I pretty well copy you word for word, so.... (Effective way of dealing with trolls)Monkey see monkey do. Simple minded troll = simple minded response. Sorry, Techy. If you want me to be more witty, you'll need someone else to post. I can only work with what I get. :/
|
|
|
Quoting to preserve a record of Techy using the power of the state to fight his petty interpersonal battles. Pathetic and clueless. ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) You have all the wit of a shit slinging chimp Vod. I pretty well copy you word for word, so.... (Effective way of dealing with trolls)
|
|
|
If theymos really forced OG to remove Laudas tagg
He did not. Remember this deflection? OG was threatened with DT1 blacklist if he did not remove the trust abuse he left for Lauda. So, he was not actually forced, but he had no choice if wanted to continue scamming. (I'm just going over old posts for the SEC to document a long pattern of misdirection and dishonesty.) Quoting to preserve a record of Vod using the power of the state to fight his petty interpersonal battles yet again. I am clueless Quoting to preserve a record of Techy using the power of the state to fight his petty interpersonal battles. Pathetic and clueless. ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif)
|
|
|
If theymos really forced OG to remove Laudas tagg
He did not. Remember this deflection? OG was threatened with DT1 blacklist if he did not remove the trust abuse he left for Lauda. So, he was not actually forced, but he had no choice if wanted to continue scamming. (I'm just going over old posts for the SEC to document a long pattern of misdirection and dishonesty.)
|
|
|
WTF are you talking about? Everyone received exactly what they should have and everyone involved was happy. Really fucking weak form of harassment to demand I continue to engage lying trolls.
Quoting for his trial. More deflection. True, they did receive your amended promise, but you kept the bitcoin that pirate returned to you. OG: I stole $100. Here, have $20 Victim: I'm happy.
|
|
|
Vod did make the false assumption about me being Quickseller. I had asked him to review his negative feedback, and unfortunately even if he did now, he probably won't change it because of the tension/emotion created when I had no choice but to make a PM of his public (accusation followed by PM blockage leaves me only one option). Oh well, stubborn vs stubborn seems to be the motto of this forum when it comes to disputes. No hard feelings, life goes on.
I don't at all care that you made it public. I distrust you because you ran promoted a ponzi. What Ponzi? Your reference was actually to a loan - that scambusters here deemed 'too large'. If you're speaking of the arbitrage bot, there was evidence it was real (a bot posting every possible trade), I took it down. This thread is to show everyone the type of person that is accusing me. If you have an issue with me, start your own thread.
|
|
|
just don't abuse the systems designed to prevent fraud to fight your petty interpersonal battles. That is where I draw the line.
Me too. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I almost pissed myself. Thanks for the laugh. Quoting to preserve and document the continuing loss of your bladder control.
|
|
|
This is just another OG type ponzi. :/
|
|
|
just don't abuse the systems designed to prevent fraud to fight your petty interpersonal battles. That is where I draw the line.
Me too. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
Nah, not really... am wondering however why FFS you would start bumping this thread now I want to make sure everyone knows the type of person that is accusing me of lying. - history and pattern of dishonesty - sense of superiority and entitlement - has never denied stealing the coins He is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
|
|
|
Vod did make the false assumption about me being Quickseller. I had asked him to review his negative feedback, and unfortunately even if he did now, he probably won't change it because of the tension/emotion created when I had no choice but to make a PM of his public (accusation followed by PM blockage leaves me only one option). Oh well, stubborn vs stubborn seems to be the motto of this forum when it comes to disputes. No hard feelings, life goes on.
I don't at all care that you made it public. I distrust you because you ran promoted a ponzi.
|
|
|
Anyway, maybe you should pivot, or maybe you should keep going, but you shouldn't base your decisions off the opinions of other people at the early stage you're at.
That's bad advice. People cheat, and that's not an opinion.
|
|
|
I could try to make sense of this insane rambling, but then I would probably require heavy medication like you.
All you can do is deflect, you sick fuck. :/ Maybe shut up for a bit and let OG explain why he didn't return funds that were returned to him. That's not how burden of proof works. The accusers have produced completely ambiguous evidence that is proof of nothing. The burden of proof is on the accusers to prove their claims, not OGNasty to detail his private activities to satiate your obsessive vendetta. My agenda? Why are you so obsessed with deflecting everything, pervert? Now shut up for a bit and let's get back on topic. Let OG explain why he didn't return funds that were returned to him.
|
|
|
Cool off topic post bro. What quote did I make up? Oh right none of your accusations have any substantiation, you just make as many accusations as possible and hope people just blindly believe them.
What accusation did I make up, pervert? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Stop with the obvious deflections and stick to the topic. I suggested a forum badge for you - wouldn't that make you feel more special? So your response to a question asking you to substantiate your claims against me, is to ask me the same question? Makes sense... if you are an unhinged lunatic desperately struggling to cling to reality. Speaking of the topic, maybe to you can explain the part where any of your batshit jibbering has anything to do with the topic. If you are going to accuse me of something, why not tell me what it is when I ask? Now show us the trust abuse from Lauda, pervert.
|
|
|
Cool off topic post bro. What quote did I make up? Oh right none of your accusations have any substantiation, you just make as many accusations as possible and hope people just blindly believe them.
What accusation did I make up, pervert? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Stop with the obvious deflections and stick to the topic. I suggested a forum badge for you - wouldn't that make you feel more special?
|
|
|
I could try to make sense of this insane rambling, but then I would probably require heavy medication like you.
All you can do is deflect, you sick fuck. :/ Maybe shut up for a bit and let OG explain why he didn't return funds that were returned to him.
|
|
|
So I am a pervert now too? That is a new one. I don't even particularly like OGNasty and have had minimal contact with him over the years.
Yes you are, but that's YOUR issue with OG. He is the one that pointed out deflection is a common tactic of pediophiles. You'd be very smart to stop deflecting like that self described sick fuck.
|
|
|
I fuck goats.
Man, debate is easy when you just make up quotes! It sure is Techy. Maybe there should be a forum badge for you and Nasty?
|
|
|
|