Time to start a WAR!!! |
|
|
|
I done been warning you guys for a year now!!!
 |
|
|
|
The following is a list of those individuals who have achieved the distinctive title of SANS Cyber Guardian.
 Get REKT!!! |
|
|
|
|
Brohim, you should read Satoshi's whitepaper again. Splitting the network and ecosystem in two and having 2 bitcoins sharing or shaming the brand is not the way to go. What's to stop someone from splintering it into 4 or more? Would you like to see 8 bitcoins? Would that coddle your coexist feelers?
By design and for the best interest of Bitcoin's long-term survival, the short chain will be [naturally] killed off as outlined in Satoshi's original paper/vision.
xoxo,
Jericho911
|
|
|
|
|
Gleb, I finally got the ADD time span to read your sausage post.
Bunk.
Did you see the news about Dr Wright's $300 million deal with Nchain?
My source came through - your bogus source was a no-show.
You owe me apples! Romanian apples.
|
|
|
|
Muppets! I have nothing interesting to say so I'm being basic to bump this thread. |
|
|
|
Some slogans: ShitCoin - Faeces where you need it ShitCoin - Cryptographically secure turds Hahaha. I love the second one. The choice in font is in such sophisticated good tast. lol |
|
|
|
In December 2010 Hal said Bitcoin would need a second layer payment system (*cough* sidechain) lighter weight, more efficient, faster, etc. A few months later, lo and behold, the first bitcoin clone pops up (at a time when only a few people in the world new how to clone bitcoin) is a bitcoin twin and the creator's name is Thomas. Pop quiz: What was the name of that coin? Just more coincidences.  Actually there is a very good reason for Bitcoin-backed banks to exist, issuing their own digital cash currency, redeemable for bitcoins. Bitcoin itself cannot scale to have every single financial transaction in the world be broadcast to everyone and included in the block chain. There needs to be a secondary level of payment systems which is lighter weight and more efficient. Likewise, the time needed for Bitcoin transactions to finalize will be impractical for medium to large value purchases.
Bitcoin backed banks will solve these problems. They can work like banks did before nationalization of currency. Different banks can have different policies, some more aggressive, some more conservative. Some would be fractional reserve while others may be 100% Bitcoin backed. Interest rates may vary. Cash from some banks may trade at a discount to that from others.
George Selgin has worked out the theory of competitive free banking in detail, and he argues that such a system would be stable, inflation resistant and self-regulating.
I believe this will be the ultimate fate of Bitcoin, to be the "high-powered money" that serves as a reserve currency for banks that issue their own digital cash. Most Bitcoin transactions will occur between banks, to settle net transfers. Bitcoin transactions by private individuals will be as rare as... well, as Bitcoin based purchases are today.
|
|
|
|
Yes, the future points to a war with a lot of weaponized AI.
Good luck if you don't have access to that weaponry.
Excellent point. Try applying it to the current civil war. Excellent testing ground and one which crypto investors could really appreciate. |
|
|
|
The correct question is, can you predict events better than everyone else.
Me? I didn't expect that question. I personally cannot predict any future events but my SI algo: DeepDream may be able to. Never put it to any test against any other intuitive SI/AI.  |
|
|
|
Apparently you haven't read the whitepaper in its entirety.
It is a marketplace that hosts the "code" for Deep Learning networks. What that means is that, many Deep Learning capabilities will be accessible on this network. What exactly?
"Intuitive thought"
a basic example....
"predicting human behavior"
is that important?
Is a machine that can best the best poker players in the world important?
Is a machine that can best other traders in crypto-currency trading important?
...
I didn't read the whole thing but that's what I was expecting. Yeah, this is a really big deal. Do you think with enough data it can also predict future events with decent accuracy? |
|
|
|
And what are the capabilities? |
|
|
|
I like your idea. Let see in the future
Let's see THE future. There, I fixed that for you. |
|
|
|
Ex Tenebris Lux! |
|
|
|
Honestly, I think this shit must be listed in Yobit, is far better than several shitcoins listed there, we should try XD
I think I paid the fee once already and they didn't list it. They're just hatin'! |
|
|
|
|
This is a good one to watch!
|
|
|
|
What is Dr Craig Wrights stand on the blocksize debate, does anyone know what side he stands on? I haven't seen any comments from him on it although I don't take the guy too seriously.
But if he is Satoshi as he says then he should have some input on it that reflect the original proposal to scale as needed.
Dr. Wright says unlimited blocks. |
|
|
|
...
Shame on you, CSW!
Robsa comments at coindesk: "Someone or the group that invented bitcoin solved the double spending problem for digital currencies, implemented the first blockchain, deployed the first decentralized digital currency and did so while remaining unknown. They are unlikely to then act as clumsily as Wright." Craig may have known who the real Satoshi was, and acts as if he knows that if he makes outrageous claims, he wouldnt be refuted by the real Satoshi...so he knows Satoshi died in 2013. You monkeys ready for the next Wright act? You about to get REKT! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
