As it turns out, Craig Wright actually is Satoshi!

[Vlad2Vlad]

...
Shame on you, CSW!

Robsa comments at coindesk: "Someone or the group that invented bitcoin solved the double spending problem for digital currencies, implemented the first blockchain, deployed the first decentralized digital currency and did so while remaining unknown. They are unlikely to then act as clumsily as Wright."

Craig may have known who the real Satoshi was, and acts as if he knows that if he makes outrageous claims, he wouldnt be refuted by the real Satoshi...so he knows Satoshi died in 2013.

You monkeys ready for the next Wright act?  You about to get REKT!

[deisik]

Code:

https://books.google.com/books?id=LchFDAAAQBAJ&pg=PR23&lpg=PR23&dq=May+2007+satoshi&source=bl&ots=AqsKfX6HlE&sig=xfJ4YXOHY7NGD7kFVl2oZOlIhi0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiy_dLS04jSAhVB-WMKHXuPDV0Q6AEIUDAM#v=onepage&q=May%202007%20satoshi&f=false

So, Satoshi Nakamoto envisioned a real-world currency that wouldn't be used in the real world, e.g. Starbucks (no pun intended)? Shame on you, CSW!

I guess you are mostly nitpicking

Nowhere in the quote which you cited Satoshi says about Bitcoin as a "real-world currency". In fact, you are outright distorting his words since he just says about using Bitcoin across "Internets". Nevertheless, if you consider a currency used in such a way as a real-world currency (which I basically agree with, given the role Internet now plays and the place it now takes), you shouldn't then claim that it can't be used in the real world since it directly follows from your own assumption that Internet is (a significant part of) the real world

[cryp24x]

...
Shame on you, CSW!

Robsa comments at coindesk: "Someone or the group that invented bitcoin solved the double spending problem for digital currencies, implemented the first blockchain, deployed the first decentralized digital currency and did so while remaining unknown. They are unlikely to then act as clumsily as Wright."

Craig may have known who the real Satoshi was, and acts as if he knows that if he makes outrageous claims, he wouldnt be refuted by the real Satoshi...so he knows Satoshi died in 2013.

Though some of the information had or may resembles the person who died last 2013 due to a car accident, it has not been founded that he is really satoshi.  So all we have right now are just speculation and wild guesses.  Only one thing to prove who the real satoshi is and that is to move the Bitcoin address that is under Satoshi's or sign a message from it.

[bitkilo]

What is Dr Craig Wrights stand on the blocksize debate, does anyone know what side he stands on? I haven't seen any comments from him on it although I don't take the guy too seriously.

But if he is Satoshi as he says then he should have some input on it that reflect the original proposal to scale as needed.

[Vlad2Vlad]

What is Dr Craig Wrights stand on the blocksize debate, does anyone know what side he stands on? I haven't seen any comments from him on it although I don't take the guy too seriously.

But if he is Satoshi as he says then he should have some input on it that reflect the original proposal to scale as needed.

Dr. Wright says unlimited blocks.   

[Xester]

...
Shame on you, CSW!

Robsa comments at coindesk: "Someone or the group that invented bitcoin solved the double spending problem for digital currencies, implemented the first blockchain, deployed the first decentralized digital currency and did so while remaining unknown. They are unlikely to then act as clumsily as Wright."

Craig may have known who the real Satoshi was, and acts as if he knows that if he makes outrageous claims, he wouldnt be refuted by the real Satoshi...so he knows Satoshi died in 2013.

Though some of the information had or may resembles the person who died last 2013 due to a car accident, it has not been founded that he is really satoshi.  So all we have right now are just speculation and wild guesses.  Only one thing to prove who the real satoshi is and that is to move the Bitcoin address that is under Satoshi's or sign a message from it.

Though it is hard to believe but among all the individuals who claims to be satoshi only the person they considered dead last 2013 have a solid concrete evidence showing that he is satoshi. But I don not buy the idea and probably satoshi is still alive and watching how bitcoin evolves and was busy selling his millions of bitcoin at his disposal.

[qiman]

Well anything goes to be quite frank. We will never know who the real SATOSHI is without concrete evidence and proof. This maybe just another good write up job from Coindesk to attract more readers to its fold.

[Clement Kaliyar]

What is Dr Craig Wrights stand on the blocksize debate, does anyone know what side he stands on? I haven't seen any comments from him on it although I don't take the guy too seriously.
But if he is Satoshi as he says then he should have some input on it that reflect the original proposal to scale as needed.

Dr. Wright says unlimited blocks.   

Where did he talk about the scaling issue and i could not find any documents or videos that Craig wright talks about scaling and i have not seen him supporting unlimited blocks,Craig being a developer he could very well understand the weakness in their line of codes and for that sole reason he wont support them i do accept that they do have a good theory but they should have backed that up with a bug free code.

[KennyR]

Well anything goes to be quite frank. We will never know who the real SATOSHI is without concrete evidence and proof. This maybe just another good write up job from Coindesk to attract more readers to its fold.

Long back itself Graig Maxwell have been claiming him as Satoshi describing various reasons. But importantly revealing his identity doesn't gonna make any impact but as mentioned it might gain some reputation to coindesk. The innovation made by Satoshi is really good.

[Pencil Pastel]

Don't think that Satoshi would reveal himself. It would just be a bad move and best avoided.
Some people love him some not so much so rather be safe.