Now we can ride the pump and dump scam rocket to the moon again just like the good old days of BAKKT.  Not sure if I can find a place to store so much profit.  My coffers are just overflowing from the BAKKT pump as is.

Bitcoin is a derivative of the US dollar and various other fiats and is in no way free floating whatsoever, nor the unit of account of anything.  If the market imploded in deflation, Bitcoin would go straight off a cliff with all the other high risk, gambling pump and dump scams like WeWork.  So Bitcoin is garbage for deflation.  

For inflation?  If there was a Venezeulan-style melt up, people then lose faith in the current unit of account (Jewish Federal Reserve note), and all pile into the base of Exter's Pyramid to try and retain value (physical gold and silver). Bitcoin is located nowhere near the base of Exter's Pyramid so in a rush to the exits will not be the benefactor of becoming the new unit of account.  Technically gold and silver never even stopped being the unit of account, even Max Keiser the worst Bitcoin shill on earth admits it.  You just live in a system where everyone who received paper promises got scammed, but the world never even went off metals.

Terrible, but better than Germany building statues in parks to memorialize "African drug dealers and their often difficult journey to reach Germany".

https://www.dw.com/en/statue-of-african-drug-dealer-erected-in-berlins-notorious-g%C3%B6rlitzer-park/a-51055828

No, if you read my post it says due to all the abnormal and fraudulent activity occurring on Bitfinex, it's how I knew I should withdraw every single cent away from the exchange.  The exchange then imploded with their fake "hack" claiming all customer deposits got stolen shortly after.  

A couple of people I know who I told to withdraw everything from there did lose money though because they didn't take their money out.  One of them then somehow got lucky and went from broke to millionaire by buying the Ethereum IPO, which Goldman Sachs pump and dumped.  And now you have newcomer idiots like McGoossens posting in this thread that know absolutely nothing about Bitfinex and probably never even traded there claiming anything said about Bitfinex or Tethers is "fud", when the exchange was and is a rigged, criminal enterprise.

I'm positive Bitfinex was doing that before their bogus "hack" where they claimed someone stole all customer deposits as I talked about 3+ years ago:

https://steemit.com/news/@r0achtheunsavory/bitfinex-is-lying-about-the-hack-and-i-can-tell-you-exactly-what-likely-happened

The level of carelessness and risk taking of this single entity who was controlling the price on that exchange was absurd and just not rational at all.  They were trading like a suicide bomber that did not even care if the trade blew up in their face.  I would know, I watched the entire thing trading against him in real-time.  That's why I said in the past it would not surprise me if some entity like the ESF pulled up to Bitfinex, issued them a gag order, and said we're taking control of this market for national security blah blah.  The price movements were all done looking like they were done in an attempt to rig and not in an attempt to actually make money is what I'm saying.  

If some jackass like Giancarlo Devasini at Bitfinex was using customer funds to trade, I doubt he would be trading that reckless and insane unless he's also using customer funds to get high on kilos of cocaine at the same time.  So there has to be much more to the story of just who this entity was using customer funds to trade on Bitfinex (unless this Bitfinex employee is just a very bad, mentally insane, and stupid trader).

Shows you inflation is not a flat metric.  Housing up around 8x or more while beef up around 5-6x, bread up an enormous 12-16x, milk 3-4x, income up 4x, gas 6-7x, cars 6-7x.  So everything is drastically more expensive compared to income level.  The real shocker is tuition up 18x.  Jews like Larry Summers took control of educational institutions like Harvard then lobbied congress to subsidize student loans so that anyone can get a loan with zero collateral driving prices to the moon.  

If you needed to post collateral to get a loan, far less loans would be taken and the price would only be up 4-8x instead and not creating a bunch of debt serfs.  It's also illogical for houses that are depreciating assets to increase 8x.  A depreciating asset house built in the 1950's should not be skyrocketing 8x vs wages that are up 4x.

Look at these Jewish, slime faggots at the ESF. Right at the VERY SECOND of the federal reserve announcement they try to implode both gold and silver (or a bullshit JP Morgan shakeout rigging before it inevitably goes higher due to ZIRP).  Either way, it's organized crime Jewry.  You see the same retarded shit 24/7 for every single Bitcoin movement like they're running exactly identical strategies and bot scripts for each market.  

These stupid shakeouts are almost entirely pointless but they ALWAYS do them anyway, which is why you can tell it's the exact same kike idiots at the TBTF banks and ESF controlling both markets.  Except the Shlomos are always trying to rig Bitcoin up instead of down to try and fool stupid goyim to adopt a cashless society slavery system and away from metals.

Another part of Nick Szabo's 'shtick' is claiming that gold is not a resource at all and it is/was only valued as a "trinket".  If we expand upon these Szabo statements further to their logical conclusion, you would NOT end up with Bitcoin as the holy grail of value for the monetary system, you would arrive at something that functions as the most important resource possible while still maintaining all the required monetary characteristics like fungibility, portability, etc, since he claims to have a disdain for things that don't function as resources and are merely "trinkets".

So using Nick Szabo's own logic that being a resource is important and gold is admittedly lacking in that regard (but it still obviously is a resource unlike what he claims), you would arrive at the conclusion that something like silver should dwarf the market cap and monetary importance of gold, with Bitcoin being completely inferior to both.  Nick Szabo seems to have some tenuous ties with the government and probably only exists in the Bitcoin space to try and funnel people into a cashless society slavery system and away from physical metals.

What the fuck.  You have GOT TO BE SHITTING ME.  That's an entirely made up, bullshit word salad like blue hair feminists fabricate out of thin air to try and bamboozle people.  I don't know why you people even quote Nick Szabo when he's an Ethereum shill.  It was obvious it was a Wolf of Wall Street IPO scam before it was even released, with the system itself incapable of even functioning at a drawing board level.

When he's bullshitting you in things like that, it's obvious he's bullshitting you in lots of other places too.  He makes numerous leaps of illogic like concluding the only reason humans value something like gold is because it has large amounts of sunk cost fallacy to produce, then tries to claim that PoW aka "unforgeable costliness" replicates that sunk cost fallacy making Bitcoin equal to gold LOL.  This whole simpleton train of logic is so stupid it hurts.  If Bitcoin had "unforgeable costliness", the 51% attack would not even exist for fucks sake.

And producing gold isn't even sunk cost fallacy in the first place since you're producing an actual resource, while Bitcoin REALLY IS sunk cost fallacy producing nothing.  So it's a complete apples to Toyota Corollas comparison.  Then factor in absolutely none of the other million traits of physical metals and Bitcoin are comparable either with one being an imaginary object and all.  I could go on about the illogical economic statements of Nick Szabo for hours but nobody reads posts over three paragraphs as a spontaneous, JayJuanGee defensive reflex.

Alright, found the #1 worst Reddit forum that exists.  Every single post looks like a Lauda post.  Look:

https://www.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/dp6qeb/the_patriarchy_all_comes_down_to_making_sure_low/

These retards believe "the patriarchy" - they imply the existence of the institution of marriage is patriarchy - exists solely for "low value men" to get laid or secure a woman.  Men don't even want to get married in the first place.  It's the woman that wants to get married as an insurance policy for themselves.  They also inadvertently seem to be advocating some type of civilization where the #1 male prospect in their region sleeps with all the women and cheats on them all, inevitably creating a bunch of single mothers on welfare that turn into felon factories causing civilization to implode.

This thing they refer to as "patriarchy" was just a system of cultural norms and rules set up over the course of thousands of years to cause society to function, because doing things differently caused it to collapse in mayhem.  These cultural norms benefit women more than men and go entirely against men's natural instincts, so it's sort of a joke to even call it a "patriarchy" in the first place.

If it's lebensraum you want, it is lebensraum you shall have:

https://dailystormer.name/yids-flip-lids-after-big-afd-victory-in-germany/

Since any normal white person can look around and notice the government, media, educational, banking, and judicial system are completely criminal (occupied by Jews), and civilization is imploding due to this, none of them are expanding anywhere.  Why have a bunch of kids that will just be slaves for Jewish psychopaths?  The only people expanding are 60 IQ negroes, 80 IQ Mexicans, and single mother criminal factories.  

That's one indirect reason civilizations thought the institution of marriage was important in the past.  If you force people to get married to have kids, it limits how much the bad genes can reproduce, since the good, K-selection genes don't have many kids, otherwise you are overwhelmed with trash who attempt to externalize the cost of the kids to society to reproduce out of control.  Without a stable 1:1 institution of marriage, you have things happening like one woman having 5 kids from different fathers who all turn out to be felons, or one guy with crap genes marrying four women with crap genes and having 17 kids with crap genes flooding the world with garbage:

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1721666/

#1)  The entire planet isn't supposed to be a parking lot

#2)  Free space is useless unless you can prevent the dindus from following you there

Bitcoin is looking to overthrow women as the biggest form of malinvestment.  Trollgoossens and LFC_Bitcoin have decided to all-in on both to make sure they don't miss out on whoever the winner is.

You base your premise on numerous false assumptions and pretend the same people weren't working both sides of the trade.  Goldman Sachs and other traditional scam entities were deep into the digital shitcoin market around six months to a year before the Ethereum pump and dump scam launch, which Goldman Sachs bought most of the premine for.  So the Jewish scam financiers were one of the reasons the price went up in the first place.  They were pumping the garbage they owned trying to dump it on people at higher prices.  

After dumping all their garbage they might have taken some shorts out, I have no idea.  But unless those shorts were taken out on an exchange that actually settles in Bitcoin instead of dollars, it would have no actual effect on real Bitcoin prices without also attempting to manipulate the underlying market.  So, no, "Donald Trump" is not the cause of Bitcoin imploding.  But entities like Goldman Sachs were the cause of the rise and fall.

Your statement overlooks the inconvenient fact that traditionally the main reason women seek out men and marriage in general is entirely an insurance policy/safety net.  The man was replaced by big government as that safety net, hence women's now instant flight to divorce at the first sign of minor inconvenience or non-asymmetrical benefit in their favor.  

For this paradigm to remain true, big government (which women always selfishly vote for in their own interest) would need to not only continue in current form, but get even larger due to women as a whole being a net negative contributor to a nation over the course of their lives.  In other words, if the man is not footing the bill, the woman's net negative economic contribution to the nation would attempt to be extracted from an ever-expanding state.  But this ignores the fact no matter what taxes are set to, the state only ever manages to pull out 20% from it's serfs.  So you're already at 'peak-state' and 'peak-women'.