Bitcoin Forum
July 05, 2024, 02:38:13 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 »
321  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Tuto] ETHEREUM CPU / GPU available ------ [Fr & En] on: November 23, 2015, 04:31:55 AM
Pretty easy to follow.   Wish I would have seen this a while ago.   Had a hell of a time getting things set up to mine eth.
322  Economy / Goods / Re: [Buying] Marlboro Red Cigarettes on: November 23, 2015, 04:13:30 AM
I wish I could get them for $35 per 200 (a carton)   the last time a bought a carton it was $68.

Have fun finding them for under $50.   Unless south u as better prices or u buy them from the Phillipines.

Let me know what u find.
323  Other / Off-topic / Re: YOUR FAVOURITE ANDROID GAME!!! on: November 23, 2015, 04:01:04 AM
Anyone ever try Darkness Reborn?    Play it daily now.
324  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Any good CPU coins to mine now? on: November 23, 2015, 03:45:04 AM
I agree with one of the posts above.  XMR or BCN.  For CPU.

And I love how some people tell people that mine with CPUs not to or that you should give up.  I CPU mine daily as well as GPU and ASIC mine.   I mine XMR with CPU and over time the Satoshi that you make does add up.  I take mine and invest in ICOs and sometime double if not triple what I mined.  There for CPU mining can be worth if.  Unless you just plan on mining and selling.   Take the little you get and try the lotto to make a lot.

I hate when people say to give up.

To give you all that think that mining isn't worth it when it comes to CPUs.
I started with only CPU mining.  Even when people said that is wasn't worth it.  I made little satoshi and again invested what i mined.

Today I now sit on over $10k worth of BTC.   And the only investment that I have was The Solar I use to charge my computer.  I turned hardly nothing into something.

So it can be done even with a higher DIFF.  Just wouldn't recommend BTC with CPU.   Takes to long to to earn anything.

OK sorry i went on but I just hate when people say you cant or to give up.
I agree with you.  But 10k cpu mining and you have a month old acct. here.

$10,000 CPU mining from one laptop powered by solar?

No not from mining.   I got lucky trading.  But started from mining with a CPU.  And on top of that most of my mining was on a Tablet and Android Quad Core Phone.

Dude you'd make like 0.001$ a month mining on a phone, trust me, I tried it, there's no way this is possible

Doesn't anyone ever read an entire post?   I said most not all.  And I never said how long I've acutely been mining now did I?  Just because I wasn't on here doesn't mean I wasn't trollin.   Which I have stated in many posts.  I been around for a long as time.   Just no one knew it.

And if anyone else noticed.  I said I got lucky trading.  Wasn't all mining.  Pay attention....
325  Other / Off-topic / Re: Post your Total time logged into Bitcointalk on: November 23, 2015, 03:34:34 AM
1 days, 15 hours and 24 minutes. Tongue
326  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Ethereum Mining Intensity..? (AMD GPU) on: November 22, 2015, 09:04:56 PM
I have noticed a few things aswell.  Mining ETH can be a pain in the arse.   I have noticed that everyone PCs act differently as well.  I myself use Windows 10 and it took me a LONG time to get it to work.  I just finally got everything working.

If you have 4GB GPU I wouldn't worry to much about allocating more to the cause ETH doesn't require anything over 4GB of mem.

I do know that some people like to underclock some of there cards as well.   They say they like emm to run at around 80% instead of 90-100%.

You sacrifice a few hashs for a longer GPU life.   Guess it ='s itself out.  Don't know otherwise.  Anyone else have any insite on this?

Also I to use Ethminer.  Anyone know if there is a command to add to the .bat file to select how many core you want to use?

I have a small GPU farm but I also have a few PCs I want to use to add a few hashes.   CPU mine with them.

Hope I helped at all and I hope someone can answer my questions as well.
327  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Computer algorithm created to encode human memories on: October 05, 2015, 11:57:59 AM
Researchers in the US have developed an implant to help a disabled brain encode memories, giving new hope to Alzheimer’s sufferers and wounded soldiers who cannot remember the recent past.

The prosthetic, developed at the University of Southern California and Wake Forest Baptist Medical Centre in a decade-long collaboration, includes a small array of electrodes implanted into the brain.

The key to the research is a computer algorithm that mimics the electrical signalling used by the brain to translate short-term into permanent memories.

This makes it possible to bypass a damaged or diseased region, even though there is no way of “reading” a memory — decoding its content or meaning from its electrical signal.

“It’s like being able to translate from Spanish to French without being able to understand either language,” said Ted Berger of USC, the project leader.

The prosthesis has performed well in tests on rats and monkeys. Now it is being evaluated in human brains, the team told the international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society in Milan.
The project is funded by Darpa, the US Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency, which is interested in new ways to help soldiers recover from memory loss.

But the researchers say findings could eventually help to treat neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's, by enabling signals to bypass damaged circuitry in the hippocampus, the brain's memory centre.

Sensory inputs to the brain — sights, sounds, smells or feelings — create complex electrical signals, known as spike trains, which travel through the hippocampus. This neural process involves re-encoding the signals several times, so they have a quite different electrical signature by the time they are ready for long-term storage.

Damage that interferes with this translation may prevent the formation of long-term memories while old ones survive — which is why some people with brain damage or disease recall events from long ago but not from the recent past.


For the rest of the story: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/466bf22e-66a8-11e5-97d0-1456a776a4f5.html#axzz3nAnrAsKG


Pretty cool.  Wonder if this is the beginning to the cyborg race.  Wonder whatelse they can make it do.   Wonder if they could rase IQs in the stupid people.
yes you need one because you cannot spell raise.. RASE you said ..
So stop trying to be a smart ass ..RASE IQ ha ha ha..
so make sure you save up to buy one to RASE YOUR IQ  Cheesy dumb ass..
                   RAISE

Ya.  Lol.  Im on my phone.  It either auto corrects shit or my fingers are to big for the keys....lol
328  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Should the psychologist have poured the drain cleaner and blinded this lady? on: October 05, 2015, 12:59:01 AM
I just dont understand why drain cleaner?  I m sure there. Is someting else.  Weird.
329  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Causes of Mass shootings, suicides + - Many of them are on psychotropic drugs on: October 05, 2015, 12:49:03 AM
Would it be the drugs rhey are on or wouod it be the kids are already messed up.

I know Chantix or whatever its called I was on for a while.  Some of the side effects were change in mood or behavior,  thoughts of suicide, and homicidal tendancies.

So I am sure thatbif theybwere all on meds that it may have been a cause or a push or some sort of help to what they did.  I once took ridallin and ill tell ya love it.   Focus and motivated all in one.  Had all my work done in 4 hours instead of 8.  Spent all the rest of the day trying to find something to do.
330  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Self-Driving Cars Could Save 300,000 Lives Per Decade in America on: October 05, 2015, 12:44:31 AM
just wonder how many they could kill heh......

I think the self driving cars woud be cool.  However I could see them being a problem.  Someone mentioned ealier about police beingsbleto.  Use them at there liesure.  Which in time you know would happen.  Not only that with these types of system they would also find a way to know every movment a certain car makes.   Maybe even how long it was at a location or the next location you are headed to.   I dont feel confortable letting such a thing get in the hands of our govenment.   They would know everything that we are doing, where we are, and where we are going.  Im not down for any of that. 

Also someone mentioned about hackers.  Or even moving sensors that the car reads as its driving down the road.  All depends on the system these cars have and how theybare self driven.  But I would bet its possible to make one go off its course.
331  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Russian parliament grants Vladimir Putin right to deploy military in Syria on: October 04, 2015, 04:36:56 PM
Afghanistan 2.0 back to ussr
Yes I think Syria will become new battle field for Russia and US to test their military power against each other as they did decades ago in Afghanistan

Yeah I agree with you.  I think it will be a way tosee who has what and what a possible outcome maybe between Russia and the US.
332  Other / Politics & Society / Re: MORE THAN A DOZEN REPORTEDLY KILLED IN SHOOTING AT OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE on: October 04, 2015, 03:29:54 PM
Funny how people always beleive what they see or read kn the news.  When most news channels have been proven too be liars and never tell the whole story.  Its almost like they work for our govenment and are told what they can and can not tell in the news.  I watch the news for local things larger things I would rather see or dig deeper into see what may be behind the rest of the shit.  Ya just never know nowadays.
333  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Computer algorithm created to encode human memories on: October 04, 2015, 01:52:45 PM
Researchers in the US have developed an implant to help a disabled brain encode memories, giving new hope to Alzheimer’s sufferers and wounded soldiers who cannot remember the recent past.

The prosthetic, developed at the University of Southern California and Wake Forest Baptist Medical Centre in a decade-long collaboration, includes a small array of electrodes implanted into the brain.

The key to the research is a computer algorithm that mimics the electrical signalling used by the brain to translate short-term into permanent memories.

This makes it possible to bypass a damaged or diseased region, even though there is no way of “reading” a memory — decoding its content or meaning from its electrical signal.

“It’s like being able to translate from Spanish to French without being able to understand either language,” said Ted Berger of USC, the project leader.

The prosthesis has performed well in tests on rats and monkeys. Now it is being evaluated in human brains, the team told the international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society in Milan.
The project is funded by Darpa, the US Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency, which is interested in new ways to help soldiers recover from memory loss.

But the researchers say findings could eventually help to treat neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's, by enabling signals to bypass damaged circuitry in the hippocampus, the brain's memory centre.

Sensory inputs to the brain — sights, sounds, smells or feelings — create complex electrical signals, known as spike trains, which travel through the hippocampus. This neural process involves re-encoding the signals several times, so they have a quite different electrical signature by the time they are ready for long-term storage.

Damage that interferes with this translation may prevent the formation of long-term memories while old ones survive — which is why some people with brain damage or disease recall events from long ago but not from the recent past.


For the rest of the story: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/466bf22e-66a8-11e5-97d0-1456a776a4f5.html#axzz3nAnrAsKG


Pretty cool.  Wonder if this is the beginning to the cyborg race.  Wonder whatelse they can make it do.   Wonder if they could rase IQs in the stupid people.
334  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What do you do with your idle coins? on: October 04, 2015, 01:50:33 PM
I put all the coins I can in lending accounts.  If the coins arent able to be I sell them off and turn them into lendabke coins.  That way my coins are always at work.
335  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Peeple: The App From Hell? on: October 04, 2015, 01:48:48 PM
Wouldn't you be safe as long as you just don't install the application?

I don't think that part would matter.  If they really wanted to piss everyone off and gain more traction (I think this is what they actually would want to do) I think if you aren't in the system already they would just make a new review and put your name on it which then they will make you apart of the system; whether you want to be on there or not.  This way, if/when you find out you are on there, it will make you want to get the app and dispute the bad claim or possibly just see what the person said.

But yeah, this is going to be bad... I can feel it.

Exactly. I cannot see anyone having made this app having good intentions. They seem to have "sold their soul" to get money. Make an app that teens, and tweens need to use because of peer pressure and the usual amount of "popular" people who will want to rate their friends to be on top, and then rag on the others, leading to the others to commit suicide or fall into depression.

This shouldn't be allowed. I'm against banning things, I believe in no censorship, except when it hurts someone. A profile for a person should not be able to be created without their consent. Period.

But that's obviously the point of this app from hell.

Yes. Facebook is good enough if you want to participate in it. How would the system know all those 5 stars reviews are saying how of a bad, evil human you are. It would not. They say a bad review won't be posted. Then people will post only 5 stars reviews, with bad comments in it. For adults it is pretty bad. For teens, female teens, it will be hell.


Yeah, I saw that. Everyone will just post 5 stars to get the crap posted. I think I heard or read here (I forget) that the company has one whole YEAR to deal with complaints too. As if that would help any of the tweens/teens. A week in HS can feel like a year in hell depending on what's going on with the school population.

They also said that any review (negitive) 2 stars or less have to be reviewed by the poster and the reviewee.  They have 24 hours to battle it out and then it gets posted if they cant settle. 

Like I said in a previous post.  I think this app might be a bad idea and I can see teen suicide rate increasing over this.
336  Other / Politics & Society / Re: GAY MEN WANT KIM DAVIS BACK IN JAIL on: October 04, 2015, 01:44:57 PM

So does State trump Federal when you want it to (weed) but Federal trumps State when you want that to (Marriage)?

Yes. If the feds were to say same sex marriage is not okay, and states did it anyway, I would support that as well. That's because I support basic civil rights for human beings, marriage is one of them.

Quote
that's some screwed up thinking there.   Really there are no principles involved here at are, are there?  It's all about I want what I want and it's my right to get it my way and screw you.  I am able to change my opinion here if you can present a logical method to show why your approach doesn't just mean no principles, and no rule of law.

Yes, supporting giving people their rights back is horrible of me.
Look can we just have some honesty here?

You see something okay in Fed enforcing the marriage thing, but not in them enforcing the weed law?  

So who gets to pick and choose when and to whom to apply "law" to?

Leaving aside for the moment that this constitutes the very reverse of law, who?

No hiding behind vague slogans please.

What's wrong with the current system? If you are trying to convince me that states should have final say no matter what, you won't. The history of civil rights abuses have proven it to not be the best method.  

You say that you want me to be honest and stop hiding behind slogans, while at the same time ignoring my comments, and trying to bait me into a states rights debate that's been had millions of times, so you can hide behind your slogan of states rights. Civil rights>state's rights.


So does State trump Federal when you want it to (weed) but Federal trumps State when you want that to (Marriage)?

Yes. If the feds were to say same sex marriage is not okay, and states did it anyway, I would support that as well. That's because I support basic civil rights for human beings, marriage is one of them.

Quote
that's some screwed up thinking there.   Really there are no principles involved here at are, are there?  It's all about I want what I want and it's my right to get it my way and screw you.  I am able to change my opinion here if you can present a logical method to show why your approach doesn't just mean no principles, and no rule of law.

Yes, supporting giving people their rights back is horrible of me.


Then... The gays has no rights to force her to re-sign a document that is perfectly legal, and already signed and 100% valid. Would you agree with that?




Somewhat, but they do have a legitimate bone to pick in that they are being given "special" licenses. Seems like a scarlet letter to me. I'll leave that to the courts to decide.


You can't even logically process your own bias. The court said the paper signed was valid. "Bone picking" has nothing to do with it, unless it was a political move by the gay couple, not based on #lovewins. There is no need to go any further. They are married. The Scarlet Letter will be on the face of the gay couple forever because they wrote that Scarlet Letter themselves, accepting to be a farce for all the world to see, a martyr for others like them to be free from people like davis, and send her to jail.

They should accept their martyrdom fully and be happy, forever and never.




Then it'll be tossed out of court, or the judge will tell them to fuck off. People have the right to air greivances if they feel they have one. Don't be so quick to blindly accept something an authority figure says, just because it lines up with your personal beliefs.


  
She's an elected official, she refuses to do her job, refuses to resign, she can't be fired, thus ends up in jail. I don't think she deserves to be in jail but she needs to leave her religious bullshit at the door where it belongs. Religion has no place in politics, it's just a convenient smokescreen to excuse bigotry and hatred.

Your are not alone here.   I get into arguments all the time over this very same thing.  Religion and politics do not mingle well and should not work together either.  If your an elected official you should keep your beliefs to yourself.  No one wants to hear them anyways.

Why pick on religion?  Is it somehow unique from other personal beliefs?

Let's NOT ENFORCE the federal law on IMMIGRATION and BORDERS.

Let's NOT ENFORCE the federal law on MARIHUANA.

FUCK YEAH, let's slap it to those religious bigots WHO WANT TO DISOBEY THE FEDERAL LAW.

Are you guys insane?

Religion has very little to do with it, it's about the rights of the people to get married. Religion doesn't give you the right to take someone else's rights away.  

You are right.  It doesnt. But people in and that are highly religious and see things only there way need to understand this.  Most dont.  They think it is this way and this way only.
I dont see it much different as me blocking the door to a church.  Im blocking the door because I believe you shouldnt attend church.  So I wont let you.   I would never do that but.  Wouldnt be much difference.  Kim Davis should sit in jail for a while and be made an example out of.  She is in no place to say what happens to someone else.  

They should lock her up in a room filled with lesbians.  And have them talk about getting married all day.  Wonder if it would deive Kim nuts?   LoL

You and the prior poster are misdirecting, to avoid the substantive argument made.  The misdirection is simply to flog the offensive illegality of the lady's action (or from another point of view, her heroic disobediance.)  But if you can't address the substantive argument, you are just expressing your own opinion that it's fine for one political group to selectively enforce and not enforce the law.  Hence my question -

Why pick on religion?  Is it somehow unique from other personal beliefs?

Let's NOT ENFORCE the federal law on IMMIGRATION and BORDERS.

Let's NOT ENFORCE the federal law on MARIHUANA.

FUCK YEAH, let's slap it to those religious bigots WHO WANT TO DISOBEY THE FEDERAL LAW.

Are you guys insane?


Suppose it is a battle of morals to laws.
Marijuana ain't that bad, but it is a federal-ly banned thing.
Which either means the law should change (which it will within 2 years) or they got to stop the state laws.

This country is built on immigrants, the only people who aren't immigrants are the Native Americans.

However, the whole love wins law was recently put in place, so people are more up in arms about that.

I think laws need to change.
So laws need to change.  So fucking WHAT?  That's true anytime in the last hundred years on any number of subjects.

The laws that get enforced should be -

A.  Whatever prosecutors want
B.  Whatever you want.
C.  Whatever some group that shouts the loudest wants.
D.  Whatever your political party wants.
E.  Laws on the books need to be enforced equally.

Please stop the bitching, moaning, endless praise of your own point of view, demonizing of other people and their views, and try to simply think this matter through.



Laws should be enforced equally. However they are not.  I live in a commonwealth state.  Some laws and punishments to to be all over the place.  One person nailed with possession of marijuanna on there first offense can get 5 years while someone with the same charge and first offense can get 2 years.  Sentencing and laws seem to be all over the place.  It also goes on how much you have when caught.  Which shouldnt really matter.  Your in possession period.  1 gram or 3 grams it should still be the same.

It should never be about what the prosecuters want.  Thats just a bad idea. Thats opening a door to have them fry someone for whatever they feel they want.

It shouldnt be about what the political parties want either. We all know how that is already going.

What it should be about is what the majority of people want.  All people who would want to vote on laws.  Instead of voting on poloticians.

The law makers themselves in legislature should be bias on what laws are put into effect and what they vote to pass.but you know as well as I do.  That everyone has there opinion and that is what persuades a vote for law.  Its like being on jury duty.  12 people are supose to be unbias but everyone always has there own thoughts and opinions. 

Laws arent much different.  People (lawmakers) can and i am sure do use there own opinions to pass laws.

It should be about what us the people want and not what parties want or feel we the people should have.  I know there are many laws in place that I never voted for nor do I want them.
337  Other / Politics & Society / Re: NASA has found water on MARS!! on: October 04, 2015, 01:15:57 PM
I think we can life in mars, but not now,
maybe 1000 year again Smiley
but we do not know when the end will come, the earth and everything can be destroyed without the opportunity to move to mars

I think we're perfectly able to live on Mars in just 30 years. ...

Not in any self sustaining mode.

100-200 years for that is more realistic.  Even that might not allow local production of things like advanced tech medicines, electronics or sensors.  And we'd need to raise herds of cattle and pigs, for steaks and bacon.

Can't move there until we have that, now can we?

Even now we can perfectly live in Mars underground. Underground we are safe from micro meteorites, radiation, strong wind, dust and temperature fluctuation.

We can plant and raise some herds underground in mars. We can get energy from the Sun or using Nuclear Reactor as power source. We can produce oxygen from the water. We can seal the entrance to prevent the oxygen from escaping and to maintain the pressure.

I don't argue with your reasoning.  Only that any realistic implementation should be looked at as 100-200 years.  Try making up a list of required items, then determining which would be produced or manufactured on Mars and how, and what would be shipped from Earth and how.

The only practical way is to send robots, rovers that can do more than just rove around, then have them start a construction project.   NASA and other space agencies don't know how to do construction projects.  Regardless, a sufficiently large collection of robots over decades, one would think could make serious progress in creating a habitat. 

However, that would likely be counterproductive.  Much wiser would be to use such robots to study the planet, as our remote eyes and hands, then make very careful decisions as to where, and why, to place human habitats.  Then commence building them.  There isn't anything wrong with something like 30-50 years for such a period of research and study.
338  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Middle age flat earth hoax by atheists on: October 03, 2015, 03:33:25 PM
Maybe the world really is flat.  We just preceive it as being egg like.  After all the universe from what some say fold on itsself.  Would and may give a preception of the world being round.   LoL.

339  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy? on: October 03, 2015, 03:30:42 PM



Illegal Immigrants Could Elect Hillary
How noncitizens decrease Republican chances of winning the White House next year.


Illegal immigrants—along with other noncitizens without the right to vote—may pick the 2016 presidential winner. Thanks to the unique math undergirding the Electoral College, the mere presence of 11-12 million illegal immigrants and other noncitizens here legally may enable them to swing the election from Republicans to Democrats.

The right to vote is intended to be a singular privilege of citizenship. But the 1787 Constitutional Convention rejected allowing the people to directly elect their President. The delegates chose instead our Electoral College system, under which 538 electoral votes distributed amongst the states determine the presidential victor. The Electoral College awards one elector for each U.S. Senator, thus 100 of the total, and D.C. gets three electors pursuant to the 23rd Amendment. Those electoral numbers are unaffected by the size of the noncitizen population. The same cannot be said for the remaining 435, more than 80 percent of the total, which represent the members elected to the House.

The distribution of these 435 seats is not static: they are reapportioned every ten years to reflect the population changes found in the census. That reallocation math is based on the relative “whole number of persons in each state,” as the formulation in the 14th Amendment has it. When this language was inserted into the U.S. Constitution, the concept of an “illegal immigrant,” as the term is defined today, had no meaning. Thus the census counts illegal immigrants and other noncitizens equally with citizens. Since the census is used to determine the number of House seats apportioned to each state, those states with large populations of illegal immigrants and other noncitizens gain extra seats in the House at the expense of states with fewer such “whole number of persons.”

This math gives strongly Democratic states an unfair edge in the Electoral College. Using citizen-only population statistics, American University scholar Leonard Steinhorn projects California would lose five House seats and therefore five electoral votes. New York and Washington would lose one seat, and thus one electoral vote apiece. These three states, which have voted overwhelming for Democrats over the latest six presidential elections, would lose seven electoral votes altogether. The GOP’s path to victory, by contrast, depends on states that would lose a mere three electoral votes in total. Republican stronghold Texas would lose two House seats and therefore two electoral votes. Florida, which Republicans must win to reclaim the presidency, loses one seat and thus one electoral vote.

But that leaves the electoral math only half done. The 10 House seats taken away from these states would then need to be reallocated to states with relatively small numbers of noncitizens. The following ten states, the bulk of which lean Republican, would likely gain one House seat and thus one additional electoral vote: Iowa, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma and Pennsylvania.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/10/illegal-immigrants-could-elect-hillary-clinton-213216


---------------------------------------------
The plan. All along.




Illegals shouldnt be allowed to vote.  Same goes for people here on green cards.
340  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Isis claims responsibility for death of Italian man in Bangladesh on: October 03, 2015, 03:04:09 PM
Let'd send ISIS back to the Medieval times they belong in!! Who's the one who built a time machine that brought those low-lifes into our modern times

Im sorry I couldnt let my machine go public.   It was an accident I swear.  I tried to bring back a super hot princess but ISIS followed. Iv been trying to figure a way to get them back.   Nothing has worked.  Guess ill go back in time and stay there.  There missing there princess.  I guess ill have to pretend to live a royal live as a princess with a beard.  LoL
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!