That's more of a contrast problem than a dark problem, it's a gray font on a gray background. Your monitor quality can make a large difference too: on my laptop I have to adjust my viewing angle to see it, on my monitor I can read everything.

I checked, and it wasn't mentioned anywhere in this topic. This post is the first time the word "signature" is added.

It's (more or less) public data.

Says who?

---

---

For the record: I'm totally fine with not qualifying, that's up to you. But I honestly thought I found a "loophole" that nobody had mentioned yet, and as far as I could see, it fitted all requirements (at the moment I posted it).

It sounded promising, until I checked their website:

I just can't take them serious this way.

The question mark has been there for a long time.

It feels like someone who's only interested in the tabloid-gossip part of Bitcointalk, instead of the Bitcoin part.
This, for instance, is really weird:
And there it is:
What do you need that higher rank for?

Great! Keep it that way

Nice try

1. Foxpup
2. Foxpup's Merit Cycling Club, $∞, 0.015BTC max, 0 max (I had to be a creative, because the campaign firmly stands against all these PAID2POST campaigns)
3. Foxpup, icopress, Carollzinha
4. No

What's the verdict on this one?
It's partially incorrect and sounds very much like chat AI spam/plagiarism.

Someone donated Bitcoins for having it there for eternity. By now, those classics are part of Bitcointalk history.

I didn't know Staff get one too.

Agreed! So add your own

Who is this for? Yourself, or other people? If I use Tor, I wouldn't rely on a third party but just bookmark the link. Anything that makes Onion links easy to remember introduces an attack vector. It's not supposed to be remembered.

It should be replaced: "To help retrieve your password, enter a Bitcoin address here that you'll use to sign a message.".

At least he's honest about what "quality" to expect.

He's far from DT because of his bad judgement. There's really nothing else to do. Everyone's free to leave correct or incorrect feedback, it's up to the community how to value it.

What's the obsession with other people's loans? And why do you keep dragging me in? Welcome to my notification ignore list. I have nothing to do with bans or loans. Leave me out of your drama.

So you bought a scam-wallet with additional files. You're wasting everyone's time.

That's such a weird and oddly specific thing to say for a Newbie with a problem

Nope.

That's a Microsoft link, but you may be on to something: "sparse files" exist on ETX4 too. It looks like that's what Electrum is doing, there must be a lot of empty space in the file. That brings the next question: why not just delete the empty space?

Nope, my file system doesn't support compression.

I didn't expect Tinyurl to actually support onion links. Not bad!

So you'd need a separate, decentralized "lookup system" for .onion links. I can imagine this would be something that can be done with a blockchain: all users download all blocks, and once a short name is in there, it can no longer be changed. Then "duckduckgo.onion" would expand to it's full URL, but only if they're the first to claim it.

See this image:

Electrum's file blockchain_headers is larger than the disk space it occupies (on a Linux system).
How can this be? Normally, files take slightly more space on disk (because of the disk block size), not less.

Are you sure you don't mean megabytes?

Where did you get those private keys?

Are those transactions coming from the addresses you thought had funds? If so, your wallet if empty. If not, you have the wrong seed phrase or you may have to "Extend this seed with custom words" to get to your other wallet.

---

---

It helps if you write a clear overview. It's hard to read if you throw everything in one very long sentence.

Thanks again for your flawless timing!

In that case: I guess an underground man cave isn't an option?

It's the same principle they use then building sound barriers (between roads and houses).