Has any customer's unit seen hashing yet? Link?
What, yours isn't hashing yet?
|
|
|
Must be 1-500 customer for status change I thing.
^^ This I think that your order status will be "In progress" only if you belong to custormer group 1-500 I'm not in the 1-500 customer group, and my order #21x is in progress (scheduled for shipping Day 2).
|
|
|
I offered ckolivas my mercury for a couple days to make a better driver if it would help the community.
I want to contribute - I'll pay You 1BTC if You do as You wrote. thanks man! i do appreciate that! im dead serious, if ckovilas wants a unit to write a driver, hes got one. im in the first batch and should have my unit before the 15th this month. I'm in too, if you're serious I will donate 2BTC - 1 to you and 1 to Kano/ckolivas for their efforts.
|
|
|
I guess I feel a bit left out of all the trolling— KNC is now mining on their hardware, while customers wait for it to ship: http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/17Czc8RVL3FU5T2MLx2zLbRnpfBNgH9vFoThis is, as far as I know, 100% of the KNC hashrate in existence. Pedantically speaking, it means that KNC is violating their 5% commitment. Testing doesn't involve using the production network. Production mining is unlikely to test finding blocks— whereas testnet, or replays of past found blocks are more complete tests. Mining on the mainnet increases the difficulty and takes income from customers who are waiting on units that will be late. Every bit of earlier mining is worth large amounts of future mining due to expected growth. I do not understand why miners keep funding mining hardware companies that mine in competition with their own customers. [yifu] you assume that KnC controls that address [/yifu]
|
|
|
3 hours 351.52 Gh/s 883922 22.5 minutes 495.19 Gh/s 155648 256 seconds 529.79 Gh/s 31578 128 seconds 568.12 Gh/s 16931
|
|
|
(snip) ...it's looking like it might be 1.4w/Gh/s ...at the wall!! And the hashing performance??
|
|
|
Yifu,
Please refund me the 15 bitcoins to 1CorsCrBEcbncfnR7BVKadUZbHP7xNZCjJ.
Thanks
done. Also there will be some compensation for trade-in and chip order customers. ( you are entitled regardless, so don't think I am trying to sway your decision. ) If you want to talk compensation, you might want to start with the various board manufactures and their customers.
|
|
|
What is your policy on refunds?
|
|
|
They take PayPal
|
|
|
The latest from Punin: Update:snip Shipping schedule:We've been working our asses off this week to deliver on the promise of shipping first october orders this week. It was a bit of a stretch (because of the capacitor issue, see below), but we managed to ship the first few orders today. We will proceed to ship more next week. Please don't send e-mails asking when your order will ship. We are a small team and this just distracts us and creates extra work and thus DELAYS shipping.Hardware:We have encountered overheating issues with the capacitors placed in 4 groups of 8 between the chips on H-cards. This shouldn't affect any orders shipped in august. We have not had any serious issues apart that the caps run extremely hot (up to 250°C). This is clearly a malfunction and we're not sure what is causing this. There shouldn't be a risk of fire as these are ceramic capacitors, but we decided to try removing them. (They boards seem to actually work better without these caps We've processed about 160 cards ourselves (this is the cause of not shipping earlier), and rest will be taken to a company that will remove the caps (3.50€ a card, OUCH!). Future boards will not have these caps. H-card availabilityAs some of you have noticed, we closed the october sales. We did this so that we would be able to deliver everything as promised. We will however reopen H-card sales, after we're done shipping so you can top-up your empty slots. They will be available for immediate delivery. Software:Chainminer has been updated. You can update by SSH into your pi, then cd /opt/bitfury/chainminer git pull make clean make
Then go onto web interface and stop-start your miner. We've had good results with this version even with autotuning on. We encourage you to create a backup of your SD for easy fall back (it's a good idea to have one handy anyway, as SD cards are known to fail unexpectedly). You can of course recover old version also using git checkout. We've been tuning bitfury fork of BFGMiner, and it seems to be working nicely. Mineforeman kindly offered to make us a test version of Minepeon with this, so hopefully sooner than later you will have a choice to run your miner on either platform. Refund policy:We have received some refunds and I want to clarify our refund policy. Refund in BTC is done using blockchain.info and using the price that it gives when refund is processed (I enter euro sum, and in shows number of BTC). Refund using bank transfer is also possible, but please understand it takes more time to process. Dave: can we please get an update on your shipping schedule?
|
|
|
I'm seriously considering to get a refund on the delivery charges ($240 for 2 Jupiters) and go get them myself. I spoke with Sam today, who was absolutely certain that all orders will be ready by 15th October ad he will be able to give me at least a 48h notice of when they will be ready to collect. So I did some research and here are my findings: - RyanAir seems the cheapest
- RyanAir offers to buy and Extra Item Seat* so I can buy a single ticket to go there and basically 2 singles to come back - around $100
- The miner fits just perfectly within the hand baggage allowance - 7kg and 50x40x20cm vs 10kg and 55x40x20cm, so will just put it in a strong plastic bag.
- Airport Security shouldn't be a problem - it's computer hardware with no power supply, batteries or liquids and won't be damaged by the xray scanning machine.
Anyone thinking of doing the same? Have I missed anything, that might impede my return back to UK? * - To book an extra seat for an item the word "ITEM SEAT" must be entered as the surname and "EXTRA" must be entered at the first name. EXTRA ITEM SEAT will then be displayed on the reservation and online boarding pass. The accompanying passenger's travel document details must be entered during the online check- in process. Reserved seating in emergency rows 1,16 and 17 may not be purchased if you have purchased an extra seat for item/comfort I'm seriously considering this as well, I have a ton of Airmiles that would give me essentially a free round-trip to Sweden (aside from food/lodging). Where are you located and what is your order number? Check your PMs
|
|
|
I'm seriously considering to get a refund on the delivery charges ($240 for 2 Jupiters) and go get them myself. I spoke with Sam today, who was absolutely certain that all orders will be ready by 15th October ad he will be able to give me at least a 48h notice of when they will be ready to collect. So I did some research and here are my findings: - RyanAir seems the cheapest
- RyanAir offers to buy and Extra Item Seat* so I can buy a single ticket to go there and basically 2 singles to come back - around $100
- The miner fits just perfectly within the hand baggage allowance - 7kg and 50x40x20cm vs 10kg and 55x40x20cm, so will just put it in a strong plastic bag.
- Airport Security shouldn't be a problem - it's computer hardware with no power supply, batteries or liquids and won't be damaged by the xray scanning machine.
Anyone thinking of doing the same? Have I missed anything, that might impede my return back to UK? * - To book an extra seat for an item the word "ITEM SEAT" must be entered as the surname and "EXTRA" must be entered at the first name. EXTRA ITEM SEAT will then be displayed on the reservation and online boarding pass. The accompanying passenger's travel document details must be entered during the online check- in process. Reserved seating in emergency rows 1,16 and 17 may not be purchased if you have purchased an extra seat for item/comfort I'm seriously considering this as well, I have a ton of Airmiles that would give me essentially a free round-trip to Sweden (aside from food/lodging).
|
|
|
Looks like the team managed to get all 36 outstanding August starters in boxes and out the door! Go team!
We will be sending emails out over the next day or so in order to get your BTC payment addresses.
Cheers, Dave
Great work Dave and team!
|
|
|
Wow cool - did you change R01F or just add the heatsinks? If you changed R01F what value did you use? I did both, R01F is now 3K3R. I tried 3k57R but the regulator kept going into thermal shutdown even with heatsink and fan This particular board is a bit of a freak, the most I've gotten out of my other boards is ~34GH/s with the same mods.
|
|
|
I just wanted to thank Dave and Yvonne for their excellent customer service. They are swamped, but still taking the time to provide customer support.
Thanks, and great job
|
|
|
I don't have any specific information about internal design choices of ORSoC. I'm very familiar with competitors' DIMM SoC hardware controllers and I can credit them with at least order-of-magnitude time and effort savings when doing chip-level development. For this particular purpose rPi could be considered a serious step back even in comparison with the hobbyist-level hardware like the BeagleBoard/BeagleBone.
From the picture it appears to a beaglebone, which I agree is a better choice. Seems to be a much more open platform as well.
|
|
|
<snip>
TL;DR the ORSoC embedded card is overkill for the miner application.
|
|
|
Has anyone had any luck getting more than 4 h-boards running on the same m-board? My rig is stable with all boards running at above 25gh/s when I have 4 h-boards. When I add the next 4 h-boards they seem to auto tune down in speed to the point where the output on an 8 h-board rig is no faster than a 4 h-board rig. Anyone have any hints?
/cet
What are you seeing when you look at /run/shm/.stat.log? Details Posted here. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=250249.msg3103697#msg3103697And I did these steps to order and insert the cards with least amount of slow/bad chips at the start and the bad boards at the back. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=288109.msg3119313#msg3119313From this: 0: 825 29.936 31.836 2091 100 0 0 15 1 0 (1.871/chip) 95% 1: 880 31.081 33.083 2171 101 0 0 16 0 0 (1.943/chip) 100% 2: 880 28.146 30.821 1966 35 0 0 16 0 0 (1.759/chip) 98% 3: 770 26.285 29.690 1836 193 1 0 14 2 0 (1.643/chip) 86% 4: 770 25.641 28.031 1791 145 1 0 14 2 0 (1.603/chip) 92% 5: 825 29.664 31.286 2072 85 1 0 15 0 1 (1.854/chip) 93% 6: 880 21.289 22.873 1487 94 1 0 16 0 0 (1.331/chip) 97% 7: 880 28.390 29.986 1983 107 1 0 16 0 0 (1.774/chip) 99%
I'll have to come back to this, meeting time
|
|
|
|