcohol was a bad thing and that it caused people to do terrible things. To these people it seemed like a good idea at the time to make alcohol illegal.
Yeah because comparing alcohol to weapons is totally legit. I mean absolutely everyone can build dozens of firearms in there garage like they produces alcohol during prohibition 
However, outlaws and gang members decided to keep making alcohol anyway. It was obvious that the Prohibition had failed. The latest ban that is having problems is the illegal drug bans.
Now many of us know that most drugs that are illegal are bad to people’s health when used. However, when drugs like cocaine, heroin, marijuana, and meth became illegal outlaws and gangs saw a new business and started a war with many governments especially America. Outlaws produced and sold drug illegally to the public. Even today outlaws keep making them, selling them, using them, and innocent people are still getting killed over them.
Outlaws will still find ways to smuggle, produce, and use guns to their advantage. The only thing that gun control will do is make it harder for law obeying citizens to get guns. This is one important thing to remember. Once something is outlawed only outlaws get it.
That is why gun control will not work.
Experience prove you wrong. In gun free countries, the vilains of course still have guns. But on average they have much less, much less dangerous, and use them much less than in USA. Of course outlaws will have guns. Difference being only 10% of them will have one. And only small handgun for 98% of those 10%. That makes a difference you know? |
|
|
|
Difference between guns and drugs, which is incredibly subtle I know, please try to think about it with your little amount of intelligence, is that drugs are made for yourself. Whereas guns are made to shoot at others. In the first case you take the decision to harm yourself. But it's your body, why couldn't you do whatever the fuck you want with it? In the second case, you're going to use a gun, which means you're a potential threat to absolutely anyone... And on your little first picture, you forgot the "we get most mass shooting that all the other Western countries in the world added since 2000 but we don't see any correlation with guns" part ^^ |
|
|
|
Oh look!!! Another lie of the NASA: http://climate.nasa.gov/news/2422/Lol! Like we could believe something like that! It's not because every parameters is on the "Oh my god global temperature is increasing and sea level is rising" that it's true! |
|
|
|
Thanks for this comment. I think there is nothing more to say. You belong to the kind of people believing it's right to kill others because they want to take parts of the tremendeous amount of goods and food you have in order to survive.
Funny though. Between a Syrian woman who ran a war country, traveled whole Europe bare foot, managed to reach your borders risking her life with a last both expansive and dangerous travel accross sea, and you who only born here, who deserves the most the nationality?
the definition of nationality is the status of belonging to a particular nation so obviously the syrian qualifies for nationality in syria and i qualify for nationality here. the clue is in the name. there is no country on earth in which you or i would qualify for citizenship simply on the basis that we have traveled a long way through difficult conditions to get there. the rule for every would-be immigrant in every non white country on earth is that you have to go through a legal process and prove you can support yourself financially before getting anywhere. and in almost every case you wont qualify for welfare until you've paid into their system for a few years. but when white people attempt to apply these very reasonable standards to third world muslims it all of a sudden becomes racist and cruel. And it seems like you compare our modern society to Middle Age. Wanna go back to this time? Did it even crossed your mind that the main difference between today and middle age is that we interfere in all their actions and use them as garbages? Hence that it's rather normal to see them turning at us once they got no other hope? What would be your solution? Close the borders and shoot at anyone?
yes we should shoot invaders instead of letting ourselves by overrun by them and allowing our civilisation to descend into third world anarchy. it works for israel as i have already shown you. following their no nonsense approach we'd shoot literally a handful and the rest get the message to stop coming. any that slip through are given a choice between detention and deportation. say what you want about the jews, they understand that third world savages bring the third world with them and they are having none of it in their country. I'm just glad to know people without any notion of empathy exist in the world. It's the proof that our evolution is still incomplete as empathy was the base of our evolution process. Seems to me that you have no notion of history, otherwise you would know that each and every empire collapsed after starting to close their borders and their culture calling themselves as "superioirs". Seems you also have absolutely have no notion of project management or you would understand that defending 14 000 km of borders is far more costly than integrating migrants. Seems you're a rather ignorant fool if you believe, even a moment, that Europe doesn't have the mean to welcome and integrate the correctly. But as always: "A banker, a man and a migrant are in a room with 20 cookies. The banker takes 19 cookies to the man and says "you'd better borrow me 5 or 6 cookies in order to get the immigrant out of here. He's stealing your cookie."" |
|
|
|
A wall can`t stop immigrants.
It`s just a waste of money and resources.
Certainly it can. It's wrong what you say. But we all know it's not the ONLY tool in the shed. Yeah sure. Because actually ready to risk there life in the sea, giving out everything they have for a better life, are of course going to be stopped by a fucking ridiculous wall... |
|
|
|
roslinpl works with Betcoin and manages the signature campaign among other things. He does an excellent job. I help manage the forum presence. There really is no need to constantly spam this thread with questions for him or the forum rep especially when they have no relation to the forum topic. If you don't want to be a member of the signature campaign, then that's fine. Also, you are free to create as many threads as you want throughout bitcointalk and discuss whatever else you want. This will be my last response to you in this thread on any matter non signature campaign related.
On another note the signature campaign is doing quite well and is very popular. After discussing this with Staff, we do appreciate you keeping all of our threads in the top spot of each page because it helps us generate more interest in our signature campaign and bring more customers to Betcoin who end up staying. If you had your affiliate link in there you could be earning some good coin. Indirectly, you are our number one affiliate here at BitcoinTalk and for that we are very thankful.
Ahahahah xD That's like a totally crazy argument. If you stop bashing betcoin they win. If you continue they win too cause you make adds for them. And people can see for themselves that they offer a great service. |
|
|
|
Seems like most of you have the same opinion... Good... So what your solution? Close European borders?
Make Muslims feel as unwelcome in the West as Non-Muslims are made to feel in Muslim countries. If we want to go hard-core, we could make Muslims feel as unwelcome in the West as Jews are made to feel in Muslim countries. Keep their numbers low and managable. This can be done without relying on political leaders and without voting. Creative use of pork and cartoons can go a long way. If you keep their number less, who will work instead of them? Europe is paradise of pensioners. Who will pay their salary? Europe exploites their sources and also their manpower. How will you give up that? First, it's not realistic to believe Muslims will continue to pay pensions to non-Muslims when they have the power to stop paying. Not what he's talking about. Currently, most "trash jobs" are done by refugees and immigrants. They're done by them not because they "steal" them but because good whites like you don't want to do it. In France for example there is about 1.5 millions jobs not finding anyone to fill them up simply because people refuse to do this kind of work. That's what he's talking about. Second, overall Muslims are the beneficiaries of state welfare at the moment, not contributors. Whaou. Such argument. Much logic. Beautiful figures.
And how can you say that Ô you the wise?
Finally, most European countries have made unrealistic promises to pensioners. The result is that pensioners are going to get fucked. Importing millions of Muslims won't change that. Before feeling bad for pensioners, consider that they've spent their lives voting for politicians who make unrealistic promises. Fuck them all. Yeah cause it's like it's totally a choice. We actually sent people all over Middle East and Africa spreading the word it's an Eldorado here. We've got a full control on their desire to immigrate. Really easy to work on that aspect. And objectively Europe isn't so much better than Syria at the moment, that seems clear enough sure! |
|
|
|
Seems like most of you have the same opinion... Good... So what your solution? Close European borders?
It only takes one or two brain cells to figure out that yes you close the borders. Animals know things like this. Try to walk into a cave holding a wolf pack, or a bear. Go ahead, try it. Then come back and scoff at closing borders. Good. How do you do that? Do you even have the slightest idea of the cost of closing European borders? What do you propose? To build a 14 000 km long wall with militaries everywhere? |
|
|
|
Many Muslims take advantage of the West’s unique welfare state, while at the same time despising its ethics of radical equality.
Why does Western Europe allow this? Western Europe is better off without them. Why do politicians feel the need to destroy their own countries, instead of enjoying the very nice safe countries they once had? Do not let people who hate you into your country! Stop giving them free money as an incentive to go to Europe.Could you stop spreading huge insane bulshit please? European countries aren't giving free money to refugees... That's just a retard statement made by someone who probably never went into Europe... To get benefits from National Welfare you've got at least to be of the country nationality! The only things refugees are getting are resources given out by associations!!! What do you want? That European countries close Humanitarian associations for helping refugees? |
|
|
|
Donald Trump: Punish women for illegal abortions
BBC News - 24 mins ago
Presidential candidate Donald Trump has called for "some form of punishment" for women ...
Next up for Donald Trump? A circumcision ceremony
USA TODAY - 2 hours ago
Border Patrol union endorses Donald Trump - CNNPolitics.com
CNN - 3 hours ago
Corey Lewandowski's scandal instantaneously old news. TRUMP still on every single channel all the time. 24/7. Until the next shocking thing he'll say. On an on and on and on. It does not matter what, TRUMP has to be stopped. I have never seen this in my life. Total domination. Even with more than $500M against him. And that's just from the GOPe, not from the democrats yet. Amazing. I don't understand, what do you think is amazing in a man always ready for a new scandal? What's the point here? It's cool to see a candidate never out of another idea making him on TV and newspaper? |
|
|
|
I've read many articles claiming that domestic violence coming from women might be more common than we think but we just don't really get to know about it because it's rarely reported. What do you think about this? Could it be real? And if yes, to what extent?
I think it could be real. I've seen several times with my own eyes a wife beating her husband. To what extent is another question. I think that domestic violence is coming from men mostly though. Way to read. People like you are the reason men are allowed to be abused freely. Lots of talking, no reading or thinking. Maybe know what you are talking about before you make assertions. "There are major difficulties in obtaining reliable statistics in this area but mental health studies consistently show that in heterosexual couples only about 25% of the time is domestic violence solely male-on-female. The same studies show that 25-30% of the time the violence is exclusively female-on-male, with the remainder mutual combat. However, one agreeable result emerges from these studies: The safest place for a woman is in her home with the biological father of her children." http://www.familytx.org/research/articles/humanproblem.htmlWell, you can call me sexist but I think that in the first place women should be protected against domestic violence rather than men. As you said by yourself there are major difficulties in obtaining reliable statistics in this area, so I wouldn't trust any statistics totally. We're not calling you sexist. You're calling yourself sexist. You want to give higher rights to one sex than to the other. That's the exact definition of sexism... Why should women be more protected than men? They're more concerned by domestic violence? Maybe, I don't know the area perfectly, but even if that's the case, why should they have more rights? Wouldn't it be fairer to take as much into account the words of the man than the woman? |
|
|
|
"french citizen"
Yeah French citizen. It's how you call anyone with French nationality... Why the quotes? |
|
|
|
Yeah sure, could you just stop spreading your lies here?
why couldn't you have used google Rights groups such as Amnesty International have called on the Egyptian authorities to "urgently rein in their border security forces" after seven African asylum-seekers were killed in September trying to cross into Israel on foot, but some Israeli NGOs and soldiers say the death toll at the border is far higher.
http://www.irinnews.org/report/86368/egypt-israel-how-many-migrants-are-dying-border“A big group of illegal migrants attempted to enter Bulgaria from Turkey. One man suffered a gunshot wound in the incident and died on the way to hospital,” an interior ministry spokeswoman told AFP.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/16/afghan-refugee-shot-dead-police-turkey-enter-bulgariaAnd shooting at desperate population, hungry women and children that only want to live is not acceptable in any way. It cannot. It means you're actually ready to kill innocents people simply because you can't share the basic minimum to live... It says a lot on your mentality though.
it says i place the protection of my personal belongings and national resources ahead of the well being of parasite invaders who would take them away from me. if we don't shoot a few they are only going to keep coming until all civilised countries are overwhelmed by the third world. your attitude is that of the american negress who recently critisised a homeowner for shooting dead her nigger cousin who had broken into to the person's home to steal because he "needed money for clothes for school". if our ancestors had thought this way all of europe would have fallen under islamic rule a long time ago. Thanks for this comment. I think there is nothing more to say. You belong to the kind of people believing it's right to kill others because they want to take parts of the tremendeous amount of goods and food you have in order to survive. Funny though. Between a Syrian woman who ran a war country, traveled whole Europe bare foot, managed to reach your borders risking her life with a last both expansive and dangerous travel accross sea, and you who only born here, who deserves the most the nationality? And it seems like you compare our modern society to Middle Age. Wanna go back to this time? Did it even crossed your mind that the main difference between today and middle age is that we interfere in all their actions and use them as garbages? Hence that it's rather normal to see them turning at us once they got no other hope? What would be your solution? Close the borders and shoot at anyone? |
|
|
|
You mean... You have to think before even posting anything? Would it be possible that sea level is rising as 100% of scientists are saying.? |
|
|
|
|
Seems like most of you have the same opinion... Good... So what your solution? Close European borders?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
